Madeleine McCann

limnam wrote: »

if it involved the McCanns. It's fantasy


Anything else is fair game.

Weren’t you criticising people yesterday for their “lack of imagination” when it came to defending the McCanns.

So yes, it’s fantasy. You alluded to as much yourself.

Rock77 wrote: »

They couldn’t be concerned for their child and concerned the whole world was accusing them??

They should have got the group to get the story straight then


You said as much yourself.


Your no 1 would be the child.


Everything else was a distraction.


Going out playing tennis etc (whatever the reason) didn't help with public opinion


so if they were concerned about it the best thing to do would have been to avoid public spats.


You man puling out hate mail/tweets etc


Focus on the job at hand and forget yourself


You were selfish enough when out wining and dining. Now be a responsible parent and focus energies were they're best for your missing daughter

Rock77 wrote: »

The whole group of people were in on it now! Lol..

Perfect example.


That's not what I said. I'm alluding to things that may have caused the public to question what was going on. I'm not suggesting they were all in it


but fighting even during a re-construction was bizzaare.


But we explain it all away with "LOL THE WHOLE WORLD WAS PART OF IT LOL"

Rock77 wrote: »

‘Lads listen, Kate is after overdosing one of the kids so we’re gona dump the body off a cliff. When the cops get here everyone just say she was taken. Cheers, whose round is it’

Seriously though, it sounds like they were just trying to get through it, the alternative to going out playing tennis was sitting inside with the thoughts of god knows what happening to your child.. you would literally go insane.

I don't recall making any of those claims.


most are just trying to look at it from multiple angles


Some just want it to be the McCanns or CB or whomever

Rock77 wrote: »

Have I ever mentioned anyone that was locked up by mistake? I don’t even know who your talking about.

If your more than happy to discuss it why do you keep showing so little respect for the arguments defending the parents?

‘But coconuts’

‘Ya da yada’

‘Fantasy’

And it depends what there is so much of to make it suspicious... a lot of nothing makes nothing..

No you haven't. But there is posters who bring it up every time an element is mentioned.


Bring up the dogs.


Coconuts!


As I've said 100 times.


You can fob off a certain amount of things.


When you're basically excusing a never ended loop of bizzare/suspicious/weird behaviors.


Than itself is suspicious.


then that's fobbed off with someone who was wrongly accused nearly 40 years ago

Rock77 wrote: »

The UK police were not allowed to investigate the parents?

So the police are now helping the McCann parents cover up the fact they murdered their child?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4467832/Met-interested-proving-McCann-parents-innocent.html

cgcsb wrote: »

But everyone already knows that. This is a thread about speculation (wild fantasies if you prefer) chief among them being that Maddie was abducted, which there is no evidence of.

How does one find evidence of an abduction?

bladespin wrote: »

Witness, physical evidence of disturbance, injury etc etc etc. everything leaves a trace.

Witness : there were no witnesses to anything that night unfortunately. Be it an abduction or a killing or a body disposal in broad daylight.

Physical evidence of disturbance: the door was unlocked. The scene was compromised by people coming in and out while the PJ took over one hour to arrive.

Injury: she was three years old. Do you expect her to be able to fight an abductor off? She was also likely asleep.

retro:electro wrote: »

Witness : there were no witnesses to anything that night unfortunately. Be it an abduction or a killing or a body disposal in broad daylight.

Physical evidence of disturbance: the door was unlocked. The scene was compromised by people coming in and out while the PJ took over one hour to arrive.

Injury: she was three years old. Do you expect her to be able to fight an abductor off? She was also likely asleep.

1/ The Tanner sighting

2/ who would dispose a body in broad daylight in front of a crowd?

3/ The fact it was open doesn't suggest an abductor wasn't there

4/ No, that's why they took her.

5/ The twins didn't wake up despite parents screaming, they were given something to sleep

Rock77 wrote: »

Makes absolutely no sense, why bother starting an investigation if you’ve already decided the outcome.

The local police decided it was the parents and the UK police decided it wasn’t. Amazing neither could just investigate it properly..

Not amazing at all - its a deliberate fudge tactic

Both govts covering up international paedophiles ring

Podestas ( Pizza gate and friends with Epstein) in the area at time of abduction, they are friends with Freud ( sexual predator and paedo)

Did the Mc Canns know of paedos in the area? Maybe

Who would say " They took her" ?

The sentence subject should be Someone

I'd say " Someone has taken my daughter "

German guy is a Patsy, he knows details as he is a minor player in the ring but shouldn't take the fall

Goes right to the top

partyguinness wrote: »

Sometimes the most banal of explanations is just too much for some people accept.


So they chuck out some mad deep state conspiracy. How tedious and predictable.

Sorry, I must have missed your banal explanation, which is?

limnam wrote: »

IF my daughter was kidnapped. God forbid. Regardless of the circumstances.


My no 1 focus would always be her.


No screaming "you don't know how you would react" will tell me otherwise.


Not my innocence. Not what the papers said. Not what people thought of me


But getting my daughter back.


If that meant answering police questions as a suspect it would be done.


whatever it took to try and get her back

Been reading through this forum. I can't get over the human race's desire for conspiracy. That there has to be something something more to a scenario than the obvious in that she was abducted.
As I was reading, I was thinking that it was easy to pick out those on this forum that have kids and those that don't - any one that has kids will know that the parents couldn't have killed their daughter (accidentally or on purpose) and disposed of the body and carried on in life. Can't happen. Unless it was some sort of dysfunctional family or parents were on the psychopathic side. Obviously they were a normal family with stable parents - otherwise there would be some evidence to the contrary - as everything about this case is out in the open.

I have to say, I am surprised that you are a parent.