Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVII-24,841 in ROI (1,639 deaths) 4,679 in NI (518 deaths)(28/05)Read OP

1125126128130131324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,983 ✭✭✭growleaves


    wakka12 wrote: »
    Do you think lockdowns should only be used in a targeted region/city specific manner in that case?

    Well perhaps. It ought to be done far more thoughtfully, if at all.

    The objections from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi from University of Mainz was that German regions were not comparable to Lombardy, and he gave cultural, environmental, demographic reasons why this was so.

    A sophisticated analysis of each city, region, country etc on a case by case basis done calmly would be helpful in determining whether deeply painful and harmful lockdowns are a necessary evil or avoidable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Ce he sin wrote: »
    The purchase of furniture wasn't banned. Going in person to certain shops, some of which sell furniture, was banned. Going to shops that sell lawnmowers was also banned, or at least advised against, yet I managed to buy one perfectly legally a couple of weeks ago.

    And is it comfortable to sleep on?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    hmmm wrote: »
    OK. The example I posted was just to show that there are already tests available for use at home, they will get better, cheaper and easier to use.

    This is like the successful testing at the airport, it’s really just stuff of fantasy.

    A virus is a molecule of fat with a single strand of genetic code, it sole purpose is to replicate by invading cells killing them and bursting (called budding) and find more cells (hosts). Trying to pinpoint a particular virus is difficult, how do you differentiate between SARS-CoV-19 and the common cold? you use a complimentary primers to match the RNA. It like an IP address the primers just latch on to particular short sequences of A, G, C & U nucleotides and then amplify it.

    Antibody tests are much easier as you are testing for a particular antibody, even those rapid tests very unreliable lab based tests are the good standard.

    Developing a reliable test that your average idiot can do at home, and within a couple of months nah.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,118 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Is it true there was 50 new cases in one day in Roscommon. Caused by a meat factory?

    Well there was a definite jump - wouldn't be much to assume it was the meat factory

    xI8zUI5.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    hmmm wrote: »

    There are a few posters who will come on here and decry any form of testing that doesn't involve a lab technician. They remind me of the man who used to walk in front of cars with a white flag and insisted that cars could not possibly go without him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,301 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    growleaves wrote: »
    Well perhaps. It ought to be done far more thoughtfully, if at all.

    The objections from Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi from University of Mainz was that German regions were not comparable to Lombardy, and he gave cultural, environmental, demographic reasons why this was so.

    A sophisticated analysis of each city, region, country etc on a case by case basis done calmly would be helpful in determining whether deeply painful and harmful lockdowns are a necessary evil or avoidable.

    And he is not alone. Quite a few of people in the field think the same.

    Stanford professor John Ioannidis explains in an interview with CNN that Covid19 is a „widespread and mild disease“ comparable to influenza (flu) for the general population, while patients in nursing homes and hospitals should receive extra protection.

    Stanford professor Scott Atlas explains in an interview with CNN that „the idea of having to stop Covid19 has created a catastrophic health care situation“. Professor Atlas says that the disease is „generally mild“ and that irrational fears had been created. He adds that there is „absolutely no reason“ for extensive testing in the general population, which is only necessary in hospitals and nursing homes. Professor Atlas wrote an article at the end of April entitled „The data are in – Stop the panic and end total isolation“ that received over 15,000 comments.

    Epidemiologist Dr Knut Wittkowski explains in a new interview that the danger of Covid19 is comparable to an influenza and that the peak was already passed in most countries before the lockdown. The lockdown of entire societies was a „catastrophic decision“ without benefits but causing enormous damage. The most important measure is the protection of nursing homes. According to Dr. Wittkowski, Bill Gates‘ statements on Covid19 are „absurd“ and „have nothing to do with reality“. Dr. Wittkowski considers a vaccination against Covid19 „not necessary“ and the influential Covid19 model of British epidemiologist Neil Ferguson a „complete failure“.

    German virologist Hendrik Streeck explains the final results of his pioneering antibody study. Professor Streeck found a Covid19 lethality of 0.36%, but explains that this is an upper limit and the lethality is probably in the range of 0.24 to 0.26% or even below. The average age of test-positive deceased was approximately 81 years.

    Biology professor and Nobel Prize winner Michael Levitt, who has been analyzing the spread of Covid19 since February, describes the general lockdown as a „huge mistake“ and calls for more targeted measures, especially to protect risk groups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    Saliva is a very unreliable sample type. It's prone to many contaminants. I would say the viral load wouldn't be enough to detect at low levels, especially if someone doesnt have symptoms.
    Hardly any diagnostic tests are carried out on saliva.

    I would definitely agree with that.

    Anal swab would be far more reliable than saliva, as virus is showing in stool up to 4 days before onset of symptoms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,118 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    I would definitely agree with that.

    Anal swab would be far more reliable than saliva, as virus is showing in stool up to 4 days before onset of symptoms.

    At first thought I thought you were joking, now I'm not so sure


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    patnor1011 wrote: »
    Yes but does this warrant holding whole country locked up? We certainly can not afford it. Let the nature take the course.
    There is a term for that. Natural selection.

    Certainly not, there needs to be a balance.

    Although unfortunately letting "nature take its" course in this instance could result in a completely innocent person contracting Covid and dying so natural selection doesn't apply. Asymptomatic pint lover Joe Bloggs who went out and got langered and infected half the place won't even realise that he has indirectly harmed someone or likely won't even care. As long as he enjoyed his pints.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    This is like the successful testing at the airport, it’s really just stuff of fantasy.

    A virus is a molecule of fat with a single strand of genetic code, it sole purpose is to replicate by invading cells killing them and bursting (called budding) and find more cells (hosts). Trying to pinpoint a particular virus is difficult, how do you differentiate between SARS-CoV-19 and the common cold? you use a complimentary primers to match the RNA. It like an IP address the primers just latch on to particular short sequences of A, G, C & U nucleotides and then amplify it.

    Antibody tests are much easier as you are testing for a particular antibody, even those rapid tests very unreliable lab based tests are the good standard.

    Developing a reliable test that your average idiot can do at home, and within a couple of months nah.

    I always understood that a virus is a protein that, in some cases, can wrap itself in fat in order to break into a cell.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,548 ✭✭✭Martina1991


    polesheep wrote:
    There are a few posters who will come on here and decry any form of testing that doesn't involve a lab technician. They remind me of the man who used to walk in front of cars with a white flag and insisted that cars could not possibly go without him.
    The title is Medical Scientist. The word technician implies no formal third level education.

    Diagnostic tests should be carried out by healthcare professionals that are qualified to do it, not the general public.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    The title is Medical Scientist. The word technician implies no formal third level education.

    Diagnostic tests should be carried out by healthcare professionals that are qualified to do it, not the general public.

    Bullsh*t. If a diagnostic test can be carried out at home with the same accuracy as would be provided in a lab, then there is no reason whatsoever why it should not be done. If such a test currently does not exist then it needs to stay within the lab, but if it is developed then the game changes. There was a time when I could only have sent you this message from a post office.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭ElTel


    iceage wrote: »
    HSE.ie has dropped the daily operations update off their website or have moved it elsewhere.. Anybody got an accurate link to the daily individual hospital updates?


    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=113434219&postcount=606

    Taken from the "maths of it all" thread.

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058068510&page=41


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    fritzelly wrote: »
    At first thought I thought you were joking, now I'm not so sure

    No joke, the virus causes a respiratory disease and respiratory system is actually external to the body the airway, throat, lungs are external in that they are in contact with air. The virus lives externally on cells of membranes rather than in the bloodstream. In the lungs there is a protein called ACE2 which the virus uses as a viral receptor to enter cells.

    ACE2 is also in the lower intestine, if have recently been infected and have some virus particles in the throat eating food will pull those virus through your digestive system those that survive will thrive nicely with ACE2 that’s why diarrhoea is a common symptom.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    polesheep wrote: »
    I always understood that a virus is a protein that, in some cases, can wrap itself in fat in order to break into a cell.

    The RNA is wrapped in protein and incased in fat ..they just are nano-greaseballs, washing with soap destroys the virus by bursting them as the soap disperses fats/oils. Hence wash your hands with soap or alcohol.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    The RNA is wrapped in protein and incased in fat ..they just are nano-greaseballs, washing with soap destroys the virus by bursting them as the soap disperses fats/oils. Hence wash your hands with soap or alcohol.

    Mmm, any dangers to eating soap?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    polesheep wrote: »
    Bullsh*t. If a diagnostic test can be carried out at home with the same accuracy as would be provided in a lab, then there is no reason whatsoever why it should not be done. If such a test currently does not exist then it needs to stay within the lab, but if it is developed then the game changes. There was a time when I could only have sent you this message from a post office.


    I would agree technology is often driven by necessity, but from someone who understands this stuff a reliable simple home test kit that has a result back in minutes for this virus is someway off.

    We can all pretend that might happen in a few months, but 20 -30 years ago they said by 2020 we would all have flying cars.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,021 ✭✭✭Miike


    Mmm, any dangers to eating soap?

    Why would you bother? Trump is sorting us out with internal UV light and bleach. Maybe science should check it out! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,157 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    The RNA is wrapped in protein and incased in fat ..they just are nano-greaseballs, washing with soap destroys the virus by bursting them as the soap disperses fats/oils. Hence wash your hands with soap or alcohol.

    Thank feck for soap. Shows how important having access to sanitation is throughout the world. Times like this you'd be glad water charges weren't brought in, but that's another argument!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    mandrake04 wrote: »
    No joke, the virus causes a respiratory disease and respiratory system is actually external to the body the airway, throat, lungs are external in that they are in contact with air. The virus lives externally on cells of membranes rather than in the bloodstream. In the lungs there is a protein called ACE2 which the virus uses as a viral receptor to enter cells.

    ACE2 is also in the lower intestine, if have recently been infected and have some virus particles in the throat eating food will pull those virus through your digestive system those that survive will thrive nicely with ACE2 that’s why diarrhoea is a common symptom.

    I was thinking this today, can you get infected by eating food that has the virus, like if somebody coughs close to food. Sounds like you can.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    I was thinking this today, can you get infected by eating food that has the virus, like if somebody coughs close to food. Sounds like you can.

    Stomach acid should kill the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    I was thinking this today, can you get infected by eating food that has the virus, like if somebody coughs close to food. Sounds like you can.

    You can get infected by the virus through mouth, nose and eyes. You get virus in your mouth it will get into throat and then lungs.

    The virus attacks the cells of your respiratory system killing them, this is why you get a cough and a irritated throat. The danger in the lungs is the cells that transfer oxygen to the bloodstream get damaged filling your capillaries with fluid. You starve of oxygen and basically drown in fluids caused by damaged useless cells.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,118 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Stomach acid should kill the virus.

    E coli says hello


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 912 ✭✭✭bekker


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Stomach acid should kill the virus.
    Only after it passes through the mouth and throat, which is too late were the food to have viable virus on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,435 ✭✭✭mandrake04


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Stomach acid should kill the virus.

    Definitely not the case for it’s closely related cousin MERS, also have you ever heard of Rotavirus?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    fritzelly wrote: »
    E coli says hello

    Reading that now. The protein intimin with peptidoglycan seem to give protection under acidic conditions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    bekker wrote: »
    Only after it passes through the mouth and throat, which is too late were the food to have viable virus on it.

    What do you mean viable virus?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,351 ✭✭✭NegativeCreep


    YFlyer wrote: »
    What do you mean viable virus?

    I’m not OP but it means living virus i.e. capable of causing infection.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,389 ✭✭✭schmoo2k


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Thank feck for soap. Shows how important having access to sanitation is throughout the world. Times like this you'd be glad water charges weren't brought in, but that's another argument!

    It thought the charges were to ensure we had better water supply, Dublin is running low again right now...

    Even when "cut off" for not paying charges, you would have had enough water to drink and wash hands...


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement