Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVI- 21,983 in ROI (1,339 deaths) 3,881 in NI (404 deaths)(05/05)Read OP

1101102104106107323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    It doesn't really matter... more cases will produce more deaths, pretty much a statistical certainty!

    But cases being identified won't


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 801 ✭✭✭frillyleaf


    Arghus wrote: »
    I suspect there will be a change of tone over the next couple of days from the goverment and the HSE.

    First it was - Jesus Christ, we have to get it under control.

    People thought, jesus, I don't want to get this and be seriously ill or my parents/grandparents to die. Fck it, there's no way I'm taking chances.

    Then it was - Don't be downhearted, things are bad, but they could be worse and they could have been a lot worse, we've got this, but just be careful.

    People have just heard "we've got this" and have missed the wider point that this is basically on a knife edge now and people are slacking off.

    They need to emphasise that the situation is still deadly serious. Okay it's great that the R0 rate has fallen, but people are just hearing this and "May 5th". They need to re-frame how they get their message across.

    if people are visibly relaxed they will be even more relaxed calling into people’s homes etc.

    Maybe HSE feels we are over the worst of it and that what we have done is suffice. I can’t see any other reason why things have become so relaxed compared to two weeks ago. Maybe this is welcome news and they will lift restrictions before 5th May. Sometimes it can be better to give a date further away so people are happier when when things happen ‘earlier’.

    That’s the only reason I can think. There is far more traffic etc. Two weeks ago it was nearly apocalyptic walking to the shops were as now it’s quite busy


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    joe_99 wrote: »
    But cases being identified won't

    Why won't they?

    More confirmed cases = more deaths.

    You can see the rise in our average daily deaths over the last 2-3 weeks, from the corresponding rise in cases. (Like I said, over 7,000 just in the last 10 days alone!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,191 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    In the USA current death total is 48,868. Seems like every chance of breaking 50,000 before the end of the day. 1,209 deaths so far recorded today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,208 ✭✭✭✭Arghus


    other countries are already starting the process

    I guess we'll have to see how it works out then won't we?

    Hopefully all will be well. At this point no one knows for sure.

    We might start the process ourselves in a fortnight's time, but that's no guarantee that it will work or that we won't see restrictions again imposed depending on how the virus behaves.

    If infections spike again and deaths spike again, which is entirely possible, you can bet with 100% certainty that restrictions will be reimposed again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    A large portion of these cases and deaths are in residential care settings. Unfortunately the cases in Nursing homes will lead to a high percentage of deaths


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 464 ✭✭Iamabeliever


    Why won't they?

    More confirmed cases = more deaths.

    You can see the rise in our average daily deaths over the last 2-3 weeks, from the corresponding rise in cases. (Like I said, over 7,000 just in the last 10 days alone!)

    More cases = more deaths


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    owlbethere wrote: »
    That's disappointing. I was hoping there would be success with that.
    But normal in this area. Lots of them will fail.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,191 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Trump will be in his element tonight now that Obama is calling him a jack ass :D

    https://twitter.com/funder/status/1253061187744468994


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    Why won't they?

    More confirmed cases = more deaths.

    You can see the rise in our average daily deaths over the last 2-3 weeks, from the corresponding rise in cases. (Like I said, over 7,000 just in the last 10 days alone!)

    Let's make it simple.

    100 people are infected in a country. 10 people die.

    If we identified 50 of those cases. 10 people die.

    If we identified no cases. 10 people die.

    Identifying cases does not increase deaths. The rationale is that if we identify more we can stop the spread so that less people are infected.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,590 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    Very disappointing news about Remdesivir. Had high hopes for that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    In the USA current death total is 48,868. Seems like every chance of breaking 50,000 before the end of the day. 1,209 deaths so far recorded today.

    58,000 US soldiers died during the Vietnam war, started in 1965- ended 1975.

    Near 49,000 deaths only a couple of months?


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,458 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    More cases = more deaths

    Yes, but we are still missing all those who died of this without having been tested from the "official" figures

    The fact we are testing more in nursing homes can be expected to increase the "official" number


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    In the USA current death total is 48,868. Seems like every chance of breaking 50,000 before the end of the day. 1,209 deaths so far recorded today.

    Still pretty low deaths, considering the huge amount of cases they have...

    They have more than 4.5 times Italy's number of confirmed cases, but less than double their deaths.

    They're a huge country, that gets probably more movement and international travel over their borders than most nations. They seem to be doing reasonably okay right now, all things considered.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,768 ✭✭✭timsey tiger


    I don't think you know what community transmission is.

    Community transmission is the euphemism they use for we haven't a f**king clue where you caught the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,197 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    That was very sad on the news just there

    RIP to that man

    What was that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Beasty wrote: »
    Yes, but we are still missing all those who died of this without having been tested from the "official" figures

    The fact we are testing more in nursing homes can be expected to increase the "official" number
    There's also that NH census, which is coming, going back to January.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Still pretty low deaths, considering the huge amount of cases they have...

    They have more than 4.5 times Italy's number of confirmed cases, but less than double their deaths.

    They're a huge country, that gets probably more movement and international travel over their borders than most nations. They seem to be doing reasonably okay right now, all things considered.

    Yes, makes it seem like USA is doing very badly but the death rate is better than most European countries. The total number of deaths looks alarming because USA is such a large country. Other large countries with widespread outbreaks such as Indonesia and Brazil are also just not reporting deaths anywhere near accurately


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    Community transmission is the euphemism they use for we haven't a f**king clue where you caught the virus.

    Are people picking up the disease from their whoring cats? Or dogs?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    joe_99 wrote: »
    Let's make it simple.

    100 people are infected in a country. 10 people die.

    If we identified 50 of those cases. 10 people die.

    If we identified no cases. 10 people die.

    Identifying cases does not increase deaths. The rationale is that if we identify more we can stop the spread so that less people are infected.

    Oh I agree. In theory we can reduce the spread, if done correctly.

    But more cases will produce more deaths. So confirming them will confirm that we should expect more corresponding deaths to follow as a result - which we can see over the last few weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,544 ✭✭✭Reckless Abandonment


    In the USA current death total is 48,868. Seems like every chance of breaking 50,000 before the end of the day. 1,209 deaths so far recorded today.

    Last Sunday the US media predicted 61k deaths by August. They'll hit that by the end of the month


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    Something has to work for us

    Or maybe nothing will. Maybe this is the disease X that can't be stopped .

    It's entirely possible no drug will work or no vaccine will be created successfully.

    That's the nightmare scenario I don't want to think about.

    I think our best hope is this virus decides to mutate to something much more manageable and we can go about our lives again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,039 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    What was that?

    An interview with the mother of a 50 year old man with Down syndrome who died

    Saddest thing I have seen over the last few weeks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,251 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    joe_99 wrote: »
    Let's make it simple.

    100 people are infected in a country. 10 people die.

    If we identified 50 of those cases. 10 people die.

    If we identified no cases. 10 people die.

    Identifying cases does not increase deaths. The rationale is that if we identify more we can stop the spread so that less people are infected.

    Something very Underpants Gnomey about this post

    Identifying the infected is not the cause of fewer deaths, its enforcing quarantine on those infected people that will reduce future deaths.

    You can either lock everyone down indefinitely, or bring community spread down to a manageable level and then slowly lift restrictions while rigorously contact tracing everyone who tests positive

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 91,197 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    An interview with the mother of a 50 year old man with Down syndrome who died

    Saddest thing I have seen over the last few weeks

    RIP

    Was he in a residential care centre?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 65 ✭✭Refractions


    Mass testing going on now folks. My wife has been redeployed to testing and the workload is going to be intense for the foreseeable. Be prepared to see crazy jumps in cases day to day.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Our death rate is increasing rapidly of late... I can't see this changing with so many people now ignoring the rules. Not looking too good.

    77 43 39 28. Convenient?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement