Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Dominance of Dublin GAA *Mod warning post#1*

19394969899323

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭tritium


    kksaints wrote: »
    Could play one in Nowlan Park and another in Portlaoise. The semi finals don't have to be a double header. If 36,000 showed up this year for 4 counties this year in Croker then Nowlan and Portlaoise should cope with 2 counties each quite easily.

    I don’t think dublin would be the ones objecting to that, though you might find other counties did once they realized the financial implications of not being able to milk the dublin cash cow as effectively.

    Of course you’d have posters on here pointing to a full house attendance and telling us it was further evidence of the death of football because there was more in Croker the year before (though it would probably still be more than at the Munster final)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    In a lot of ways it makes a lot more sense to bring weaker counties together than to split Dublin.

    For example, Longford/ Westmeath or Tipp / Limerick.

    Splitting Dublin doesn't make it any easier for Leitrim or Longford to compete.

    Its just makes it a bit easier for Tyrone or Donegal to compete.

    Again, it comes back to whether people want a solution, or simply want to put the boot into Dublin - as a place, because of the general resentment and begrudgery that is out there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,018 ✭✭✭Bridge93


    Yeah is it equity for all people want, or equity for the few at the top. The general tone here seems to be people still dont give a **** about carlow or Leitrim so long as Kerry and Mayo can win the odd all ireland. Why level the playing field between Cork/Galway and Leitrim when all most are interested in is pulling Dublin down to Kerry/Mayo/Donegal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    One way you could do it is that the club champions represents the county in the All Ireland series.

    That would be fairly radical, but its the way it was done in the beginning.

    And it would certainly even the playing field very dramatically.

    Having said that, would 80000 people show up to see Skryne vs Ballyboden? Not sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,370 ✭✭✭doc_17


    kyote00 wrote: »
    You are just embarrasing yourself now....

    In 2018, Dublin played Tyrone, Mayo and Galway away in the league.
    In 2018, Dublin played Wicklow in the championship opener in O'Moore park....

    In 2019, Dublin played Monaghan Roscommon and Kerry away
    In 2019 dublin played Louth and Tyrone away in Championship

    Maybe you should review that post. Were Louth and Wicklow away games? And Tyrone was, after 2 home games.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,880 ✭✭✭Happyilylost


    tritium wrote: »
    I don’t think dublin would be the ones objecting to that, though you might find other counties did once they realized the financial implications of not being able to milk the dublin cash cow as effectively.

    Of course you’d have posters on here pointing to a full house attendance and telling us it was further evidence of the death of football because there was more in Croker the year before (though it would probably still be more than at the Munster final)

    Dublin cash cow isn't what it was. As far back as 2012 the DCB wanted to remove themselves from Croke Park and this was refused by the GAA. Not Dublin's fault. Championship attendances were in line with the Tipperary hurlers last year. Ya the odd league game still throws up the odd big attendance but its disingenuous to say Dublin vs Mayo is all about Dublin. I would hazard a guess it has a lot to do with Mayo rather than Dublin alone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    omega man wrote: »
    Dublin’s success is because of HARD WORK too.

    Out of curiosity, can I ask you where do you think the funding goes specifically and how does that equate to our senior success? Give me some details and not one liners.

    No details provided I see.

    Genuinely interested to hear how people think a single GDO per club directly equates to our recent senior success.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    Dublin cash cow isn't what it was. As far back as 2012 the DCB wanted to remove themselves from Croke Park and this was refused by the GAA. Not Dublin's fault. Championship attendances were in line with the Tipperary hurlers last year. Ya the odd league game still throws up the odd big attendance but its disingenuous to say Dublin vs Mayo is all about Dublin. I would hazard a guess it has a lot to do with Mayo rather than Dublin alone.

    We discussed this earlier
    (I) Dublin attendances are well ahead of Tipp this year, when you strip out the two matches Dublin played outside of Croke Park (which were sell outs and would have drawn a much larger crowd in Croke Park).
    Avg 56000 to Avg 43000.

    (II) You are saying Tipp, when what you mean is All Ireland Hurling Finalists. Tipp didn't draw such big numbers last year when they were knocked out early.

    I agree with your point on Mayo. Per county population, they probably have the best turnouts - Monaghan also maybe.

    Nonetheless, Dublin in my view is a cash cow. And whats more, it has a lot of potential to grow numbers, if the LGFA can start drawing a crowd to semi final or quarterfinal games; or if the Hurlers can start filling Croke Park.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,880 ✭✭✭Happyilylost


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    We discussed this earlier
    (I) Dublin attendances are well ahead of Tipp this year, when you strip out the two matches Dublin played outside of Croke Park (which were sell outs and would have drawn a much larger crowd in Croke Park).
    Avg 56000 to Avg 43000.

    (II) You are saying Tipp, when what you mean is All Ireland Hurling Finalists. Tipp didn't draw such big numbers last year when they were knocked out early.

    I agree with your point on Mayo. Per county population, they probably have the best turnouts - Monaghan also maybe.

    Nonetheless, Dublin in my view is a cash cow. And whats more, it has a lot of potential to grow numbers, if the LGFA can start drawing a crowd to semi final or quarterfinal games; or if the Hurlers can start filling Croke Park.

    I didn't want to cherry pick figures but to be fair Tipp played a game in a reduced capacity game against Clare which would of got a lot more played elsewhere. And one of the games I gave Dublin credit for was against Kildare which was a double header which means a stand alone you would expect would of attracted less. So no. I don't buy Dublin are that far ahead. Leagues attendances are higher than any county fair enough but again there is an added cost of opening headquarters that regional stadiums do not face (I'm not talking about this random 30,000 figure that has been spouted but there is an added cost.) A number of counties bring in decent revenue. Dublin might be the top but they aren't that far ahead of a few counties. I think the GAA would worry more by a drop of interest in the Munster Hurling Championship rather than anything Dublin do.

    While it pains me to give an example just look at Dublin vs Galway All Ireland Semi Final in 2018 and Dublin vs Mayo this year in the All Ireland Semi Final in 2019. The opposition matter just as much as Dublin.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭TrueGael


    omega man wrote: »
    No details provided I see.

    Genuinely interested to hear how people think a single GDO per club directly equates to our recent senior success.

    Its very simple because WE pay your phalanx of underage coaches who create elite players

    it allows the lorryload of sponsors (AIG, Subaru, Aer Lingus https://www.dublingaa.ie/partners) money can be directly funneled into creating a professional IC setup (Altitiude Chambers, Cryotherapy ) and other such sports sciences that are light years beyind what anyone else could hope to afford, free meals from the food crowd free cars from Subaru

    Every other county board has to pay GDO's out of its pocket (as well as try an run IC teams with huge travelling and catering expenses) as the token amounts from Croke Park are just that - Token

    But of course none of those are advantages!!!!!!!!!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭TrueGael


    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    We discussed this earlier
    (I) Dublin attendances are well ahead of Tipp this year, when you strip out the two matches Dublin played outside of Croke Park (which were sell outs and would have drawn a much larger crowd in Croke Park).
    Avg 56000 to Avg 43000.

    (II) You are saying Tipp, when what you mean is All Ireland Hurling Finalists. Tipp didn't draw such big numbers last year when they were knocked out early.

    I agree with your point on Mayo. Per county population, they probably have the best turnouts - Monaghan also maybe.

    Nonetheless, Dublin in my view is a cash cow. And whats more, it has a lot of potential to grow numbers, if the LGFA can start drawing a crowd to semi final or quarterfinal games; or if the Hurlers can start filling Croke Park.

    Jesus Christ comparing a county with a tenth of the population, who had 2 (TWO) games at home in 2019 to the crowd who have a THIRD of the population who face no obstacle to travelling (and don't until the Final anymore)

    Lord help us...............................


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    TrueGael wrote: »
    Jesus Christ comparing a county with a tenth of the population, who had 2 (TWO) games at home in 2019 to the crowd who have a THIRD of the population who face no obstacle to travelling (and don't until the Final anymore)

    Lord help us...............................

    Good man, the religious references really move this along.

    I was responding to someone else making the comparison.

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    I didn't want to cherry pick figures but to be fair Tipp played a game in a reduced capacity game against Clare which would of got a lot more played elsewhere. And one of the games I gave Dublin credit for was against Kildare which was a double header which means a stand alone you would expect would of attracted less. So no. I don't buy Dublin are that far ahead. Leagues attendances are higher than any county fair enough but again there is an added cost of opening headquarters that regional stadiums do not face (I'm not talking about this random 30,000 figure that has been spouted but there is an added cost.) A number of counties bring in decent revenue. Dublin might be the top but they aren't that far ahead of a few counties. I think the GAA would worry more by a drop of interest in the Munster Hurling Championship rather than anything Dublin do.

    While it pains me to give an example just look at Dublin vs Galway All Ireland Semi Final in 2018 and Dublin vs Mayo this year in the All Ireland Semi Final in 2019. The opposition matter just as much as Dublin.



    The other thing here is that hurling attendances are substantially up, whereas football attendances are substantially down.

    I'd say its the first time in history that hurling is drawing consistently better crowds than football.

    I'm not making an argument to say its an apples and oranges comparison though.

    There are a few major reasons why football attendances are down, but the biggest one is that the games are crap which in turn reflects their one sided nature.

    At the moment, its fairly plain to see - next years championship we'll have a decent semi-final and decent final - which will most likely involve Dublin, Kerry, Tyrone or Donegal and one other - and after that the best games will be ones that are inconsequential for neutrals.

    Whereas the hurling is incredibly entertaining by comparison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭TrueGael


    Kerry Tyrone 2015 53,000 (on a ****ty wet day)
    Kerry Tyrone 2019 33,000 (on a lovely sunny day)

    It took a while for the penny to drop with the peasants (not for the prescient among us who could see the train coming down the tracks yonks ago) but the sheer irrelevance of what would and should be a big game has now dawned and its not turning back

    ''Pigs get fat Hogs get slaughtered''


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    TrueGael wrote: »
    Its very simple because WE pay your phalanx of underage coaches who create elite players

    it allows the lorryload of sponsors (AIG, Subaru, Aer Lingus https://www.dublingaa.ie/partners) money can be directly funneled into creating a professional IC setup (Altitiude Chambers, Cryotherapy ) and other such sports sciences that are light years beyind what anyone else could hope to afford, free meals from the food crowd free cars from Subaru

    Every other county board has to pay GDO's out of its pocket (as well as try an run IC teams with huge travelling and catering expenses) as the token amounts from Croke Park are just that - Token

    But of course none of those are advantages!!!!!!!!!

    Our GDOs create elite players, you’re talking pure nonsense. By the way the clubs fund 50% of the GDO cost.

    Free meals are a myth and your sports science rabble is off the charts.

    As you well know plenty of other IC players have personal deals with commercial organisations, not just Dublin players. There’s no free cars handed out to the panel.

    Tell me how much the DCB earn from sponsorship deals then as you seem to know it all?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭TrueGael


    omega man wrote: »
    Our GDOs create elite players, you’re talking pure nonsense. By the way the clubs fund 50% of the GDO cost.

    Free meals are a myth and your sports science rabble is off the charts.

    As you well know plenty of other IC players have personal deals with commercial organisations, not just Dublin players. There’s no free cars handed out to the panel.

    Tell me how much the DCB earn from sponsorship deals then as you seem to know it all?

    All you have to do is click the link to see the Catering Sponsors, you think the DCB are giving them free advertising without getting anything

    Same with Subaru, yes the odd player from elsewhere get cars (which I'm totally against btw) not EVERY player on the panel which is about 35-40

    AIG deal is a million a year, but shur if Carlow were smarter they'd be able to get AIG millions as well


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,370 ✭✭✭doc_17


    TrueGael wrote: »
    omega man wrote: »
    No details provided I see.

    Genuinely interested to hear how people think a single GDO per club directly equates to our recent senior success.

    Its very simple because WE pay your phalanx of underage coaches who create elite players

    it allows the lorryload of sponsors (AIG, Subaru, Aer Lingus https://www.dublingaa.ie/partners) money can be directly funneled into creating a professional IC setup (Altitiude Chambers, Cryotherapy ) and other such sports sciences that are light years beyind what anyone else could hope to afford, free meals from the food crowd free cars from Subaru

    Every other county board has to pay GDO's out of its pocket (as well as try an run IC teams with huge travelling and catering expenses) as the token amounts from Croke Park are just that - Token

    But of course none of those are advantages!!!!!!!!!

    And not having to fundraise from your beleaguered supporters who at the same time have to pay thousands of euro every year following the team the length and breath of the country also helps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    While some of you are on to the GAA querying our games development funding feel free to also ask about the 100m spent on pairc ui chaoimh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,388 ✭✭✭zetecescort


    omega man wrote: »
    While some of you are on to the GAA querying our games development funding feel free to also ask about the 100m spent on pairc ui chaoimh.

    Worth every cent. We got Westlife out of Croker, the Dubs are next


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    Worth every cent. We got Westlife out of Croker, the Dubs are next

    Can’t wait to watch the Dubs play there! However in the context of GAA funding and a ‘level playing field’ then it’s worthy of discussion is it not?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    Balymuns great response to RTE primetime.

    Ballymun Kickhams
    @BallymunGAA
    We've 6 players in this magnificent Dubs team! We developed facilities using fundraising events, and grant facilities that are open to all clubs, all around the country. Our super 6 had all natural talent that was nurtured by our volunteer coaches and you say money is the cause?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,029 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    omega man wrote: »
    Can’t wait to watch the Dubs play there! However in the context of GAA funding and a ‘level playing field’ then it’s worthy of discussion is it not?

    Not really. The Dubs have a free stadium to play in.

    PUC was falling down. It needed redevelopment. You can argue about the final cost but it would not be unusual in Ireland for a major project to overshoot it's budget unfortunately.

    These are all strawman arguments to be fair.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    Not really. The Dubs have a free stadium to play in.

    PUC was falling down. It needed redevelopment. You can argue about the final cost but it would not be unusual in Ireland for a major project to overshoot it's budget unfortunately.

    These are all strawman arguments to be fair.

    Everyone is doing their nut over 18m (over 10 years) but they can throw 100m on one county stadium and that’s a strawman argument!

    We don’t have a free stadium in Croker and in fact our fans through gate receipts over the years probably funded the rebuild of the National stadium.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    omega man wrote: »
    Balymuns great response to RTE primetime.

    Ballymun Kickhams
    @BallymunGAA
    We've 6 players in this magnificent Dubs team! We developed facilities using fundraising events, and grant facilities that are open to all clubs, all around the country. Our super 6 had all natural talent that was nurtured by our volunteer coaches and you say money is the cause?

    nobody disputes the development of club facilities. Dublin clubs are a credit for doing that
    they also leverage their local politicians very well

    what club in Longford or group of clubs were offered matching funding to hire a full time underage coach though?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 4,149 Mod ✭✭✭✭bruschi


    omega man wrote: »
    Balymuns great response to RTE primetime.

    Ballymun Kickhams
    @BallymunGAA
    We've 6 players in this magnificent Dubs team! We developed facilities using fundraising events, and grant facilities that are open to all clubs, all around the country. Our super 6 had all natural talent that was nurtured by our volunteer coaches and you say money is the cause?

    Dublin clubs and fans are taking a lot of this personal. I can accept that when people call it manufactured or financial doping, it is not giving credit to the hard work done by clubs.

    However, even with their own tweet, they are wrong. Shane Treanor is the most recent listed GPO for Ballymun, a role he has that is not available to every other club. That in itself is a major contributory factor to improved coaching both to players and to volunteer coaches to have a full time employee at the clubs disposal.

    Also, with regards to grants, and something I recall spoken about on here at the time, in 2017, 26 Dublin clubs got the maximum application of €150,000 grant. From recollection, only one other club in the rest of the country got the maximum grant allocation.

    So yes, the grant applications are absolutely available to all other clubs, but receiving them is not on the same par as Dublin clubs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,880 ✭✭✭Happyilylost


    omega man wrote: »
    Balymuns great response to RTE primetime.

    Ballymun Kickhams
    @BallymunGAA
    We've 6 players in this magnificent Dubs team! We developed facilities using fundraising events, and grant facilities that are open to all clubs, all around the country. Our super 6 had all natural talent that was nurtured by our volunteer coaches and you say money is the cause?

    @omega man. And I guess herein lies the crux of the issue. My club applied for a grant from Croke Park for the development of facilities three years in a row. We got the grant year three. (ironically we got two other grants the same year!) No proper explanation as to why it was refused other than we didn't meet the criteria please apply again next year. This delay in funding stopped us from adding B Teams at certain underage groups as we had no space to cater for them. I fully believe our development as a club was hugely impacted by this delay in grans. Since we got our funding we have gone out of our way to help other clubs in Galway apply for same. Refusal after refusal. It is soul destroying. (Before anyone says about looking for handouts when you put in your costing proposal the GAA will only pay a certain percentage of the cost the rest is done through fundraising.) My dealings with clubs in Dublin is they do not seem to have the same amount of problems being granted this money as clubs in Galway. I won't speak for the rest of country because I have no idea. But in Galway it is an issue. And as is national news our county board is no help.


    I will state again this isn't a Dublin problem nor am I putting blame on Dublin. Simply trying to highlight issues that other counties may be facing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    nobody disputes the development of club facilities. Dublin clubs are a credit for doing that
    they also leverage their local politicians very well

    what club in Longford or group of clubs were offered matching funding to hire a full time underage coach though?

    In response -

    (I) Do many clubs in Longford have over a 1000 kids as playing members. A lot of Dublin clubs would have this.

    (II) When you have that many underage, as well as all the senior teams, rest assured that one single coach does it really make a huge difference?

    Most kids will never be coached one to one by this individual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,798 ✭✭✭Tombo2001


    bruschi wrote: »
    Dublin clubs and fans are taking a lot of this personal. I can accept that when people call it manufactured or financial doping, it is not giving credit to the hard work done by clubs.

    However, even with their own tweet, they are wrong. Shane Treanor is the most recent listed GPO for Ballymun, a role he has that is not available to every other club. That in itself is a major contributory factor to improved coaching both to players and to volunteer coaches to have a full time employee at the clubs disposal.

    Also, with regards to grants, and something I recall spoken about on here at the time, in 2017, 26 Dublin clubs got the maximum application of €150,000 grant. From recollection, only one other club in the rest of the country got the maximum grant allocation.

    So yes, the grant applications are absolutely available to all other clubs, but receiving them is not on the same par as Dublin clubs.

    That's interesting - I suppose ultimately the difficulty with the conversation around financials is that we have a lot of imperfect information.

    By comparison for example the national lottery publishes each and every grant it hands out, its obvious then if something is not right or looks out of place.

    That doesn't happen at least on this discussion on boards, because simply of absence of information to draw any real conclusions.


  • Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    RedDevil55 wrote: »
    When you can't argue for Dublin keeping all their advantages you may as well start attacking the poster. Good luck to you.

    Again, why split Dublin to level the playing field? Why not amalgamate counties together? I mean, If you split Dublin in four, do they all then play in Leinster? That would mean there'd be 15 counties versus 6 in Munster. Why isn't that seen as an unfair advantage?
    RoyalCelt wrote: »
    He's obviously talking about home league games. Just another advantage Dublin have.

    Hmm, Dublin play their home league games in Dublin.....how is that an advantage again?
    Tombo2001 wrote: »
    In a lot of ways it makes a lot more sense to bring weaker counties together than to split Dublin.

    For example, Longford/ Westmeath or Tipp / Limerick.

    Splitting Dublin doesn't make it any easier for Leitrim or Longford to compete.

    Its just makes it a bit easier for Tyrone or Donegal to compete.
    Bridge93 wrote: »
    Yeah is it equity for all people want, or equity for the few at the top. The general tone here seems to be people still dont give a **** about carlow or Leitrim so long as Kerry and Mayo can win the odd all ireland. Why level the playing field between Cork/Galway and Leitrim when all most are interested in is pulling Dublin down to Kerry/Mayo/Donegal

    Bingo, people don't want a level playing field at all, they want to see their county win more, which is impossible at the moment.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,176 ✭✭✭omega man


    @omega man. And I guess herein lies the crux of the issue. My club applied for a grant from Croke Park for the development of facilities three years in a row. We got the grant year three. (ironically we got two other grants the same year!) No proper explanation as to why it was refused other than we didn't meet the criteria please apply again next year. This delay in funding stopped us from adding B Teams at certain underage groups as we had no space to cater for them. I fully believe our development as a club was hugely impacted by this delay in grans. Since we got our funding we have gone out of our way to help other clubs in Galway apply for same. Refusal after refusal. It is soul destroying. (Before anyone says about looking for handouts when you put in your costing proposal the GAA will only pay a certain percentage of the cost the rest is done through fundraising.) My dealings with clubs in Dublin is they do not seem to have the same amount of problems being granted this money as clubs in Galway. I won't speak for the rest of country because I have no idea. But in Galway it is an issue. And as is national news our county board is no help.


    I will state again this isn't a Dublin problem nor am I putting blame on Dublin. Simply trying to highlight issues that other counties may be facing.

    I completely accept your point at face value. Again as others have rightly said on here that this is a GAA issue. Transparency is required now more then ever with regard to the continuation, granting or refusal of funding.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement