Is it just me or have SF vanished?

maccored

tikkahunter wrote: »

Noting made up .

Thought the Northern Ireland Ra pension was the taxi and taxi licenses they all got handed out.

so that waffle is fact now?

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

That's 3, involved in incidents that had nothing to do with the conflict/war.

Methinks this is going to be another...name more than two or three spies that we know about, and more than two or three involved in sexual abuse dead end.

You still going on about this as if it didn’t exist Francie?

Sure there is a quota of child rapists in the Adams family alone.

If you want 3 spies how about Gerry’s head of counter intelligence, Gerry’s right hand man in Stormont and Gerry’s driver.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

You still going on about this as if it didn’t exist Francie?

Sure there is a quota of child rapists in the Adams family alone.

If you want 3 spies how about Gerry’s head of counter intelligence, Gerry’s right hand man in Stormont and Gerry’s driver.

You forgot Gerry himself and McGuinness :eek::eek:

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

You forgot Gerry himself and McGuinness :eek::eek:

Deflect, deflect, deflect!!!

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Deflect, deflect, deflect!!!

'All the IRA were psychopaths'
The IRA were riddled with informers and spies'
SF and the IRA infested with sex abusers and pedophiles'

Have we got over 5 in any category yet?

Mythmaking and sensationalist comments are just that SS.

maccored

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Deflect, deflect, deflect!!!

i thought he was just contributing to the little fantasy world you have going - you know - the one where the brits fight themselves

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

'All the IRA were psychopaths'
The IRA were riddled with informers and spies'
SF and the IRA infested with sex abusers and pedophiles'

Have we got over 5 in any category yet?

Mythmaking and sensationalist comments are just that SS.

No, no, no Francie.

It’s you who is saying people can only name 2 or 3 sex abusers or informers in the republican movement.

I think that’s both deflection and, to use a favourite term of yours, a well worn trope.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

No, no, no Francie.

It’s you who is saying people can only name 2 or 3 sex abusers or informers in the republican movement.

I think that’s both deflection and, to use a favourite term of yours, a well worn trope.

If you say,

'All the IRA were psychopaths'
The IRA were riddled with informers and spies'
SF and the IRA infested with sex abusers and pedophiles'

naming a few is not evidence that you are correct in the mythmaking above. You are being a sensationalist for political effect.
It's pretty basic stuff.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

If you say,

'All the IRA were psychopaths'
The IRA were riddled with informers and spies'
SF and the IRA infested with sex abusers and pedophiles'

naming a few is not evidence that you are correct in the mythmaking above. You are being a sensationalist for political effect.
It's pretty basic stuff.

Basic stuff indeed Francie.

You said only 2 or 3 republican sex abusers Or informers could be named, therefore it is all a “myth”.

Here’s 6 of each


Denis Donaldson
Freddie Scappaticci
Brendan “Ruby” Davison, (he is both an informer and sex abuser)
Raymond Gilmour
Martin Mc Gartland
Eamon Collins
Roy Mc Shane


Gerry Adams Snr
Liam Adams
Seamus Marley
Martin Morris
Brendan “Ruby” Davison
Eamon Cooke

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Basic stuff indeed Francie.

You said only 2 or 3 republican sex abusers Or informers could be named, therefore it is all a “myth”.

Here’s 6 of each


Denis Donaldson
Freddie Scappaticci
Brendan “Ruby” Davison, (he is both an informer and sex abuser)
Raymond Gilmour
Martin Mc Gartland
Eamon Collins
Roy Mc Shane


Gerry Adams Snr
Liam Adams
Seamus Marley
Martin Morris
Brendan “Ruby” Davison
Eamon Cooke

No...SafeSurfer...nobody noticed your little shift of the goalposts there...nobody at all.

We are talking about 'republicans' now not those who are in SF or the IRA.

'Riddled & Infested' Six? Really?

Give up SS, and try losing the sensationalist angle, you will eb taken more seriously.

*p.s. I see your court has found an alleged abuser guilty there...well done on that.

Superfoods

I can see why Sinn Fein told supporter to shut up on social media. A quick read of the c**p been posted here and it would turn any decent person from ever voting for Sinn Fein.

maccored

Superfoods wrote: »

I can see why Sinn Fein told supporter to shut up on social media. A quick read of the c**p been posted here and it would turn any decent person from ever voting for Sinn Fein.

Your hatred of them is self evident so Im not too sure how you can put yourself in the shoes of someone who might consider voting for them

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

No...SafeSurfer...nobody noticed your little shift of the goalposts there...nobody at all.

We are talking about 'republicans' now not those who are in SF or the IRA.

'Riddled & Infested' Six? Really?

Give up SS, and try losing the sensationalist angle, you will eb taken more seriously.

*p.s. I see your court has found an alleged abuser guilty there...well done on that.

Defending paedophiles should come easily to you Francie, given your past form.

You are some man to talk about “changing goalposts”.

You ask for 5 names and when given your response is “only six”.

Hilarious as ever Francie.

If you think any of the pedos on the list are hard done by you can include the 6 names Ferry have to the Gardaí.

Curious as to who on the list was not in IRA or Sinn Fein.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Defending paedophiles should come easily to you Francie, given your past form.

You are some man to talk about “changing goalposts”.

You ask for 5 names and when given your response is “only six”.

Hilarious as ever Francie.

If you think any of the pedos on the list are hard done by you can include the 6 names Ferry have to the Gardaí.

Curious as to who on the list was not in IRA or Sinn Fein.

6...Safesurfer...one of them not even given a chance to defend himself.


You are legend if you can turn that into 'Infested or riddled'...not to mention the 'All of them' sensationalism.

Try approaching the topic reasonably. the SHinners had as much and as many issues with these things as other organizations their size had and handled them as badly as other organisations too.

That is a reasonable fact based assessment. Won't cut much ice in the offices of the Daily Mail...but there you go.

Superfoods

maccored wrote: »

Your hatred of them is self evident so Im not too sure how you can put yourself in the shoes of someone who might consider voting for them

Who hates them? All I see is a group of unemployed posting all day on internet, an image Sinn Fein are trying to get away from

maccored

Superfoods wrote: »

Who hates them? All I see is a group of unemployed posting all day on internet, an image Sinn Fein are trying to get away from

if all you are seeing are unemployed people then I'd go to the opticians. Who are these unemployed people and how can you tell anyway? Everyone who posts on boards in the daytime are unemployed now?

Superfoods

maccored wrote: »

if all you are seeing are unemployed people then I'd go to the opticians. Who are these unemployed people and how can you tell anyway? Everyone who posts on boards in the daytime are unemployed now?

You saying Sinn Fein also need to go to opticians? they are the ones that sent out the release.....


Did I say everyone on boards is unemployed? I think you need to take your own advice and go to the opiticans

maccored

Superfoods wrote: »

You saying Sinn Fein also need to go to opticians? they are the ones that sent out the release.....


Did I say everyone on boards is unemployed? I think you need to take your own advice and go to the opiticans

I have no idea what you are on about. i had said it didnt really matter what you think of SF as you hate them anyway and wouldnt vote for them ('A quick read of the c**p been posted here and it would turn any decent person from ever voting for Sinn Fein' was the line) Then you reply with all you see is unemployed people posting on the internet all day.

Superfoods

maccored wrote: »

I have no idea what you are on about. i had said it didnt really matter what you think of SF as you hate them anyway and wouldnt vote for them ('A quick read of the c**p been posted here and it would turn any decent person from ever voting for Sinn Fein' was the line) Then you reply with all you see is unemployed people posting on the internet all day.

I don't hate Sinn Fein. When did I say that? you seem to struggle with comprehension of English language. To be honest not a surprise

maccored

Superfoods wrote: »

I don't hate Sinn Fein. When did I say that?

aye - have you been reading your replies about them? You certainly dont come across as a fan of theirs.

you seem to struggle with comprehension of English language. To be honest not a surprise

awww .... trying to bully? and it didnt work ... awww poor you.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

6...Safesurfer...one of them not even given a chance to defend himself.


You are legend if you can turn that into 'Infested or riddled'...not to mention the 'All of them' sensationalism.

Try approaching the topic reasonably. the SHinners had as much and as many issues with these things as other organizations their size had and handled them as badly as other organisations too.

That is a reasonable fact based assessment. Won't cut much ice in the offices of the Daily Mail...but there you go.

Do you think Sir Jimmy Saville was a decent man too or is it only republican paedos you defend?

Such hypocrisy on top of deflection.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Do you think Sir Jimmy Saville was a decent man too or is it only republican paedos you defend?

Such hypocrisy on top of deflection.

I never defended a paedo in my life SS.
Is this what you have sunk to now, rather than take a simple point. Stop the sensationalist dog whistling.

tikkahunter

maccored wrote: »

so that waffle is fact now?

So no old boys club in Newry , given grant’s for taxis and licenses by the British Government to give them employment as they would struggle as they are are former provos .

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I never defended a paedo in my life SS.
Is this what you have sunk to now, rather than take a simple point. Stop the sensationalist dog whistling.

What’s the difference between the two “alleged” paedos?

You defend one because he is a republican but accept the guy of the other because he is not.

Ten of Swords

Time to give the hamsters a break

If you could all make your way in an orderly fashion to the brand new thread

https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058107965