Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XX-26,644 in ROI (1,772 deaths) 6,064 in NI (556 deaths) (08/08)Read OP

1132133135137138333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    Exactly

    We are now averaging 44 cases a day and yet people think because the numbers are low in hospital now that they'll stay that way. That's not how this thing works

    Have we not learned from April and May?

    Anyhoo, time for some fresh air. This daily thread really is becoming an unreadable jokeshop with all the sugarcoaters

    The variable here is the testing and tracing capability. So the numbers detected are close to reality and there is less chance of unknown spread.

    But still this is cause for concern. As long as death count remains low, this could still be a new normal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    The cases have been slowly increasing for a while but all the other stats are staying steady. What you said would be a fair point a couple of weeks ago but at this point you'd expect to see an increase in hospital admissions if things were getting out of control.

    Who said anything about complacency? I wear a mask when in shops, I keep my distance from people, I avoid places that are allowing big crowds in. All this despite living in a county where there have been a handful of cases in the past month. Is that complacent?

    Not everyone who doesn't think the sky is falling is in denial. I get that this is a serious illness, I'm taking precautions, but as far as I can see we're doing very well in this country and I really don't see the need for the constant negativity.

    Fantastic post


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    spookwoman wrote: »
    It doesn't matter if if you feel safe, the regulations say max of 1 3/4 hours. Ever think some other sod would have liked to have had a pint but you were hogging the seat?

    I've not experienced this problem, most know if it comes to it that they might have to leave, but later at night it generally isn't an issue as you don't have new arrivals after the food has closed.
    spookwoman wrote: »
    I are talking about people not adhering to the regs and it's not speculation, he posted he was in a pub for 3 hours

    What do you believe the impact of the 3 hours is vis a vis the virus though, compared to 2 hours? Or is it just the face that a rule was broken?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    If 18 are linked to clusters. What about the other 27 cases?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,733 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    The R nought rate is what matters


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 949 ✭✭✭Renjit


    rob316 wrote: »
    The R nought rate is what matters

    It can be a bit flawed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,309 ✭✭✭Vertigo100


    I reckon we're seeing a Kildare-factory situation in Limerick. Small increases last 3 days, with no reason why. Exact same thing as what happened in Kildare earlier this week.

    Limerick started in a creche. 1 child had it. In a pod with 3 others. So the 4 families tested.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Vertigo100 wrote: »
    Limerick started in a creche. 1 child had it. In a pod with 3 others. SO they 4 families tested.

    Oh that makes sense, cheers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,566 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    rob316 wrote: »
    The R nought rate is what matters

    The R nought rate can blow me.

    About as useful as a solar powered calculator at night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Roscommon reached 4 weeks without a case today. Waterford next at 17 days, followed by Carlow and Monaghan at 10.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    I've not experienced this problem, most know if it comes to it that they might have to leave, but later at night it generally isn't an issue as you don't have new arrivals after the food has closed.



    What do you believe the impact of the 3 hours is vis a vis the virus though, compared to 2 hours? Or is it just the face that a rule was broken?

    The regulations are there for a reason, just like speed limits etc. If people think it's ok to start ignoring them what do you think will happen?

    They asked people not to have house parties and guess what some thought oh that doesn't apply to me so lets have a house party. Then we see a rise in cases and clusters.
    Do not need to be a rocket scientist to see cause and effect in action.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 806 ✭✭✭wowzer


    You do realise that the % of cases that are community transmission has not changed? 33% is the average.

    But 33% of a number that gets bigger on a daily basis means there's more and more of a community spread, which is a worry. Or am I completely missing something?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Strumms wrote: »


    be less of a narrow minded selfish grim fûcker and expand your hobbies.

    Will you be taking your own advice?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,812 ✭✭✭thelad95


    Very predictable patterns as to where large outbreaks are occurring and yet nothing seems to be learned all the while the media and general populace keeps focusing on the Red Herrings of travel and pubs.

    We had a factory cluster that increased the known active caseload by over 30% yet there is no outrage and close to zero media coverage, I find this confusing. Something went seriously seriously wrong in that factory, be it the arrangements made for workers, lack of compliance by the workers (and a matching lack of care about this from the employer) or a combination of both, there is serious negligence somewhere and if this is indicative of an industry wide culture, then a few feathers need to be shaken. Hopefully it's enough of a shock to the system that the factory in question is going to lose two weeks of productivity.

    I can only imagine the outrage if that cluster had originated in a public house.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Come back to me in two weeks

    I won't, this isn't a right or wrong bit of craic. Trust me, I'd rather be wrong.

    I just think it's mad that we've forgotten how things played out back in March. The exact same thing is happening again but at a slower rate and it is much more containable but it's going up regardless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    I won't, this isn't a right or wrong bit of craic. Trust me, I'd rather be wrong.

    I just think it's mad that we've forgotten how things played out back in March. The exact same thing is happening again but at a slower rate and it is much more containable but it's going up regardless.

    Over 70% of cases in March were untrackable, you can’t really compare


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,195 ✭✭✭Ohmeha


    Average 7 days numbers for the past 3 weeks

    No question that this outbreak in Kildare has spiked numbers so the full fall-out will be known better by next week but otherwise <=30 average cases per day would be still a good spot to be in considering substantial re-opening in phase 3 with foreign travel and despite that outbreak we are still running close to that 7 day average

    Day Month Date Cases 7 Day
    Sunday July 12th 17 18.14
    Monday July 13th 11 19.14
    Tuesday July 14th 32 20.29
    Wednesday July 15th 14 20.71
    Thursday July 16th 21 20.43
    Friday July 17th 34 21.71
    Saturday July 18th 21 21.43
    Sunday July 19th 10 20.43
    Monday July 20th 6 19.71
    Tuesday July 21st 36 20.29
    Wednesday July 22nd 17 20.71
    Thursday July 23rd 7 18.71
    Friday July 24th 20 16.71
    Saturday July 25th 24 17.14
    Sunday July 26th 12 17.43
    Monday July 27th 11 18.14
    Tuesday July 28th 40 18.71
    Wednesday July 29th 14 18.29
    Thursday July 30th 85 29.43
    Friday July 31st 38 32.00
    Saturday August 1st 45 35.00


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    rob316 wrote: »
    The R nought rate is what matters

    It's not exact as the Germans found some weeks ago.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,411 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    ongarite wrote: »
    Still >25% of daily cases are health care workers.
    Baffling at this stage IMO.
    By end of year nearly every health care workers could have had COVID.

    Yes high cases still for healthcare workers, the frontline heroes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,761 ✭✭✭maebee


    Vertigo100 wrote: »
    Limerick started in a creche. 1 child had it. In a pod with 3 others. SO they 4 families tested.

    Yes. My son's GF works in a creche in Limerick City and they were told this earlier in the week.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,411 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Vertigo100 wrote: »
    Limerick started in a creche. 1 child had it. In a pod with 3 others. SO they 4 families tested.

    How did the child get it?

    The positive cases seem to be getting younger


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,922 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Will you be taking your own advice?

    I don’t really need to, plenty to be getting on with, not a pub ‘obsessive’ either, thanks ;)


  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    spookwoman wrote: »
    The regulations are there for a reason, just like speed limits etc. If people think it's ok to start ignoring them what do you think will happen?

    They asked people not to have house parties and guess what some thought oh that doesn't apply to me so lets have a house party. Then we see a rise in cases and clusters.
    Do not need to be a rocket scientist to see cause and effect in action.

    I get you're annoyed about the breach, but I had asked you where you perceived the risk between 2 hours and 3 hours in a pub?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    Strumms wrote: »
    I don’t really need to, plenty to be getting on with, not a pub ‘obsessive’ either, thanks ;)

    Hopefully we too can aspire to perfection.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 529 ✭✭✭lukas8888


    There we go, the anti-pub comment in response to non-pub related clusters, right on time

    Who would have thought that Boards would emerge as a nursery for new PTAA members.Before you head to google Pioneer Total Abstinence Association.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,459 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Jimi H wrote: »
    I haven’t been following the thread but heard on the radio this morning that a number of those that had tested positive had not been self isolating. Any info on this? Some difficult decisions ahead.

    No mention of those testing postive not isolating. What was said was those presenting with covid like symptoms to GPs hadn't been isolating prior to visiting the GP


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    The 7 day average is now 35 cases a day. The highest weekly average we have had since the first week of June. In good news only 4 deaths in the last 2 weeks and numbers in hospital remains low hopefully it stays that way for the weeks and months ahead.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    Over 70% of cases in March were untrackable, you can’t really compare

    That's why I said at a slower rate.

    It only takes a small number of people to fall out of the reach of our amazing tracing system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    I get you're annoyed about the breach, but I had asked you where you perceived the risk between 2 hours and 3 hours in a pub?

    Not a medical expert so I cannot say why they chose 1 3/4 hours instead of 2 or 3.
    But as I keep saying doesn't matter about the amount of time they ignored the regs. But people seem to think the 2-3 hours is more important or just have nothing better to do with their time than arguing for the sake of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,767 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    That's why I said at a slower rate.

    It only takes a small number of people to fall out of the reach of our amazing tracing system.

    The number of community transmissions out of total is actually 2-3% down (33% total, 30% last 3 days) so we’re not seeing any sort of increase in that


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement