Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

After Hours Presidential Election Poll

1212224262761

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,029 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    dudara wrote: »
    The reason why I am discounting Sean Gallagher as a candidate is that I haven't seen him do anything for the past 7 years since his first punt at the Presidency. He didn't stand for local elections or for general elections. We didn't hear anything (IIRC) during the same sex marriage or 8th amendment referendums. To me, it just looks like he simply re-emerged for a second shot. If he is serious about having an impact, I would have expected something from him in the past 7 years.

    I'm hoping tonight's debate will be interesting. We have a real lack of polls and a lot of turmoil, so it will be interesting to see how the candidates perform.

    I see Gallagher has had to chew his 'principles' for fear of missing out on a last debate. Funny.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    Hopefully thats exactly what he will be, the semi articulate buffoon that he is

    all criticism is self criticism, psychology 101


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,294 ✭✭✭LiamoSail


    I voted five times in that poll. :rolleyes::rolleyes:

    So Casey is in fact further ahead than the pole suggests?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,029 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    LiamoSail wrote: »
    So Casey is in fact further ahead than the pole suggests?

    Yeh, yeh he is! :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,577 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    One large bookie now has Casey as 2nd fav @29 (28/1).
    It's turning into a 2-horse race (old horse and the new blood).


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    dudara wrote: »
    The reason why I am discounting Sean Gallagher as a candidate is that I haven't seen him do anything for the past 7 years since his first punt at the Presidency. He didn't stand for local elections or for general elections. We didn't hear anything (IIRC) during the same sex marriage or 8th amendment referendums. To me, it just looks like he simply re-emerged for a second shot. If he is serious about having an impact, I would have expected something from him in the past 7 years.

    I'm hoping tonight's debate will be interesting. We have a real lack of polls and a lot of turmoil, so it will be interesting to see how the candidates perform.

    If Peter Casey hadn't emerged as a candidate it would be between Michal D and Gallagher
    but sean is aggrieved from twittergate the last time and i believe he will put some hard questions to michael d
    and to be honest i hope it descends into a sh1tshow and mudslinging contest
    or a brawl on live tv


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    One large bookie now has Casey as 2nd fav @29 (28/1).
    It's turning into a 2-horse race (old horse and the new blood).
    i'm feeling fairly confident about my tenner on casey to win at 100/1
    roll on friday


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Conservative


    Atlantis50 wrote: »
    scooby77 wrote: »
    And down to 9/4 in betting without Michael D....he was at 12/1 in that as recently as Saturday (threw on a sneaky €5 then).
    Some money going on him...

    Wow, down to 9/4 now. Good thing I got in at 16/1 last Thursday

    33aw22a.jpg

    Well done!! That's surely a winning bet at this stage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,887 ✭✭✭Atoms for Peace


    It will be great fun if Gallagher starts throwing some serious dirt at Higgins, which he surely must have after seven years of brooding. I can see MDH getting fierce ratty if he does.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,577 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    haley79 wrote: »
    i'm feeling fairly confident about my tenner on casey to win at 100/1
    roll on friday

    Somewhat also (80/1), but if they offer a pre-event cash out (even at half these odds), would be worth consideration too.

    Fair to say any early value has left the building now. And the W/O markets won't allow a line selection (risk reduction) as part of an acca.

    i047IZB.png

    Who knows what the final result will be once the hoards of average bingo-mass-tea-soapopera voters will swing, once they get bussed in to polling stations. I.e. "That wee man, he seems like a nice chap".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,157 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    It will be great fun if Gallagher starts throwing some serious dirt at Higgins, which he surely must have after seven years of brooding. I can see MDH getting fierce ratty if he does.

    It’s now or never for Gallagher. He’s gone down the smiley smiley harmless route so far and it’s gotten him sweet fa so tonight’s the night if he wants to push it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    It will be great fun if Gallagher starts throwing some serious dirt at Higgins, which he surely must have after seven years of brooding. I can see MDH getting fierce ratty if he does.

    i reckon sean has the ammo to unleash at higgins but why should he now when hes an also-ran


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,801 ✭✭✭✭suicide_circus


    The man was a ginger all along!!

    00052971-440.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,157 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    Hopefully thats exactly what he will be, the semi articulate buffoon that he is

    A multi millionaire “buffoon”...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭paw patrol


    haley79 wrote: »
    i reckon sean has the ammo to unleash at higgins but why should he now when hes an also-ran

    Probably forgotten about by election day or give Higgins time to recover or spin on it.
    sweet revenge, KO at the final furlong.
    who knows? also who knows if he has anything.
    I hope so.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,644 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    It depends, if some people were to be believed, his support level is still on 2% so there would be little point in going after him.


    Attacking Casey (even with his feeble level of support) will help them with the self-righteous PC voter, who would otherwise be stuck voting for MichaelD.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,157 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    paw patrol wrote: »
    Probably forgotten about by election day or give Higgins time to recover or spin on it.
    sweet revenge, KO at the final furlong.
    who knows? also who knows if he has anything.
    I hope so.

    It’s last chance saloon tonight. Now or never


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    Hopefully thats exactly what he will be, the semi articulate buffoon that he is

    Semi-articulate, self made millionaire, buffoon that he is. Making millions must be right handy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    the debate is on rte 1 at 9:35

    not sure who the moderator will be


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 145 ✭✭BoneIdol


    Patser wrote: »
    But Casey's approach, his speaking plainly and his attacks on Higgins have generated all the interest over the last week. If the others really want to make an impact they have to have a lot more presence and substance than last week.

    Yeah, where people think he's a complete knob and the others will do well to hammer him if they want any good will from the public.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    Semi-articulate, self made millionaire, buffoon that he is. Making millions must be right handy.

    if you sit on your communist arse for seven years in the aras writing bolshevik poetry you will make a nice cool 3.5 million euro

    unless your peter casey who will not take the salary nor the unvouched annual 317,000 euro expenses


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 10,930 Mod ✭✭✭✭humberklog


    haley79 wrote: »
    he just has to be himself


    Think so? I find him very flappy and sort of all over the place and his diction is odd.

    I hope he has a few drags off a spliff and chills the f out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,161 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    haley79 wrote: »
    the debate is on rte 1 at 9:35

    not sure who the moderator will be

    Beasty!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,043 ✭✭✭Berserker


    It will be great fun if Gallagher starts throwing some serious dirt at Higgins, which he surely must have after seven years of brooding. I can see MDH getting fierce ratty if he does.

    I'm not sure if he's got enough to rattle him, much as I'd love to see it. MD is a old pro and they are well used to dodging punches. Recall VB, who was a proper interviewer to be fair, trying to get at M. Martin and he couldn't lay a glove on him. Think it'd be something similar with MD and SG.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    debate in 76 minutes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,518 ✭✭✭✭dudara


    haley79 wrote: »
    if you sit on your communist arse for seven years in the aras writing bolshevik poetry you will make a nice cool 3.5 million euro

    unless your peter casey who will not take the salary nor the unvouched annual 317,000 euro expenses

    Honest question here as I don’t know the answer, can a president (or TD etc) legally not take a salary? The whole point of paying them is to disincentivise bribery etc. I would have thought it was mandated? If they wanted to give it to charity afterwards, then fine


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    dudara wrote: »
    Honest question here as I don’t know the answer, can a president (or TD etc) legally not take a salary? The whole point of paying them is to disincentivise bribery etc. I would have thought it was mandated? If they wanted to give it to charity afterwards, then fine

    As far as I remember he said he’ll take it, but redistribute it to local county councils.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,029 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    dudara wrote: »
    Honest question here as I don’t know the answer, can a president (or TD etc) legally not take a salary? The whole point of paying them is to disincentivise bribery etc. I would have thought it was mandated? If they wanted to give it to charity afterwards, then fine

    Yes, I think they have to take it first, and return it or give it away.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭haley79


    i hope they have the debate on rte radio aswell for the people who are stuck out driving


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,019 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    What's with these weird little videos about Michael D appearing on Casey's twitter?

    https://twitter.com/CaseyPeterJ/status/1054271429401890816
    And the American lad narrating them.
    Is he just trying to tap into the American reality tv politics MIGA feel of his supporter base, with their parroting talk of liberals, snowflakes, NPCs and silent majorities? Or could it be possible that he has received support in his campaign from American interests?

    I'd say Trump would much rather sit down with Casey than Higgins, and you'd have to wonder if the cancellation of his planned trip here might have been done with that possibility in mind.

    I just watched those video's on his twitter feed. there's blatent lies in them and yeah, what is up with an american narrating them?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement