Garda shoots dog in Longford

Plumbthedepths · 04-12-2018 10:07PM

BBFAN wrote:

The edited video that you state is edited is now the gospel?

You have to wonder why Mrs Speilberg edited it.

Signore Fancy Pants · 04-12-2018 10:08PM

LOL

BBFAN has lost the plot.

Water John · 04-12-2018 10:08PM

The Guard's tie is held firmly when the shot is fired, Stop reinventing the facts. If I thought a dog was a threat to me I would use whatever force was needed to remove the threat.

archer22 · 04-12-2018 10:09PM

tuxy wrote: »

So the youtube clip from post 9 is a completely different incident? Because his tie is streached tight, you can even see it in the still i posted.

This is starting to get very strange and confusing.

Yep the Virgin news clip shows the actual shooting...I do not see that on clip on first page

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:09PM

Panch18 wrote: »

Do you have any support to prove th Guard and van driver were friends??

Nope, no more than the people who claim the traveller had a slash hook have support.

But I do know he wouldn't have been risking his life and career for someone he didn't know. That is definitely a fact.

Plumbthedepths · 04-12-2018 10:09PM

BBFAN wrote:

Answer me this all the "shoot em all dead" crew. Why should an off duty guard have any more respect than an ordinary joe?

Was he off duty? As to the respect thing it's just common sense not to set your dog on an armed individual and hope nothing happens to your dag.

Plumbthedepths · 04-12-2018 10:10PM

BBFAN wrote:

So has anyone got an answer as to why this savage killer dog is so silent?

It's mouth was full of the guard's tie prehaps , what's your explanation?

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:11PM

tuxy wrote: »

So the youtube clip from post 9 is a completely different incident? Because his tie is streached tight, you can even see it in the still i posted.

This is starting to get very strange and confusing.

You're still not answering the question.

If so many people in this thread claim that the youtube clip from post 9 was very strongly edited how can they then claim it's gospel?

Water John · 04-12-2018 10:11PM

Then go back and watch the video on page 1 again.

Plumbthedepths · 04-12-2018 10:11PM

#jesuisalsatian.... or #jesuistoby....

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:12PM

Señor Santa Pants wrote: »

LOL

BBFAN has lost the plot.

In what way? Please back up your post.

Panch18 · 04-12-2018 10:12PM

BBFAN wrote: »

Nope, no more than the people who claim the traveller had a slash hook have support.

But I do know he wouldn't have been risking his life and career for someone he didn't know. That is definitely a fact.

No it’s not a definite fact, only in your head is it a fact

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:14PM

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

You have to wonder why Mrs Speilberg edited it.

So you admit she edited it? So we can't take that as gospel so?

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:15PM

Panch18 wrote: »

No it’s not a definite fact, only in your head is it a fact

So you think that an off duty detective would stop and get involved in this situation if he didn't have some motive?

Bless that you're that naïve.

tayto lover · 04-12-2018 10:16PM

BBFAN wrote: »

So you think that an off duty detective would stop and get involved in this situation if he didn't have some motive?

Bless that you're that naïve.

You were asked for proof that the detective was off duty.

tuxy · 04-12-2018 10:16PM

archer22 wrote: »

Yep the Virgin news clip shows the actual shooting...I do not see that on clip on first page

The one from post 9 has the incident but the gun is slightly out of frame as it goes of. Is youtube not working for you? You can see it as the top result if you type "garda shoots traveller" on youtube. It seems to be much longer and has the dialogue where the garda says "get him to let go of me"

Plumbthedepths · 04-12-2018 10:16PM

BBFAN wrote:

So you admit she edited it? So we can't take that as gospel so?

A blind man can see it's edited but the guard can be clearly heard saying "get him to let go" also "watch him Toby" can be heard before the shot is fired as for take as gospel wtf are you on about?

Signore Fancy Pants · 04-12-2018 10:17PM

BBFAN wrote: »

So you think that an off duty detective would stop and get involved in this situation if he didn't have some motive?

Bless that you're that naïve.

What was the Detectives motive?

alias no.9 · 04-12-2018 10:17PM

BBFAN wrote: »

So you think that an off duty detective would stop and get involved in this situation if he didn't have some motive?

Bless that you're that naïve.

Again, why do you assume he's off duty?

banie01 · 04-12-2018 10:19PM

BBFAN wrote: »

It has reported on every single source of media that a dog was killed and yet you still don't believe it? Bias much?

Read what I posted and try again

Panch18 · 04-12-2018 10:20PM

BBFAN wrote: »

So you think that an off duty detective would stop and get involved in this situation if he didn't have some motive?

Bless that you're that naïve.

You claimed on several occasions that he was off duty and friends with the van driver - you are presenting those 2 points as fact

Yet you seem to have zero support to back up these “facts”

So if you have evidence to support both of those points then provide that evidence, otherwise your 2 points can be ignored as just an idea that you seem to have come up with for no logical reason

nc6000 · 04-12-2018 10:22PM

Is there any footage which shows the dog?

seamus · 04-12-2018 10:22PM

BBFAN wrote: »

So you think that an off duty detective would stop and get involved in this situation if he didn't have some motive?

Bless that you're that naïve.

You're unreasonably cynical if you think they wouldn't.

Most Gardai would get involved if they felt there was a serious threat. Off duty just means off shift. It doesn't mean they have no responsibility to get involved.

tayto lover · 04-12-2018 10:22PM

BBFAN was all over the Casey thread defending travellers.
He makes up a lot of stuff to suit his arguments.
Pay no attention.
He has been asked by posters to prove that the garda was off duty and that he had a pal there but seemingly and unsurprisingly cannot.

tuxy · 04-12-2018 10:25PM

There are two different stories being posted on whatsapp and facebook. One story by travellers and one by friends of the man who owns the van.
In one story the detective is friends with the man who owns the van

And even using bits from both stories I can't make judgment on what happened yet. Still lots of info missing.

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:26PM

Señor Santa Pants wrote: »

What was the Detectives motive?

That it was his mates van. Fairly simple.

saintsaltynuts · 04-12-2018 10:27PM

https://youtu.be/ABhZQ_VRbsQ

whisky_galore · 04-12-2018 10:27PM

Yer Da sells Avon wrote: »

They're a cunt to put on, in fairness. And you usually need to have your top button closed for them to stay on, so it feels like you're getting strangled regardless.

They're not.
Get a shirt with the proper collar size, it's not that hard really.

tuxy · 04-12-2018 10:28PM

BBFAN wrote: »

That it was his mates van. Fairly simple.

Proof please.
Not so simple now?

BBFAN · 04-12-2018 10:28PM

tayto lover wrote: »

BBFAN was all over the Casey thread defending travellers.
He makes up a lot of stuff to suit his arguments.
Pay no attention.
He has been asked by posters to prove that the garda was off duty and that he had a pal there but seemingly and unsurprisingly cannot.

BBFAN has never defended travellers. I challenge you to produce a post where I have done so?

Garda shoots dog in Longford

Comments