Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread VII (Please read OP before posting)

1306307309311312325

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,458 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    Roger_007 wrote: »
    I've never heard any of the hard brexiteers explain why it is preferable to be a relatively small player in WTO than being a big player in the EU.
    Because the brexiters* are only interested in removing EU co-operation and oversight from the UK which they want to turn into a low-tax, low-regulation environment for their own personal gain.

    * Not 'brexiteers' which provides these crooks with a sheen of derring-do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,154 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    So... is the plan this?

    1. reject No-Deal.
    2. Extension gets rejected or accepted.
    3. Vote either May-Deal (with some small change if there is an extension?) or revoke A50.

    Result - feck knows.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    All this talk of zero tariffs from EU to NI just clouds the issue. If NI is outside the SM, then IRL will have to put up a border to protect the EU's market, so I see no reason why the UK is taunting the WTO. All so they can say their not putting up a border. However their actions are causing the border.
    This might be the time to open a NI business "Gerry T trading" and manage the shipment/sales of goods from NI to the rest of the UK !


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,873 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mod: Please stop using insults or I'll have to start issuing sanctions. Posts deleted.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,974 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Heres the idiot projecting his own personal ethics of acting in bad faith during negotiations onto the EU in any future trade deal, the only party who has acted in bad faith thus far is the tory government

    https://twitter.com/VictoriaLIVE/status/1105777683177172992


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,210 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    First Up wrote: »
    NI is not a separate jurisdiction. It is part of the UK and will be treated as such by WTO. Unless there are procedures between NI and Britain of course, which remains the most practical solution outside of the whole UK being in a CU

    D'you know what? I think Theresa May has already started the process of shafting of the DUP. Revenge served cold.

    As discussed above, this new 12-month no/low tariff regime is of very little importance in the grand scheme of things, except for one corner of the UK. While a steel manufacturer in India or a gagdet maker in China or a sweat-shop knicker-weaver in Bangladesh will be too far away or tied into existing arrangements to exploit the NI back door, there's one group of home-grown ... entrepreneurs :rolleyes: who will be agile and crafty enough to exploit it.

    Now the UK says publicly they're not going to impose checks on the NI-RoI border, and they're not going to even try collecting import duties - but will check and charge duties on goods entering GB.
    The Government insists that this will not create a border down the Irish Sea, as there will be no checks on goods moving between Northern Ireland and Great Britain.
    Instead, normal compliance and intelligence methods will be used to detect any traders attempting to abuse the system.
    Well, the only way they're going to be able to apply "normal compliance and intelligence methods" will be to have checks on trade across the Irish Sea, meaning anyone wanting to manipulate the situation to their advantage only has to ensure that a sufficient number of abuses are discovered to require HMRC to carry out more and more checks, until an effective hard border is created between NI and GB.

    If I was a member of the DUP, I would be very worried by this sudden change in the wind, as summarised by the Belfast Telegraph headline
    Northern Ireland 'wild west of UK' - PM's no-deal Brexit plan treats region differently to Britain


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,827 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    nice_guy80 wrote: »
    its called politics
    Bertie knows the game

    Cox couldn't really lie. Every AG is terrified of ending up in a 2 year Chilcott Inquiry situation a decade from now when they should be should be enjoying themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,776 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    D'you know what? I think Theresa May has already started the process of shafting of the DUP. Revenge served cold.

    As discussed above, this new 12-month no/low tariff regime is of very little importance in the grand scheme of things, except for one corner of the UK. While a steel manufacturer in India or a gagdet maker in China or a sweat-shop knicker-weaver in Bangladesh will be too far away or tied into existing arrangements to exploit the NI back door, there's one group of ... entrepreneurs :rolleyes: who will be agile and crafty enough to exploit it.

    Now the UK says publicly they're not going to impose checks on the NI-RoI border, and they're not going to even try collecting import duties - but will check and charge duties on goods entering GB.
    Well, the only way they're going to be able to apply "normal compliance and intelligence methods" will be to have checks on trade across the Irish Sea, meaning anyone wanting to manipulate the situation to their advantage only has to ensure that a sufficient number of abuses are discovered to require the HMRC to carry out more and more checks, until an effective hard border is created between NI and GB.

    If I was a member of the DUP, I would be very worried by this sudden change in the wind, as summarised by the Belfast Telegraph headline
    Northern Ireland 'wild west of UK' - PM's no-deal Brexit plan treats region differently to Britain

    As has already been noted the goods will still be dutied on import to the EU, so there is no change for the UK in that regard.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,847 ✭✭✭intellectual dosser


    Northern Ireland poised to get the best of both worlds and become a hive of economic activity, will the DUP actually come out against the Tarriff proposals?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 418 ✭✭Duane Dibbley


    Even Farage saying in the EU Parliament the EU should Veto the extension and move on. I agree with him for once


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,381 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    Calltocall wrote: »
    Watching live sky news coverage of brexit with Adam Boulton and some fella in the background keeps interrupting and singing we’re not going to brexit, no we’re not going to brexit, we’re not going to brexit anymore, hilarious, make that man prime minister!

    That lad has been around for months!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,655 ✭✭✭Infini


    Hurrache wrote: »
    Just in case anyone over there missed his spoken interviews, Verhofstadt tweets it for emphasis.

    https://twitter.com/guyverhofstadt/status/1105784292553211907

    Pretty clear from that alone that an extention isnt happening unless theres a significant development in Westminster. Basically walk GB or Quit this nonsense already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,067 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The Government insists that this will not create a border down the Irish Sea, as there will be no checks on goods moving between Northern Ireland and Great Britain.
    Instead, normal compliance and intelligence methods will be used to detect any traders attempting to abuse the system.

    What compliance checks and what will they be checking?

    There are no tariffs at the NI border, as such there are no tariffs payable. Under what jurisdiction would they stop goods coming from NI, with all the required tariffs (ie zero) already paid being imported into GB at the correct tariff rate (ie zero).

    There is nothing they can do to stop it. And nothing the EU will do once the goods meet their tariffs regime. So, French wine for example gets a tariff of 10% (I didn't look it up as its an example). So instead of paying the tariff and customs checks at Dover they reroute through Dublin-NI-GB.

    Can't see any issues in terms of tariffs of compliance in that scenario


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,210 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Inquitus wrote: »
    As has already been noted the goods will still be dutied on import to the EU, so there is no change for the UK in that regard.

    That's not the point. Anyone can import selected goods into NI at a rate different to that which would apply in GB. There only needs to be a significant volume of dubious transfers from NI to GB to trigger additional controls on that trade. There's one side of the political divide in NI who would see that as an easy way to get one over on their opponents. The monetary value of the exercise would be irrelevant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,267 ✭✭✭joeysoap


    Is it not the attorney generals job (any attorney general including our own) to examine the legal consequences of any proposal put in front of him/her and say what those consequences are. I can vaguely remember our AG saying that before the president signs a piece into law that he/she wasn’t happy with it and referring it to some other body. Cox might well have worded it differently but if that’s how he saw it..........


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    What compliance checks and what will they be checking?

    There are no tariffs at the NI border, as such there are no tariffs payable. Under what jurisdiction would they stop goods coming from NI, with all the required tariffs (ie zero) already paid being imported into GB at the correct tariff rate (ie zero).

    There is nothing they can do to stop it. And nothing the EU will do once the goods meet their tariffs regime. So, French wine for example gets a tariff of 10% (I didn't look it up as its an example). So instead of paying the tariff and customs checks at Dover they reroute through Dublin-NI-GB.

    Can't see any issues in terms of tariffs of compliance in that scenario

    Other than avoiding the queue at Dover though, any cost the importer is trying to save being imposed by avoiding the tariffs will be matched by the extra transport cost. Still end up with their product costing more on the shelf in the UK, just the Irish get to collect a bit more in fuel duty from filling up the lorries on their long round trip.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,381 ✭✭✭✭Hurrache


    The EU throws its hat into the UKs plans for a no tariff regime in NI
    https://twitter.com/tconnellyRTE/status/1105794665817747456


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,697 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    I really don't understand the No Deal vote tonight. No Deal happens by default if they can't agree something. Are they really wasting time and energy to vote on something that will happen anyway if they can't agree on what should happen next?

    What's the point? All it's poised to do is humiliate them as there's a strong chance they'll vote to say they don't want to proceed with a No Deal scenario, and then by March 29th when they can't agree on an alternative, that's exactly what will happen anyway. Or, they apply for an extension which would have to be on the basis of a second referendum or a general election. Both of which could still end up with a No Deal scenario anyway.

    This is ending up becoming an even greater clusterf*ck than I think most even thought it might.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,686 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    No deal is the default option, it can't actually be taken off the table, can it? This vote is absolutely pointless again.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    I can see a slight point behind having the vote against no-deal tonight as when it's agreed that no-deal isn't what anyone wants that makes the vote for asking for an extension more likely to pass. If they just went straight for the asking for an extension vote then that would almost certainly fail.

    They still need to figure out why they are going to ask for an extension of course, but they might stick amendments in to clarify that tomorrow.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,067 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    The vote tonight is meaningless, it was put there to try to influence the vote yesterday on the basis that voting down TM's deal would lead to No deal being taken off the table which would then lead to extension/delay to Brexit.

    It, obviously, didn't work. But they have to go through the charade now that they created it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    re: HMRC not checking goods entering NI
    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/northern-businesses-have-been-hung-out-to-dry-industry-leaders-1.3824145

    So let me get this straight,

    brexiteers have claimed that the EU would throw Ireland under a bus, which did not happen, if anything EU repeteadly stood up for us

    While here we have UK throwing NI under the bus



    Madness.

    In this this new arrangement is there any legal impediment to an Irish exporter sending their good to the UK market via NI
    I would imagine there been massive logistical issues, but would it be unlawful.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,776 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    joe40 wrote: »
    Madness.

    In this this arrangement is there any legal impediment to an Irish exporter sending their good to the UK market via NI
    I would there been massive logistical issues, but would it be unlawful.

    It would be lawful and allowed unless and until the UK puts up a border in the Irish Sea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,394 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    re: HMRC not checking goods entering NI
    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/northern-businesses-have-been-hung-out-to-dry-industry-leaders-1.3824145

    So let me get this straight,

    brexiteers have claimed that the EU would throw Ireland under a bus, which did not happen, if anything EU repeteadly stood up for us

    While here we have UK throwing NI under the bus

    Given the tariff schedule, it's more like the UK throwing itself under the bus.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Send ERG and DUP to Brussels next time to negotiate.

    These guys are so pathetic, sniping from the sidelines but never prepared to take to the field or get involved in negotiations. And if you ask them if May should step down or one of them wants to be leader they always say No. Hopeless bunch.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,758 ✭✭✭Laois_Man


    I feel like the only one who sees tonight's vote as an important exercise. It is phenomenally historic if tonight's vote results in majority support for no deal. NO deal Exit will be so, as per T May's statement last night.

    That being extremely unlikely, it is still worthwhile to have a formally recorded vote as to how many MPs want to avoid a "no deal" - as of now, it is untested formally and having the view confirmed does play a useful part in setting the path forward.

    Amazingly, on Sky News, they still have Brexiteers going on about having to keep "no deal" on the table as it is needed for a stronger negotiating position. When will these pillocks get it thru their head....THERE ARE NO, AND WILL BE NO FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS HAPPENING!!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,873 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Penn wrote: »
    I really don't understand the No Deal vote tonight. No Deal happens by default if they can't agree something. Are they really wasting time and energy to vote on something that will happen anyway if they can't agree on what should happen next?

    What's the point? All it's poised to do is humiliate them as there's a strong chance they'll vote to say they don't want to proceed with a No Deal scenario, and then by March 29th when they can't agree on an alternative, that's exactly what will happen anyway. Or, they apply for an extension which would have to be on the basis of a second referendum or a general election. Both of which could still end up with a No Deal scenario anyway.

    This is ending up becoming an even greater clusterf*ck than I think most even thought it might.

    Surely a People's Vote is the only way forward if this passes. The EU will likely veto an extension as it would be a waste of time otherwise. They might accommodate a general election but at the moment it looks like the Tories would win again.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,210 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    There's a more comprehensive list here. Gives commodity codes and breaks it down by product.

    Some issues trying to figure it out because you have things like this:


    I'm assuming the 6.8 is a percentage, otherwise it doesn't make sense to separate it out.

    Edit: And now there's a spreadsheet for your ease of use.

    :confused: Is that a list of exceptions to the zero-tariffs? I.e., if it's not on the list, I can export tariff-free to the UK? Because if so, the Brits can continue to drink continental beers, wines and spirits (other than rum) at no extra charge.

    But I thought the Brexiteers said that France (amongst others) would be demanding a great FTA to save their wine producers, and Spain would want one to save their tomato growers? And now the UK is going to give them unconditional free access to the UK market because ... they need us more than we need them??? :confused:

    How many feet does the UK have left to shoot?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    Laois_Man wrote: »
    I feel like the only one who sees tonight's vote as an important exercise. It is phenomenally historic if tonight's vote results in majority support for no deal. NO deal Exit will be so, as per T May's statement last night.

    That being extremely unlikely, it is still worthwhile to have a formally recorded vote as to how many MPs want to avoid a "no deal" - as of now, it is untested formally and having the view confirmed does play a useful part in setting the path forward.

    Amazingly, on Sky News, they still have Brexiteers going on about having to keep "no deal" on the table as it is needed for a stronger negotiating position. When will these pillocks get it thru their head....THERE ARE NO, AND WILL BE NO FURTHER NEGOTIATIONS HAPPENING!!

    I agree with this. An extension will be hard enough to get but passing this vote will help.
    A large number of the people rejecting Mays deal are doing so in order to frustrate the Brexit process or achieve softer Brexit.
    This vote will give a definitive number on the hard brexiteers and DUP clowns.

    As for the last bit I heard Nigel Dodds at the same nonsense. They think this process is like buying a used car, don't let the salesman know you are keen.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,991 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    D'you know what? I think Theresa May has already started the process of shafting of the DUP. Revenge served cold.
    The problem is that her revenge is being taken out on all residents in NI.
    For all the love the British government have for NI, they've a funny way of showing it!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement