Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Relaxation of restrictions Part II

1180181183185186327

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sean 18


    GazzaL wrote: »
    That's bull****, and even the Government and HSE have rowed back on insulting the public, because it's as clear as day that the public have done their job on this.

    Yes we can't stay locked up forever it'll be the summer soon if they can't control this now with social distancing etc how can they control it in the winter when flu season starts?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,393 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Sean 18 wrote: »
    The thing is we don't know if they will ever find a vaccine and we don't know if you can get reinfected after getting it what's their plan keep us locked up forever the health service is going to be complete mayhem when the flu season starts in the autumn how are they going to manage that?
    The recent evidence now seems to point to the fact you can't be reinfected.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-south-korean-reactivated-cases-not-reinfected-experts-2020-4

    Also Dr Holohan confirmed no cases of reinfection in Ireland


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sean 18


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    Brilliant

    So that's at least 8 weeks of lockdown with 0 reduction in restrictions

    Bloody fantastic

    I think they expect us to stay inside till a vaccine is found what if there is no vaccine?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sean 18


    gmisk wrote: »
    The recent evidence now seems to point to the fact you can't be reinfected.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-south-korean-reactivated-cases-not-reinfected-experts-2020-4

    Also Dr Holohan confirmed no cases of reinfection in Ireland
    What about this vascular inflammation children are getting is this a new strain or something?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,739 ✭✭✭scamalert


    KrustyUCC wrote: »
    From 12th of March to 5th of May is 55 days

    According to the Irish Times timetable it will be at least another 2 months if you don't live within 20km of your partner

    Dr Holohan has said now it willl be at three weeks in between stages

    You're now up to the end of July

    How can the government expect any couple to stick to that?
    id guess if someone cant make it to their OH, over few miles then prob they dont want to see each other :rolleyes: no ones blocking roads every day 24.7, doesnt take a genius to print some leaflet your essential worker, which no guard cares about either. If people think some knob head knows best when it ok for them to go see their family or loved ones, and they stick to it, then i guess carry on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 840 ✭✭✭setanta1984


    The answers to these questions in the briefing are infuriating. They'll never be "happy" or have the numbers "where they want them" - until they are all 0, which is cuckoo land.
    They'll never recommend easing anything, the country has no hope unless some other authority brings some perspective on what constitutes life in this country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sean 18


    gmisk wrote: »
    The recent evidence now seems to point to the fact you can't be reinfected.
    https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-south-korean-reactivated-cases-not-reinfected-experts-2020-4

    Also Dr Holohan confirmed no cases of reinfection in Ireland
    What about this vascular inflammation children are getting is this a new strain or something?


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Soon we’ll have a thread discussing the governments need to relax the Covid payments. Economy will be ruined trying to give some folks another few months to live.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sean 18


    The answers to these questions in the briefing are infuriating. They'll never be "happy" or have the numbers "where they want them" - until they are all 0, which is cuckoo land.
    They'll never recommend easing anything, the country has no hope unless some other authority brings some perspective on what constitutes life in this country.
    Yes theirs no plan on the horizon nothing its like the same briefing every evening


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    Sean 18 wrote: »
    What about this vascular inflammation children are getting is this a new strain or something?

    I read 20 kids in the uk got it.

    Non story.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    Sean 18 wrote: »
    Yes theirs no plan on the horizon nothing its like the same briefing every evening

    You could paraphrase it at this stage

    "The HSE keep spreading it around care homes, hospitals and their close contacts. Its been eradicated in the general population"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    IS the rate of reproduction/r0 number for different countries published anywhere on a regular basis? Would be interesting to compare different lockdowns and openings with how the virus progresses

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    99nsr125 wrote: »
    They will still die, just in the coming months not weeks

    That's what flattening the curve is all about, this seems to be lost from the narrative. There will still be the same number of cases both asymptomatic and terminal.

    We have no vaccine
    We have no cure
    We have no treatment, only the symptoms can be eased but ultimately your body must overcome it.

    Ask yourself why if we have spare bed capacity why those in nursing homes are not being treated in hospital.
    It's because it has been decided at political level with senior heath professionals to let them die.

    There's a story on the rte page today from a peer which gives an insight

    https://www.rte.ie/culture/2020/0429/1135577-nursing-home-chaos-diary-of-a-pandemic-doctor/

    Wrong about a political decision to just let them die. Rarely if ever would you see someone over 80, with pneumonia and in a home, sent to icu to prolong their life on ventilation. Old mans friend


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 787 ✭✭✭SNNUS


    A doctor should not be in charge of the country. The longer they lock down, numbers of other medical issues will rise plus livelihoods will be gone for many.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 877 ✭✭✭moonage


    Goose76 wrote: »
    For how long though? Are at risk groups expect to wave goodbye to all meaniful aspects of their entire lives (and indeed livelihoods) until there's a widely available vaccine?

    I cannot believe there isn't more focus and attention given to this, both on official news sites and speculative mediums like Boards.

    Perhaps the best solution is to let the vulnerable remain cocooned while the rest begin to carry on with life as normal. Let the virus spread among the non-vulnerable who will recover and gain natural immunity. When there is enough community immunity the vulnerable are relatively safe.

    The virus isn't going to be eradicated. Trying to keep the spread as low as possible is futile and counterproductive—that will just keep us in a perpetual state of suspended animation.

    Quarantining the healthy is not the way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus that has the lethality of a bad flu season.


  • Posts: 4,727 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hospitals are nowhere near capacity, ICU numbers dropped greatly again today. Infection rate less than 1.

    What’s the agenda for 3 more weeks lockdown?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    A few of days ago I would have agreed with you, then the sh!t hit the fan locally in the last couple of days with a factory having over 80 positive tests and 200 staff out. People are going nuts as those people aren't isolating, so in 2 weeks time we should have a burst of cases due to this idiot employer who wanted to keep the show on the road at all costs. It's crap that like that will keep us in lockdown.
    Isolating has to be mandatory and forced, I know why they were welding apartments shut in Whuhan now.
    I'm not happy about this, I'm not a lockdowner but I see the problem with the soft approach and trusting people to do the right thing.

    It's shortsighted selfish money grabbers like this that will keep us in a situation where we need to continue restrictions.

    They are too stupid to see the consequences of their own actions. How will they keep their show on the road if a significant number of their employees are out sick or have to self isolate? This possibly happening in repeated cycles.

    No business can run effectively if it has to almost shut down every time an employee tests positive. If a business hasn't planned for effective social distancing and containment it's not going to be able to operate restrictions or not. It's cowboys like this that prolong the need for restrictions for everybody else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,067 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    ixoy wrote: »
    One nugget from the data there - 5,684 cases of healthcare workers being tested positive but of those 210 were hospitalised. That's less than 4% and this is from people who are more exposed to heavy viral loads. Obviously very high but a bit different than what we've heard about the risk of ending up in hospital. Is it a younger age profile in play here?

    I think that they were working off 8-10% hospitalisation for under 60's and 11-14% for over 60's.
    And that sub 4 percent hospitalisation rate is before you allow for them most likely not detecting a large proportion of cases


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,393 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    moonage wrote: »
    Perhaps the best solution is to let the vulnerable remain cocooned while the rest begin to carry on with life as normal. Let the virus spread among the non-vulnerable who will recover and gain natural immunity. When there is enough community immunity the vulnerable are relatively safe.

    The virus isn't going to be eradicated. Trying to keep the spread as low as possible is futile and counterproductive—that will just keep us in a perpetual state of suspended animation.

    Quarantining the healthy is not the way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus that has the lethality of a bad flu season.
    All indications point to it having a lethality higher than the flu so that is nonsense.

    Literally the only person I know personally who thought herd immunity was a better bet was my mum.
    In fairness she was a nurse for 30 plus years then a health visitor and thought herd immunity amongst families with kids under the age of 11, with cocooning of vulnerable people, plus social distancing etc would have made most sense in the long run.
    Maybe she was right who knows.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,824 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    We're flushing our economy and children's futures down the toilet to save a bureaucrat's reputation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,859 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Sean 18 wrote: »
    Yes theirs no plan on the horizon nothing its like the same briefing every evening

    Given up watching those about two weeks ago. There’s never anything new bar sadly a new death toll. I check in here for latest info and rumours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,393 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    We're flushing our economy and children's futures down the toilet to save a bureaucrat's reputation.
    If we are doing that so is a large portion of Europe and a fair chunk of the rest of the world


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,395 ✭✭✭GazzaL


    SNNUS wrote: »
    A doctor should not be in charge of the country. The longer they lock down, numbers of other medical issues will rise plus livelihoods will be gone for many.

    It's quite telling that in the 5 points up for consideration, the economy isn't one of them. Taoiseach Tony's daily update is basically him saying **** family, **** relationships, **** jobs, **** business. We will see more widespread breaking of restrictions.

    Will any of our elected representatives hold him to account? Will any of them try to save ordinary, hard-working people?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,207 ✭✭✭99nsr125


    Wrong about a political decision to just let them die. Rarely if ever would you see someone over 80, with pneumonia and in a home, sent to icu to prolong their life on ventilation. Old mans friend

    Sadly I'm not
    Politicians make the decisions, look around the world where it's more obvious to see what groups have been prioritised. Sadly again that's what politics is all about the legalised discrimination of one group at the expense of others


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,346 ✭✭✭easypazz


    road_high wrote: »
    Given up watching those about two weeks ago. There’s never anything new bar sadly a new death toll. I check in here for latest info and rumours.

    At least here there is 2 sides to the argument. There is nobody challenging the consensus in the mainstream media.

    Claire Byrne gives tutorials on how to get a DIY haircut or how to wear a mask etc.

    Tubridy just interviews people who have been on his programme about 5 times already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭dalyboy


    Sean 18 wrote: »
    What about this vascular inflammation children are getting is this a new strain or something?

    What about it ? There’s no scientific evidence to suggest it’s related to covid 19. People / kids have been getting sick since the dawn of time and we do not look for lazy correlations.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,839 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    GazzaL wrote: »
    That's bull****, and even the Government and HSE have rowed back on insulting the public, because it's as clear as day that the public have done their job on this.

    The vast majority of the public have done their job. Other posters have highlighted two large food processing businesses in different areas of the country which are at the centre of large clusters of CoViD-19 so it is clear a small minority is not doing their job to help contain this virus. This small minority are part of the problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 999 ✭✭✭NewRed2


    It's shortsighted selfish money grabbers like this that will keep us in a situation where we need to continue restrictions.

    They are too stupid to see the consequences of their own actions. How will they keep their show on the road if a significant number of their employees are out sick or have to self isolate? This possibly happening in repeated cycles.

    No business can run effectively if it has to almost shut down every time an employee tests positive. If a business hasn't planned for effective social distancing and containment it's not going to be able to operate restrictions or not. It's cowboys like this that prolong the need for restrictions for everybody else.

    He said a factory with 80 positive COVID19 tests and 200 staff out but it doesn't make the news.... Journos these days, they're missing all the stories ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Looking at neighbours meandering about the street chatting to each other makes it clear that the people themselves have decided to ease restrictions, so there's no point in stopping them from going back to work. It's not the first time in our history that the people of Ireland have had to force things while the government attempted to hold them back.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,836 ✭✭✭Nermal


    What’s the agenda for 3 more weeks lockdown?

    An establishment incapable of taking risk - any action that might decrease safety, even if it has other benefits, is always avoided.

    Desire to avoid the realisation that when we lift the lockdown, and cases increase, that the lockdown was pointless.

    Finally, institutions incapable of admitting error and changing course, after investing so much effort in the current paradigm.

    Edit: forgot one - as a smaller country, tendency to wait and follow what others are doing, rather than setting our own agenda.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement