kitten_k wrote: »
Nothing confirmed yet but more than likely toward the later half of the month
OMG Necro sign me up already, would love another slow burner. Canâ€™t manage the faster ones with work
Necro wrote: »
Cool I'll prob hurl up a sign up thread when this game concludes. Will be limiting sign-ups to 17 so we don't over-run into yours or effect it
Ye can have COP though I'll use the other place - assuming sKeith is ok with that!
QB is gonna be my co-mod for this one btw
TheSkunk wrote: »
OMG Necro sign me up already, would love another slow burner. Can’t manage the faster ones with work
Clarabel wrote: »
Oh I'll have in on that too please. I'm away the next few days will ya hold me a spot
Necro wrote: »
I'll do better than that I'll consider you and TheSkunk already signed up
15 spots still open.
Drumpot wrote: »
What’s the story with the slow burner games? The quicker games are fun but intense and I can’t stay away from them. Would the same problem not exist in a longer game and the only difference is really that’s its much longer?
quickbeam wrote: »
[Necro, I'm disappointed ]
Necro wrote: »
:pac: I'm in second place after dying on Wednesday morning :P
Do you want me to gif bomb the place or something:D
Rikand wrote: »
Will be phone posting the whole way through averaging about 20 posts a day
We had quite a serious breach of the rules in the last game, although technically there was no breach as its not in the rules but should be obvious. A player, known they were dead, posted vital info in the shared br before we sorted permissions. It didnt have any bearing on the game overall as far as I can tell. Also we noticed players posted in the brs before the game went live on boards. Maybe we need to explicitally state this in the rules, no posting in the br untill game goes live or after you are announced dead. Probably not an issue for most games unless you are using a shared br setup like we did on hg.
Also noticed, as with most games, players accidently posting in their own accs in an anon. As I suggested to my co mods, maybe we should auto revoke ww forum permissions for ever player who signs up for an anon. Extra work for the forum mods so its something they would need to decide on. Im not sure how much of an affect on the game posting in your own acc has but I think its better it doesnt happen.
Finally, with all the interest currently in modding and playing, could we have a case for running bi monthly themed games. Might dilute the rosters but could give players a chance to get their favourite themes out there. Of course we have the slow burners running which are an excellent addition. Thoughts?
The PM discussion in the last game in particular pissed me off a lot, that is a hard and fast rule since the inception of the game here and they were openly discussed in the game thread on multiple occasions. We've had games broken over less so I'd ask again that players have a think about what they want to say publically and if it's even remotely near a line in the game rules PM the game mods and ask them first. It's only fair after they put in time and effort into the setup.
Baggly wrote: »
That's not true. Discussion of pms hasn't been a rule in every game ever. And it's not really a hard and fast rule if people have to subjectively decide whether they should ask a mod or not.
I agree using the info in a pm shouldn't be the way to go, but that's why we started posting the nrv pms in the OP: to remove the point of discussing pms. That seems to have been discontinued lately.
What happened in this game was someone said they didn't read the pm. They didn't quote it and didn't give any info from it. Just said they didn't read it. With all due respect, I don't believe that's actually clear cut tbh.
4) No posting of any PM's from the game mod or referring to the content of them.
5. All players will receive PMs, please no copying and pasting of PMs that we send you, nor will you be allowed copy and paste anything from any backroom you may or may not have. If you want to discuss the content of a PM with the village, please discuss it with the Mods first before discussing any PMs on thread.
Completely incorrect -
Baggly wrote: »
I didn't say it didn't feature in game 1. I said it hasn't been in every game.
If its a clear breach then its ups to game mods to adjudicate. I disagree it was a clear breach and disagree these things can be clear cut, so we can agree to disagree.