Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Coronavirus Part IV - 19 cases in ROI, 7 in NI (as of 7 March) *Read warnings in OP*

1119120122124125309

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    banie01 wrote: »
    With other serious underlying health issues.
    Age is a factor, but so is the health of an infected person.

    There was a marathon runner in Italy in intensive car. Just because you are healthy doesn't guarantee anything.

    You are less likely to die or suffer severely if you are young. Doesn't mean that nobody young or healthy will suffer.

    You can be one of the very small number. I wouldn't be too complacent


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,421 ✭✭✭endainoz


    OK I'm due to work today with someone who was at that Blindboy gig thing. Is there any solid links anywhere about possible exposure at it?

    No it's not made official. Anyone who were near the people have been already contacted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Boggles wrote: »
    If this was a move you'd def be the first gone.

    I have the post-apocolyptic book Children of the Dust running through my head for the last few days. The family were well protected in their house eating tinned food, but all but one of the kids drank water from a tub and radioactive dust came down the chimney and contaminated it. So don't think I'm not a little concerned for me too. The only thing I'm 100% sure I'm safe on are my testicles.:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭Somedaythefire


    flynnlives wrote: »
    listen the facts speak for themselves. Taiwan were proactive. We arent.

    The facts are facts except in cases where the facts contradict the facts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    You do know the person in intensive care in cork is your age. The stats might say it only kills the old, there stats though it doesn't mean you get a free pass.

    He's my age but had underlying health issues.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Your example is not great.

    Buying enough toilet roll for a couple of weeks is logical. Buying enough to last a year or so is not. Also arguably the greatest invention is the modern sewerage system so we no longer live in our own ****.

    Toilet roll is a part of that system and we would be a lot unhealthier without it.

    And virus apparently is transmitted from your feces. I rememeber hearing about how this might of spread in locked down apartments in Wuhan (literally through the sewage system).

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.livescience.com/amp/coronavirus-spread-building-pipes.html

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.sciencealert.com/latest-coronavirus-study-suggests-it-can-also-be-spread-through-poop

    https://www.google.ie/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-may-spread-via-poop-2020-3%3famp

    So public toilets are a no no for me


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Canonfan wrote: »
    Because of the 5000+ Italian tourists expected this weekend I heard.

    I wonder if anyone is the press is at the airport counting numbers of passengers today?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭1641


    My point is some posters seem to believe that the crisis in Italy and the insanity in Iran couldn't happen here.

    It can.

    I'm not optimistic at all on that front to be perfectly honest but they want to defend the HSE and how this country is run.


    I would be considered in the "at risk" category but not as majorly so as some others. I am of an age where a lot of those I'm close to would be considered highly at risk. I suspect some will not make it.

    I know of very few people not taking this seriously. Every time I check into this thread I mostly read posters who are taking it seriously (admittedly there are a few minimisers and even one outright denier). But what I don't find helpful are the few who are shouting "PANIC, PANDEMIC, SARS/HIV, 200,000 thousand dead, everyone is useless - don't believe them."

    I find some posters are the equivalent of the guy who rushes into the crowded cinema which is being orderly evacuated and shouts "FIRE,RUN NOW, BUT ITS TOO LATE - 20% OF YOU ARE GOING TO DIE ANYWAY, THE MANAGEMENT ARE ALL INCOMPETENT B*&^TARDS, THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU, ONLY I DO" !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,972 ✭✭✭Panrich


    No it doesn't . Means hospitalised with symptoms.
    DIMESSI
    GUARITI means healed.

    Hence not included in the 1777 total.

    Breakdown is hospitalised, intensive care and domestic isolation. giving total actually positive.

    The red and green = cases concluded . green = alive. red = dead/

    Then why would they not say that they are in hospital?

    Recoverati con sintomi literally means 'Recovered with symptoms'. It does not mention hospital. they may be there but that is not clear from the column header.

    My reading that seems to make more sense is that Recovered with symptoms means that they are still showing positive.

    Healed would be those who are now recovered but not showing as positive any more.

    Now if you can show where the initial column actually means that they are in hospital then I will agree but the column header does not show that. Why would people who have 'recovered' be in hospital?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 336 ✭✭ThePopehimself


    University of Limerick has sent email to students.

    THE University of Limerick will ‘likely’ restrict numbers on the campus, due to the coronavirus, at some point in the near future, students have been informed.

    “The objective of UL is to safeguard its staff, students and the general public. Therefore we will take the appropriate steps to prevent the spreading of the virus...The situation is being monitored daily by Executive Management and we will communicate as soon as possible on relevant aspects of our response.”


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭amadangomor


    1169 "Ricoverati con sintomi" means recovering in hospital.
    244
    "Terapia intensiva" . Add the two of them together to get
    1413
    1777 is total actual cases. Divide one by the other and multiply by 100.
    = 79.5% which when rounded to the nearest whole number.

    Surely Ricoverati con sintomi means recovering with syptoms!!:confused:
    And I speak about 7 words of Italian


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,023 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    Are all confirmed cases in Ireland in being Quarantined in Hospital?

    Yes it was in the Irish examiner article this morning. They've said everyone else can feck off and stay at home there not letting any more into hospital.

    The article has since been removed I linked and quoted to in an earlier post.
    Hospitals don't want to see you, https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/ireland/covid-19-patients-in-emergency-depts-like-bringing-drum-of-petrol-to-fire-says-consultant-986160.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,130 ✭✭✭Akabusi


    I will forever love Blindboy for how much he irks boardsies. It’s endlessly amusing.

    Does he still go around with a plastic bag on his head? Should protect him from COVID-19


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    Stop misinforming people. Yes there are more cured at this stage then there are in intensive care. However there are approx 2K in hospital now. In Lombardia there are 244 people in intensive care right now. There are 364 recovering at home.

    That's 2K in hospital 364 at home. Wonder how many are mild.

    We can all use percentages / comparisons to make something sound different.
    Here's a good one.

    Of the 1777 people who have the disease currently in Lombary 79% are in hospital

    Don't take my word for it. Get out the all calculator.

    504771.png


    http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/documents/20182/1221364/Dati+Riepilogo+Nazionale+5marzo2020/a529828b-0bf0-4d5b-ad66-4669d3635a24

    How am I misinforming people?

    I literally just put down what I seen on the totals. You even agreed in your 2nd sentence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    Here to counter panic and misinformation. Let’s fight this thing together and fight the need for infection cheerleading and doomsday porn.

    There are those who think this is the end of the world. There are those who think there's nothing to worry about.

    Most of the rest of us are in the middle ground and believe with a little effort and competent leadership from health officials and politicians, we could easily avoid the worst of this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,851 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    My point is some posters seem to believe that the crisis in Italy and the insanity in Iran couldn't happen here.

    It can.

    I'm not optimistic at all on that front to be perfectly honest but they want to defend the HSE and how this country is run.


    It is not just the competence of a particular health service that is an issue.

    You can have the best health service in the world, but if people don't bother to follow instructions, continue to go on ski trips, fail to wash their hands, post repeated panicky advice on social media, keep going to work when sick etc., then the best health service in the world won't save you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    Waterford hospital closed down. Suspected case there.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This comes to mind!!!

    Those airports will be open!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,189 ✭✭✭Cilldara_2000


    Italy was the first country to ban flights from china

    This has been lost in the clamour for flights to be banned. On 31 January Italy banned flights from China. They had two confirmed cases at the time, two Chinese tourists. Their third case was on 6 February, an Italian repatriated from Wuhan. On 21 February they had 20 cases and we know the story since.

    Doesn't this indicate that banning flights is somewhat pointless?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,043 ✭✭✭sReq | uTeK


    iguana wrote: »
    He's my age but had underlying health issues.

    The directive for any body coming in now goes to HDU it's where they have isolation. Its standard procedure dont read too much into it


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 309 ✭✭Pseudonym121


    And where would the legally detained psychiatric patients go? Psych nurses aren't trained to give IVs etc. as well

    Well I’m saying if it got really bad there are lots of options to make beds. Psych wards also aren’t plumbed for supplementary O2 in the main so you’d be relating on canisters.

    As to nurses. Well, if it got bad enough you were using psych units for this and psychiatrists and psych nurses to provide care I’m sure they’d be leavened by a number of medical doctors and nurses to provide know how.

    If I were organising it I’d just pick a few centres to hold the involuntarily detained patients, transfer them all to those three or four centres and then use the empty ones for the moderate severity patients with COVID19.

    But this sort of thing would only happens if we were in reasonable worst case scenario territory.

    My goal was to illustrate that if things got bad our assumptions of what would and wouldn’t be possible would change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,147 ✭✭✭SafeSurfer


    iguana wrote: »
    I have the post-apocolyptic book Children of the Dust running through my head for the last few days. The family were well protected in their house eating tinned food, but all but one of the kids drank water from a tub and radioactive dust came down the chimney and contaminated it. So don't think I'm not a little concerned for me too. The only thing I'm 100% sure I'm safe on are my testicles.:pac:

    Apparently coronavirus damages the testicles.

    https://www.worldofbuzz.com/researchers-coronavirus-may-attack-testicular-tissue-leave-men-infertile-after-infection/

    Multo autem ad rem magis pertinet quallis tibi vide aris quam allis



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,109 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    1641 wrote: »
    I would be considered in the "at risk" category but not as majorly so as some others. I am of an age where a lot of those I'm close to would be considered highly at risk. I suspect some will not make it.

    I know of very few people not taking this seriously. Every time I check into this thread I mostly read posters who are taking it seriously (admittedly there are a few minimisers and even one outright denier). But what I don't find helpful are the few who are shouting "PANIC, PANDEMIC, SARS/HIV, 200,000 thousand dead, everyone is useless - don't believe them."

    I find some posters are the equivalent of the guy who rushes into the crowded cinema which is being orderly evacuated and shouts "FIRE,RUN NOW, BUT ITS TOO LATE - 20% OF YOU ARE GOING TO DIE ANYWAY, THE MANAGEMENT ARE ALL INCOMPETENT B*&^TARDS, THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT YOU, ONLY I DO" !


    I agree. But I don't and have never done that.

    Actually I mostly try and inject some humor but sometimes it seems to go over poster's heads :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,837 ✭✭✭quokula


    The maths of an epidemic aren't comparable to road death statistics.
    Image in being drunk was contagious and had a reproduction number of (R0) 2 to 3.

    In a very short period of time road deaths would shoot through the roof as the ratio of drunk to non drunk increased.

    Take it further and imagine we could just close the road with the drunk town and stop anyone who appears drunk.

    We do that to reduce road deaths anyway

    No the Maths of road deaths are far, far worse. And they continue long after the epidemic passes.

    In China there are over 1000 road deaths per week. There have been 3000 coronavirus deaths over approx 3 months. So even in ground zero of the crisis roughly one quarter as many people were killed by the virus as were killed by cars.

    The epidemic has now largely passed in China with fewer and fewer cases each day. Other countries have advantages China didn't in greater advanced knowledge of the virus, more knowledge of what treatments help, knowing to isolate people and the importance of hygiene steps etc.

    People point out that China took some extreme measures but only after the disease was rampant for 1+ months without any awareness whatsoever, and even after that period there was no awareness of what treatments were of benefit and what weren't. The steps China took beyond that are still open to everyone if things do start to get worse, but there's no evidence that that is happening yet.

    The odds of Ireland being hit half as bad as China are slim as we have advanced warning and half the population density, but even if we are, then proportional to our population, that will mean approx 10 deaths in total - equivalent to the number of road deaths in an average month.

    My post was in response to someone who said this thread should be reserved for posting whenever there were new cases and people trying to provide perspective should be shut down.

    But if you take any bad thing, whether it's coronavirus, suicide, road deaths, seasonal flu, heart disease etc, and you start obsessively following every single incidence of that thing occurring anywhere on the entire planet, you will start to get a wildly unrealistic perception of how likely that thing is to directly impact you or those around you and it's simply not healthy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    Drumpot wrote: »
    And there have been reported cases of healthy middle aged adults dieing for unexplainable reasons (Dr Bruce Aylward recent Channel 4 interview). Statistically speaking younger people’s chances are much lower but not zero.

    I don't think people fully understand that at all. Everyone is like oh I'm not old I'm safe. You may even have a health condition that you don't know about. Heart problems that are not that serious on their own.

    Even if it is one per cent. You could be unlucky and be that one per cent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Nijmegen


    Banning flights from Italy makes no sense anyway - they fly from anywhere else in Europe or travel to the UK.

    You'd have to ban all European flights to achieve a result.

    That's effective what they did internally in China.


  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Corbin Gifted Scab


    Surely Ricoverati con sintomi means recovering with syptoms!!:confused:
    And I speak about 7 words of Italian

    It means hospitalised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,339 ✭✭✭✭martingriff


    YFlyer wrote: »
    Even RTE had a short clip early last week that the person suspected of having the coronavirus to self isolate themselves from the rest of the household.

    All the students in the schools that have the coronavirus should be self isolated and not mixing with others.

    I agree with you. My post was a post was replying to someone what to do. He ranted our depending who you listen to our incompetent HSE (which they are) or an overseas health area and then had a rant so I asked what are others saying or doing. As far as I see it's the same as the HSE


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,109 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    deisedevil wrote: »
    Waterford hospital closed down. Suspected case there.

    Don't see anything relating to that.

    Link?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement