Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Autumn Internationals Team Announcement/Talk

1202123252632

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,356 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Late hit. Off the ball. Shoulder to the head. Take your pick.

    The one in the SA v Fra match only got a penalty.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Definitely a yellow at least. If he did make contact with the head then it’s an obvious red card and citing and there’s no difference between it and Stander.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,058 ✭✭✭Mookie Blaylock


    Definitely a yellow at least. If he did make contact with the head then it’s an obvious red card and citing and there’s no difference between it and Stander.

    Aussies said he was already in the air and couldn't change his trajectory...so no intent and the ref agreed.
    Wonder would he have been as lenient if they were both going up for a high ball and 1/2p went down hard


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    The lack of consistency in an area deemed extremely high priority of late is bewildering. I don't have the slow motion replays available but, if he connects with the head, it's a clear cut red card.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭Webbs


    It wasnt even given as a penalty, from the ensuing play Aus got a penalty and 3pts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 548 ✭✭✭Commanchie


    Buer wrote: »
    The lack of consistency in an area deemed extremely high priority of late is bewildering. I don't have the slow motion replays available but, if he connects with the head, it's a clear cut red card.

    I was thinking this the weekend with all the talk around high tackles, rules being discussed and discussed and then something that looks so elementary of a decision, gets passed up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Very similar to Stander poleaxing Lambie a couple of years ago. Even then, being accidental was no defence.

    Hard to tell if Halfpenny gets hit in the head or chest so maybe a red would be harsh.

    I’ve watched it repeatedly and couldn’t see the contact to the head he refered to. It’s reckless, but then again so is any charging attempt to block down a kick if you leave the ground.


  • Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The one in the SA v Fra match only got a penalty.


    Haven't seen that one


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Haven't seen that one

    The two incidents can be seen here:

    https://twitter.com/theblitzdefence/status/1061954700281561089

    Faf de Klerk took out the kicker late. It wasn't a high hit, chest/shoulder into the kicker's chest. The slow motion replay makes the contact look worse than it was. I believe the French player milked it but FdK was lucky not to go to the bin. I don't think he was ever blocking that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,356 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Buer wrote: »
    The two incidents can be seen here:

    https://twitter.com/theblitzdefence/status/1061954700281561089

    Faf de Klerk took out the kicker late. It wasn't a high hit, chest/shoulder into the kicker's chest. The slow motion replay makes the contact look worse than it was. I believe the French player milked it but FdK was lucky not to go to the bin. I don't think he was ever blocking that.

    :D I thought the real time footage made it look worse tbh, I was sure there was a red card coming. The slowed down version vindicates him a bit.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭Webbs


    For the halfpenny incident Martin Johnson was adamant that kerevi knew exactly what he was doing in leading with his shoulder and not making any attempt to protect halfpenny.
    Its an unnatural movement for just a kick block attempt and surely should have been worthy of a penalty at least.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Webbs wrote: »
    For the halfpenny incident Martin Johnson was adamant that kerevi knew exactly what he was doing in leading with his shoulder and not making any attempt to protect halfpenny.
    Its an unnatural movement for just a kick block attempt and surely should have been worthy of a penalty at least.

    Think the fact he is looking away and not at 1/2p is what gets him off, though I’d agree it was a strange body shape to be in when trying to block a kick. You usually make yourself as wide as possible.

    The DeKlerk one is far more straightforward in my opinion, he played the man, he was never going to block the kick.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭croket


    Here are some highlights from Italy-Georgia, obviously from a georgian fan.



    Watched full game and IMO Georgia was not so far away. They faced a full Tier1 who really played 100% and Italy showed that the gap between Tier1 and Georgia is still not closed.

    If Italy missed few first choice team because of injuries, Georgia too. The second row duo Mikautadze (Montpellier) and Nemsadze (Ospreys) missed a lot to Georgia, considering how difficult were lineouts without them. Also, they are two very powerfull locks, I think any prop would love to have these locks behind them. Both of them, alongside Clermont's flanker Kolelishvili are also strong ball carrier and very usefull to destroy mauls (especially Mikautadze - just check "Mikautadze maul" on YT) . I don't mention Toulon talisman Gorgodze who is retired from international rugby, despite that he is younger than Parisse. Unlike Tier1 teams like Italy, were an injured Pro14 player is replaced by another Pro14 player, Georgia suffers from a lack of depth, as almost every Tier2 team, except for the props. So, these three top level players were replaced by 3 players from french ProD2 and English Championship and this is a proof that Georgia is still a Tier2 team. Georgia also missed these 2 most experienced backs, centre Kacharava and fullback Kvirikashvili, both 100+ caps, and both out of injury.

    Despite that, I think that Georgia showed some good display, and made progress from an all-forward oriented game plan to a moste complete style.

    Italy played a decent game, and could have scored an 5th try, when Castello just had to run to the corner but made the wrong choice. In another hand, Allan's try (5:06) were scored after Lobzhanidze was hurted with a borderline tackle, then Mchedlidze loss the ball and Allan just had to run where Lobzhanidze is lying down, instead of being able to defend, but well played by Italy. Georgia also had an opportunity to close the gap to 4 points (7:00 on the video) with a great break by Gorgadze, unfortunately followed by a knock on from Aprasidze.

    I think that Georgia suffered a lot from the yellow card at min 30., with 10 points conceded during this time and the whole team looked very tired after that. Obviously, most of the players are not used to playing at such intensity, some of them are even amateurs and I think Georgia needs a Pro14 franchise or at least more Tier1 tests like this one to made progress. Also obvious that there is a gap between Italy and Georgia but not so big at all...

    Still, Georgia fielded a very young side, with the entire backrow born 1996, as the starting scrumhalf and the right winger while only 3 players in the starting XV are 30 or more. On the bench, Aprasidze born 1998 and Kveseladze born 1997. All these players are already decent and can still progress a lot. Also Georgia can compete with Tier1 teams at U20 level, especially this year, with 2 small loss against France (champions) and South Africa (3d) followed by 3 won against Ireland, Japan and Scotland. But again, the big potentiel of these players can be limited if they stay playing in the amateur georgian championship instead of a georgian Pro14 franchise or whatever professional team.
    Another good news for Georgia was the crowd, with more than 10K georgians fans in Florence and thousands in Tbilisi, whatching the game on a big screen. That's a big argument to get more Tier1 tests.

    Another thing, there is not a single foreign player in georgian championship and the whole national team raised in Georgia. I do not blame Italy for using foreign players and it is not the team that abuses it the most but still a good advantage for a team when they can't develop a local guy at some position. I mean, the entire italian backrow were born and raised abroad, Negri, Steyn and Meyer learned rugby in South Africa, talisman Polledri in England. But this is an additional reason for Georgia to develop its own players.

    Finally, congratulations to Italy for the deserved win, you showed that Georgia is still a Tier2 team who needs to keep working, but I think that Georgia is in the right way to become a strong rugby nation the following years !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,170 ✭✭✭troyzer


    croket wrote: »
    Here are some highlights from Italy-Georgia, obviously from a georgian fan.



    Watched full game and IMO Georgia was not so far away. They faced a full Tier1 who really played 100% and Italy showed that the gap between Tier1 and Georgia is still not closed.

    If Italy missed few first choice team because of injuries, Georgia too. The second row duo Mikautadze (Montpellier) and Nemsadze (Ospreys) missed a lot to Georgia, considering how difficult were lineouts without them. Also, they are two very powerfull locks, I think any prop would love to have these locks behind them. Both of them, alongside Clermont's flanker Kolelishvili are also strong ball carrier and very usefull to destroy mauls (especially Mikautadze - just check "Mikautadze maul" on YT) . I don't mention Toulon talisman Gorgodze who is retired from international rugby, despite that he is younger than Parisse. Unlike Tier1 teams like Italy, were an injured Pro14 player is replaced by another Pro14 player, Georgia suffers from a lack of depth, as almost every Tier2 team, except for the props. So, these three top level players were replaced by 3 players from french ProD2 and English Championship and this is a proof that Georgia is still a Tier2 team. Georgia also missed these 2 most experienced backs, centre Kacharava and fullback Kvirikashvili, both 100+ caps, and both out of injury.

    Despite that, I think that Georgia showed some good display, and made progress from an all-forward oriented game plan to a moste complete style.

    Italy played a decent game, and could have scored an 5th try, when Castello just had to run to the corner but made the wrong choice. In another hand, Allan's try (5:06) were scored after Lobzhanidze was hurted with a borderline tackle, then Mchedlidze loss the ball and Allan just had to run where Lobzhanidze is lying down, instead of being able to defend, but well played by Italy. Georgia also had an opportunity to close the gap to 4 points (7:00 on the video) with a great break by Gorgadze, unfortunately followed by a knock on from Aprasidze.

    I think that Georgia suffered a lot from the yellow card at min 30., with 10 points conceded during this time and the whole team looked very tired after that. Obviously, most of the players are not used to playing at such intensity, some of them are even amateurs and I think Georgia needs a Pro14 franchise or at least more Tier1 tests like this one to made progress. Also obvious that there is a gap between Italy and Georgia but not so big at all...

    Still, Georgia fielded a very young side, with the entire backrow born 1996, as the starting scrumhalf and the right winger while only 3 players in the starting XV are 30 or more. On the bench, Aprasidze born 1998 and Kveseladze born 1997. All these players are already decent and can still progress a lot. Also Georgia can compete with Tier1 teams at U20 level, especially this year, with 2 small loss against France (champions) and South Africa (3d) followed by 3 won against Ireland, Japan and Scotland. But again, the big potentiel of these players can be limited if they stay playing in the amateur georgian championship instead of a georgian Pro14 franchise or whatever professional team.
    Another good news for Georgia was the crowd, with more than 10K georgians fans in Florence and thousands in Tbilisi, whatching the game on a big screen. That's a big argument to get more Tier1 tests.

    Another thing, there is not a single foreign player in georgian championship and the whole national team raised in Georgia. I do not blame Italy for using foreign players and it is not the team that abuses it the most but still a good advantage for a team when they can't develop a local guy at some position. I mean, the entire italian backrow were born and raised abroad, Negri, Steyn and Meyer learned rugby in South Africa, talisman Polledri in England. But this is an additional reason for Georgia to develop its own players.

    Finally, congratulations to Italy for the deserved win, you showed that Georgia is still a Tier2 team who needs to keep working, but I think that Georgia is in the right way to become a strong rugby nation the following years !

    Cheers for the analysis. I agree pretty much with everything you said.

    I think the most important thing for Georgia is to get a Pro14 team first, not a Seven Nations spot.

    It'll allow them to keep their players in the same club set up, we've seen what that's done with Jaguares and Argentinian rugby. It'll also be easier to develop strength in depth because Georgian rugby will have more money and resources.

    I love how Georgia play. Squidge Rugby did a brilliant video on this recently and how their prowess stems from Lelo.

    If they can get a good, consistent back line they'll be lethal. Easily Tier 1. Those forwards are already Tier 1 level.

    I don't think it makes sense to expand the Six Nations until they have a club team which is there or there abouts. There are already naysayers on Italy being allowed in and how it was a mistake. Letting another Tier 2 team flop would hurt the brand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    A poor Nov. will be the end of Cheika imo. The wallabies have been disastrous and have declined since the last rwc. They are a very average side and bar 2 or 3 guys have no noteworthy players.
    I don't see them being a frontrunner next Oct.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,511 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    I was rewatching the Ireland v Argentina match last night and one of the things I noticed about the Argie scrum (as it was going backwards) was how their were binding. They were putting their arms around the outside of the props' hips rather than between the legs. I had never seen this before. I would have thought it weakened the scrum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,413 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    I was rewatching the Ireland v Argentina match last night and one of the things I noticed about the Argie scrum (as it was going backwards) was how their were binding. They were putting their arms around the outside of the props' hips rather than between the legs. I had never seen this before. I would have thought it weakened the scrum.
    Locks I presume? That's weird. Would have thought that they wouldn't be able to get their shoulder into the shove in that configuration.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,967 ✭✭✭✭The Lost Sheep


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    I was rewatching the Ireland v Argentina match last night and one of the things I noticed about the Argie scrum (as it was going backwards) was how their were binding. They were putting their arms around the outside of the props' hips rather than between the legs. I had never seen this before. I would have thought it weakened the scrum.
    Dont know reason behind it but theyve been doing it a while.
    Possibly could mean there is a greater spread of power across the front row and its about the drive not keeping the scrum at all tight and means it needs to be much more of an 8 man drive than binding like most teams/people do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    I would find that incredibly difficult but I could certainly see it benefitting a prop


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,248 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Surely it would make it harder to push up through your shoulders? The angle wouldn't be as effective?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,978 ✭✭✭✭irishbucsfan


    Surely it would make it harder to push up through your shoulders? The angle wouldn't be as effective?

    I would find it hard to stay fully engaged but then again I assume (perhaps naively) this is coming from Ledesma so... maybe props have wanted this for decades but weren’t able to string enough words together to explain it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    croket wrote: »
    Here are some highlights from Italy-Georgia, obviously from a georgian fan.



    Watched full game and IMO Georgia was not so far away. They faced a full Tier1 who really played 100% and Italy showed that the gap between Tier1 and Georgia is still not closed.

    If Italy missed few first choice team because of injuries, Georgia too. The second row duo Mikautadze (Montpellier) and Nemsadze (Ospreys) missed a lot to Georgia, considering how difficult were lineouts without them. Also, they are two very powerfull locks, I think any prop would love to have these locks behind them. Both of them, alongside Clermont's flanker Kolelishvili are also strong ball carrier and very usefull to destroy mauls (especially Mikautadze - just check "Mikautadze maul" on YT) . I don't mention Toulon talisman Gorgodze who is retired from international rugby, despite that he is younger than Parisse. Unlike Tier1 teams like Italy, were an injured Pro14 player is replaced by another Pro14 player, Georgia suffers from a lack of depth, as almost every Tier2 team, except for the props. So, these three top level players were replaced by 3 players from french ProD2 and English Championship and this is a proof that Georgia is still a Tier2 team. Georgia also missed these 2 most experienced backs, centre Kacharava and fullback Kvirikashvili, both 100+ caps, and both out of injury.

    Despite that, I think that Georgia showed some good display, and made progress from an all-forward oriented game plan to a moste complete style.

    Italy played a decent game, and could have scored an 5th try, when Castello just had to run to the corner but made the wrong choice. In another hand, Allan's try (5:06) were scored after Lobzhanidze was hurted with a borderline tackle, then Mchedlidze loss the ball and Allan just had to run where Lobzhanidze is lying down, instead of being able to defend, but well played by Italy. Georgia also had an opportunity to close the gap to 4 points (7:00 on the video) with a great break by Gorgadze, unfortunately followed by a knock on from Aprasidze.

    I think that Georgia suffered a lot from the yellow card at min 30., with 10 points conceded during this time and the whole team looked very tired after that. Obviously, most of the players are not used to playing at such intensity, some of them are even amateurs and I think Georgia needs a Pro14 franchise or at least more Tier1 tests like this one to made progress. Also obvious that there is a gap between Italy and Georgia but not so big at all...

    Still, Georgia fielded a very young side, with the entire backrow born 1996, as the starting scrumhalf and the right winger while only 3 players in the starting XV are 30 or more. On the bench, Aprasidze born 1998 and Kveseladze born 1997. All these players are already decent and can still progress a lot. Also Georgia can compete with Tier1 teams at U20 level, especially this year, with 2 small loss against France (champions) and South Africa (3d) followed by 3 won against Ireland, Japan and Scotland. But again, the big potentiel of these players can be limited if they stay playing in the amateur georgian championship instead of a georgian Pro14 franchise or whatever professional team.
    Another good news for Georgia was the crowd, with more than 10K georgians fans in Florence and thousands in Tbilisi, whatching the game on a big screen. That's a big argument to get more Tier1 tests.

    Another thing, there is not a single foreign player in georgian championship and the whole national team raised in Georgia. I do not blame Italy for using foreign players and it is not the team that abuses it the most but still a good advantage for a team when they can't develop a local guy at some position. I mean, the entire italian backrow were born and raised abroad, Negri, Steyn and Meyer learned rugby in South Africa, talisman Polledri in England. But this is an additional reason for Georgia to develop its own players.

    Finally, congratulations to Italy for the deserved win, you showed that Georgia is still a Tier2 team who needs to keep working, but I think that Georgia is in the right way to become a strong rugby nation the following years !

    Thanks for taking the time to review the match, it's great to get a Georgian point of view. Owing to the Eng vs NZ match, I only got to watch the first half, but the first Georgian try was very well taken. I thought the main difference between the sides was that Georgia started to look tired towards the end of the first 40, and Italian ruck ball was just that little bit faster. Also, Campagnaro is a genuine top-class centre, and stood out. Given it was a home game for Italy, I think the final scoreline was still more than respectable for Georgia.

    Soccer will always be the main sport in Italy, I doubt they ever get much better than their current level of 6N wooden spoon, 3rd place in their RWC pool, and a couple of Pro 14 sides who pick up the odd upset victory. As others have pointed out, Georgia should probably forget about the 6N for the moment, it just won't happen, but instead try and get some sides into the Pro 14. In the next maybe 10 years, Georgia could ease past Italy, especially as your U20 sides routinely perform better than the Italian counterparts. The only way I could see genuine change though in terms of meaningful international matches, is beating a higher ranked side in the RWC and progressing to at least the 1/4 finals. Basically, it's the path Argentina took to being admitted into the 4N.

    Good luck for future Georgian success anyway, you goal should be defeating at least Uruguay and Fiji in RWC 2019 pool play, and giving it a good whirl against Wales and Australia.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 160 ✭✭Irish Beef


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    I was rewatching the Ireland v Argentina match last night and one of the things I noticed about the Argie scrum (as it was going backwards) was how their were binding. They were putting their arms around the outside of the props' hips rather than between the legs. I had never seen this before. I would have thought it weakened the scrum.

    The Argies call it the bajada scrum they seems to be doing it for a while. might have worked for them in the past but not at the moment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    I was rewatching the Ireland v Argentina match last night and one of the things I noticed about the Argie scrum (as it was going backwards) was how their were binding. They were putting their arms around the outside of the props' hips rather than between the legs. I had never seen this before. I would have thought it weakened the scrum.

    It’s a technique called the bajada unique to Argentina, they stopped using it for a while in the 2000s but apparently Ledesma is a fan and brought it back. I saw Mike Ross discussing it on Twitter during the match, he said Ireland clearly had done their homework on it, driving low to negate the benefits and turn it into a weakness.

    I recall Demented Mole discussing it on their podcast too a while back but I can’t for the life of me remember which episode.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Irish Beef wrote: »
    Yeah_Right wrote: »
    I was rewatching the Ireland v Argentina match last night and one of the things I noticed about the Argie scrum (as it was going backwards) was how their were binding. They were putting their arms around the outside of the props' hips rather than between the legs. I had never seen this before. I would have thought it weakened the scrum.

    The Argies call it the bajada scrum they seems to be doing it for a while. might have worked for them in the past but not at the moment.

    Correct. Been doing it for years. The concept of Bajada is to make the scrum into an arrow that drives forward through the hooker at the tip of the arrow.

    All movements and positioning is to assist in this. The locks bind onto the hookers hips to pull them in tighter to the hooker and make that arrow stronger. The locks will also keep one foot slightly behind the other to transfer more of their body weight to the inside shoulder on the engagement and shove, giving more focus to the hooker.

    It's an interesting concept. It was formed in an Argentine club and became the accepted technique in Argentine scrummaging. All of their forwards are familiar with it. It probably peaked 3 or 4 years ago when Figallo was anchoring their scrum and the Argentine pack was eating SA and NZ for breakfast in the scrum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,511 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    prawnsambo wrote: »
    Locks I presume? That's weird. Would have thought that they wouldn't be able to get their shoulder into the shove in that configuration.

    Whoops. Yes the locks. :o

    Thanks for the info guys. It's funny that the amount of times I've seen Argentina, I've never noticed it before. As a former (very average) prop, that's embarrassing. Maybe it was because their scrum was going back so fast and the locks arms ended up sliding up the backs of the props that it became really obvious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭Webbs


    Wales team to face Tonga: Only a few changes then!!!

    Jonah Holmes; Liam Williams, Tyler Morgan, Owen Watkin, Steff Evans; Dan Biggar, Tomos Williams; Wyn Jones, Elliot Dee, Leon Brown; Jake Ball, Adam Beard; Aaron Wainwright, Ellis Jenkins (C), Seb Davies.

    Subs: Ryan Elias, Rob Evans, Tomas Francis, Cory Hill, Ross Moriarty, Aled Davies, Rhys Patchell, Josh Adams.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 265 ✭✭croket


    Georgia - Samoa Line ups

    Georgia again with a lot of youngsters
    1- Mikheil Nariashvili (Montpellier, France) - 1990 - 52 caps
    2- Jaba Bregvadze (Sunwolves, Japan) - 1987 - 52 caps
    3- Davit Kubriashvili (Grenoble, France) - 1986 - 46 caps
    4- Nodar Cheishvili (Cornish Pirates, England) - 1990 - 16 caps
    5- Lasha Lomidze (Aurillac, France) - 1992 - 42 caps
    6- Otar Giorgadze (Brive, France) - 1996 - 15 caps
    7- Giorgi Tsutskiridze (Aurillac, France) - 1996 - 11 caps
    8- Beka Gorgadze (Bordeaux-Bègles, France) - 1996 - 12 caps
    9- Vasil Lobzhanidze (Brive, France) - 1996 - 37 caps
    10- Tedo Abzhandadze (Aia Kutaisi) - 1999 - uncapped
    11- Zurab Dzneladze (Locomotive Tbilisi) - 1992 - 2 caps
    12- Tamaz Mchedlidze (Agen, France) - 1993 - 49 caps
    13- Merab Sharikadze (Aurillac, France) - 1993 - 58 caps / CAPTAIN
    14- Giorgi Kveseladze (Armazi Marneuli) - 1997 - 12 caps
    15- Lasha Khmaladze (Batumi) - 1988 - 67 caps

    16- Shalva Mamukashvili (Enisei-STM, Russia) - 1990 - 59 caps
    17- Giorgi Gogichashvili (Racing 92, France) - 1998 - uncapped
    18- Beka Gigashvili (Grenoble, France) - 1992 - uncapped
    19- Shalva Sutiashvili (Soyaux-Angoulême, France) - 1984 - 70 caps
    20- Beka Bitsadze (Narbonne, France) - 1991 - 27 caps
    21- Gela Aprasidze (Montpellier, France) - 1998 - 9 caps
    22- Lasha Malaguradze (Krasny Yar, Russia) - 1986 - 88 caps
    23- Anzor Sichinava (Batumi) - 1995 - 9 caps


    Samoa
    DsAGtsJW4AAcsfQ.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭Digifriendly


    Georgia vs Samoa a good indication of where both sides are at and should be a reasonable game. Have Samoa declined a bit as a rugby nation in last few years?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,637 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    Georgia vs Samoa a good indication of where both sides are at and should be a reasonable game. Have Samoa declined a bit as a rugby nation in last few years?

    Yeah, and Samoa is under a lot of pressure from Rugby League. It's a game that probably suits their style a little more.


Advertisement
Advertisement