Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

CoVid19 Part XII - 4,604 in ROI (137 deaths) 998 in NI (56 deaths)(04/04) **Read OP**

19899101103104323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,667 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    Interestingly the DEASP on their website now say the Covid-19 payment is for the "duration of the crisis"..I am nearly sure it said 12 weeks the last time I looked...

    So is the crisis, this 2 week lock down, the 12 weeks as previously advertised, or as long as this problem occurs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,779 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    The mortality rate for Hubei Province (Including Wuhan) is currently at 4.7%.

    I don't believe the Chinese figures either way...

    The UK governments science advisors, probably a cover for Intelligence sources, believe the Chinese have probably under reported their figures which may be as much as 40 times worse. Basing anything on China's figures is an absolute waste of time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,595 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    scamalert wrote: »
    if theres no positive results in 2 weeks time, think curtain will drop and people will take their chances, i get some enjoy this kumba ya isolation forever no work no worries attitude, but realistically if 2 weeks dont give enough leverage whats the point in keeping going same route, social distancing and some ppe seems about as effective. Doubt any government in the world will say sure lock it down till there's cure found, stupid and pointless all together. even if there was no cases someone immune could spread it and in theory this could go on for years.

    Well numbers of new cases seem to have fallen in Italy and they are around 3 weeks of lockdown now. Obviously they need to stay locked down for a while longer.

    Why do you say 2 weeks?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 875 ✭✭✭mean gene


    chasm wrote: »

    Cheers for that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭iwillyeah1234


    Messaging from U.K. news media is still confusing and muddled. ITV news just stated that 28 of the U.K. deaths “had no underlying conditions”

    This doesn’t make any sense - how come some healthy people recover and others die?

    Anyone got a more sensible explanation for this?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,667 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    threeball wrote: »
    So Paddy Cosgrove was posting sh1te on twitter. No nurses have died from Covid19 here. Dipstick.

    Didn't the IT report a nurse dying last week?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 94 ✭✭mouldybiscuits


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    Mortality rate in Italy is now 11.7%.

    I'm sure the vast majority of people who are mildly sick aren't getting diagnosed because of the massive strain on the health system. The mortality rate certainly isn't going to be accurate in this case.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,103 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    threeball wrote: »
    So Paddy Cosgrove was posting sh1te on twitter. No nurses have died from Covid19 here. Dipstick.

    He has really made a tit of himself these last couple of weeks on Twitter.

    Hard to believe he was kind of looked up to before this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 306 ✭✭Just Saying


    ooh, interesting. It definitely did say 12 weeks before...

    Says 12 weeks on Citizensinformation.ie which you would imagine is slower to update


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,809 ✭✭✭threeball


    Fann Linn wrote: »
    Didn't the IT report a nurse dying last week?

    Hse said no nurses have died. Cosgrove said more than one had died.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,103 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    cnocbui wrote: »
    The UK governments scicience advisors, probably a cover for Intelligence sources, believe the Chinese have probably under reported their figures which may be as much as 40 times worse. Basing anything on China's figures is an absolute waste of time.

    Apparently, from midnight tonight they are going to be releasing daily figures for asymptomatic cases (following growing anger from abroad).

    This should be be very telling...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 94 ✭✭mouldybiscuits


    Messaging from U.K. news media is still confusing and muddled. ITV news just stated that 28 of the U.K. deaths “had no underlying conditions”

    This doesn’t make any sense - how come some healthy people recover and others die?

    Anyone got a more sensible explanation for this?

    Everyone reacts differently to infection. Some healthy people die from all kinds of illnesses that other healthy people recover from.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭irishlad.


    Department briefing moved to 7.30

    I repeat, 7.30!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭cosanostra


    threeball wrote: »
    So Paddy Cosgrove was posting sh1te on twitter. No nurses have died from Covid19 here. Dipstick.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/coronavirus-healthcare-worker-in-republic-dies-after-contracting-virus-1.4213892


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,809 ✭✭✭threeball


    He has really made a tit of himself these last couple of weeks on Twitter.

    Hard to believe he was kind of looked up to before this.

    Hes used the crisis for self promotion and talking about his rich mates from what ive seen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92,394 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    mean gene wrote: »
    Me old man is over 70 and wants to get his pension Friday is there some waiver form we can get to keep him indoors.

    Cheers for any info

    He would have got 2 weeks last Friday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,503 ✭✭✭Be right back


    threeball wrote: »
    Hse said no nurses have died. Cosgrove said more than one had died.

    He said 4 had died.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,678 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    irishlad. wrote: »
    Department briefing moved to 7.30

    I repeat, 7.30!

    What time? ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,103 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    France

    7,578 new cases

    499 new deaths

    Worst day yet for France by some distance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 445 ✭✭iwillyeah1234


    cnocbui wrote: »
    The UK governments scicience advisors, probably a cover for Intelligence sources, believe the Chinese have probably under reported their figures which may be as much as 40 times worse. Basing anything on China's figures is an absolute waste of time.

    You can take it as a given that a “U.K. government scientist” has a certain degree of interaction with their intelligence services, if not actually being a part of it.

    It’s the same Stateside - NSA/CIA/DARPA are crammed with “government scientists” doing intelligence led research.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,076 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    scamalert wrote: »
    if theres no positive results in 2 weeks time, think curtain will drop and people will take their chances, i get some enjoy this kumba ya isolation forever no work no worries attitude, but realistically if 2 weeks dont give enough leverage whats the point in keeping going same route, social distancing and some ppe seems about as effective. Doubt any government in the world will say sure lock it down till there's cure found, stupid and pointless all together. even if there was no cases someone immune could spread it and in theory this could go on for years.

    There's the problem. There will still be mounting fatalities in two weeks time, the restrictions are only going to reduce that rate, not stop it. People who don't understand that, or who just don't want to stay at home, are going to claim that any level of infection proves that the restrictions haven't worked.


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 80,690 Mod ✭✭✭✭New Home


    cosanostra wrote: »

    Just as I thought --> healthcare worker =/= nurse. Not much different, but different enough not to make a liar our of the HSE.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,678 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭statesaver




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭cosanostra


    Didn't Leo say a nurse had died in one of his speeches?

    Yep


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭BLIZZARD7


    I'm sure the vast majority of people who are mildly sick aren't getting diagnosed because of the massive strain on the health system. The mortality rate certainly isn't going to be accurate in this case.

    Yeah I don't think the mortality rate will come in close to that in the end but it is still increasing.

    I think the ~1% figures are conservative and possibly only achievable in a developed country with low rate of infection. The mortality appears to sky rocket when healthcare systems get overwhelmed.

    But yes we have no idea how many people are truly infected until we see widespread community testing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,023 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Messaging from U.K. news media is still confusing and muddled. ITV news just stated that 28 of the U.K. deaths “had no underlying conditions”

    This doesn’t make any sense - how come some healthy people recover and others die?

    Anyone got a more sensible explanation for this?

    theres always going to be statistical outliers who truly are healthy and who will die, and obviously the more infections increase the more of these will happen. Thats why I dont get why some young people are being so cavalier about becoming infected. You dont know that you wont be one of the unlucky ones. I certainly wouldnt want to take the chance.


    Also at least one of the "no underlying conditions" people that I saw was obese. I think being overweight is definitely a risk factor for more severe outcomes.


  • Posts: 24,773 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    antodeco wrote: »
    Its really scary if 133 ICU patients mean we are under severe pressure...
    JP Liz V1 wrote: »
    103 in ICU as of yesterday in ROI according to Virgin Media News and that some private hospitals have already been treating public patients

    Accumulated since the start, media misreporting.

    These are not the numbers currently in ICU, the hse only reports accumulated numbers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,779 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Apparently, from midnight tonight they are going to be releasing daily figures for asymptomatic cases (following growing anger from abroad).

    This should be be very telling...

    Not quite the same thing as stating that , well actually, to be perfectly frank, 132,000 people died in Wuhan.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭FVP3


    France

    7,578 new cases

    499 new deaths

    Worst day yet for France by some distance.

    You have a fetish for the bad news. Did you post their 2,600 new cases a few days ago, a major drop?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement