Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

College Green Plaza -- public consultation open

Options
14849515354

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 37 celtcia


    prinzeugen wrote: »
    The problem with computer modelling is that it does not work. I have said this here many times.

    A computer, AI or whatever, cannot predict human behaviour. Its why we binned it! Bollox!

    Boeing did some outsourced modelling for the max...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 37 celtcia




  • Registered Users Posts: 15,919 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Route diversions for the closing of College Green for the Plaza trial for the next three Sundays....

    https://www.dublinbus.ie/News-Centre/General-News/Diversions-due-to-College-Green-Closures/


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    Cant wait to see this area hitting closer to its full potential these next few sundays! Even on suffolk street you can see street life blossoming beautifully with it being closed off to traffic. Dublin is a city truly destroyed by cars :(

    Everything east of christchurch, west of trinity, north of stephens green and south of parnell square should be completely private car and taxi free. Anything less is absolutely prioritising the comfort of a relatively small number of motorists over the citizens of the city


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    I’m assuming the trials will just close off traffic completely and not use the opportunity to try different options.

    One option that I think would work extremely well is to put all traffic to the north side of the green. During the trial, NB traffic could use bike lane and SB use the current NB lane. This would keep traffic moving through the area while also providing a plaza.

    I know people are keen in the idea of a full plaza but in practice this will have a significant effect on transport in Dublin. Keeping some traffic flowing in the area would help.

    Running the trials on a Sunday makes little sense as it does not test the full impact of the plans. The current CG can be quite nice on a Sunday given the reduced number of buses


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭trellheim


    The diversions list via Georges St southbound ... is that now a legal turn right from Dame St (its not even signalled if I recall ) ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,561 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    trellheim wrote: »
    The diversions list via Georges St southbound ... is that now a legal turn right from Dame St (its not even signalled if I recall ) ?

    There will be no buses coming *from* College Green, because none will be using stops on Dame Street beyond George's Street.

    There may be the odd taxi that has gone up Dame Street and then turns around using Trinity Street/Church Lane, but I would imagine it would be minimal.

    Therefore it's pretty safe to assume that the buses turning right from Dame Street to George's Street will largely have a free run, and won't need any filter lights.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    One of the largest advantages of having the green pedestrianized is this could then be used as a reason to narrow the road, and widen the paths on Dame Street which are dangerously congested almost 24/7. Cars and buses going through the Dame/George's st junction will be few so it seems like a no brainer gain for peds.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭trellheim


    MJohnston wrote: »
    There will be no buses coming *from* College Green, because none will be using stops on Dame Street beyond George's Street.

    There may be the odd taxi that has gone up Dame Street and then turns around using Trinity Street/Church Lane, but I would imagine it would be minimal.

    Therefore it's pretty safe to assume that the buses turning right from Dame Street to George's Street will largely have a free run, and won't need any filter lights.

    Thats not what I asked.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3442139,-6.2652862,3a,75y,86.23h,95.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saCkvy2ikfgMPnEyBb1M7Rg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192


    No right turn .

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3442107,-6.2646314,3a,75y,106.9h,98.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd-6sooLXVXyNxWgzW_k3Gw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

    filter ahead only.


    What I asked was, is it a legal turn. It does not look like it is.

    Nothing on DCC traffic news about the change to road signage or a temporary bus-only right turn.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    trellheim wrote: »
    Thats not what I asked.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3442139,-6.2652862,3a,75y,86.23h,95.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saCkvy2ikfgMPnEyBb1M7Rg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192


    No right turn .

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3442107,-6.2646314,3a,75y,106.9h,98.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd-6sooLXVXyNxWgzW_k3Gw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

    filter ahead only.


    What I asked was, is it a legal turn. It does not look like it is.

    Nothing on DCC traffic news about the change to road signage or a temporary bus-only right turn.

    Given the temporary nature of the closure I’d imagine there will be a Guard at that junction ensuring everything goes to plan.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,708 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    prinzeugen wrote: »
    The problem with computer modelling is that it does not work. I have said this here many times.

    A computer, AI or whatever, cannot predict human behaviour. Its why we binned it! Bollox!

    Who's the 'we' that binned computer modelling? There's an entire industry out there of human behaviour modelling in building design, evacuation design and more.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    Who's the 'we' that binned computer modelling? There's an entire industry out there of human behaviour modelling in building design, evacuation design and more.

    While I agree with what you’re saying and computer modelling does tend to be efficient at predicting transport movements he does have a point about human behaviour. This to me is the biggest barrier to driverless cars and will continue to be for years to come.
    I heard a fact that only 60% of construction accidents can be prevented and that the other 40% are due to human error which cannot be mitigated


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,561 ✭✭✭✭MJohnston


    trellheim wrote: »
    Thats not what I asked.

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3442139,-6.2652862,3a,75y,86.23h,95.36t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1saCkvy2ikfgMPnEyBb1M7Rg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192


    No right turn .

    https://www.google.com/maps/@53.3442107,-6.2646314,3a,75y,106.9h,98.72t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sd-6sooLXVXyNxWgzW_k3Gw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

    filter ahead only.


    What I asked was, is it a legal turn. It does not look like it is.

    Nothing on DCC traffic news about the change to road signage or a temporary bus-only right turn.

    I'm sure they can adjust this with a very quick change - but you also asked about there being no filter light for right turns, and I was just pointing out how easy it will be to handle this turn without one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,888 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Last Stop wrote: »
    Given the temporary nature of the closure I’d imagine there will be a Guard at that junction ensuring everything goes to plan.

    Very probably, as pedestrians will not be used to traffic coming from that direction.


  • Registered Users Posts: 920 ✭✭✭Last Stop


    Took a stroll around and while it was nice to see how the area would work, unfortunately my feedback is mainly negative.

    My main points would be:
    1. The events put in by DCC were very poor and reminded me of a 90s family day in a rural town (not good). There was no food places or even an ice cream van, no street performers etc.
    2. The area was dead. Extremely odd given the two matches in Croke Park and being peak tourist season. It felt like everyone was avoiding the area
    3. Some live music would have been a plus. Incidentally there was an orchestra playing the wood quay amphitheater.
    4. Traffic on the quays especially the northern one was very bad and filled with buses. Would like to see the effect on journey times
    5. There were barriers everywhere! For some reason over half on Dame St. was fully enclosed which made it quite narrow on the other side especially given the bike parking.
    6. There seemed to be a lot of confused tourists and I noticed several very stressed DB staff.
    7. Didn’t notice many DCC staff around either engaging or even just observing.

    In summary I would say today confirmed 2 things:
    1. ABP were correct to refuse planning
    2. DCC couldn’t organise a piss up in a brewery


  • Registered Users Posts: 921 ✭✭✭benjamin d


    I had planned on going for a nosey on College Green today but saw the pictures on twitter of the absolutely shambolic mess DCC made of the whole thing and stayed home. I made a point of going to South William Street yesterday and it was phenomenal, it felt like a lovely natural area for people to stroll around in and relax.

    What possible logic was there for those barriers? Surely a single barrier layer blocking each traffic lane at the edges is all that was required? I can only surmise that this was designed to elicit negative feedback about pedestrianising the area.

    It didn't even need to be an "event". Just open up the bloody space and let people enjoy it on its merits.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,907 ✭✭✭Stephen15


    Went into town to today to give it a try and was quite impressed. However the tents were a bit stupid and so were the barriers that were erected this was after they removed the barriers which made the whole thing much better. There was definitely no need for the whole event thing that was going on with security looked stupid and pointless.

    Even if it wasn't to be a full time plaza no reason why it couldn't be closed off to traffic every weekend or a t least every Sunday.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Spun through there earlier on the bike, plenty of barriers, Gardai dotted about the place, loads of metal barriers, a few stalls catering for families and stuff..

    Came off the quays which was moving fine, went up lwr. Bridge street, very little motorised traffic really, or anyone on bicycles either, exited by Westmoreland St, all the way down the quays to the point/east wall road... only traffic I came across was exiting the port tunnel...

    Overall, great idea, needs a lot more planning, works on widening the area for pedestrians would be great and so the bars/cafes could put more tables and chairs outside, and really develop the area for tourism and locals. Also putting cycle lanes in place would help two wheeled transport...


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Tenzor07 wrote: »
    Spun through there earlier on the bike, plenty of barriers, Gardai dotted about the place, loads of metal barriers, a few stalls catering for families and stuff..

    Came off the quays which was moving fine, went up lwr. Bridge street, very little motorised traffic really, or anyone on bicycles either, exited by Westmoreland St, all the way down the quays to the point/east wall road... only traffic I came across was exiting the port tunnel...

    Overall, great idea, needs a lot more planning, works on widening the area for pedestrians would be great and so the bars/cafes could put more tables and chairs outside, and really develop the area for tourism and locals. Also putting cycle lanes in place would help two wheeled transport...
    Middle of the summer just gives you an idea what it looks like. Not that useful in terms of information. Key thing is what happens to buses and how that affects the quays. Not sure what tourism there is to be had on Dame Street and I wouldn't be celebrating the already over-priced hostelries spreading out further.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Stephen15 wrote: »
    Went into town to today to give it a try and was quite impressed. However the tents were a bit stupid and so were the barriers that were erected this was after they removed the barriers which made the whole thing much better. There was definitely no need for the whole event thing that was going on with security looked stupid and pointless.

    Even if it wasn't to be a full time plaza no reason why it couldn't be closed off to traffic every weekend or a t least every Sunday.
    That I could see as a runner as you could organise regular events around it. The current plan is really aiming to shunt traffic out of that part of the city regardless of where it goes. That's what shot down the planning permission in the first place.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,919 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Next Sunday will be much better. Hopefully.

    When we email DCC to get their act together. They either want it or they don’t.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,919 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    Oh and agree with weekend closures for all traffic to the Plaza. Gets people used to it.

    Can only be a positive really now.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,635 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Middle of the summer just gives you an idea what it looks like. Not that useful in terms of information. Key thing is what happens to buses and how that affects the quays. Not sure what tourism there is to be had on Dame Street and I wouldn't be celebrating the already over-priced hostelries spreading out further.

    I've sat on a bus going through that area with about 10 other busses in a line queuing ahead of the one I was on, and as many behind, the area just can't sustain that amount of bus traffic...

    As for "Not sure what tourism there is to be had on Dame Street" :eek: it's basically the centre of tourism in that part of the city, crossing from Temple bar, to Trinity, all the pubs in the area, the wax museum, retail stores...!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    DCC ballsed it completely up. The barriers there ruined what could have been a sense of openness and easy pedestrian movement. Instead it was like trying to get into electric picnic or something but all that was inside was a face paint tent and a caricature guy. I'm really curious what the point of the barriers and the security was. The events were really sad, no food or music or activities.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    On a more positive note there is a new permanent right turn filter light at the dame/George st junction


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,919 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    cgcsb wrote: »
    On a more positive note there is a new permanent right turn filter light at the dame/George st junction

    Bus only?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,310 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Bus only?

    It was only an arrow


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Tenzor07 wrote: »
    I've sat on a bus going through that area with about 10 other busses in a line queuing ahead of the one I was on, and as many behind, the area just can't sustain that amount of bus traffic...
    The original idea was to push that problem elsewhere. In reality DCC don't really care as long it goes away.

    As for "Not sure what tourism there is to be had on Dame Street" :eek: it's basically the centre of tourism in that part of the city, crossing from Temple bar, to Trinity, all the pubs in the area, the wax museum, retail stores...!!
    Wax museum is on Westmoreland St. Most of that can be done from just outside Trinity anyway. I'd sooner give my money to a mugger than any of the pubs around there. I think it's an expensive vanity project with no obvious purpose apart from get the traffic off the street. As a weekend event spot, at certain times of year, it could work. Otherwise it would be a vast useless extent of concrete space, frequented by people we love to complain about.


  • Registered Users Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    cgcsb wrote: »
    DCC ballsed it completely up. The barriers there ruined what could have been a sense of openness and easy pedestrian movement. Instead it was like trying to get into electric picnic or something but all that was inside was a face paint tent and a caricature guy. I'm really curious what the point of the barriers and the security was. The events were really sad, no food or music or activities.
    And unfortunately indicative of what they are likely to do if they make it permanent.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,712 ✭✭✭BabysCoffee


    Went along today to see the open area / car free College Green

    While it was great that there was no traffic on the street everything else was really grim. Have a look on twitter under #CollegeGreen or #Streetsareforpeople to see the prison like barriers and security and large signs with rules

    Dublin City Council put massive barriers out that blocked off streets that were closed to traffic but also made them unusable by pedestrians - it also created pinch points on pavements and blocked off Dame Street to Temple Bar.

    It was completely soulless and it felt like when you are entering or exiting a concert arena and are placed in pens and corralled in to the venue.

    There were a few token tents with activities for kids but they didn't look up to much.

    All in all I think Dublin City Council missed an opportunity and stole the use of these streets from citizens today. Car free streets are in cities worldwide and are executed with ease - have to agree with the poster above who said that DCC could't organize the proverbial in a brewery.

    I would think that the concept of streets closed to cars should allow for restaurants to extend seating out on to the street for a convivial social atmosphere (that will also bring in revenue for the businesses) - see Mall on Duval for an example http://mallonduval.com/

    I'd urge anyone who went along to give feedback to Dublin City Council as big changes are needed before next Sunday


Advertisement