Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine/antidote and testing procedures Megathread [Mod Warning - Post #1]

1…2223252728…325

Comments

  • #722
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    LiquidZeb wrote: »
    I think Brazil get their first 15m doses of the Oxford vaccine in December.

    Before it could even possibly be certified as safe.

    Great stuff, using the Brazilians as guinea pigs. :rolleyes:


  • #723
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    Before it could even possibly be certified as safe.

    Great stuff, using the Brazilians as guinea pigs. :rolleyes:

    Professor Sarah Gilberts 21 year old triplets signed up for the trials. Do you think she used her kids as guinea pigs. You do whatever you want regarding a vaccine personally but stop bull****ting people with your uninformed guff.


  • #724
    dominatinMC
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    alwald wrote: »
    How are we looking, based on what we know on both the virus and the progress on various vaccines, to completely get rid of and eradicate this virus from the world?

    Most experts have concluded that we will not be able to completely eradicate this virus - the genie is out of the bottle. However, with an effective vaccine and treatment programme, it's expected that the virus will be sufficiently suppressed so that life will resume as normal. Some have remarked that it could be like the flu, it will linger around but not to the detriment of society.


  • #725
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    LiquidZeb wrote: »
    Professor Sarah Gilberts 21 year old triplets signed up for the trials. Do you think she used her kids as guinea pigs. You do whatever you want regarding a vaccine personally but stop bull****ting people with your uninformed guff.

    Show me a historical example of a vaccine being mass produced safely in under a year, or shut your mouth!:mad:


  • #726
    alwald
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭alwald


    dominatinMC wrote: »
    Most experts have concluded that we will not be able to completely eradicate this virus - the genie is out of the bottle. However, with an effective vaccine and treatment programme, it's expected that the virus will be sufficiently suppressed so that life will resume as normal. Some have remarked that it could be like the flu, it will linger around but not to the detriment of society.

    That's my understanding as well from what I read so far. I had some plans to travel this year to many destinations in May/June but everything was cancelled. Hopefully we can get back some level of normality by 2022 with all the promising vaccines that are currently in phase 3.


  • Advertisement
  • #727
    Gael23
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,149 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    What is the science behind the sanofi vaccine!


  • #728
    Jizique
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭Jizique


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    Show me a historical example of a vaccine being mass produced safely in under a year, or shut your mouth!:mad:

    Fauci is confident about Q4


  • #729
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    Jizique wrote: »
    Fauci is confident about Q4

    Pfft Fauci what does he know? I trust random boards posters for my science.


  • #730
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    Show me a historical example of a vaccine being mass produced safely in under a year, or shut your mouth!:mad:

    Show me a historical example of a situation where we needed a vaccine mass produced in under a year or shut your mouth. Oxford have been performing phase 1/2 tests on this for years back when it was a MERS vaccine.


  • #731
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    LiquidZeb wrote: »
    Show me a historical example of a situation where we needed a vaccine mass produced in under a year or shut your mouth. Oxford have been performing phase 1/2 tests on this for years back when it was a MERS vaccine.

    The fastest vaccine ever developed was the mumps vaccine, which took FOUR years.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3cszmv5

    There is clearly no safe way to produce a vaccine in under a year, no matter how much cash you throw at it.

    It's why a sizeable chunk of the population would never dream of taking such rubbish.


  • Advertisement
  • #732
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    The fastest vaccine ever developed was the mumps vaccine, which took FOUR years.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3cszmv5

    There is clearly no safe way to produce a vaccine in under a year, no matter how much cash you throw at it.

    It's why a sizeable chunk of the population would never dream of taking such rubbish.

    Yeah you only had to go back 60 years. Technology and science have advanced a fair share in 60 years. Again the experts say that they can make one so maybe listen to them?


  • #733
    Deeper Blue
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,398 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    Any chance this thread could go back to being an information thread?

    I have zero interest in reading anti-vaxxer nonsense.


  • #734
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    El Sueño wrote: »
    Any chance this thread could go back to being an information thread?

    I have zero interest in reading anti vaxxer nonsense.

    And I have no interest in reading your slavishly pro vaccines comments either, so it's swings and roundabouts. :o


  • #735
    Micky 32
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    And I have no interest in reading your slavishly pro vaccines comments either, so it's swings and roundabouts. :o

    As long as you’re happy enough that restrictions maybe imposed on the anti vaxxers due to the seriousness of the disease.


  • #736
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    As long as you’re happy enough that restrictions maybe imposed on the anti vaxxers due to the seriousness of the disease.

    Try and impose your restrictions on me and see how that pans out for you.


  • #737
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    Try and impose your restrictions on me and see how that pans out for you.

    Well considering the whole country has had restrictions imposed on it for months it'll probably pan out very well on just one person.


  • #738
    Micky 32
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    Try and impose your restrictions on me and see how that pans out for you.

    It won’t be me personally because i won’t need to, it will be the government because i’ll make sure i keep paying my taxes so they can do it for me.


  • #739
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    LiquidZeb wrote: »
    Well considering the whole country has had restrictions imposed on it for months it'll probably pan out very well on just one person.

    I never once obeyed those restrictions, and I never will. :o


  • #740
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I never once obeyed those restrictions, and I never will. :o

    Yeah you're obviously a troll. They all go that one post too far past reality and give the game away.


  • #741
    Stark
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭Stark


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I never once obeyed those restrictions, and I never will. :o

    Hardly surprising. No-one is under any illusion that anti-vaxxers are anything other than ignorant and selfish.


  • Advertisement
  • #742
    Micky 32
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I never once obeyed those restrictions, and I never will. :o

    If restrictions are imposed on anti vaxxers they’ll be different. You may need evidence that you took it for flying/travelling, enclosed places like matches, pubs weddings etc.

    Not saying it will happen but if most people refuse it they may have to do something like that.


  • #743
    dominatinMC
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    And I have no interest in reading your slavishly pro vaccines comments either, so it's swings and roundabouts. :o
    So do us all a favour and get off the thread then? Everyone's a winner that way..


  • #744
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    If restrictions are imposed on anti vaxxers they’ll be different. You may need evidence that you took it for flying/travelling, enclosed places like matches, pubs weddings etc.

    Not saying it will happen but if most people refuse it they may have to do something like that.

    I couldn't give a toss about pubs, matches or weddings.

    The travel aspect is a concern, but I'll find a way around that, by whatever means necessary. ;)


  • #745
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    Anyone who's anti vax, could you please follow this link?

    https://touch.boards.ie/forum/576


  • #746
    Azatadine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,567 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I never once obeyed those restrictions, and I never will. :o

    As said above, just that one post too far.....


  • #747
    What Username Guidelines
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I never once obeyed those restrictions, and I never will. :o

    What’s it like being a full time mad bastard? Only a part timer myself.


  • #748
    Micky 32
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,623 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I couldn't give a toss about pubs, matches or weddings.

    The travel aspect is a concern, but I'll find a way around that, by whatever means necessary. ;)

    The travel aspect is a big concern and will be the most strict i’d say.


  • #749
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    FutureTeashock wrote: »
    I couldn't give a toss about pubs, matches or weddings.

    The travel aspect is a concern, but I'll find a way around that, by whatever means necessary. ;)

    I don't think cargo crates are the best method of transportation. Unless Amazon prime get into human trafficking.


  • #750
    LiquidZeb
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    What Username Guidelines wrote: »
    What’s it like being a full time mad bastard? Only a part timer myself.

    You clearly don't care for username guidelines anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • #751
    FutureTeashock
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 439 ✭✭FutureTeashock


    dominatinMC wrote: »
    So do us all a favour and get off the thread then? Everyone's a winner that way..

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQX5LZts9Zc


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement