Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Coronavirus

Options
1…5455575960…80

Comments

  • Options
    #1682
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »
    Entertaining and more shift of stances by Dohnjoe.  Previously you claimed 5G was not dangerous and was completely safe.

    Show us the post.


  • Options
    #1683
    Cheerful Spring2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Show us the post.

    There three musketeers (yourself, Nal, Kingmob) one of you posted links 5G was safe and not dangerous. There 113 pages to find out which of you posted the links.


  • Options
    #1684
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »
    There three musketeers (yourself, Nal, Kingmob) one of you posted links 5G was safe and not dangerous. There 113 pages to find out which of you posted the links.

    That's false, I have never written that 5g was perfectly safe

    Use the search function
    https://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?query=5g&forum=&user=759707&date_from=&date_to=


  • Options
    #1685
    Cheerful Spring2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    That's false, I have never written that 5g was perfectly safe

    Use the search function
    https://www.boards.ie/search/submit/?query=5g&forum=&user=759707&date_from=&date_to=

    Your search function says you mentioned 5G in the last 4 days, that doesn't make any sense :confused: Where the rest of your comments you have made in other threads?


  • Options
    #1686
    IAMAMORON
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,078 ✭✭✭IAMAMORON


    I think anyone using 5G or even talking about it need to have a good look at their frequency and ask the question, what wavelength am I on?

    Treehuggers are always looking for an excuse to burn things, the irony.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1687
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »
    Your search function says you mentioned 5G in the last 4 days, that doesn't make any sense :confused: Where the rest of your comments you have made in other threads?

    It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.


  • Options
    #1688
    Cheerful Spring2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.

    What perfectly safe? If wasn't you, I apologize. I remember one of you, you or Nal posted a link that said 5G was safe? Kingmob does not post links, it's very rare he does that.


  • Options
    #1689
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It makes perfect sense when you factor in that I don't hold the view that 5g is perfectly safe.

    I remember that no one had a problem with the first gen.
    2G was actually seen by many as dangerous with communities not wanting masts in their area.
    3G and 4G was introduced with few complaints
    Now people are having the same hysteria about 5G as they did about 2G.

    At what point did 2G because safe and won't the same thing happen with 5G?


  • Options
    #1690
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    tuxy wrote: »
    I remember that no one had a problem with the first gen.
    2G was actually seen by many as dangerous with communities not wanting masts in their area.
    3G and 4G was introduced with few complaints
    Now people are having the same hysteria about 5G as they did about 2G.

    At what point did 2G because safe and won't the same thing happen with 5G?

    They get bored and move onto the next thing to be hysterical about. They are applying the same faulty thinking to a newer more topical thing.


  • Options
    #1691
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »
    What perfectly safe? If wasn't you, I apologize. I remember one of you, you or Nal posted a link that said 5G was safe? Kingmob does not post links, it's very rare he does that.

    Thanks for the apology. And before you misinterpret my view again. This doesn't mean I maintain 5g is dangerous. There's a spectrum of acceptable safety, just about everything has an element of risk.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1692
    Cheerful Spring2
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Thanks for the apology. And before you misinterpret my view again. This doesn't mean I maintain 5g is dangerous. There's a spectrum of acceptable safety, just about everything has an element of risk.

    RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. Higher the frequency, the more risk (5G likely will have higher frequency) than 3G and 4G. Scientist's concerns are not unfounded.


  • Options
    #1693
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,418 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »
    Entertaining and more shift of stances by Dohnjoe.  Previously you claimed 5G was not dangerous and was completely safe.

    The website is not disinformation. Linking this site with other 5G- conspiracy sites you find online is hilarious. There the names of scientists and their department listed on this site, all writing to the UN summarizing why- 5G is potentially dangerous right now.

    Are 5g signals perfectly safe? No

    Perfectly safe (no) mean? Why would anybody use a technology that not 100 per cent safe for the public? How do you know if it is scaremongering? Are you educated enough about 5G to judge these scientists are wrong?

    So ban all modes of transport?


  • Options
    #1694
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    They get bored and move onto the next thing to be hysterical about. They are applying the same faulty thinking to a newer more topical thing.

    Exactly, I guess they missed out on 3 and 4G as they were banging on about something else at the time.
    Cheerful Spring2 wrote: »
    RF-EMF has been proven to be harmful for humans and the environment. Higher the frequency, the more risk (5G likely will have higher frequency) than 3G and 4G. Scientist's concerns are not unfounded.

    At what point should the line be drawn though? Perhaps back at the first generation?


  • Options
    #1695
    Clarence Boddiker
    Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Old news at this stage but both CBS and Sky news used the same footage, Skys was from Italy and CBS claimed the footage to be from New York. Its hard then to trust any footage you see.
    Screen-Shot-2020-04-04-at-17-31-03.png


  • Options
    #1696
    Clarence Boddiker
    Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Another example of the media using 'fake' footage and passing it off as footage from inside a Covid-19 ward.

    This time they present what are clearly dolls as Covid-19 patients



  • Options
    #1697
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    Another example of the media using 'fake' footage and passing it off as footage from inside a Covid-19 ward.

    This time they present what are clearly dolls as Covid-19 patients


    It's clearly a training dummy. Words fail me.


  • Options
    #1698
    Clarence Boddiker
    Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    It's clearly a training dummy. Words fail me.

    Yes it is a training dummy, it even says so on the wall behind it. The issue is that it was presented on the news as being from a Covid-19 ward.


  • Options
    #1699
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Lazy reporting is not a conspiracy.


  • Options
    #1700
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    The issue is that it was presented on the news as being from a Covid-19 ward.

    Simple challenge: explain what is happening in this video

    And then, explain how the person who made this video frames it


  • Options
    #1701
    Clarence Boddiker
    Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Simple challenge: explain what is happening in this video

    And then, explain how the person who made this video frames it

    I'm more interested in how Channel 4 framed it tbh


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1702
    Clarence Boddiker
    Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    More 'lazy' reporting.

    First its an English boy, then a Portuguese boy, then a Belgian Girl. Lots of lazy reporting going around it seems.

    Screen-Shot-2020-04-04-at-17-57-08.png

    Screenshot-20200404-175737.jpg


  • Options
    #1703
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    I'm more interested in how Channel 4 framed it tbh

    Is it generic Covid-19 hospital footage/journalism error

    or

    A global conspiracy involving every country from the US to China to Russia faking 10's of thousands of deaths with fake plastic dummies involving every healthcare service in the world, and the disease doesn't exist

    Think before you post this stuff.


  • Options
    #1704
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    More 'lazy' reporting.

    Actually it's lazy thinking. It's a dynamic fluid situation, news agencies and papers are reporting on this stuff around the clock, with decreased staff - errors happen.

    Unless you want to explain what you are suggesting is going on here?


  • Options
    #1705
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    It kind of reminds me of this

    ITV use Arma 2 video game footage in IRA Documentary



  • Options
    #1706
    Clarence Boddiker
    Registered Users Posts: 776 ✭✭✭Clarence Boddiker


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Is it generic Covid-19 hospital footage/journalism error

    or

    A global conspiracy involving every country from the US to China to Russia faking 10's of thousands of deaths with fake plastic dummies involving every healthcare service in the world, and the disease doesn't exist

    Think before you post this stuff.

    How do you know its an error?

    As for the bolded part, who said anything like that? Certainly not me.


  • Options
    #1707
    tuxy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,983 ✭✭✭✭tuxy


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    How do you know its an error?

    It was either an error or more likely they were way behind schedule and needed the report to fill air time.


  • Options
    #1708
    Dohnjoe
    Registered Users Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Clarence Boddiker wrote: »
    How do you know its an error?

    It's either standard footage from a hospital, and/or it's a journalistic error

    Unless you care to specify what the third alternative is..
    As for the bolded part, who said anything like that? Certainly not me.

    That's what the video is suggesting. That it's a "mistake" by the media exposing some massive conspiracy.

    In case you aren't familiar, Every time there's any major event in the world, countless numbers of like-minded (and highly paranoid) people scour the news for any perceived mistakes or discrepancies and anomalies for one specific reason - to hint they've discovered a "hole" in the plot, ergo "something is going on", aka some big vague conspiracy plot.

    Anything that's perceived as strange or out of the ordinary becomes some sort of clue that "something fishy is going on".


  • Options
    #1709
    4068ac1elhodqr
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    How COVID19 started is impossible to prove, there are three options (accident, state, or a deep {beyond any single state} purposed release) it could be any of these three.

    The only important matter now, is the current and future consequences as a result of it.
    One good example is a 3rd world country (with a 15% poverty rate) Tunis has no problem spending good money on fancy oppresive monitoring technology:

    wbOoLoM.png


  • Options
    #1710
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,178 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    tuxy wrote: »
    I remember that no one had a problem with the first gen.
    2G was actually seen by many as dangerous with communities not wanting masts in their area.
    3G and 4G was introduced with few complaints
    Now people are having the same hysteria about 5G as they did about 2G.

    At what point did 2G because safe and won't the same thing happen with 5G?

    people said the same thing when electricity was introduced


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1711
    4068ac1elhodqr
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    people said the same thing when electricity was introduced
    Yet you can't easily sell a house that finds itself near a large electric pylon.
    Can't make/sell a mobile phone with a SAR level of +1.6.
    Also if you choose to sleep right next to an electric fuse box, expect poor health before too long.

    Saying that, the worst 5G can do is interfere slightly with the natural immune system, not enough of course, to cause a global pandemic.

    Another theory is that in very high pollution areas (N.Italy/Wuhan) that had recent 5G installs, it somehow casued an exaggerated immune response, maybe something to do with new microwaves and pollutant particles.

    Perhaps this theory comes from abroad?
    E.g. last night in an enthic area of Birmingham (mainly SE Asian), they choose to turn a new 70 foot 5G mast, into a raging bonfire.


Advertisement