Is it just me or have SF vanished?

Mortelaro wrote: »

Nope
Nothing wrong with Vradakar in the park,

This is the blind spot of the fan.

It is just as easy to make the case that varadkar running around drinking cans in the park, shopping for clothes, eating out is responsible for people letting their guard down in Temple bar (they were just doing waht Leo thought it was alright to do).

But of course not if you deny, and keep denying.

Mortelaro wrote: »

Vradakar didn't break any laws in the park
Even the photos did not show what was in the cans,if that's what you are scratching the barrel for
How many more times are you going to go on with this misnomer?
Friends in groups of 4 were allowed outdoors and Vradakar lived in Farmleigh at the time

Meanwhile in Belfast, MoN's definition of the NI rules is have some man have his arm around her taking a selfie

You just don't care anymore Francis,all posting subterfuge ditched at this stage

Which she has said was the wrong thing to do.
Nobody said Varadkar broke the law, the conversation was around the signals he was sending after having being seen several times being loose with the regs.

You keep trying to change what people are actual;ly saying to something you can deny.
You are a gas debater, like some others here, doing that. Change what a poster says then lambast them for sying it.

Mortelaro wrote: »

Your made up 'several times' and your incredible outrage that he spent time in the park with 2 friends and his partner you mean
Get up the yard,I believe is the appropriate reaction to that



Deflect Deflect Deflect and make up some more nonsense about Vradakar setting a bad example shopping or meeting friends,both of which must be grave sins
Meanwhile in Belfast...actual flouting by people in the public eye who want to run the country
Yeah gas alright

Again the hypocrisy.. .we have seen the regs flouted everywhere.
Until the PSNI say otherwise the Belfast event was no worse than some others...and still in denial as to what the issue with Varadkar was. The example he was setting.

Alright for some to do.. grave crime agin humanity for the Shinners
To be expected tbh.

I criticised them all btw. No denying.

markodaly wrote: »

https://www.rte.ie/news/2020/0707/1151774-politics-sinn-fein-paddy-holohan/



The first split of many.

SF core support are made up of people like Paddy Holohan, it's just their leadership don't realise it yet.

ye's are wile funny with the anti shinnerisms and the sheer effort a lot of you seem to put in to go googling. these threads are hilarious reading.

roll on another 20 years of SF hoovering up the vote so more SF threads by people who 'dont like them' are here to be read and laughed at. Keep up the good work!

It's not like SF have many councillors. That's the thing about SF. They definitely used social media to maximum effect during the election, and got the 'hop of the ball' on the day. But they have almost no party structures down the country, and when they do, it's a bunch of fat lads like the sort you saw in Belfast the last day. Think cheap cider, rollies, going to Wolfe Tones gigs, working as a bouncer, maybe a few tattoos they got in their 50's.

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

It's not like SF have many councillors. That's the thing about SF. They definitely used social media to maximum effect during the election, and got the 'hop of the ball' on the day. But they have almost no party structures down the country, and when they do, it's a bunch of fat lads like the sort you saw in Belfast the last day. Think cheap cider, rollies, going to Wolfe Tones gigs, working as a bouncer, maybe a few tattoos they got in their 50's.

Driving home after with gay abandon?

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

Not sure what you are getting at here, Francie.

You weren't tuned into see the calibre of person we have as Ministers about half an hour ago?

Mortelaro wrote: »

Speaking of which, SF have according to RTE accepted Cowens apology and left it at that
Another side effect of the Belfast sit ye aisan,they are looking for magnamity it seems on the apology front
Enough said

Or maybe they just accepted his apology. Get them lads out from under the bed Mort.

Mortelaro wrote: »

I might go easy on theory if you stop inventing stuff about Vradakar being loose on regulations
Deal?

Varadker on a number of occasions was accused of being lax or even breaking the, at the time, stricter regs.

It is a matter of your opinion and mine whether he did. Mine is, that the PR op in the warehouse were photographers can be seen breaking the social distancing requirements that he was lax in allowing that happen to get a publicity shot. He was again in the hospital photo ops.
He didn't show great leadership in the Park in my opinion nor since, running around like a calf let out to grass getting photos taken.

My opinion...you'll just have to accept it. By the way, see the recurrent theme above? An addiction to the limelight and PR.

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

Does everyone agree that O’Neill should issue a full and forthright apology to her assembly colleagues on behalf of the SF party?

I think so. This is a would that will continue to fester unless it is cauterised.

Absolutely 100% agree with this.

We have seen Billy Kelliher apologise, and that was that. Now, his actions didn't result in funerals for ordinary people being cancelled.

Some of the excuses put out here have been pathetic to say the least. One of the most ridiculous ones peddled was that Sinn Fein weren't responsible for cancelling the nine funerals - that it was the Council that did it.

So IRA plant a bomb in a pub, phone in a bomb warning, pub owner clears pub and closes down for the night. When a punter complains about losing out on his nightly pint, IRA say it was the pub owners fault!!! Same thing here, if the SF carry-on with the double funeral for Bobby hadn't taken place, then the other funerals would not have been cancelled.

Instead of weasly words, we need proper full apologies.

blanch152 wrote: »

Absolutely 100% agree with this.

We have seen Billy Kelliher apologise, and that was that. Now, his actions didn't result in funerals for ordinary people being cancelled.

Some of the excuses put out here have been pathetic to say the least. One of the most ridiculous ones peddled was that Sinn Fein weren't responsible for cancelling the nine funerals - that it was the Council that did it.

So IRA plant a bomb in a pub, phone in a bomb warning, pub owner clears pub and closes down for the night. When a punter complains about losing out on his nightly pint, IRA say it was the pub owners fault!!! Same thing here, if the SF carry-on with the double funeral for Bobby hadn't taken place, then the other funerals would not have been cancelled.

Instead of weasly words, we need proper full apologies.

'Standard procedure for high profile funerals' is the term they used.

But the RA etc etc.

Mortelaro wrote: »

That barrel scraping wS debunked
It takes level 11 obsession to ignore the debunking
At this stage my opinion is there's 3 or 4 people writing these posts and when one clocks off they don't bother checking back to see what the other has wrote

Debunked by someone who is here defending FG and Varadkar to the hilt? Are you having a laugh?

'Leadership in the park' L o fucking L,4 friends cannot sit out and meet up like human beings just because one is Tsoiseach?

Pull the other one

Your opinion differs to mine and others who criticised him. Get over it.