Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Waggle your 'Joystick' - Post your 3Dmark Scores here

Options
1…6791112…14

Comments

  • Options
    #242
    Metric Tensor
    Registered Users Posts: 3,724 ✭✭✭Metric Tensor


    I fear this is a bit of a blog for me at the moment but this is my last post for the time being (I promise):

    I've settled on a modest 4.5GHz overclock on the 6700k with a max Voltage of 1.315V (stock for me was 1.282V).

    And I've pushed an extra 145MHz onto the 1070 GPU Clock and 300MHz onto the GPU Memory Clock. I didn't trying upping the voltage on the 1070.

    Yielding:

    TimeSpy 1.0: 6337 (Up from 5880 at stock after build)
    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20305981?

    Firestrike 1.1: 16573 (Up from 15246 at stock after build)
    http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/20306028?


  • Options
    #243
    Samuel T. Cogley
    Registered Users Posts: 10,684 ✭✭✭✭Samuel T. Cogley


    TimeSpy : 7540

    Firestrike : 18290

    This is my daily driver config ang I think I have everything OC'd just so - so no more head room :(


  • Options
    #244
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Didn't bother with a Firestrike run. I just done a fresh run or TimeSpy in anticipation of the new TimeSpy Extreme that will be out later this month.


    TimeSpy: 5655


  • Options
    #245
    lmimmfn
    Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    Everything overclocked, 1080Ti, 6800K:
    Firestrike - 22643
    Timespy - 9396
    Only did the Timespy once, got bored testing the card and have since been gaming :)


  • Options
    #246
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Not bad scores at all. Did you hit a overclocking limit with the CPU or did you not want to push it too much?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #247
    lmimmfn
    Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    Thanks, I had it at 4.2 but every 7 or 8 days would crash( even though stable with prime95 for 5-6 hours and tbh didnt spend that long overclocking it ) so i just reduced it to 4.0 for 24/7 and loosened the memory timings. Kid uses it a lot to watch youtube, any instability is 110% not worth the grief lol.
    Ill take a look at it sometime again, definitely wont go far above 4.2, needs far to much juice.


  • Options
    #248
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    lmimmfn wrote: »
    Thanks, I had it at 4.2 but every 7 or 8 days would crash( even though stable with prime95 for 5-6 hours and tbh didnt spend that long overclocking it ) so i just reduced it to 4.0 for 24/7 and loosened the memory timings. Kid uses it a lot to watch youtube, any instability is 110% not worth the grief lol.
    Ill take a look at it sometime again, definitely wont go far above 4.2, needs far to much juice.

    Yea afair, those x99 chips didn't overclock that well. The newest x299 skylake-x chips seem to overclock fairly high a bit like the skylake, kaby lake and coffee lake chips.


  • Options
    #249
    lmimmfn
    Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    yeah, they suck at overclocking tbh. I only built this in April( minus 1080Ti ), was going to go Ryzen but didnt like the memory situation at the time and number of dimm slots. Skylake i knew would be too expensive and not very robust initially so just went with an older x99 build to replace my aging 7-8 year old x58.
    Great to see AMD shake up the market, now a Threadripper build would be nice lol


  • Options
    #250
    Gehad_JoyRider
    Registered Users Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Gehad_JoyRider


    I just ran my system and got this but then discored my ram was at 2400 :mad:

    https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/22739154


  • Options
    #251
    lmimmfn
    Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    Gehad_JoyRider wrote: »
    I just ran my system and got this but then discored my ram was at 2400 :mad:

    https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/22739154
    Your GPU ram should clock higher too


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #252
    Gehad_JoyRider
    Registered Users Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭Gehad_JoyRider


    lmimmfn wrote: »
    Your GPU ram should clock higher too

    yep not to much point at the moment as I'm running 1080p but in 9 days I should have a new monitor :D [edit holding out for black friday]

    so then the overclock happens ram is still a pain in the ass


  • Options
    #253
    lmimmfn
    Registered Users Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    Gehad_JoyRider wrote: »
    yep not to much point at the moment as I'm running 1080p but in 9 days I should have a new monitor :D [edit holding out for black friday]

    so then the overclock happens ram is still a pain in the ass
    lol, yeah, definitely something that would be at the bottom of my favorite tech activities


  • Options
    #254
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    I thought I would resurrect a old thread for the new year. See how people fair with all the spectre and meltdown patches.


    Timespy: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5638722


  • Options
    #255
    Venom
    Registered Users Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    My 1070 showing its age.


    Timespy: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5640605


  • Options
    #256
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    @Venom I need a better CPU. Vega 2 will be interesting.

    I decided to beat my last score.

    Timespy: https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5640095


  • Options
    #257
    Venom
    Registered Users Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    Yeah AMD really needs to get back into the GPU market as Nvidia are just taking the piss at this stage.


  • Options
    #258
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Venom wrote: »
    Yeah AMD really needs to get back into the GPU market as Nvidia are just taking the piss at this stage.

    They do alright but I made a mistake I was suppose to say Ryzen 2 will be good when released later this year. Hopefully we hear more at CES.


  • Options
    #259
    Venom
    Registered Users Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    wotzgoingon wrote: »
    They do alright but I made a mistake I was suppose to say Ryzen 2 will be good when released later this year. Hopefully we hear more at CES.


    I think there was talk around the start of December, that there would be a GPU announcement alongside the Ryzen 3 one coming from AMD around CES.


  • Options
    #260
    MiskyBoyy
    Registered Users Posts: 8,798 ✭✭✭MiskyBoyy


    Still playing around with overclocks

    Firestrike 24,046


  • Options
    #261
    Shlippery
    Registered Users Posts: 2,255 ✭✭✭Shlippery


    Just started experimenting with this 3dMark stuff, somewhat addictive.

    https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/32005919?

    Not sure why its whinging about my graphics driver.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #262
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    Shlippery wrote: »
    Just started experimenting with this 3dMark stuff, somewhat addictive.

    https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/32005919?

    Not sure why its whinging about my graphics driver.

    You must be on the latest beta driver I am assuming and not a WHQL approved one. https://benchmarks.ul.com/support/troubleshooting?redirected=true#


  • Options
    #263
    BArra
    Registered Users Posts: 4,032 ✭✭✭BArra


    have an 8700k overclocked to 5ghz

    https://www.3dmark.com/spy/4770886


  • Options
    #264
    TitianGerm
    Registered Users Posts: 27,817 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    I can't post mine for some reason but got 4527 with a 1060 and Ryzen 1700. Didn't overclock anything.


  • Options
    #265
    cherryghost
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 17,133 Mod ✭✭✭✭cherryghost


    One of my laptops:
    https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5410039

    My main PC. Think 6k is a bit meh for the specs, would be expecting 6.5k or higher
    https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5669725

    EDIT: Just realized vsync is enabled. Will have to test again later.


  • Options
    #266
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    TitianGerm wrote: »
    I can't post mine for some reason but got 4527 with a 1060 and Ryzen 1700. Didn't overclock anything.

    When the benchmark is finished press the button compare in orange I think and it opens up a webpage and just copy and link that webpage.


  • Options
    #267
    TitianGerm
    Registered Users Posts: 27,817 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    Finally got around to running Time Spy again. Will be installing my new 2060 over the weekend so i'll re-run and post the results then.

    https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/33179826?


  • Options
    #268
    Luck100
    Registered Users Posts: 878 ✭✭✭Luck100


    Just built my first new rig in 6 years!

    https://www.3dmark.com/spy/5577983


  • Options
    #269
    Skerries
    Registered Users Posts: 12,306 ✭✭✭✭Skerries


    Timespy with no overclocking on CPU or GPU

    https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6034617
    Untitled Image




  • Options
    #270
    OmegaRed
    Registered Users Posts: 1,051 ✭✭✭OmegaRed


    Hi Folks, tried running this last night (downloaded 3dmark from Steam) and tried running firestrike. PC hangs and becomes unresponsive just after starting where it says gathering system details. Any thoughts what might be going on here?

    Thanks,


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #271
    wotzgoingon
    Registered Users Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    OmegaRed wrote: »
    Hi Folks, tried running this last night (downloaded 3dmark from Steam) and tried running firestrike. PC hangs and becomes unresponsive just after starting where it says gathering system details. Any thoughts what might be going on here?

    Thanks,

    What is your system specs?


Advertisement