Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Car bomb has exploded in Derry City Centre

1151618202126

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,593 ✭✭✭Wheeliebin30


    Britain, Germany and Japan were thriving 20 years after a global war that made the Troubles look like a pillow-fight in comparison. Blaming the Troubles for current economic malaise is just stupid.

    Britain didn’t thrive.

    That’s a big reason for Brexit.

    They never felt they won the war as Germany boomed and Britain didn’t after the war.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Britain didn’t thrive.

    6034073


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    In fairness Thomas provides detailed replies. Aegir replies to detailed replies with but but but what about ect and a lot of smiley faces.

    that's one way of putting it. i tried reading some of 'em, but i remembered there was some wet paint that needed watching:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    eggman100 wrote: »
    Agreed and we all hope that that will not return. There is no evidence that the UK economy will decline if there is a so called 'hard brexit'.Brexit is brexit, we did not vote for a degree of brexit, we voted to leave fully and wholely. If anything the UK economy will improve after brexit compared to how it would be if we were still shackled inside the EU. Even if the UK mainland dropped off, the closeness of NI to the Rep of Ireland which is doing well currently will mean NI will continue to do well.

    I don't know how you assert that brexit will cause a border poll. If it did happen in any case there are too many people who like being part of the UK and enjoying all the benefits it brings than to to vote for a united Ireland. I was actually considering buying my first house in NI actually.

    The evidence for a decline of the UK economy will emerge after a hard Brexit with no deal takes place. I know that Brexiteers always dismiss all the warnings and predictions by experts who know how the market works and where the economy will be hit hardest. That is because Brexiteers hate all facts that stand in the way of their anticipated glorious post-Brexit future.

    Just remember this, the problems the UK has are fundamentally and to the core more domestic ones, created by the politics of the UK itself. Brexiteers like to deflect from that fact by projecting the problems on the EU and make the EU the scapegoat for it but this won't work for the time after Brexit. The Brexit propagandists will certainly not cease to continue with this projection as they are not just used to it but more to the point that is their whole agenda. Without having the EU to put the blame on for all and everything, they would had to look into the mirror and face the facts. But that is rather an option they prefer to run away from it.

    I also like to remind every Brexiter and those who say they aren't Brexiteers themselves but continue to fall for this anti-EU propaganda that every UK govt since the UK joined the EEC which is now the EU has been part in carrying all the policies and decisions the EU has made, just like every other member state has done so as well. The EU itself relies on the approval and work of the ´national govts of her member states. The 'EU Superstate' is nothing but a blatant ly and this is proven by the fact that the EU itself has no government of its own. Therefore, every national govt of every member state bears the responsibility for the actions the EU takes and that includes all regulations. The EU-Parliament is in compare to that not as much powerful as the national govts of the member states are.

    As for the border poll in NI in the post-Brexit period I just like to recommend you to watch a bit beyond the daily Brexit mess reports. There is probably (I say probably cos I hold many of the polls as not that reliable) a growing support for an IndyRef2 in Scotland. It is still going back and forth on a tiny margin scale between pro and con Independence. A hard Brexit and the effects this will have on the economy of Scotland will surely make it more likely that in an IndyRef2 a majority will vote in favour of Independence in order to escape the post-Brexit chaos and once and for all get rid of the domination of the UK by England. It is just a question of how and when this IndyRef2 takes place, but once its result is a majority in favour of Independence, the path towards the break up of the UK is opened.

    Look at the DUP as the one party that still has their hands on the levers of power by their 10 MPs who back up the current minority Tory govt and the DUP is exposed by therself as being in fact for a no-deal hard Brexit. I think that the DUP will have a lot to answer for that in the future and more so when the 'post-Brexit-Paradise-Bubble' implodes and the hard Brexit reality kicks in. I also assume, despite that there is Little reportation about that in the UK and Irish media, that this behaviour of the DUP in the HoC and towards the UK govt as well as their backing of the hardliner no-deal Brexiteers has already brought more tensions and fears among the people in NI.

    The constant refusal of the DUP to resume a power-shared NI govt with SF and thus still blocking the NI Assembly from resuming to work (in March it'll be two years since the last elections 2017) leaves NI in a deadlock. There is nothing the people in NI can do to alter that because new elections for the NI Assembly are a couple of years away and I haven't noticed anything from any party in NI that called for a new election before Brexit takes place. This Situation is very much of the liking for the DUP. They don't have (as they certainly see it) the Need to resume working together with SF, they don't have to attend the NI Assembly sessions and they can still hold the UK govt in ransom to make it do what the DUP wants. Plenty of evidence for that since the last UK GE in 2017. This will go on that way until there is a new UK GE in which the Tories either lose more of their MPs or win more so that the Tory Party is no longer relying on the DUP support. But a snap UK GE isn't on the table cos May fears that she'll lose more this time and of course the DUP doesn't favours a snap UK GE as well cos they might also lost votes due to their utter despicable performance in this Brexit mess.

    A snap UK GE would give not just the Brits the opportunity to punish the present Tory govt but more so (given that some Unionists in NI would vote UUP instead of DUP) would also give the people in NI the chance to punish the DUP and bring them losses of votes and thus lesser MPs for Westminster.

    Both parties are playing this gambling for their own selfish reasons and the people of NI certainly matter not to them. Otherwise the DUP would had respected the result of the BrexitRef 2016 in NI in which a majority of the people of NI voted for Remain. But that doesn't matter to the DUP as this party in particular has a record of ignoring majorities that doesn't suit their own agenda.

    A border poll in NI will be the result of this misbehaviour cos such things can go a long time but they cannot go on for ever cos one they they will have to answer for that and pay the price for it. The DUP is pushing the people in NI too far with a no-deal Brexit and the discontent and anger that will grow out of the consequences of a hard Brexit which will hit NI harder than England is what will lead to a border poll in NI.

    Just bear in mind that I am not talking of things that will or might take place immediately after Brexit, but these things are already in development and I am talking about that by counting in a couple of years, maybe five, maybe ten. But when history is the making, things can develop faster than one thinks.

    Up to this day, the UK govt still hasn't named all the alleged 40 countries they are ready to strike trade deals with, immediately after Brexit takes place. The major economical strong English speaking countries like Australia, NZ and Canada have already signalled that their economic ties lie closer to home for them and that the post-Brexit UK is not on top of the list for trading partners. The USA are very egoistical and selfish centred by Trump and there isn't much fairness to be expected (other than what he himself deems to be fair).

    Single trade deals by the UK with EU member states post-Brexit are out of question and that leaves Russia, China, probably India and some other CoN member states to 'fill' that list of 40 countries. The global big players look down on the UK as being proven unreliable by their own conduct during the UK-EU Brexit negotiations, India isn't ruled by fools as well and the many of the CoN countries aren't economically that strong and the people living there probably don't have such high wages as that they could afford to buy expensive British goods.

    The bigger picture is more complex than the simple one-sided one of the Brexiters is portraying. But maybe the 'BE2.0 Brexiteers' will have to learn it the hard way that they were just following a wet dream of their own making. Pity that the Remainers will have to suffer for this as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Before the IRA campaign loyalists burned large numbers of Catholics out of their homes. This was when NI became less attractive to investors.

    That's proven facts.

    Well I didn't but you did. I seem to remember you just mention IRA as the reason. Actually Harland and Wolff suffered as a result of their sectarian policies.

    That was a long standing policy of theirs, as like many others too.

    Maybe they were but now it's a problem. You can't have an economy based around civil servants.

    Quite right, it needs economists to run a successful economy.

    So even though the loyalist groups were launching terrorist attacks pre-IRA and they acted identically to the IRA during the troubles it was only the nationalist campaign that led to an economic downturn?
    ...

    That is the problem with discussing NI history and NI politics up to this day, the many take one side and the arguments are therefore always one-sided.

    It's good pointing out that there was a long standing regime of oppression and discrimation in place that treated the CNRs as 'second class citizens' (even when they considered them as being 'citizens' at all).

    The NI Civil Rights Movement had every right to be as this was a just movement, but the IRA interfered with that in order to instrumentalise that for their own political aims which was to end the partition of Ireland. The Civil Rights Movement wasn't aiming at that in particular, they merely wanted the same rights like any other citizen of the UK in NI. Normally one would anticipate that the UK govt was obliged to make sure that These civil rights were given to the CNRs in NI, but as it is well known, the many UK govts since partition didn't care about that and let the Stormont Regime run this part of the UK on their own. NI matters were even excluded (in fact is was forbidden by Parliament regulations) from being brought before the UK Parliament which was one condition of the partition of Ireland as a concession to the Unionists in 1920 and this continued until the Peak of the Troubles in the early 1970s.

    I have no sympathy whatsoever for any sort of Terror Organisations, fact is that the Stormont Regime by its colonial style oppressive ruling and the neglect of that by the UK govt either left the CNRs with no choice but to accept or tolerate their 'defence' by the IRA because the UK govt didn't act in time.

    The BA troops which have been deployed to NI in 1969 were first welcome by the CNRs as they were sent to protect the CNRs, but in a short time this turned into the reverse by the actions of the BA influenced by the RUC, the (B) Special Branch and other Unionist Paramilitary Organisations. The BA relied on them as the local Unionists knew the vicinities and the people. It led to collusion between all them but the many Unionists still have a problem with facing that past and admit that it was that way.

    It isn't hard to guess why that is just as it isn't hard to guess why they always deflect from that by immediately pointing to an alleged collusion between the PIRA and the govts of the Republic of Ireland during that time. Such as blaming the Gardaí for turning one or two blind eye(s) when they got notice of a Provo taking shelter in the Republic while on the run from NI. Preferred shelters were provided by Republicans along the border counties in the Republic, a short drive across the border.
    Actually as I work a lot in America I can say that people don't invest to this day because there's highly sectarian events like the 12th of July still occurring.

    This certainly applies for many other countries too who were checking on investing in NI and the always errupting riots in certain places in NI around that date have a much deterring effect on many investors. But hardline Unionists don't care about that and ignore the fact that every Investor is first checking on the conditions and the political climate in a country or part of a country.

    Just to mention another example, the East of Germany faces similar problems because it has become recognised as a part of Germany with major problems of anti-immigration and far-right people. It isn't quite so that every German living in that part of Germany is per se a far-right supporter but the damage on the image on that part of the country is already done and that continued since the early years after German re-unification and lasts to this day. The result of that is that the economy in that part of Germany suffers economically because foreign investment there is rather low. But the far-right fools there don't care about it like the Unionists in NI do.

    I would predict that unless there is a change in the attitudes of the many Unionists in NI, this part of the Island of Ireland might keep the same problems in a UI just with the difference that it'll be the Irish govt who had to care about it and no longer the Brits. Some Irish people who are strictly against a UI point that out as one of the main reasons to object a UI, close to that comes the financial burden of NI which a UI had to shoulder financially and anti-UI people are refusing to even pay a €-Cent for that out of their income taxes.

    There is much wishful thinking and fear around that topic of a UI. The truth of both is somewhere in the middle of them. A UI bears responsibilities which one would rather not take, but it also brings opportunities and chances with it. But as this is all politics, it's the politicians who bring it to a success or make a mess out of it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,078 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    Blaming the Troubles for current economic malaise is just stupid.

    The Troubles are used as an excuse for a lot of things in NI.

    It gets a lot of funding released for various projects (well it did when there was a Stormont functioning) to deal with 'legacy issues'.

    A lot of people around the province don't work, are on permanent sick etc because of the same legacy.

    I get the feeling a lot of people will use the Troubles as a crutch for as long as they possibly can.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    NIMAN wrote: »
    The Troubles are used as an excuse for a lot of things in NI.
    To be fair, it can't be ignored. But it can't be blamed entirely.

    The economic history of NI is something of a series of unfortunate events really. One of the main reasons that the UK wanted to hold onto NI was that at the time of partition, it accounted for two-thirds of the economic output of the island.

    The rest of the island was considered to be mostly just peasant farmers and light industry, the UK could afford to drop it.

    Just like the Republic, NI had a string of largely ineffectual governments who would rather bicker over matters of ideology than improve the economy. But because NI had some good strong industries that the UK relied on, it could afford to do this, while the Republic remained a basket case.

    This remained the case through WWII, with NI shipyards being insanely busy through the period.

    It's the post-war period where it all started going tits up. Demand for shipbuilding services plummetted. Heavy industry started changing its models, the service industry began to rise. Where most countries would adapt to capture new markets, NI began to flounder. Not only did they have crap governance, but the UK wasn't that pushed to help NI adapt its economy, and sectarian violence was on the rise. Where joining the EEC was a pivotal moment for the republic, heralding social and economic progress, the north at the same time saw foreign investment completely freeze as the Troubles properly kicked in.

    When the GFA was signed, functionally you were left with a statelet which hadn't moved on economically or socially since 1970.

    And in the 20 years since, it has still suffered from the poor governance of sectarian ideologues who have failed to invest properly in the infrastructure NI badly needs. A hard Brexit will send NI back to 1998, economically. (Socially it's still stuck in 1980)

    TL;DR: The economy of NI was already going down the toilet when the troubles began, the violence just ensured that the economy stayed in the toilet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,809 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Aegir wrote: »
    so you're saying the PIRA didn't have an objective of destroying the economy of Northern Ireland?

    Nifty deflection attempt there.

    what i was saying was (i thought) pretty clear. YOU seem to think the conflict in the north was caused, orchestrated and run solely by nationalists and republicans. Very obviously not the case.


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    maccored wrote: »
    Nifty deflection attempt there.

    what i was saying was (i thought) pretty clear. YOU seem to think the conflict in the north was caused, orchestrated and run solely by nationalists and republicans. Very obviously not the case.

    When did I say that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Aegir wrote: »
    When did I say that?

    By saying the economy is primarily a basket case because of Republicans.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,809 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    Aegir wrote: »
    When did I say that?

    this is how a thread is derailed. read back to your post to which I had been replying to as otherwise i am wasting my time even replying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    Eamon Collins? Yes, he was certainly an impartial observer of the war. The man was an informer, a traitor, and was proven to be a liar too.

    Why pick one book out of the thousands that have been written on this subject? It's an awful book, very poorly written and I'm surprised that even you could stomach his self-praise and the way he comes over as the "Big Man" in everything he ever did.

    Actually, come to think of it, judging by your posts it's obvious why you are promoting this piece of garbage.

    But in fairness didn't informants make a positive contribution to bringing about the GF agreement and peace on this island.
    many risked their lives in doing so, and therefore need to be remembered and thanked for their sacrifice.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    maccored wrote: »
    this is how a thread is derailed. read back to your post to which I had been replying to as otherwise i am wasting my time even replying.

    I think you are. There's a certain whinge amongst loyalists to the tune of "the Irish cause all the problems". It's a popular one to sing while marching down towards your bonfire littered with slogans about killing Catholics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,514 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    I think you are. There's a certain whinge amongst loyalists to the tune of "the Irish cause all the problems". It's a popular one to sing while marching down towards your bonfire littered with slogans about killing Catholics.

    You only have to trawl comments made by Sammy Wilson this week to find the evidence of that too steddyeddy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    You only have to trawl comments made by Sammy Wilson this week to find the evidence of that too steddyeddy.

    This week? Sammy like the previously mentioned poster have a habit of blaming the IRA for everything and supporting/ignoring loyalist terrorism. Here's something from the Edinburgh University press about Sammy:
    In January 1994, the Ulster Defence Association (UDA) released a document calling for ethnic cleansing and repartition of Ireland, with the goal of making Northern Ireland wholly Protestant. The plan was to be implemented should the British Army withdraw from Northern Ireland. Some areas with strong Catholic/nationalist majorities near the Irish border would be handed over to the Republic of Ireland, and those Catholics left stranded in the "Protestant state" would be "expelled, nullified, or interned". Controversially, Wilson called the plan a "very valuable return to reality". He added: "[it] shows that some loyalist paramilitaries are looking ahead and contemplating what needs to be done to maintain our separate Ulster identity".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    well if we are to observe developments in the House of Commons, it's patently clear they are not being influenced in the slightest by threats of violence in NI.

    Lest we forget, these people withstood the Nazis in the 1930s, the criminals in NI during the troubles.

    i hope Leo is bracing himself, cos as i've said all along, he is about to get a very hard border shoved up his precious Backstop!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Perifect


    well if we are to observe developments in the House of Commons, it's patently clear they are not being influenced in the slightest by threats of violence in NI.

    Lest we forget, these people withstood the Nazis in the 1930s, the criminals in NI during the troubles.

    i hope Leo is bracing himself, cos as i've said all along, he is about to get a very hard border shoved up his precious Backstop!

    Are you a proud west brit?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    Perifect wrote: »
    Are you a proud west brit?

    no but i have repeatedly said on this and other forums, that the Irish Govt's stance on this is about to explode in its' face.
    By insisting on the backstop Leo and his Euro buddies will effectively create a very hard border on this island.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Perifect


    no but i have repeatedly said on this and other forums, that the Irish Govt's stance on this is about to explode in its' face.
    By insisting on the backstop Leo and his Euro buddies will effectively create a very hard border on this island.

    You sound like a west brit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    well if we are to observe developments in the House of Commons, it's patently clear they are not being influenced in the slightest by threats of violence in NI

    Really? Then why try to avoid a hard border at all? Maybe it's because, during the Troubles, the RUC couldn't walk the streets without heavily Armed soldiers to protect them?

    Or maybe they remember that the British Army had no control of the territory and indeed had to fly its rubbish out of bases in Helicopters?

    Maybe they've learned a hard lesson that the people in the border communities simply will not put up with their bullshit?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 751 ✭✭✭Perifect


    Really? Then why try to avoid a hard border at all? Maybe it's because, during the Troubles, the RUC couldn't walk the streets without heavily Armed soldiers to protect them?

    Or maybe they remember that the British Army had no control of the territory and indeed had to fly its rubbish out of bases in Helicopters?

    Maybe they've learned a hard lesson that the people in the border communities simply will not put up with their bullshit?

    Quite a lot of the British army got killed. Just looked it up, 1013 of them! I'd say they are scared of coming back over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,514 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    well if we are to observe developments in the House of Commons, it's patently clear they are not being influenced in the slightest by threats of violence in NI.

    Lest we forget, these people withstood the Nazis in the 1930s, the criminals in NI during the troubles.

    i hope Leo is bracing himself, cos as i've said all along, he is about to get a very hard border shoved up his precious Backstop!

    'These people'? 'These people' got soft on what their parents went through in WW2.

    And they didn't withstand the Nazi's alone either, that took help and they retreated back into a Britain that Hitler probably wasn't that bother taking in the heel of the hunt.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    no but i have repeatedly said on this and other forums, that the Irish Govt's stance on this is about to explode in its' face.
    By insisting on the backstop Leo and his Euro buddies will effectively create a very hard border on this island.

    Mary?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,809 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    well if we are to observe developments in the House of Commons, it's patently clear they are not being influenced in the slightest by threats of violence in NI.

    Lest we forget, these people withstood the Nazis in the 1930s, the criminals in NI during the troubles.

    i hope Leo is bracing himself, cos as i've said all along, he is about to get a very hard border shoved up his precious Backstop!

    i dont know how the hell you are getting joy out of a hard border happening. then again Im sure you'll be the first complaining when the **** kicks off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,809 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    no but i have repeatedly said on this and other forums, that the Irish Govt's stance on this is about to explode in its' face.
    By insisting on the backstop Leo and his Euro buddies will effectively create a very hard border on this island.

    and no backstop means ....? Unless the british make provisions for having no border, there will be one.

    unless you believe they can create an invisible one with as yet un invented technology ...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    maccored wrote: »
    i dont know how the hell you are getting joy out of a hard border happening. then again Im sure you'll be the first complaining when the **** kicks off.

    when did i say i was getting joy out of this fiasco. sure it's interesting, fascinating even. but just because i don't parrot the remainer line, then i must be getting joy out of it?
    and you wonder why Brits want out!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,985 ✭✭✭Penfailed


    no but i have repeatedly said on this and other forums, that the Irish Govt's stance on this is about to explode in its' face.
    By insisting on the backstop Leo and his Euro buddies will effectively create a very hard border on this island.

    You are completely mistaken. The Irish government, along with the EU AND the UK, took a stance against having a hard border in Ireland. The UK came up with the idea of a backstop and then agreed it with the EU. The DUP then decided they didn't like it but without the insurance policy of the backstop it won't fly with the EU. In the absence of a backstop (or some other work around) there will be a hard border. Insisting on a backstop does not create a hard border.

    Gigs '24 - Ben Ottewell and Ian Ball (Gomez), The Jesus & Mary Chain, The Smashing Pumpkins/Weezer, Pearl Jam, Green Day, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Electric Picnic, Pixies, Ride, Therapy?, Public Service Broadcasting, IDLES, And So I Watch You From Afar

    Gigs '25 - Spiritualized, Supergrass, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, Queens of the Stone Age, Electric Picnic, Vantastival, Sprints, Getdown Services, And So I Watch You From Afar, The Scratch

    Gigs '26 - Deftones, Sleaford Mods, Stereolab, Sugar, Clutch, Big Thief, The Cure, Stendhal Festival, Forest Fest, IDLES, Electric Picnic, Public Service Broadcasting, Korn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,809 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    when did i say i was getting joy out of this fiasco. sure it's interesting, fascinating even. but just because i don't parrot the remainer line, then i must be getting joy out of it?
    and you wonder why Brits want out!

    you seem to be bleating on about how the Irish governments insistance on the backstop will create the border and how you predicted it.

    the reality is the backstop - as things are - is the only current solution on the table. the british either need some to provide some alternative or accept it. if they dont, then THEY cause the hard border. Basically means your theory is not just incorrect, but pretty naive into the bargain


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    maccored wrote: »
    and no backstop means ....? Unless the british make provisions for having no border, there will be one.

    unless you believe they can create an invisible one with as yet un invented technology ...

    so a Backstop means a Hard Border & no Backstop means not such a Hard Border.

    i agree there will be a border either way. i've said that from Day 1.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,514 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    so a Backstop means a Hard Border & no Backstop means not such a Hard Border.

    i agree there will be a border either way. i've said that from Day 1.

    What you are forgetting is that they are not out yet, and they are not showing much sign of ever having the courage to leave without a deal.

    They are hoo raaing in Parliament but out here in the real world they are royally snookered.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement