How will schools be able to go back in September?

timmy_mallet wrote: »

This is a charade. The Dept. know they can't open schools to any degree with current Public Health guidance. The Public Health guidance is not going to change. The Teachers know the Dept. know. It's essentially a dance til start of September til each of the stakeholders can get their story straight and cover their ar$e.

That’s the type of ****e that gets my goat. If you bothered to read the thread you would realise that most teachers want to return to school with some form of protection. Similar to every other industry. Nobody is getting their story straight and covering their arse. It’s telling that you pop in and out of this thread making sure to get your dig in but have yet to offer anything constructive other than a good old stir till the next time.

Would be very wary of Colleges here. Could lead to a big spike.

https://twitter.com/devisridhar/status/1285954801453457408

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I am sorry, they should be told to suck it up or make themselves unavailable for work and accept the financial consequences. Nurses and Doctors got on with it, and the education of kids is the next frontline in this, for two reasons - the kids themselves, and to allow parents back to work.

Few points - it’s a survey of 6100 teachers out of how many ? bit of perspective needed.
Education is extremely important and if people want to class it as frontline work then good. But if we are going to do so and compare teachers to frontline staff in the HSE then they should be offered some form of ppe/ screens / provision of hand sanitiser . No ? Similar really to what we see in retail / restaurants / public transport etc.

ETA This survey is also in the context of no guidelines and no one including the dep it seems is aware of any measures proposed to facilitate a return to education.

Eta - if you look at the last 3 points they are very valid.
SET teachers should not be used to cover classes to the detriment of those children with special / additional needs. They need a return to education the most.
The dep have not covered themselves in glory. Schools have been closed since March. Contingency plans should have been put in place and clearly communicated before now.
As yet no indication of financial investment to facilitate a return to school.

lulublue22 wrote: »

Few points - it’s a survey of 6100 teachers out of how many ? bit of perspective needed.
Education is extremely important and if people want to class it as frontline work then good. But if we are going to do so and compare teachers to frontline staff in the HSE then they should be offered some form of ppe/ screens / provision of hand sanitiser . No ? Similar really to what we see in retail / restaurants / public transport etc.

ETA This survey is also in the context of no guidelines and no one including the dep it seems is aware of any measures proposed to facilitate a return to education.

Eta - if you look at the last 3 points they are very valid.
SET teachers should not be used to cover classes to the detriment of those children with special / additional needs. They need a return to education the most.
The dep have not covered themselves in glory. Schools have been closed since March. Contingency plans should have been put in place and clearly communicated before now.
As yet no indication of financial investment to facilitate a return to school.

ETA - Thinking on it - people are entitled to their own feelings. Rather than viewing this in a knee jerk reaction of Teachers are precious they don’t want to go back in Sep. It highlights how poor the gov response has been to the educational needs of our children. They have blithely announced a full return of school in Sep yet have made no attempt to communicate how this is going to happen. Israel and melbourne have seen clusters in schools. The south Korea study has indicated children from the age of 10 can transmit the virus. A ten year old is 4th / 5th class. Taking senior primary school children and all of post primary thats a lot of children that have the potential to transmit the virus.

[Deleted User] wrote: »

For younger Kids some sort of app similar to what the GAA have in place should be used. Parents certify kids as well in the morning prior to going to school. Younger kids are definitely the lowest risk for getting and transmitting the virus so present a lowever risk for teachers and each other. for older kids screen and masks may be an option where 2m is not possible

https://www.google.com/search?q=school+desk+covid+screens&rlz=1C1CHBD_en-GBGB865GB865&hl=en-US&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjWrs_wmeHqAhUmQkEAHQPDCPEQ_AUoAnoECAsQBA&biw=1280&bih=610#imgrc=HZxS9JmHxcYSKM

That’s the whole point - steps can be taken to minimise transmission but as of yet no one has any idea what the gov is going to do in terms of funding.

BonsaiKitten wrote: »

I can see cover being a huge problem next year. I wonder how many of the non teachers on this thread are aware that the first day of teacher self-certified sick leave does not entitle a school to a sub? Typically you'd handle this by splitting a class up into groups and sending them to different classrooms with work packs. Can't do that next year presumably...so what do you do with them? Put the SET teacher in to cover the class and deprive kids with additional needs of their support? Do you put the principal in (which a teaching principal can't do)? Do you send them home?

It will be a huge issue next year especially with covid symptoms being easily confused with a cold and or a viral illness Due to the amount of colds, flu’s and viral infections that go around schools staffing will be critical. I can’t imagine any principal/ BOM being happy with a staff member turning up to school with a cough/ sore throat etc. Testing will also be an issue I presume if you have any signs you will need to be tested and given the all clear prior to returning to work. Not fair to constantly pull SET away from those children that need it the most. Next year will be very messy if we manage to get back.

The current turn around for a covid test is 1.8 days. Teachers should be given priority on testing so if they are unwell they can be tested. They can also be tested on a Friday evening of every week. It wont be pleasant but its the only way to try and work around general illnesses.

The GAA thing drives me mad but needs must. It also shows how easily signing of on your child's current health can be.
There are work arounds, but is there the will? I dont think there is.

Anyone know what the infection rates are in countries that have had schools open for weeks in Europe. Forgive me for being lazy, but stats are not something I seek out!

It's just that I haven't heard of any spikes in places like Netherlands, France, Denmark, Spain and so on, but some of those countries may be on Summer break right now. What I mean is spikes traced back to schools. I do realise that there are some spikes in these countries, but not sure of the source.

Would visors work for teachers does anyone know?

[Deleted User] wrote: »

I am sorry, they should be told to suck it up or make themselves unavailable for work and accept the financial consequences. Nurses and Doctors got on with it, and the education of kids is the next frontline in this, for two reasons - the kids themselves, and to allow parents back to work.

There wasn't a single nurse or doctor that was in a small room with up to 30 other people, with no protection.

This isn't just about teachers it is about protecting the wider community. Kids will mix together in schools hundreds over a 1000 in some cases. They will then go home to parents, grandparents etc.

If not handled properly there will be a spike in cases. 3rd level aren't going back to crowded lecture halls.

Schools are every bit as crowded.

I would love to go back to work as normal and on a personal level I'm not too worried, but social distancing will be impossible in schools.

I as a teacher might be able to protect myself but pupil interaction will mean a spike in the population is inevitable.