Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

8th amendment referendum part 3 - Mod note and FAQ in post #1

1204205207209210324

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,662 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Mary Lou talking sense. Particularly about the stupid clapping.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,029 ✭✭✭SusieBlue


    AnneFrank wrote: »
    All the yes side have is the very small % of hard cases, and they keep going back to it over and over

    Even if there were just 1 hard case each year, the 8th should be repealed to acommodate that 1 woman.
    Even one woman suffering is too much. We all know it’s a lot more than that though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭robarmstrong


    KaneToad wrote: »
    Really??

    Yep.

    They just hide it behind the "care about the babies!!" curtain.

    If they really did "Love Both", they'd be focusing on what's around the uterus, not just what's inside it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,118 ✭✭✭Lackey


    Mary Lou calling out the clapping ....doing Claire's job for her


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 212 ✭✭Dressing gown


    bubblypop wrote: »
    how exactly is that social abortion?
    needs explaining

    I’m calling major BS there. The published stats make no comment on the health or otherwise of the pregnant women or foetus. 1 in 6 pregnancies miscarries. They are NOT healthy pregnancies. But you can’t know whether that would have occurred or not if the pregnancy has terminated early. Nor do you have ANY knowledge on the health of the mother in the stats. **** off suggesting it’s 97%.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,440 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Big mis-step from Ronan Mullen, offered to bargain for the hard cases, their numbers must be showing they are ****ed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭Shelga


    ‘Hard cases’? What it comes down to is, some the No side think a foetus conceived via rape can be aborted, but a woman who has consensual sex should be punished. Such utter hypocrisy. This programme is making me so angry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,687 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    Getting a bit peeved with this Abortion 'on demand' terminology. It's the moral issue that matters to me. Either it's morally right or it isn't so if one wants an abortion for some serious health issue OR they want one simply because they don't want to be a parent, then that doesn't matter to me when it's comes to providing for it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,440 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    doylefe wrote: »
    Wonder what way Claire will vote

    You tell her and im sure she will tell you...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,598 ✭✭✭robarmstrong


    AnneFrank wrote: »
    All the yes side have is the very small % of hard cases, and they keep going back to it over and over

    What do the no side have?

    Other than lies, misrepresentation of statements/statistics/reports, sneaky tactics and an overwhelming tendency to ignore everything that refutes their bizarre claims.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    Big mis-step from Ronan Mullen, offered to bargain for the hard cases, their numbers must be showing they are ****ed.

    He has changed his tune. A few years ago he showed complete disrespect to the TFMR families.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭Shelga


    AllForIt wrote: »
    Getting a bit peeved with this Abortion 'on demand' terminology. It's the moral issue that matters to me. Either it's morally right or it isn't so if one wants an abortion for some serious health issue OR they want one simply because they don't want to be a parent, then that doesn't matter to me when it's comes to providing for it.

    Exactly! The Yes side are not rebutting this point at all. Very disappointing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,597 ✭✭✭gctest50


    Yep.

    They just hide it behind the "care about the babies!!" curtain.

    If they really did "Love Both", they'd be focusing on what's around the uterus, not just what's inside it.


    jj5kjU8.jpg

    1000 words etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,268 ✭✭✭Cypher_sounds


    Claire will let him finish.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 484 ✭✭ANDREWMUFC


    Shut up Claire


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Lad in the yellow jacket just got caught rapid vaping in the studio!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭Uncharted


    P_1 wrote: »
    Lad in the yellow jacket just got caught rapid vaping in the studio!

    #Repealthevape


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,827 ✭✭✭AnneFrank


    What do the no side have?

    Other than lies, misrepresentation of statements/statistics/reports, sneaky tactics and an overwhelming tendency to ignore everything that refutes their bizarre claims.

    Pro life, not a license to kill


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭neonsofa


    neonsofa wrote: »
    Poor woman in the back who had her hand up the whole time has finally given up and taken her arm down.

    Nevermind the hand is back up


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,440 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Would you blame him?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,681 ✭✭✭✭P_1


    Peter Boylan massive mis-step there! Do not mansplain in this debate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭CptMackey


    Dr boylen schooling the Iona lady Steen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,662 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Peter Boylan scoring very high on the condescending meter. Mary Lou should be allowed talk more...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,348 ✭✭✭✭ricero


    No side winning this debate so far. Some of the yes side speakers have been very poor.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,662 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Audience whooping now. Embarrassing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,161 ✭✭✭frag420


    ..


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    so, what actual points have the no side made?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    This is farcical, treating such a serious issue as panto. I don't like seeing my experience treated like this, I'm out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,687 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    lawred2 wrote: »
    She's rotten to the core... A woman high on her own self esteem who has spent her whole life looking down her snout at everyone around her.

    She certainly does have a rather pompous demeanour about herself. However I'm willing to put that aside and listen to her arguments.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    marylou is making a political mistake
    i can't see her being welcomed in he west of ireland ever again
    and that is a shame


    I'm not watching it, but why not?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement