Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Armstrong Cup 2018-19

1234568

Comments

  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    St Benildus 3-2 Kilkenny. Last three games on Wednesday.

    Decent start for us - because the league fixtures don't change, we always get Kilkenny on the weekend of their annual dinner, so they typically have a full team for it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    cdeb wrote: »
    St Benildus 3-2 Kilkenny. Last three games on Wednesday.

    Decent start for us - because the league fixtures don't change, we always get Kilkenny on the weekend of their annual dinner, so they typically have a full team for it
    Another good reason why the fixtures should change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    cdeb wrote: »
    St Benildus 3-2 Kilkenny. Last three games on Wednesday.

    What happened in those games last night?

    Rathmines v Gonzaga A tonight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭Danville


    What happened in those games last night?

    Rathmines v Gonzaga A tonight.

    St Benildus 5 Kilkenny 3


  • Registered Users Posts: 290 ✭✭Rathminor


    Rathmines 2.5 Gonzaga A 5.5


  • Registered Users Posts: 290 ✭✭Rathminor


    Tonight’s results confirm Gonzaga as champions.
    The only team that can catch Gonzaga A for the title are Gonzaga B


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    So Gonzaga "B" are still in with a chance of taking the title ahead of their "A" team. But first they need a very big score against Dublin on this coming Saturday - not easy. In the last round the "B" team has the easier pairing (Dun Laoghaire) as opposed to the "A" team who play Balbriggan.
    I'll leave it to someone else to analyze the relegation "battle".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    The situation is complicated by the current deduction of points for non-registration.

    That makes the analysis of the relegation battle messy, and if both Gonzaga teams failed to get their points back then other clubs could win the Cup.

    In practice as we know the points are usually restored. Anyone know of exceptions?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Anyone who doesn't get the points back deserves to be relegated tbh

    They'll all be restored. But it's a good exercise all told


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Matters in the relegation zone will be a lot clearer after the remaining round 10 matches are played (two on Saturday and one next Monday).

    Assuming all clubs get their Reg deductions back, I think we can assume that Dun Laoghaire are doomed. They are 5.5 or more adrift of four clubs which have a match in hand, and with Gonzaga B to come DL cannot hope to survive. Even an improbable 8-0 win for them might well be insufficient.

    On the other hand, even if Balbriggan (37) are whitewashed in the last round by Gonzaga A they might survive. Rathmines and Dublin could both struggle to catch Balbriggan especially if the northsiders can score a point somewhere.

    Rathmines (with only St. Benildus to play) are 3.5 behind Balbriggan and, though they have improved their chances lately, they are probably favourites to go down with DL as it stands.
    However if Dublin (30 pts) were to be heavily whacked by Gonzaga B and still be in 11th after the weekend, then Rathmines prospects improve a bit.
    Dublin play Trinity in that very badly timetabled last round when the college club may find it hard (between exams and the Ennis congress) to turn out in strength. I will play if called on but I cannot speak for others.

    The other teams in the nether regions are all on 32.5 with two matches to go, and since Blanch plays Elm Mt on Monday, one or other or both should be safe after that. If not, Bray play Elm Mount in the last round which could yet be a significant match.
    Blanch play Kilkenny in round 11.

    Meanwhile Bray play Trinity on Saturday and we shall do our best to do Rathmines and Dublin a favour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    I heard that both the venue and the date of the last round might be changed. They both certainly should be!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 885 ✭✭✭DmanDmythDledge


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I heard that both the venue and the date of the last round might be changed. They both certainly should be!!
    Again?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Again?
    Better late than never.


  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Past_Pawn_99


    Trinity 3 - 5 Bray


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Can anyone explain why, in the current Armstrong table, all Trinity's points are deducted under "Reg" although in the posted list of unregistered players there are no Trinity Armstrong players, only two subs from the Ennis team?

    (And only some of the Ennis team's points are deducted.)

    It's impossible to make sense of the league table the way it is at present.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Can anyone explain why, in the current Armstrong table, all Trinity's points are deducted under "Reg" although in the posted list of unregistered players there are no Trinity Armstrong players, only two subs from the Ennis team?

    (And only some of the Ennis team's points are deducted.)

    It's impossible to make sense of the league table the way it is at present.
    Reg , or Reginald as he prefers to be called, is actually a mischievous gremlin. He is responsible for the nonsensical league table and the silly fixture list which now sees teams losing players for matches because their players are playing chess in Galway and Ennis. No doubt he is also responsible for the league not ending until sometime in the summer, whenever that may be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Joking aside, all players should be paid up and registered with the ICU BEFORE the leagues begin. What is happening at the moment is that some players don't pay at all and their clubs end up paying for them in an effort to avoid losing points. Advance payment and registration would stop teams importing players late in the season too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    Any result for Gonzaga B - Dublin ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Any result for Gonzaga B - Dublin ?

    4-4 Gonzaga had to field a weakened team because of the clash with Galway which is very unfair to Rathmines. Thanks again Reginald


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    In fairness, the LCU have long said they can't avoid clashes with every tournament and will only prioritise Leinster events and Bunratty. I think it's entirely reasonable. The leagues would never get finished if clashes with Limerick, Ennis, Cork, Galway, the Ulster championships, the Tory Island King of the Board tournament, etc, had to be avoided.

    The option was there to rearrange boards, which I know other clubs have done.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    cdeb wrote: »
    In fairness, the LCU have long said they can't avoid clashes with every tournament and will only prioritise Leinster events and Bunratty. I think it's entirely reasonable. The leagues would never get finished if clashes with Limerick, Ennis, Cork, Galway, the Ulster championships, the Tory Island King of the Board tournament, etc, had to be avoided.

    The option was there to rearrange boards, which I know other clubs have done.

    Clubs threatened with relegation are hardly going to facilitate opponents by rearranging games.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    Tough so.

    Also, weren't the LCU fixtures done before Galway was scheduled? Should the LCU have foreseen what weekend Galway was going to be on? Or should they have dictated to Galway what weekend to select?

    Not seeing what practical solution there is here.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25 undisputed


    One solution is to play all league matches just on weekdays. No weekend matches at all, maybe with exception for Kilkenny only.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 ChessPlayer123


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    4-4 Gonzaga had to field a weakened team because of the clash with Galway which is very unfair to Rathmines. Thanks again Reginald

    How is that unfair on Rathmines, but Gonzaga A fielding a 1300 against Rathmines isn't unfair on Dublin? Or is it unfair on Dublin too but you didn't say anything because the world revolves around Sodacat?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    How is that unfair on Rathmines, but Gonzaga A fielding a 1300 against Rathmines isn't unfair on Dublin? Or is it unfair on Dublin too but you didn't say anything because the world revolves around Sodacat?
    The Gonzaga 1300 is a lot better than that as he proved by drawing with an 1800. Dublin's final two fixtures are against a weakened Gonzaga B and a probably even more weakened Trinity (according to Tim) so yes it is unfair to Rathmines especially as we always get Gonzaga "A" AND Benildus in the final rounds and they are seldom weakened.
    Yes my world does revolve around Sodacat ,and those I love. If your world doesn't revolve around you then perhaps you need some therapy to deal with your low self esteem.


  • Registered Users Posts: 290 ✭✭Rathminor


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    Clubs threatened with relegation are hardly going to facilitate opponents by rearranging games.

    I understand that Gonzaga did ask to move some boards to midweek to avoid clashing with Galway, but Dublin (as is their right) refused.

    When we played Dublin earlier this year, Dublin were able to facilitate us by playing one board on a Saturday, although we were hoping to play 2 on a Saturday afternoon.

    I think it’s a challenge for both the league controller in trying to get 11 rounds into the calendar, whilst accommodating certain events and then for captains to get suitable dates for games that work either on Saturday afternoons or midweek evenings.


  • Registered Users Posts: 14 ChessPlayer123


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    The Gonzaga 1300 is a lot better than that as he proved by drawing with an 1800. Dublin's final two fixtures are against a weakened Gonzaga B and a probably even more weakened Trinity (according to Tim) so yes it is unfair to Rathmines especially as we always get Gonzaga "A" AND Benildus in the final rounds and they are seldom weakened.
    Yes my world does revolve around Sodacat ,and those I love. If your world doesn't revolve around you then perhaps you need some therapy to deal with your low self esteem.

    did Gonzaga "B" 1300 not beat a 1667? Giving him a better performance than Gonzaga "A"'s 1300? So unfair on Dublin in my opinion. And the Armstrong is a round robin league, so every team has to play Gonzaga A and Benildus, the point of the season you play them is irrelevant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭Past_Pawn_99


    did Gonzaga "B" 1300 not beat a 1667? Giving him a better performance than Gonzaga "A"'s 1300? So unfair on Dublin in my opinion. And the Armstrong is a round robin league, so every team has to play Gonzaga A and Benildus, the point of the season you play them is irrelevant.

    I agree with your first point but what time of the year you play certain teams is completely relevant. Certain teams are weaker or stronger at different times of the year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16 Kilmokey


    I have an idea can every team captain please submit to the League controller which round they will be submitting a weakened team so that the league fixtures can be done to accommodate Sodacat


  • Registered Users Posts: 213 ✭✭Pete Morriss


    cdeb wrote: »
    Also, weren't the LCU fixtures done before Galway was scheduled? Should the LCU have foreseen what weekend Galway was going to be on? Or should they have dictated to Galway what weekend to select?

    FYI the Galway Congress was scheduled last June.*mod snip* I don't know when the LCU arranged its fixtures, but if it wanted to avoid scheduling matches to clash it obviously could have done. It seems that the earlier statement that the LCU makes no attempt to avoid clashes with events outside Leinster, except Bunratty, is correct. Of course the LCU cannot "dictate" to Galway or anyone else - but it could attempt to liaise if it wanted to, which would benefit both other congresses and its own leagues.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Kilmokey wrote: »
    I have an idea can every team captain please submit to the League controller which round they will be submitting a weakened team so that the league fixtures can be done to accommodate Sodacat

    An excellent idea!! I would also appreciate it if Rathmines matches don't clash with Chelsea games and any major golf and horse racing events. If the new controller emails me I will provide a detailed list of unsuitable dates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    R 10 Elm Mount 2.5- 5.5 Blanchardstown


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    So Gonzaga A are officially champions and Dun Laoghaire are relegated. Too close to call who the other relegation team will be.

    Gonzaga A 58
    Gonzaga B 49.5
    Benildus 45.5
    Trinity 43.5
    Kilkenny 42
    Blanchardatown 38
    Bray 37.5
    Balbriggan 37
    Elm Mount 35
    Dublin 34
    Rathmines 33.5
    Dun Laoghaire 24.5

    Most matches in the last round will be significant (apart from Gonzaga B vs Dun Laoghaire And Kilkenny Vs Blanch - although Blanch may rest a little easier once they’ve a point or two on the board).

    Not to speculate too much but personally I’m excited to see what teams are turned out - would like to see David for Elm Mount, finally a full team from Rathmines (Haques and all) and Colm for Bray.

    Balbriggan have averaged 1.2 points against Gonzaga over the past 5 years and have lost to the 3 teams behind them (somehow! - they’ve only lost 4 matches total) so go down on tiebreak if it comes to a tie for 10th and 11th.

    In saying that, Rathmines will have a lot to do to get to that projected Balbriggan total of 38. They’ll need to beat a top 6 side for the first time this season; where their best score until now against a top 6 side is 2.5. However, they arguably have the strongest squad to choose from of the bottom 5 with Mel, 2 Haques, some Peter guy (never heard of him), Fiachra, and 3 others over 1800.

    Dublin will have an unknown quantity in trinity who could turn out a team that drew with Gonzaga A or that has 2-3 subs because of exams/other commitments. Dublin have managed only 2 wins this season but 4 draws and another draw would be enough to get them to 38.

    Lastly, Elm Mount take on their nemesis of the last round last year who beat them 4.5-3.5, Bray. Bray can technically strengthen on that team if both Colm and MDV play and they turn out a team similar to the one that played Gonzaga B. Elm Mount may be able to call on Dave to strengthen the top boards and they could do with their strongest team as Bray will likely have an 1800 on 8.

    Hopefully those matches are all played on the last day as it would be fascinating to watch.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    I see you are assuming all registration points will be restored but it's still unexplained why Trinity are docked all their points despite the fact that no player on our Armstrong team is unregistered.

    Dun Laoghaire nevertheless look like being in the Armstrong next season as they are 4 points clear in the Heidenfeld?
    Rathmines would have an outside chance if they could win their last match heavily.

    Something needs to be done about this registration issue next season. It's not right that it has brought unclarity to promotion/relegation issues with just one round to go.
    Maybe it's impracticable to expect all players to pay up in the early season, though I always do, but a much earlier deadline needs to be enforced (say Christmas?) after which no restoration of points is allowed.

    I have a double suggestion.
    a) Let clubs have an option to pay membership fees to ICU in advance for, say, two (maybe even four) new players. These could be students, new adult players, seniors returning after a long break from chess or genuine visitors from abroad (as opposed to "hired guns" who should pay a double fee, incidentally).
    These codes can then be assigned to last-minute subs or new arrivals as required, rather than chasing these (sometimes casual) players after the event for their money. I would think this should help college and school clubs especially.

    2) Nobody should be allowed play an ICU-rated tournament of any kind (including blitz and rapid) without paying their ICU sub for the season. When they enter a tournament their status is checked and they are told they must pay before being included in the draw for round 2.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    You had several unpaid players at the time points were deducted (start of March). The LCU did as they’ve always done and deducted every point from matches where those players were involved. I’m sure they will be restored as they always are once a new rating file comes out or once the league controller checks again - it’s unrealistic to expect him to check who has and hasn’t paid every day. These players had 6-7 months to pay their fees - this has always been the way of ensuring they do or will in fairly short order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Also, Dun Laoghaire look highly unlikely to be promoted. A revised table has them in 4th with 4 teams with games in hand likely to overtake them. Malahide were favourites to win that league but have since started very poorly against Enniscorthy; any of 7 others can claim some varying degrees of promotion chances.

    Curragh 45 10MP
    Celebridge 43.5 10MP
    Benildus 43 10MP
    Dun Laoghaire 42 10MP
    Ballinasloe, Phibsboro, Rathmines all on 41 9MP
    Malahide 38 8MP
    Bray 36.5 10MP
    Elm Mount 31.5 9MP
    Inchicore 31 9MP
    Enniscorthy 20.5 9MP


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 7,265 Mod ✭✭✭✭cdeb


    There is a strong argument that points deductions should apply in January instead of March alright. They could then be all cleared up by late Feb, giving no issues for the run-in in March.

    As always, of course, it comes down to volunteers helping out rather than typing on the internet.

    It does look like Rathmines up and down is quite likely alright


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    It is very clear to even the most obtuse that Rathmines are badly handicapped by having the same fixtures in the same order year after year as we always have to play Gonzaga "A" and Benildus in the last two rounds and those two teams always have close to their strongest line ups because they are always in contention for medals and because their players do not have to travel too far to the venues. The teams who get the middle ranked teams who have nothing left to play for or the teams whose players have to travel long distances get a MUCH easier ride. One just has tolook at the Six Nations rugby or any other league that I can think of to see that the order of fixtures is changed every year. This can easily be done while alternating the home/away situation between clubs but even if it didn't would a completely open fixture draw every season be such a bad thing once clubs still got five home and five away matches?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 917 ✭✭✭Ciaran


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    This can easily be done while alternating the home/away situation between clubs but even if it didn't would a completely open fixture draw every season be such a bad thing once clubs still got five home and five away matches?

    It should be a simple matter to do an open draw every second year and reverse the home and away the next year. It wouldn't be long before someone was complaining about being away to Kilkenny three years in a row with a fully open draw every year!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Ciaran wrote: »
    It should be a simple matter to do an open draw every second year and reverse the home and away the next year. It wouldn't be long before someone was complaining about being away to Kilkenny three years in a row with a fully open draw every year!
    Yes, that would be a perfect solution!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Good suggestion by Ciaran.

    Looking on the bright side, if it doesn't happen, Rathmines getting relegated (and not promoted from the Heidenfeld) would break the sequence of getting the same teams.

    It's not even really true, sodacat, if you go back two seasons.
    In 2016/17 Rathmines played Balbriggan in round 10 and Blanchardstown in round 11:
    http://www.chessleague.net/chessorg/leinster/fixtures.php?org=1&lid=85

    In 15/16 Rathmnines was in the Heidenfeld and in 14/15 Rathmines played the two Elm Mount teams in the last two rounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    That is only because promoted teams replace relegated teams. We had the same fixtures, just with venues reversed, in the same order this season as last.
    I am sure that Trinity would enjoy relegating their local rivals, Dublin, so start ensuring that you get a strong team out against them in may!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    That is only because promoted teams replace relegated teams. We had the same fixtures, just with venues reversed, in the same order this season as last.
    I am sure that Trinity would enjoy relegating their local rivals, Dublin, so start ensuring that you get a strong team out against them in may!

    We shall do our best to save you but you need to get all your big guns out on the last day, whatever the problems with school exams etc.

    At least the tie-break is in your favour if you can make up the half-point deficit on Dublin?

    I suspect it will come down to who is available on whichever date and venue is chosen. Personally I favour playing on the 12th May in Rathfarnham rather than out in ALSAA on the 19th. Both dates are bad for some people, between student exams, clash with Ennis on the 19th, and other factors. It's just far too late in the season.

    Meanwhile the league table has been updated. Some teams including Gonzaga are still missing a few Reg deductions and Blanchardstown are minus all their points at present.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    I suspect it will come down to who is available on whichever date and venue is chosen. Personally I favour playing on the 12th May in Rathfarnham rather than out in ALSAA on the 19th. Both dates are bad for some people, between student exams, clash with Ennis on the 19th, and other factors. It's just far too late in the season..

    I never heard the 12th in May being mentioned anywhere. What's that about?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I never heard the 12th in May being mentioned anywhere. What's that about?

    Well you are the one who posted on 19 March (page 25 of this thread):
    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I heard that both the venue and the date of the last round might be changed. They both certainly should be!!

    May 12 was the original date, though no venue was announced.
    I am going on what I've been told unofficially by our captain.

    The Aer Lingus club is only available on the 19th apparently but he tells me there is a move to have the matches (or some of them) played on the 12th after all at Colaiste Eanna, Rathfarnham.

    This is unofficial; I have no first-hand confirmation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Dun Laoghaire 1-7 Gonzaga B


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Dun Laoghaire 1-7 Gonzaga B

    So that is first, second and last places confirmed. Which leaves third place and the other relegation spot to be decided on 19 May, but LCU still have not made a definite announcement about the times that each division final is to be played, so far as I can see.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    benildus .5 Rathmines .5
    I hear that Trinity only have four or five players available for their match against Dublin on Sunday. If this is the case then either Trinity should get relegated for failing to fulfill their fixtures or we should get a play off against Dublin. It would be grossly unfair if we were relegated because of a combination of inept fixturing by the league controller and unacceptable behaviour by Trinity. If Trinity knew they weren't going to be able to field a decent team why didn't they contact the Controller and have their match v Dublin played in advance? The whole thing is a pathetic farce.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    benildus .5 Rathmines .5
    I hear that Trinity only have four or five players available for their match against Dublin on Sunday. If this is the case then either Trinity should get relegated for failing to fulfill their fixtures or we should get a play off against Dublin. It would be grossly unfair if we were relegated because of a combination of inept fixturing by the league controller and unacceptable behaviour by Trinity. If Trinity knew they weren't going to be able to field a decent team why didn't they contact the Controller and have their match v Dublin played in advance? The whole thing is a pathetic farce.

    I am not the captain and I don't know where you got your information. I don't know how many players we shall have (it was four a few days ago) but I will play and do my best. Probably this will be the last league game I play for anyone, certainly for Trinity.

    Our captain, as I understand it, entered the Ennis Congress before the LCU changed the date of the last round. Even the original date was far too late in the year, falling in the middle of student exams.
    Also Trinity has to field an Ennis team in the same session. I have no idea whether there will be a full team for that.

    I believe our captain asked for games or the whole match to be played in advance but Dublin wouldn't agree because of course they want to exploit the situation.

    LCU cannot penalise us for their mistakes but I agree you should get a challenge match against Dublin to decide the relegation spot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    You can join Rathmines Tim!
    Not very sporting of Dublin to decline a reschedule but no surprise as sportsmanship seems to be a thing of the past these days . The only fair way of solving what is a very unfair situation is a play off between Dublin and Rathmines. Then again, maybe Benildus could do a "trinity" a field a vastly weakened team, that would teach Dublin a lesson.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement