Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Car bomb has exploded in Derry City Centre

1141517192026

Comments

  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thomas_IV wrote: »
    That is right as well. In fact both is right.

    The IRA campaign took it from a place that was simply not an attractive place to invest in, to a place where companies that wanted to invest there became actual targets.

    Eddy's post also ignores the fact that the economy of the North was heavily reliant on two major industries, ship building and textiles, both of which declined significantly for a number of reasons.

    He also blames the high level of civil servant jobs as part of the problem, when they were actually created to be part of the solution. Most of the civil service jobs are decentralised ones, similar to the way the Irish government decentralised jobs. You also have the added bonus of those jobs being controlled from London, where a close eye could be kept on any sectarianism and even promote positive discrimination.

    Yes, it is multi faceted and other than the above, i would agree with Eddy's points, but but the PIRA campaign has to take the biggest criticism for the stagnated economy. When Sunderland lost its mining, it was replaced with car builidng, but there is no way a car company would have built a plant in the North (De Lorean's vain efforts aside) because the plant would have been considered a justifiable economic target, or at least, their risk assessors would have made that assumption and would not have allowed the investment to be made.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    strange then that you're contributing to a thread with CAR BOMB & Derry in the title. :confused:

    If that book you have recommended is the main source of your way to take part in this discussion then it surely isn't enough of background knowledge to have for it.

    I have read enough other sources to know about the nature and the patterns of such criminal acts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    Thomas_IV wrote: »
    If that book you have recommended is the main source of your way to take part in this discussion then it surely isn't enough of background knowledge to have for it.

    I have read enough other sources to know about the nature and the patterns of such criminal acts.

    i never said it was my main source of information. i just recommended a book thats all. no need to get so frickin touchy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,513 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Aegir wrote: »
    The IRA campaign took it from a place that was simply not an attractive place to invest in, to a place where companies that wanted to invest there became actual targets.

    Eddy's post also ignores the fact that the economy of the North was heavily reliant on two major industries, ship building and textiles, both of which declined significantly for a number of reasons.

    He also blames the high level of civil servant jobs as part of the problem, when they were actually created to be part of the solution. Most of the civil service jobs are decentralised ones, similar to the way the Irish government decentralised jobs. You also have the added bonus of those jobs being controlled from London, where a close eye could be kept on any sectarianism and even promote positive discrimination.

    Yes, it is multi faceted and other than the above, i would agree with Eddy's points, but but the PIRA campaign has to take the biggest criticism for the stagnated economy. When Sunderland lost its mining, it was replaced with car builidng, but there is no way a car company would have built a plant in the North (De Lorean's vain efforts aside) because the plant would have been considered a justifiable economic target, or at least, their risk assessors would have made that assumption and would not have allowed the investment to be made.

    The IRA campaign finished off a rotten economy in a rotten failed sectarian statelet, designed to favour one community and run by that community.
    As soon as we got a new executive and new financial structures, guess who started to look for ways to fleece it? - the erstwhile sectarian mandarins. :rolleyes:


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    As soon as we got a new executive and new financial structures, guess who started to look for ways to fleece it? - the erstwhile sectarian mandarins. :rolleyes:

    What better excuse is there for a united Ireland, politicians fleecing the state would never happen down here :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,781 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Aegir wrote:
    The IRA campaign took it from a place that was simply not an attractive place to invest in, to a place where companies that wanted to invest there became actual targets.
    Let's be clear here. There were two sides to this conflict. There was the UVF as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    i think most Irish people would like a UI (personally i couldn't give a fiddlers), but do you think we could afford it?
    do you really think Loyalist paramilitaries would take it lying down?
    surely it would result in more violence, but this time south of the border?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,365 ✭✭✭✭McMurphy


    Aegir wrote: »
    but but but what about........

    That's quite low, tbh.

    That poster put together a very constructive post, very factual and well written.

    Your reply is bad form.

    If you're gonna dispute any of his points, do so.

    <snip>


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,513 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Aegir wrote: »
    What better excuse is there for a united Ireland, politicians fleecing the state would never happen down here :rolleyes:

    Yes they did fleece the state here. They fleece the state everywhere, including Britain.
    What was particularly joyful about this particular party/section of the community getting caught with their hand firmly in the cookie jar is that they like to give the impression that they are above everyone else,(and like you like to give the impression that only one side is responsible) full to the brim with fiscal rectitude and that they would never wreck the state's purse recklessly. But they cannot pretend that anymore because the hard 'pellet' of the truth will be fired at them.

    Anyway were you saying something about 'whataboutery'?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    Aegir wrote: »
    The IRA campaign took it from a place that was simply not an attractive place to invest in, to a place where companies that wanted to invest there became actual targets.

    Eddy's post also ignores the fact that the economy of the North was heavily reliant on two major industries, ship building and textiles, both of which declined significantly for a number of reasons.

    He also blames the high level of civil servant jobs as part of the problem, when they were actually created to be part of the solution. Most of the civil service jobs are decentralised ones, similar to the way the Irish government decentralised jobs. You also have the added bonus of those jobs being controlled from London, where a close eye could be kept on any sectarianism and even promote positive discrimination.

    Yes, it is multi faceted and other than the above, i would agree with Eddy's points, but but the PIRA campaign has to take the biggest criticism for the stagnated economy. When Sunderland lost its mining, it was replaced with car builidng, but there is no way a car company would have built a plant in the North (De Lorean's vain efforts aside) because the plant would have been considered a justifiable economic target, or at least, their risk assessors would have made that assumption and would not have allowed the investment to be made.

    Quite right. The heavy and the textile industry were once the backbone of the NI economy. As you pointed out, the decline of both industries was the way into general economical decline worsened by the Troubles.

    In a previous post you've quoted passages from the IRA Green Book, which one can see as their 'bible'. Comparing that to the way the Old IRA of the years 1919 to 1922 operated there is a significant difference between them. As everyone who was studdying Irish Republicanism of the 20C knows, the 'targets' back then were singled out (not just by Collins' Squad but also by others on his watch). They targetted personal of the Administration, Police and Military, keeping economical damage as less as possible, but at that time the economic world was different, much different to places like Belfast.

    When one watches interviews in documentaries by those who took part in all this at their times, the older ones were to improvise their way of fighting a Guerilla war, the 'younger ones' which many of them say that they have read the accounts of their Republican forebears like Tom Barry and Dan Breen, took their example for their 'new times', but they didn't bother to exclude economical damage and follow the examples of the past. That was with the reason that the Provos calculated that a wrecked economy in NI would bring the Unionists down. This didn't pay off and that because the subsidies from Westminster were still coming in.

    What is plain to see in your quotation from the Green Book is that they didn't give much of a thought that by wrecking the economy of NI they'd to suffer with it and for the fact that the CNRs were always the most deprived at that time, it was probably good enough for the Provos to get new ones recruited for them. Plenty of occasions by Terror from the RUC, the BA and the Brits secret service brought many young men and some women to join them.

    The GFA was the best NI ever got and it was the worst for the DUP which was and now is again to undermine it as they were always against it. The 'chuckle brother' Paisley sr. was more putting up with it by doing his own show. That is what I believe because he never managed to get the hatred towards the CNRs out of his party. But for the sake of politics and probably for the reason that the UK govts watched them more closer in the first decade than in recent years, made him to play by the book and share power with SF.

    Every time when I saw the sour face of the late FM Robinson and the way he was playing his part in this power-shared NI govt which was also taking efforts to attract Investment into NI, it was always McGuinness who came across as the 'manager' the one who put more efforts into bringing NI Forward towards a stable economy. That is for his part something which stands in contrast to the usual stance of SF to work towards a UI in the first place and not to support the NI statelet. But the more pragmatic - like it or not - are to be found on the SF side. The regressive are within the DUP and the current leader of that Party is an example not just for herself but also for the legacy of Paisley sr.

    SF has moved on, the DUP has returned to the old thinking by the hardliners taking over. It's quite the same as it happened with the UUP in the mid to late 1960s.

    This 'Britishness' of those Unionists in NI who are Loyalists as well is very much distinctive to that of the people in GB. Only the far-right and other right-wing nationalists over there have much in common with Unionist Loyalists in NI. But it is this ideology which always holds them back to make progress for themselves.

    There have always been dissos since the GFA and they always committed their crimes from time to time by planting bombs into cars or shoot someone. In such cases the Unionists and Loyalists were the first to condemn that very loud, SF didn't stand back in condemning them as they had to distance themselves from the dissos. I think that by now, one can take it from SF that their condemnation of such violence is genuine.

    The bigger threat now is that the DUP with her hardliner Foster as leader of that party and her way to hold the UK PM to ransom in the HoC will bring more damage to the economy of NI than all the bombing campaigns of the past might have caused. That is because with a hard Brexit, the UK economy will probably also decline and more important to this is the SNP which is in govt in Scotland and now pressing even more for an IndyRef2 in order to get out of the Brexit trap by independence. That all means less Money for NI in subsidies and in the end of the day, the DUPpers have once again shoot themselves in the foot.

    There is probably no evidence yet that this car bomb is politically related to the ongoing Brexit mess, but I would not exclude it at all cos the threat of a hard border between the Republic and NI isn't out of the world yet. This car bomb might or could also be read like a signal of 'they haven't gone away, you know'. A hint to the past for the future and that bleak Terror future prospect has to be extinct before it can spread.

    Depending on the developments in regards of Brexit, the problem of NI will be put to a border poll and I can't say when this will happen but the more the chances of a no-deal hard Brexit increase, the more a border poll in NI will come along as well. A political solution on this would take off the steam from the dissos, but it might certainly anger the Loyalists on the Unionist side. It is now more than ever important for the electorate in NI and especially the Unionist community to vote for moderate parties and dismiss the DUP from any power in NI cos when it comes to a no-deal Brexit the DUP has her share in this. I hope that people will realise and remember that. They can't put the blame on the Republicans and Irish Nationalists anymore cos that mess is also of the DUPs own making.

    There is little reportation in the UK media about NI, except there is something important that concerns the whole of the UK and Brexit in the first place. I think that the uncertainty and this silly back and forth of the UK govt has made many peopole in NI nervous and tensions seem to get worse again. The last time it led to erruptions was the 'Flegger Season' of 2012 to 2013 (the incident with removing the UJ from the Belfast CH in December 2012 which led to riots on the Unionists side).

    Maybe the next time the DUP will face anger for the part she was playing in this Brexit mess and maybe then it might be from both sides, CNRs and PULs when the people are going to lose their jobs.

    I don't know what will happen but it doesn't look good for NI at the moment. One can hope that a hard border won't be installed, but who says that the DUP wouldn't do that by blaming the Republicans once again for it. In such a Scenario, this car bomb might just be the start for a return to the dark decades of the Troubles. I hope it won't come to that, I really do.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    i never said it was my main source of information. i just recommended a book thats all. no need to get so frickin touchy.

    Pardon? I think that it is you who gets touchy. Maybe you should grow up a bit more.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    Aegir wrote: »
    What better excuse is there for a united Ireland, politicians fleecing the state would never happen down here :rolleyes:

    Anybody who says that a UI will only bring merits is lying because such a process will cost money, kill jobs but also creates new ones.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,012 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Whats the fascination with 'ulster' as a province though, you never hear calls to reunite Meath....

    Ulster is currently split. Not sure what the comparison with Meath is about. I know the talk from the Ulster-Scots can confuse the fact much of Ulster is in what's currently called the Republic of Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 359 ✭✭Thomas_IV


    Ulster is currently split. Not sure what the comparison with Meath is about. I know the talk from the Ulster-Scots can confuse the fact much of Ulster is in what's currently called the Republic of Ireland.

    Would you say that there never grew some difference between the people who live in the one part that is in the Republic and the other that is NI?

    Given the year of the Act of Ireland of 1920, next year it will be 100 years since and 98 years since partition took place due to the Anglo-Irish-Treaty.

    It's all a long time and a couple of generation came and went during that time. I don't think that such a long time passes by without any effect on the people on both sides.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,408 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    Ulster is currently split. Not sure what the comparison with Meath is about. I know the talk from the Ulster-Scots can confuse the fact much of Ulster is in what's currently called the Republic of Ireland.

    As someone who grew up in Westmeath, let me just say we're having none of it. Those pretentious feckers from meath can feck right off back to Navan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Aegir wrote: »
    and my point about a terrorist organisation with the objective of ****ing up the economy wasn't?

    Yes it was A but you seem to be using it as evidence that the IRA was the sole reason NI is a basket case. The objective of a group cannot be used as proof that they alone were responsible for the NI economy being in tatters.

    For instance stated the objective of the Orange Order is top preserve Protestant culture. The reality is that they spread sectarianism and make NI a very unattractive place to invest in. Objective does not equal reality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,012 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Grayson wrote: »
    As someone who grew up in Westmeath, let me just say we're having none of it. Those pretentious feckers from meath can feck right off back to Navan.

    It's a whole Biggie, 2Pac thing I hear :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    tbh few people down here give a flying turd about the North, so long as they keep their troubles up there.
    why should we spend money on people who refuse to govern themselves &/or coexist peacefully?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,158 ✭✭✭✭citytillidie


    Aegir wrote: »
    fair enough, but when commenting on the economy of Northern Ireland, especially Derry, you can't ignore the troubles and the reason why no one wanted to invest there.

    Well maybe of the unionist government did not treat non unionist people as 2nd class citizens things would have been very different

    ******



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Aegir wrote: »
    but but but what about........

    Aegir if there's anything you don't understand or disagree with it's better to ask me instead of getting frustrated and lashing out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,288 ✭✭✭Wheres Me Jumper?


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Aegir if there's anything you don't understand or disagree with it's better to ask me instead of getting frustrated and lashing out.

    Thomas V please take note!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Thomas V please take note!

    In fairness Thomas provides detailed replies. Aegir replies to detailed replies with but but but what about ect and a lot of smiley faces.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Ragnar Lothbrok


    if you haven't already, you should check out a book called Killing Rage by Eamon Collins.

    Eamon Collins? Yes, he was certainly an impartial observer of the war. The man was an informer, a traitor, and was proven to be a liar too.

    Why pick one book out of the thousands that have been written on this subject? It's an awful book, very poorly written and I'm surprised that even you could stomach his self-praise and the way he comes over as the "Big Man" in everything he ever did.

    Actually, come to think of it, judging by your posts it's obvious why you are promoting this piece of garbage.


  • Posts: 5,853 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Aegir if there's anything you don't understand or disagree with it's better to ask me instead of getting frustrated and lashing out.

    In fairness Eddy, you started this discussion with the following:
    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Not sure that would work. Look at the part of Ireland still in the UK. The richest part of Northern Ireland is poorer than the poorer part of Ireland. They haven't looked after it.

    Then went on various rants telling me that pointing out the PIRA's campaign played a big part in the failed economy up there was not seeing both sides and how it was wrong to simply blame one side, despite you doing exactly that.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 8,116 Mod ✭✭✭✭circadian


    Well, that's just not true.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 eggman100


    Thomas_IV wrote: »

    The bigger threat now is that the DUP with her hardliner Foster as leader of that party and her way to hold the UK PM to ransom in the HoC will bring more damage to the economy of NI than all the bombing campaigns of the past might have caused. That is because with a hard Brexit, the UK economy will probably also decline and more important to this is the SNP which is in govt in Scotland and now pressing even more for an IndyRef2 in order to get out of the Brexit trap by independence. That all means less Money for NI in subsidies and in the end of the day, the DUPpers have once again shoot themselves in the foot.

    There is probably no evidence yet that this car bomb is politically related to the ongoing Brexit mess, but I would not exclude it at all cos the threat of a hard border between the Republic and NI isn't out of the world yet. This car bomb might or could also be read like a signal of 'they haven't gone away, you know'. A hint to the past for the future and that bleak Terror future prospect has to be extinct before it can spread.

    Depending on the developments in regards of Brexit, the problem of NI will be put to a border poll and I can't say when this will happen but the more the chances of a no-deal hard Brexit increase, the more a border poll in NI will come along as well. A political solution on this would take off the steam from the dissos, but it might certainly anger the Loyalists on the Unionist side. It is now more than ever important for the electorate in NI and especially the Unionist community to vote for moderate parties and dismiss the DUP from any power in NI cos when it comes to a no-deal Brexit the DUP has her share in this. I hope that people will realise and remember that. They can't put the blame on the Republicans and Irish Nationalists anymore cos that mess is also of the DUPs own making.

    There is little reportation in the UK media about NI, except there is something important that concerns the whole of the UK and Brexit in the first place. I think that the uncertainty and this silly back and forth of the UK govt has made many peopole in NI nervous and tensions seem to get worse again. The last time it led to erruptions was the 'Flegger Season' of 2012 to 2013 (the incident with removing the UJ from the Belfast CH in December 2012 which led to riots on the Unionists side).

    Maybe the next time the DUP will face anger for the part she was playing in this Brexit mess and maybe then it might be from both sides, CNRs and PULs when the people are going to lose their jobs.

    I don't know what will happen but it doesn't look good for NI at the moment. One can hope that a hard border won't be installed, but who says that the DUP wouldn't do that by blaming the Republicans once again for it. In such a
    Scenario, this car bomb might just be the start for a return to the dark decades of the Troubles. I hope it won't come to that, I really do.

    Agreed and we all hope that that will not return. There is no evidence that the UK economy will decline if there is a so called 'hard brexit'.Brexit is brexit, we did not vote for a degree of brexit, we voted to leave fully and wholely. If anything the UK economy will improve after brexit compared to how it would be if we were still shackled inside the EU. Even if the UK mainland dropped off, the closeness of NI to the Rep of Ireland which is doing well currently will mean NI will continue to do well.

    I don't know how you assert that brexit will cause a border poll. If it did happen in any case there are too many people who like being part of the UK and enjoying all the benefits it brings than to to vote for a united Ireland. I was actually considering buying my first house in NI actually.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,513 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Eamon Collins? Yes, he was certainly an impartial observer of the war. The man was an informer, a traitor, and was proven to be a liar too.

    Why pick one book out of the thousands that have been written on this subject? It's an awful book, very poorly written and I'm surprised that even you could stomach his self-praise and the way he comes over as the "Big Man" in everything he ever did.

    Actually, come to think of it, judging by your posts it's obvious why you are promoting this piece of garbage.

    The tragic stats of the conflict can be presented in such a way to make one side look like victims.
    Like Sammy Wilson, we have posters here trying to say that all of northern Ireland's problems are down to republicans.
    Any historian worth their salt knows the reasons are much more nuanced and deeper than that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Aegir wrote: »
    In fairness Eddy, you started this discussion with the following:

    Indeed I did. Hard to hear but it's true.
    Then went on various rants telling me that pointing out the PIRA's campaign played a big part in the failed economy up there was not seeing both sides and how it was wrong to simply blame one side, despite you doing exactly that.

    Well A that's actually not true. Take a look at my previous post:

    The actual listed reasons why Northern Ireland went from being an industrial powershouse to an economic basket case is multi-faceted. It’s a lot poorer than the neighbouring republic for several reasons:
    • Northern Ireland was a sectarian state prior to the troubles. Catholics were discriminated against in terms of housing, education and jobs (particularly civil service jobs). This led to the Sean McBride principles which dictated that some American companies would only invest in equal oppertunity companies.
    • The troubles where loyalist and republican paramilitaries launched thirty years of war doubtless made investors, including state investors, wary of investing.
    • A very large percentage of Northern Ireland’s workforce work in the civil service.
    • Flags, bonfires and tribalism have kept a significant proportion of Northern Ireland as an unattractive place to invest.
    • Finally Brexit is going to cripple the North’s economy. It will lose access to the single market and tariffs will likely be put on any trades it does with the Republic Of Ireland. For instance farmers in the North will lose out on grants that farmers in the Rep of Ireland will get. There’s no upside to this.

    You'll see a did list the terror attacks, both loyalist and republican as a reason for investor trepidation. However in a mirror image of the "the Brits are to blame for everything" slogan you heavily criticise, you linked the economic downturn to a single terrorist operation. Not loyalist and republicans but just republicans.

    So in your mind you believe that investors don't like republican bombs but like loyalist bombs like McGurk's pub bombing:

    McGurks_bombing.jpg

    They love orange bombfires:

    image.jpg

    And loyalist mobs burning Catholics out of their homes on Bombay Street in 1969 (pre-IRA):

    bombaystreetpainting.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Aegir wrote: »
    The IRA campaign took it from a place that was simply not an attractive place to invest in, to a place where companies that wanted to invest there became actual targets.

    Before the IRA campaign loyalists burned large numbers of Catholics out of their homes. This was when NI became less attractive to investors.
    Eddy's post also ignores the fact that the economy of the North was heavily reliant on two major industries, ship building and textiles, both of which declined significantly for a number of reasons.

    Well I didn't but you did. I seem to remember you just mention IRA as the reason. Actually Harland and Wolff suffered as a result of their sectarian policies.
    He also blames the high level of civil servant jobs as part of the problem, when they were actually created to be part of the solution.

    Maybe they were but now it's a problem. You can't have an economy based around civil servants.
    Yes, it is multi faceted and other than the above, i would agree with Eddy's points, but but the PIRA campaign has to take the biggest criticism for the stagnated economy.

    So even though the loyalist groups were launching terrorist attacks pre-IRA and they acted identically to the IRA during the troubles it was only the nationalist campaign that led to an economic downturn?

    Interesting, although highly biased, might I say sectarian outlook A.
    When Sunderland lost its mining, it was replaced with car builidng, but there is no way a car company would have built a plant in the North (De Lorean's vain efforts aside) because the plant would have been considered a justifiable economic target, or at least, their risk assessors would have made that assumption and would not have allowed the investment to be made.

    Actually as I work a lot in America I can say that people don't invest to this day because there's highly sectarian events like the 12th of July still occurring.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,115 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Britain, Germany and Japan were thriving 20 years after a global war that made the Troubles look like a pillow-fight in comparison. Blaming the Troubles for current economic malaise is just stupid.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement