Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

CoVid19 Part XI - 2,615 in ROI (46 deaths) 410 in NI (21 deaths)(29/03)*OP upd 28/03*

1159160162164165332

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,780 ✭✭✭Pinch Flat


    Gael23 wrote: »
    I think it’s a step too far taking away people’s freedom

    Yeah sure we should let it run its courses and have 900 people dying every day. Be grand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    FVP3 wrote: »
    US still on an exponential curve. Still 8-10 hours of reports left.

    I think their curve is starting to go backwards


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭kilkenny31


    Blaze420 wrote: »
    Tell me where the trolley crisis is now that every hypochondriac prick isn’t clogging our AES up with their medical cards? Tell me about the genuine homeless - not those sitting in hotels waiting for a free house because that isn’t homelessness? Big changes coming after this I hope when we wake up and realise what a cohort of spoofing vermin pervade our society and essential functions

    You have a terrible view on people. It makes me uncomfortable. Your generalising groups in lower socioeconomic class. My partner works in as a nurse on the front line. The trolly crisis isn't caused by hypochondriacs maybe there are some in A&E but they tend not to get to trolleys. I know 3 families that live in Hotel Rooms. Two out of 3 of those have both partners working (minimum wage jobs) but have had landlords kick them out to Jack up the rent. They are not waiting for a free house they are waiting for an affordable house. Even that you describe people as vermin makes me shiver. You are a dispicable person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,780 ✭✭✭Pinch Flat


    Gael23 wrote: »
    I think it’s a step too far taking away people’s freedom

    Yeah sure we should let it run its courses and have 900 people dying every day. Be grand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,517 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/3e14cb-an-analysis-of-the-1639-cases-of-covid-19-in-ireland-as-of-wednesday/#hospitalised-cases-by-age-group
    This is a decent breakdown of cases up until 25th March.
    Have to say I am surprised at the amount of people in those young and fairly young age brackets that have been hospitalized.
    27% 44 and under


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    So how do people feel this will impact our weeks/months ahead?

    When do you think we will now peak, how will we peak and will it be our only peak?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 904 ✭✭✭Blaze420


    FVP3 wrote: »
    US still on an exponential curve. Still 8-10 hours of reports left.

    The US are done for thanks to the orange retard. The best thing they can do is hope it takes him at some stage and someone with a shred of logic in their head takes over. If not, well god bless America because coronavirus certainly ****ing will.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    BoatMad wrote: »
    I see fining people that are out of work , good call

    Their work status is irrelevant.

    Making exceptions renders the whole thing meaningless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,332 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Can somebody explain if & why a drive would be against current guidelines?

    I.e. getting in the car at the house, driving and not leaving the car until returning home.

    It's not going to do any harm if you stay alone in your metal box...but obviously if they do try and police these rules you are actually breaking them.

    If you "imagine" some policemen or soldiers enforcing this ala China (or as is beginning to happen in parts of Europe now too) it's not really going to wash saying "oh look I am 20 km away from my house and have no reason to be but I was bored & just went for a spin see"...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭ruwithme


    Can somebody explain if & why a drive would be against current guidelines?

    I.e. getting in the car at the house, driving and not leaving the car until returning home.

    Would be grand, until you'd crash,breakdown e.t.c hence needing assistance from someone to get you home.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,517 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    con747 wrote: »
    You breakdown you need assistance. You crash You need emergency services. Have a think about it.
    Plus more visits to petrol stations more contact with people, surfaces etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,744 ✭✭✭kingtiger


    Gael23 wrote: »
    I think it’s a step too far taking away people’s freedom

    the vast majority of people are adhering to social distancing

    this new directive had to be brought in for the fcukwits that just dont listen or give a sh1t

    If everyone just stayed in for a few weeks this would be over

    But no, a few sh1theads just cant do it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,801 ✭✭✭plodder


    osarusan wrote: »
    The bit about exercising only 2km from home is disappointing - the last few days, the kids and I have driven into east Clare and walked in woodlands - nothing scenic, but the point is that they're deserted.

    If people in urban areas obey the 2km restriction, it will actually cause a bit of congregation.

    I suppose it's to stop people from using exercise as an excuse to go wherever they want....but realistically, who's going to be stopping and asking people.
    Nobody would have anticipated a month ago what we have got used to in the last week. So, if it comes to it (and hopefully it doesn't) we could do what they are doing in France and Spain. Anyone who goes outdoors has to bring id and a piece of paper declaring where they are going and why. The police collect the forms and they could in theory be used to prosecute people afterwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,639 ✭✭✭An Ri rua


    Nermal wrote: »
    Anecdotes don't grow into data.

    You've never studied Qualitative Dáta Analysis then....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,673 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    Gael23 wrote: »
    I think it’s a step too far taking away people’s freedom

    No steps are too far to save lives, nobody will care about their inconvenience in a few weeks but death is permanent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭eggy81


    topper75 wrote: »
    Personal abuse?

    I challenge you to try contradict my point instead.

    Isnt 2km enough to have enough exercise to keep you right in the short term. At the same time if you live in the back of beyond how do you get shopping and such. Or is there exception for that


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,949 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    topper75 wrote: »
    I'm sorry you ended up with that nasty experience through no fault of your own but you just sound angry. A runner keeping their distance didn't give you anything regardless of how far they ran. People should always question what they are told to do and why they are told to do it, especially when the given 'why' is vague or non-existant.
    I WON'T be complying with the 2km thing unless somebody can rationally explain how it increases the risk of me spreading the virus. I don't fear any police action in Ireland for obvious reasons.
    It's a personal thing for which I carry full responsibility, as with all my decisions and actions.

    From one runner to another runner I hope you get a good belt of the baton for going outside 2km.

    Listen and adhere to the advice you entitled ignoramus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,239 ✭✭✭Coyote


    topper75 wrote: »
    I'm sorry you ended up with that nasty experience through no fault of your own but you just sound angry. A runner keeping their distance didn't give you anything regardless of how far they ran. People should always question what they are told to do and why they are told to do it, especially when the given 'why' is vague or non-existant.
    I WON'T be complying with the 2km thing unless somebody can rationally explain how it increases the risk of me spreading the virus. I don't fear any police action in Ireland for obvious reasons.
    It's a personal thing for which I carry full responsibility, as with all my decisions and actions.

    Hi Topper75

    it was not my favorite experience but not the end of the world, I have put up with much worse.
    I'm not angry about spending the time in isolation, i have internet, tv and other things it's not fun but it's not that hard.
    no one is asking me to clime over the trenches to charge the guns. I did it to protect the people i love from becoming sick from me. but if i follow the same logic of others why would i not have gone for a walk with a mask on and stay 2m away, I should not get anyone else sick right.

    I would agree that the risk from running is very low, but who getting to deiced what the risks are?
    what if Jonny over the way deiced that holding a party is low risk or lets all go down to the holiday home whats the risk.

    if everyone gets to pick what they think is the risk why do we have speed limits on motorways and fines for going over it?

    Coyote


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,249 ✭✭✭holyhead


    GooglePlus wrote: »
    So how do people feel this will impact our weeks/months ahead?

    When do you think we will now peak, how will we peak and will it be our only peak?

    Nobody can say with any certainty I expect is the realistic reply to your question. The main concern has to be to minimise fatalities and illness. Economically this is catastrophic but lives have to trump anything else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,381 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    ruwithme wrote: »
    Would be grand, until you'd crash,breakdown e.t.c hence needing assistance from someone to get you home.

    Better off not staying at home if that's the logic you're going to use considering the amount of accidents and deaths that occur in the home.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    Blaze420 wrote: »
    The US are done for thanks to the orange retard. The best thing they can do is hope it takes him at some stage and someone with a shred of logic in their head takes over. If not, well god bless America because coronavirus certainly ****ing will.

    Doesn't the majority of Americans support the President handling of the crisis?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭GooglePlus


    kingtiger wrote: »
    the vast majority of people are adhering to social distancing

    this new directive had to be brought in for the fcukwits that just dont listen or give a sh1t

    If everyone just stayed in for a few weeks this would be over

    But no, a few sh1theads just cant do it

    How will it be over though? This virus doesn't just disappear.

    Once restrictions are eased, do you think the virus will complement us on our measures and be on its way?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭Enter name here


    topper75 wrote: »
    Personal abuse?

    I challenge you to try contradict my point instead.

    Please let us all know where you intend on running. I will be happy to show you first hand the frustration of isolation and help you understand the current seriousness of it with a little personal abuse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    kingtiger wrote: »
    If everyone just stayed in for a few weeks this would be over
    This virus is not disappearing "in a few weeks".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 904 ✭✭✭Blaze420


    Dingaan wrote: »
    Doesn't the majority of Americans support the President handling of the crisis?

    Doesn’t matter - they have no idea what they are walking in to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,059 ✭✭✭✭spookwoman


    Gael23 wrote: »
    I think it’s a step too far taking away people’s freedom

    You've heard the phrase "would it kill you to....." Well going out might actually kill you.
    Cop on and start thinking about other people's lives rather than your own


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,905 ✭✭✭✭Bob24


    BLIZZARD7 wrote: »
    I agree with this, it's why I'm worried about inflation in the long run from the massive money printing because of the fallout from this. What's the alternative though?

    Good question and I don’t have a great answer. But I deeply believe MMT is just a way to kick the can down the road and make the problem even bigger. At some point we’ll have to go through a lot of pain and probably a reset in the financial system.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,712 ✭✭✭Hrududu


    fritzelly wrote: »
    You won't mind running on the road then so I don't have to be met with your grunting and spluttering on the pavement

    But sure how would you meet him unless you’re out too?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,044 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    kingtiger wrote: »
    the vast majority of people are adhering to social distancing

    this new directive had to be brought in for the fcukwits that just dont listen or give a sh1t
    And they they still won't listen. I honestly don't think these new measures will change them whatsoever.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭FVP3


    handouts for sitting at home all day.

    That's 50% of us soon.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement