Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of Restrictions, Part IV - **Read OP for Mod Warnings**

1209210212214215325

Comments

  • Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    hmmm wrote: »
    Go sit in field, or lick doorknobs in your own house to your heart's content. It will make no difference as to how pubs and restaurants are going to be regulated during a pandemic. If sitting at a table with 6 friends only is a huge imposition, then you're going to have to sit the pub out for a few months.

    You’re missing the point though.
    Lots of people want to socialise for all kinds of reasons.

    If a group of 30 twenty year olds want to party... they will. If the pub is lame, they’ll find a house to drink in.

    And house parties are a lot more dangerous for many other reasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,173 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    polesheep wrote: »
    Or just invite your friends around to your home, which is what sensible people are doing. The frightened fannies can go to the pubs/restaurants and wave to each other across the room if it helps them feel safe.

    Why are you dissing people going out under the present rules ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    You’re missing the point though.
    Lots of people want to socialise for all kinds of reasons.

    If a group of 30 twenty year olds want to party... they will. If the pub is lame, they’ll find a house to drink in.

    And house parties are a lot more dangerous for many other reasons.
    I'm not arguing with your point. But your point doesn't make any difference as to how pubs will be required to operate.

    The government isn't going to say "oh all the kids are drinking at home because they want to sit in large groups in pubs, we should get rid of social distancing in pubs". That's not how this works. Not now, not while a virus is in circulation.

    Pubs will have to make the best of the chance they have been given to be able open safely. Maybe the pubs whose business model revolved around packing in as many 20 year olds as possible don't make it - very bad luck, but they will have to try and change their business model for the next 6 months, and we'll see what progress is being made on the vaccine and treatment front.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 608 ✭✭✭vid36


    You’re missing the point though.
    Lots of people want to socialise for all kinds of reasons.

    If a group of 30 twenty year olds want to party... they will. If the pub is lame, they’ll find a house to drink in.

    And house parties are a lot more dangerous for many other reasons.

    I don't agree, much easier to contact trace following a house party than a busy night in Temple Bar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,255 ✭✭✭joeguevara


    Doesn’t make a difference were it happens.
    It’s going to happen either way.

    What do you think is happening in Liverpool right now, just as one example?

    Well from reports 2000 Liverpool fans are outside anfield. Not many at all really. Was way more in Brighton beach today for example. Had a good few mates here all avid Liverpool supporters. All watched at home, no groups or parties.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,235 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Why are you dissing people going out under the present rules ?

    It goes with the concern for 'mental health' that the open up crowd pretend to care about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,348 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    True a lot could care less , but they will have to be a rule , no mask no travel .
    And yes the mask is to protect others , but in order for YOU to be protected it needs everyone to buy in to wearing masks otherwise no good if only 50% wearing them .
    The asymptomatic non maskwearing traveller will infect everyone they come near , and they will be , nearer .
    So in all our interests if public transport is going to 50 % capacity.

    Excuse me but that's just nonsense. I don't know how people ended up exaggerating this thing in their heads to the degree where its like an ultra contagious space alien virus but its not. Its like a bloody cold in terms of spread (and in most other terms also). You may get it if said person coughs or sneezes into your direction but to say just one infected simply sitting there will infect everyone is mega wild hyperbole. Its hysteric.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Excuse me but that's just nonsense. I don't know how people ended up exaggerating this thing in their heads to the degree where its like an ultra contagious space alien virus but its not. Its like a bloody cold in terms of spread (and in most other terms also). You may get it if said person coughs or sneezes into your direction but to say just one infected simply sitting there will infect everyone is mega wild hyperbole. Its hysteric.

    Welcome to the thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,337 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    The Doomsday scientist Dr Tomás Ryan is being given a lot of airtime on TV recently. I don’t understand how someone who’s just recently had discredited views on the letter he signed to government can be taken so seriously.
    1. He suggested on The Tonight Show with Ivan Yeats that we re-enter a ‘short/sharp’ lockdown...which we’d still be in as we’ve still some cases a day. He also suggested we’d be in a 2nd wave any day now with our new reopening plan.
    2. Scientists and the HSE ran a campaign at the start on why we didn’t need to wear face masks.... now they’re telling us the opposite when the threat of virus is minimal. We should have been told this back in Feb/March. He seems surprised at the confusion and low uptake as a result of this?
    3. He used statistics from a normal tourist season - 10 million tourists per year that arrive into Ireland to hype and scare. Did anyone on this island ever suggest we reopen the skies fully?
    Suggesting few ‘Green’ EU countries is a cautious and the correct approach.

    The possibility of air travel was also mentioned by George ‘reopening is so scary’ Lee with leading questions from Cathríona Perry on Six One News.
    Seems like we’re being ‘told’ what to do.

    The government are going to have to make a call like they did on lifting lockdown - thousands of jobs gone in aviation, airline, airports, travel companies, etc., or save some and keep the industry alive. We are an island nation and need good connectivity to other countries for our own future prosperity.


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Next few months?

    I don’t suppose you know too many people between 18 and say 27?

    A lot of them want to socialise, drink, have a ride etc

    That’s still going to happen whether it’s in a pub or not. If the pub becomes lame, it could move to leisure plexes, house parties, knacker drinking in fields.

    But they’ll find a way to do what young people do. LIVE

    You can’t stop people from living.

    Its already begun, the country did well to generally stay in line for as long as it did, but at this point people want to live.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    The Doomsday scientist Dr Tomás Ryan is being given a lot of airtime on TV recently. I don’t understand how someone who’s just recently had discredited views on the letter he signed to government can be taken so seriously.
    1. He suggested on The Tonight Show with Ivan Yeats that we re-enter a ‘short/sharp’ lockdown...which we’d still be in as we’ve still some cases a day. He also suggested we’d be in a 2nd wave any day now with our new reopening plan.
    2. Scientists and the HSE ran a campaign at the start on why we didn’t need to wear face masks.... now they’re telling us the opposite when the threat of virus is minimal. We should have been told this back in Feb/March. He seems surprised at the confusion and low uptake as a result of this?
    3. He used statistics from a normal tourist season - 10 million tourists per year that arrive into Ireland to hype and scare. Did anyone on this island ever suggest we reopen the skies fully?
    Suggesting few ‘Green’ EU countries is a cautious and the correct approach.

    The possibility of air travel was also mentioned by George ‘reopening is so scary’ Lee with leading questions from Cathríona Perry on Six One News.
    Seems like we’re being ‘told’ what to do.

    The government are going to have to make a call like they did on lifting lockdown - thousands of jobs gone in aviation, airline, airports, travel companies, etc., or save some and keep the industry alive. We are an island nation and need good connectivity to other countries for our own future prosperity.

    I dont know how these kind of people get airtime. new cases in single digits. deaths in single digits.

    and yet the feel is "look we won, now lets lock ourselves up to keep winning"

    idiotic beyond belief. We are genuinely going to go backwards as a nation if we start turning down tourists, hundreds of thousands (100,000 +) will become unemployed for years to come if this mentality prospers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,348 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I know there are a lot of jobs in tourism but the one thing where lockdown/slowdown had a positive effect is air travel and travel in general. A lot of people won't want to hear this but one aspect of trying to avoid us edging closer to environmental collapse is that Joe and Mary will no longer travel 5 times a year for €39 to Alicante. Its not sustainable.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Also funny how as restrictions are lifted the complaining moves on.

    First it was "we just want a plan".

    Then the plan was too slow, but if we sped things up a bit that would be grand.

    Then some things were moving too fast, sure businesses don't have time to prepare.

    Now it's "we don't like how things are reopening so we're not going to support the businesses we've been claiming to be so worried about".



    Personally I'll be going out to enjoy a meal, pint, and a haircut as soon as I can.

    Good. Me too


  • Posts: 12,836 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know there are a lot of jobs in tourism but the one thing where lockdown/slowdown had a positive effect is air travel and travel in general. I know a lot of people won't want to hear this but one aspect of trying to avoid us edging closer to environmental collapse is that Joe and Mary will no longer travel 5 times a year for €39 to Alicante. Its not sustainable.



    Air travel accounts for only 2% of global emissions..reducing it would have very little effect. Especially given a decent amount of that would be freight too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 917 ✭✭✭MickeyLeari


    Also funny how as restrictions are lifted the complaining moves on.

    First it was "we just want a plan".

    Then the plan was too slow, but if we sped things up a bit that would be grand.

    Then some things were moving too fast, sure businesses don't have time to prepare.

    Now it's "we don't like how things are reopening so we're not going to support the businesses we've been claiming to be so worried about".



    Personally I'll be going out to enjoy a meal, pint, and a haircut as soon as I can.

    Next week in theory once your pint is with your dinner. I am hoping some of the places I like will reopen (by no means a certainty).

    On a haircut - bought myself a clippers at the start of this which is doing a reasonably good job - a shortage on the cheaper ones meant I had to spend a bit more which in hindsight was a very good decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,777 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    half a million people on beaches and thousands out celebrating Liverpool winning the league

    Covid 2.0 is going to be banger


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 456 ✭✭Jackman25


    The pub/restaurant stuff will last a few weeks and then people will do as they like. Those that want to obey the rules to the letter can do so and people who want to have a normal experience in a pub/restaurant will do so too.

    As with the travel restriction, enforced for a couple of weeks and then ignored. By the rule book, its only this coming Monday that inter-county travel is being allowed - Most people I know have broken that nonsense long ago.
    Pubs that have been closed for 3 months going to "literally" throw money out the door (asking people to leave after 90 mins or whatever) - my hole they will. I give it a few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    Jackman25 wrote: »
    The pub/restaurant stuff will last a few weeks and then people will do as they like. Those that want to obey the rules to the letter can do so and people who want to have a normal experience in a pub/restaurant will do so too.

    As with the travel restriction, enforced for a couple of weeks and then ignored. By the rule book, its only this coming Monday that inter-county travel is being allowed - Most people I know have broken that nonsense long ago.
    Pubs that have been closed for 3 months going to "literally" throw money out the door (asking people to leave after 90 mins or whatever) - my hole they will. I give it a few weeks.

    Yeah, can totally see the bar staff coming over to the table "Erm, sirs I am going to have to ask you to take your business elsewhere" :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,447 ✭✭✭Ginger n Lemon


    lawred2 wrote: »
    half a million people on beaches and thousands out celebrating Liverpool winning the league

    Covid 2.0 is going to be banger

    Mad scenes in Liverpool, its amazing how quickly covid has been forgotten

    https://www.skysports.com/football/live-blog/22524/12012566/chelsea-vs-man-city-live


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Why are you dissing people going out under the present rules ?

    I'm not. I'm simply stating that people are taking the lead as they have done throughout. And regardless of what is happening in pubs/restaurants, they are meeting up with their friends. If you or anyone else who is frightened by a virus that is infecting less than ten people per day and not much of a health threat to the majority of people want to visit a pub/restaurant with restrictions, then go ahead.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    lawred2 wrote: »
    half a million people on beaches and thousands out celebrating Liverpool winning the league

    Covid 2.0 is going to be banger
    It's really not. It's no longer novel. Outdoor isn't really the problem no matter how nervous it makes people.


  • Posts: 17,849 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It's really not. It's no longer novel. Outdoor isn't really the problem no matter how nervous it makes people.

    So, why all the fuss about Cheltenham? Why no racegoers to horse and greyhound racing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    So, why all the fuss about Cheltenham? Why no racegoers to horse and greyhound racing?
    Just extreme caution as punters could congregate in higher risk locations like indoor bars. It was also a condition for reopening. Cheltenham has never been shown to be a big vector here. It was also in March, this is June.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,234 ✭✭✭✭normanoffside


    So, why all the fuss about Cheltenham? Why no racegoers to horse and greyhound racing?

    Cheltenham was never about standing outside watching the races, it was the packed bars, restaurants hotels etc at night.

    Same with Skiing back in February. It wasn’t picked up on the slopes but in the packed bars and nightclubs that go along with the skiing culture.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,777 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It's really not. It's no longer novel. Outdoor isn't really the problem no matter how nervous it makes people.

    Not remotely nervous about what happens in the UK.

    Hope you're right though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,969 ✭✭✭Assetbacked


    charlie14 wrote: »
    I`m not in any state of panic. I have been working all through this lockdown as my job is designated as a vital service and I have seen some of the moronic, could not care less behaviour of so many, that I fully understand why these actual quite minimal restrictions are still needed.

    Moronic is appropriate for you and essential is presumably used ironically for the type of work you do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    lawred2 wrote: »
    Not remotely nervous about what happens in the UK.

    Hope you're right though.
    Oh, I agree on the UK. At worst I'd feel a little uneasy but I think we've done a far better job. Even so the UK is also looking at all kinds of quick test options, which may benefit all of us in the long run.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭skelly22


    charlie14 wrote: »
    Getting right in your face, making a very obvious point of not keeping any distance from others, getting either sullen or belligerent when asked too, and that is just from work.
    House parties were not exactly a rare occurrence in my area but you probably didn`t know anything about them either.

    Can't say I've seen any of that to be honest. Although house parties could easily become the new norm if a trip to the pub remains about as appealing as getting slapped across the face with a wet salmon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Irish_peppa


    I would love to see the results of following in a test state thats seeing a COVID surge. With immediate effect wearing of face masks outside the home mandatory.
    I wonder what sort of an impact it would have on the growth of the virus


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,657 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Excuse me but that's just nonsense. I don't know how people ended up exaggerating this thing in their heads to the degree where its like an ultra contagious space alien virus but its not. Its like a bloody cold in terms of spread (and in most other terms also). You may get it if said person coughs or sneezes into your direction but to say just one infected simply sitting there will infect everyone is mega wild hyperbole. Its hysteric.

    Its hysteria mixed with doomsday day fantasies.

    I firmly believe some loved the lockdown and the enforced distance from loved ones.


    Bizzare stuff.

    Whats even more bizzare is that quarantining those healthy enough not to be at risk from Covid is seen as necessary.

    Of course only after exposing those in care homes who are most vulnerable.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement