Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid19 Part XVI- 21,983 in ROI (1,339 deaths) 3,881 in NI (404 deaths)(05/05)Read OP

17273757778323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,145 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    JoeA3 wrote: »
    lol. I haven’t seen a Garda checkpoint yet.

    If people think the Gardai are going out there in force dishing out fines and arresting people going to the shops they are completely deluded.

    I don't know where you are Joe but we're fairly rural and I've been stopped 5 times in the past eight days within 2km from home


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,359 ✭✭✭Be right back


    JoeA3 wrote: »
    lol. I haven’t seen a Garda checkpoint yet.

    If people think the Gardai are going out there in force dishing out fines and arresting people going to the shops they are completely deluded.

    There's loads around Cork city and county.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    Don’t want to keep arguing the point, but it’s not an inconvenient truth when it was expected. If we were at 10 per day it would be in inconvenient truth for those who argue the end of the world or at 500 per day an inconvenient truth for those arguing things are going ok considering. We are probably at the point where both groups will see in the data something supporting their point and that it’s what is perpetuating the circular arguments going on currently

    Translation: you don't really have a clue, but you'll paint it as us doing well because that's the agenda you're pushing!

    People are bullsh*tting about us doing well, when they don't really know conclusively that we are. Even our CMO - our so-called "expert" - seems confused with his interpretation of the stats. You're all trying to forecast and predict the future... but you're getting it wrong.

    There's a lot of people out there, who are great a manipulating numbers and stats... but really rubbish when it comes to simple common sense and basic logic. And quite often ignore very obvious things!

    You don't need to be a high level mathematician or statistician to see the obvious truth in front of your eyes... the basic unmanipulated numbers show the truth. We're not improving, we're getting worse... something many of us have been saying for several weeks now!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Is there any link for the daily numbers of positive cases including death in individual nursery homes?

    I'm trying to look for spikes that appear.

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    I've noticed the same in my area. A lot more traffic on the road in recent times, and more elderly people out and about than there was a week ago.

    Ditto, lots of older people sitting around on benches and walls chatting, with about 2 feet between them. For some reason people now seem to think if they're not shoulder-to-shoulder that they're socially distancing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 801 ✭✭✭frillyleaf


    People are getting all worked up about the amount of people out, but as far as I can see people are socially distancing and being very aware. Sure there have always been some who have not, but the governments modelling would have always assumed a small proportion of rule breakers. As far as I can see, the majority are being smart, and bodes well for coming weeks

    I’m referring to people who are absolutely not social distancing. They aren’t sticking to any guidelines and are calling into people’s houses for social visits even if health risks are present such as age and conditions. Other people are letting young children mix unsupervised that aren’t capable of maintaining social distance on their own


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭Away With The Fairies


    frillyleaf wrote: »
    Yep. They need to have a press conference similar to March. I feel they won’t relax restrictions much looking at what is going on at the moment. I felt they might up until yesterday.

    They're talking how about well we're doing, getting the RO below 1. It's any wonder people are becoming complacent. And it's something I still don't understand, how do they know how well we're doing when they aren't testing everybody was symptoms.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,630 ✭✭✭Newtown90


    There's loads around Cork city and county.

    I commute Killarney to Cork everyday for work.

    I've been stopped everyday since the "lockdown" came in, numerous occasions on some days.

    So yes the Gards are active in Kerry and Cork.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,334 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    Also loads of Gardai around Galway


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    joe_99 wrote: »
    This is what our numbers look like if we followed other countries death reporting.

    510578.JPG
    Any comments?

    By the way reinforces ridiculousness of comparisons and league tables.

    Ah stop, that doesn't suit "the agenda". He's just looking for anything to have a moan about. Government say no gatherings over 5k until September so as not to get hopes up about sporting events for the summer and his takeaway is "so it's fine for 4,999 people to gather, but not 5,000...gubberment stoopid"


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    You have failed to state the difference in numbers though

    Hit me with them, it's fairly simple
    I did. If you can't comprehend something so basic and obvious I can't help you.
    Same with caffeine... pure caffeine will kill you quite quickly.

    But it seems unclear if nicotine is actually inherently unhealthy, or just highly addictive...
    In low doses minus the dangerous smoking method of ingestion part it doesn't seem to be inherently unhealthy. Raises blood pressure I suppose which wouldn't be good for some. Like any drug I suppose it depends on individual tolerances too. A belt of it that the average smoker gets that chills them out could have a non smoker thinking they've just drunk the strongest coffee ever and not in a good way. :D It aids concentration and short term memory and appears to tamp down ADHD symptoms and appears to have a protective effect in some forms of parkinsons.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    Also loads of Gardai around Galway

    They have nothing else to be doing these days and sure out in the car driving round or a little walk is nice in the sun

    It's not a bad job to have at the minute


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭the.red.baron


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I did. If you can't comprehend something so basic and obvious I can't help you.

    In low doses minus the dangerous smoking method of ingestion part it doesn't seem to be inherently unhealthy. Raises blood pressure I suppose which wouldn't be good for some. Like any drug I suppose it depends on individual tolerances too. A belt of it that the average smoker gets that chills them out could have a non smoker thinking they've just drunk the strongest coffee ever and not in a good way. :D It aids concentration and short term memory and appears to tamp down ADHD symptoms and appears to have a protective effect in some forms of parkinsons.

    You haven't and let's be honest you have nothing better to be doing so state them again

    You've had two goes at it and failed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,576 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    Just on this no gatherings of people over 5000

    Why such a high figure?

    Review it in September is the thinking?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Translation: you don't really have a clue, but you'll paint it as us doing well because that's the agenda you're pushing!

    People are bullsh*tting about us doing well, when they don't really know conclusively that we are. Even our CMO - our so-called "expert" - seems confused with his interpretation of the stats. You're all trying to forecast and predict the future... but you're getting it wrong.

    There's a lot of people out there, who are great a manipulating numbers and stats... but really rubbish when it comes to simple common sense and basic logic. And quite often ignore very obvious things!

    You don't need to be a high level mathematician or statistician to see the obvious truth in front of your eyes... the basic unmanipulated numbers show the truth. We're not improving, we're getting worse... something many of us have been saying for several weeks now!

    Every post you address you bring to the personal level questioning motives, claiming people are pushing agendas and somehow have a motivation to manipulate the message, I am just someone expressing my opinion based on what I observe. If I disagree with you it’s not personal, but it’s still my view. And my view remains that all the data I have seen is entirely consistent with my view that we have maintained things under control.
    I do very much appreciate that 40 or so deaths a day for a number of days is a difficult thing for everyone to see.
    So please, question my data, my facts or opinions all you want. But my motivations are just what I see


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    fullstop wrote: »
    Ah stop, that doesn't suit "the agenda". He's just looking for anything to have a moan about. Government say no gatherings over 5k until September so as not to get hopes up about sporting events for the summer and his takeaway is "so it's fine for 4,999 people to gather, but not 5,000...gubberment stoopid"

    Simon Harris believes it's called Covid-19 because there's been 18 previous coronaviruses.

    So yeah, he at least is thick as mince


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,557 ✭✭✭JoeA3


    walshb wrote: »
    Just on this no gatherings of people over 5000

    Why such a high figure?

    Review it in September is the thinking?

    It’s been explained several times. Events over 5k require licensing. This doesn’t mean events of 4999 will be allowed. In general, they won’t either. .


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    gabeeg wrote: »
    Simon Harris believes it's called Covid-19 because there's been 18 previous coronaviruses.

    So yeah, he at least is thick as mince

    Everyone here has no doubt said at least one incredibly stupid thing at some point. Doesn’t make them stupid. Well most of them anyway


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 763 ✭✭✭joe_99


    Every post you address you bring to the personal level questioning motives, claiming people are pushing agendas and somehow have a motivation to manipulate the message, I am just someone expressing my opinion based on what I observe. If I disagree with you it’s not personal, but it’s still my view. And my view remains that all the data I have seen is entirely consistent with my view that we have maintained things under control.
    I do very much appreciate that 40 or so deaths a day for a number of days is a difficult thing for everyone to see.
    So please, question my data, my facts or opinions all you want. But my motivations are just what I see

    Well said


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭celt262


    JoeA3 wrote: »
    It’s been explained several times. Events over 5k require licensing. This doesn’t mean events of 4999 will be allowed. In general, they won’t either. .

    You are wasting your time Bob will be in shortly asking the same.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 199 ✭✭Maestro85


    walshb wrote: »
    Just on this no gatherings of people over 5000

    Why such a high figure?

    Review it in September is the thinking?




    well I regularly go up for the Willie Clancy festival but believed it was going to be called off this year but I received a call from a mate around there saying it's back on and that can get a few thousand people. I can't imagine how they will control it. Utter madness to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    John waters will probably regret his actions when some of those present at that protest who looked over 70 I will add get covid

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,145 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge



    There's a lot of people out there, who are great a manipulating numbers and stats... but really rubbish when it comes to simple common sense and basic logic. And quite often ignore very obvious things!

    You don't need to be a high level mathematician or statistician to see the obvious truth in front of your eyes... the basic unmanipulated numbers show the truth. We're not improving, we're getting worse... something many of us have been saying for several weeks now!

    Every night, the same thing!!!

    Doing well means keeping a manageable check on this thing, Reducing the rate of increase is doing well at this stage . If you think we can put a lid on this thing in a couple of months you are either very naïve or not listening to what you are being told.

    The reduced rate of growth is, by all definitions at this stage of a pandemic situation, doing well and achieving what the aim was.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Looking like USA will today report it's 2nd lowest death toll in weeks the day after reporting it's highest total ever yesterday


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    fullstop wrote: »
    Ah stop, that doesn't suit "the agenda". He's just looking for anything to have a moan about. Government say no gatherings over 5k until September so as not to get hopes up about sporting events for the summer and his takeaway is "so it's fine for 4,999 people to gather, but not 5,000...gubberment stoopid"

    So you think everyone in the country that reads that headline, will know that there is a licence needed for any gathering over 5,000 people?

    The statement makes it sound very ambiguous... it sounds like it's okay to have gatherings under 5K people. And that's exactly how many will interpret it.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Maestro85 wrote: »
    well I regularly go up for the Willie Clancy festival but believed it was going to be called off this year but I received a call from a mate around there saying it's back on and that can get a few thousand people. I can't imagine how they will control it. Utter madness to me.

    Well if the organisers believe that the information on no events of over 5k automatically allows their event because it’s under 5k to go ahead I fear they are in for a rude awakening,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭Gynoid


    https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/corona-you-need-the-sledgehammer-to-bring-down-infections-a-e939bdf1-6485-4c24-b70e-9ee7a5cdf5b0-amp

    "In an interview, Hong Kong-based epidemiologist Gabriel Leung explains why he considers a rapid lifting of contact bans and social distancing measures to be irresponsible. The corona crisis, he believes, will be with us for a long time."

    These are just two quotes I thought particularly interesting. He seems calm and clear.

    DER SPIEGEL: Should young people be allowed to more exposure?

    Leung: Trying to be too clever by half in terms of trying to expose people who are at lower risk in order that they could use herd immunity to protect other people at higher risk -- I think it is not going to work. Unless you have a very, very compliant population and you have a very targeted, almost military precision in how you think people are going to behave.

    DER SPIEGEL: There are reports in Germany, especially among the younger population, that people are not socially distancing nearly enough. Should we be worried?

    Leung: Of course, we should be -- especially when you are in the growth phase of an epidemic. It is absolutely mandatory that if you want to minimize the morbidity and mortality burden that the community-wide acceptance of physical distancing gets very high acceptance at all levels of the population, young and old.

    DER SPIEGEL: So, let’s take a view on our future course of action. Is it suppress and lift, suppress and lift again?

    Leung: Before a vaccine becomes available, I am afraid that is going to be the new normal.

    And...

    DER SPIEGEL: What do scientists need to prepare for to fight this pandemic?

    Leung: You need to have resilience. And to carry with you as a scientist a sense of humanity. Making sure we do the best science and know that we do the best science to keep people safe. And: To be absolutely resilient to external pressures.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,383 ✭✭✭olestoepoke


    Everyone here has no doubt said at least one incredibly stupid thing at some point. Doesn’t make them stupid. Well most of them anyway
    Thats some clanger from him though. He's supposed to be part of the leadership thats fighting this virus in our country and he hasn't a clue. He's the minister for health FFS. He should be dismissed immediately.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,145 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    So you think everyone in the country that reads that headline, will know that there is a licence needed for any gathering over 5,000 people?

    The statement makes it sound very ambiguous... it sounds like it's okay to have gatherings under 5K people. And that's exactly how many will interpret it.

    You've summed it up. Idiots making their minds up and taking to the internet to rant after just reading a headline.
    Ever hear of reading an article?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    Everyone here has no doubt said at least one incredibly stupid thing at some point. Doesn’t make them stupid. Well most of them anyway

    I've said loads of stupid things. Loads.

    I've never said anything that stupid though.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement