Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Terrorist Attack in Manchester (Read MOD WARNING in OP Updated 24/05/2017))

15960626465112

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    ilkhanid wrote: »
    The thng is...I really don't believe that there is any such thing as the "real version".



    Like the Danes and the Swedes?

    Unfortunately I think countries like Denmark and Sweden might be getting thrown into 'the west' grouping. It really only has been certain countries who've been bombing the Middle East but it might not seem like it from there. This could mean we might get caught up in it all also.
    If that does happen I would be disgusted by the attacker obviously but I'd be also disgusted by those who allowed the use of Shannon and also with Britain as their actions around the globe are putting us in danger because of our proximity to them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Was this man innocent? They dont add you to it for a prank.

    Better an innocent man/woman locked up, than 22 people dead.

    Edit: Replied to wrong poster but point stands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    neverever1 wrote: »
    Unfortunately I think countries like Denmark and Sweden might be getting thrown into 'the west' grouping. It really only has been certain countries who've been bombing the Middle East but it might not seem like it from there. This could mean we might get caught up in it all also.
    If that does happen I would be disgusted by the attacker obviously but I'd be also disgusted by those who allowed the use of Shannon and also with Britain as their actions around the globe are putting us in danger because of our proximity to them.

    The Islamist killers in Sweden and Denmark had been living there for a while, they were'nt living in Pakistan or Qatar,they had no excuse for ignorance of their adoptive country's policies. The same goes for the killer in Germany.What they did know was that these were countries that had given them every opportunity.
    This killer came from Libya, not Iraq. A huge number of IS recruits have come from Tunisia and other countries that have no beef with the West. They murder and bomb in the countries that gave them or their parent's shelter, asylum. Why should we accept it as a given or as natural,that Muslims have some excuse for murder because another Muslim country,possibly a thousand miles away, is at war with a Western country? Buddhists, Confucuians and Hindus don't believe that their being a Buddhist or a Hindu trumps their loyalty to their country of residence. Remarkably, despite that state of confrontation that has existed, on and off,between the West and Iran for decades now,there have been no mass murders by Shi'a Muslims., which makes me believe that the "Western policy" excuse is specious.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,862 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    EDL supporters shouted down by the Mancunians.

    'The people of Manchester don't stand with your xenophobia and racism.', 'The people of Manchester are going to stick together, no matter what religion you follow, no matter what the colour of the skin is. We're not going to stand with people like you.'

    http://metro.co.uk/2017/05/23/mancunians-show-real-manchester-spirit-as-they-shout-down-edl-protesters-6655982/

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,041 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Irish terrorist were not fighting to establish religious supremacy or on a religious point of principle. They were called Irish terrorists all around the world even though they did not represent the values of the vast majority of the Irish people. Islamic terrorists are fighting for religious values. It's plain inaccurate to call them anything else. The name doesn't suggest all Muslims are terrorists anymore than the name Irish terrorists suggest all Irish people are terrorists.

    So if 'irish terrorists' was a crappy way to describe the IRA because it caused lumped all Irish people in with the terrorists, then why are some people so insistent on calling these attackers 'Islamic terrorists' when it makes the same broad brush insinuating? Why not narrow it down and call them ISIS terrorists?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 402 ✭✭Exeggcute


    neverever1 wrote: »
    Unfortunately I think countries like Denmark and Sweden might be getting thrown into 'the west' grouping. It really only has been certain countries who've been bombing the Middle East but it might not seem like it from there. This could mean we might get caught up in it all also.
    If that does happen I would be disgusted by the attacker obviously but I'd be also disgusted by those who allowed the use of Shannon and also with Britain as their actions around the globe are putting us in danger because of our proximity to them.

    Sweden used its air force in the NATO campaign against Gaddafi in Libya.

    The do extensive arms exports to dictatorships in the Middle East.

    Radical jihadis also seem to refer to the West in their propaganda. Being a part of the EU is enough justification for them no doubt. Throw Shannon airport into the mix and we would be very naive to think we are not a target, especially since we might be perceived as a soft target.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,575 ✭✭✭WhiteMemento9




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    ilkhanid wrote: »
    The Islamist killers in Sweden and Denmark had been living there for a while, they were'nt living in Pakistan or Qatar,they had no excuse for ignorance of their adoptive countrie's policies. What they did know was that these were countries that had given them every opportunity, which makes me believe that the "Western policy" excuse is specious.

    What attacks are we talking about specifically?
    Different attacks are coming from different places and may have different reasons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,066 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    neverever1 wrote: »
    Unfortunately I think countries like Denmark and Sweden might be getting thrown into 'the west' grouping. It really only has been certain countries who've been bombing the Middle East but it might not seem like it from there. This could mean we might get caught up in it all also.
    If that does happen I would be disgusted by the attacker obviously but I'd be also disgusted by those who allowed the use of Shannon and also with Britain as their actions around the globe are putting us in danger because of our proximity to them.

    Things like Gay Marriage, our party craic socializing with lots of beer, independent women, growing atheism, etc are all going to be more pressing reasons for attacks that what goes on in Shannon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,066 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Exeggcute wrote: »
    Sweden used its air force in the NATO campaign against Gaddafi in Libya.

    The do extensive arms exports to dictatorships in the Middle East.

    Radical jihadis also seem to refer to the West in their propaganda. Being a part of the EU is enough justification for them no doubt. Throw Shannon airport into the mix and we would be very naive to think we are not a target, especially since we might be perceived as a soft target.

    Sweden is also a largely atheist country, liberal on gay rights, women's issues, music etc.

    These would have been greater pressing issue on the mind of the driver than the export portfolio of some Swedish companies.

    Isis are quite clear on that.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    Exeggcute wrote: »
    Sweden used its air force in the NATO campaign against Gaddafi in Libya.

    The do extensive arms exports to dictatorships in the Middle East.

    Radical jihadis also seem to refer to the West in their propaganda. Being a part of the EU is enough justification for them no doubt. Throw Shannon airport into the mix and we would be very naive to think we are not a target, especially since we might be perceived as a soft target.

    Yeah I actually don't know much about Sweden (and Denmarks) foreign policy so thanks for that. It might explain attacks there.

    Being apart of the EU might be enough but I see no reason why we should have anything to do with it. No one should be let near Shannon.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    Danzy wrote: »
    Things like Gay Marriage, our party craic socializing with lots of beer, independent women, growing atheism, etc are all going to be more pressing reasons for attacks that what goes on in Shannon.

    People don't attack for that. They are add ons. The route cause is the mass bombing of the Middle East for decades in my opinion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    Exeggcute wrote: »
    Sweden used its air force in the NATO campaign against Gaddafi in Libya.

    The do extensive arms exports to dictatorships in the Middle East.

    Radical jihadis also seem to refer to the West in their propaganda. Being a part of the EU is enough justification for them no doubt. Throw Shannon airport into the mix and we would be very naive to think we are not a target, especially since we might be perceived as a soft target.

    Ireland was a member of ISAF and had a few troops deployed in Afghanistan. The Irish army patrol the Golan heights and are in Lebanon.

    None of which matters. Ireland isn't a big target mainly because the Muslim community Issi small here, any radicals would get spotted easily.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭tinpib


    I don't have children, maybe it's because I'm getting older but that photo of the 8-year-old victim Saffie Rose Roussos hits me particularly hard for some reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,066 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    neverever1 wrote: »
    People don't attack for that. They are add ons. The route cause is the mass bombing of the Middle East for decades in my opinion.

    The Islamic State respectfully disagrees with you, that is way down there list but for some reason, it may not apply to you, but those who give your reasoning are loath to listen to the Org. behind it given it conflicts with their own view.

    Is that what they mean about the racism of low expectations, if they were white would they be taken at their word?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,066 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Ireland was a member of ISAF and had a few troops deployed in Afghanistan. The Irish army patrol the Golan heights and are in Lebanon.

    None of which matters. Ireland isn't a big target mainly because the Muslim community Issi small here, any radicals would get spotted easily.

    Ireland has one of the highest rate of fighters per capita travelling of any European State, it is also considered a financial hub for Al Qaeda etc.

    The extremist Muslim Brotherhood runs its European operations from Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    Last night's horrific attack was not just an attack on innocent kids, it was an attack on women and an inclusive, free society. The attacker knew the majority of Ariana Grande fans would have been young girls and he couldn't have picked an easier target. But this is in keeping with the warped Whabbist ideology that fuels such sick hate. A warped ideology that had its birth pangs in and continues to be spread and funded by the disgusting and primitive House Of Saud in Saudi Arabia. A country that treats women like chattel and their rights are almost non-existent.

    Yet this is the same country where The United States Of America just signed a new ten year $350 billion dollar arms deal last weekend. A deal that maintains The House Of Sauds suppression regime in Saudi Arabia, a deal that further enables their continuing brutality in Yemen and their global exportation of terror. But that's O.K, because for successive American administrations, their corporate masters and money is and always will be their God. The American 'national interest' is more important than the rights of women, the kids in Yemen or the global victims of Saudis inspired Wahhabi terror. So the elephant in the room has to be ignored.

    Why? Because billion dollar deals and The Saudis trillion dollar investments in the American economy. Means the Americans will gladly turn a blind eye, as The Saudis continue to provide the ideological and financial support to Wahhabi terrorist scum. Incompetent and war mongering America foreign policy through the decades has also facilitated, enabled and fueled the growth of the psychopaths from Daesh and Al Qaeda. From the brutal and illegal war in Iraq to the destruction of Libya, helping to return it to the stone age.

    Which all begs the question, will America ever learn and stop the cycle? Or are the corporate profits just too good? Will they ever stop this hypocrisy and confront The disgusting House Of Saud and the continuing export of their warped, Wahhabi, terrorist ideology. Sadly, I suspect they won't. Since Saudi oil and their big investments in The West will continue to prevent such confrontation, because it would appear that money is and will continue to be God.

    So the media and the experts, will continue to waste their times analysing the symptoms of the disease, rather than focusing on the real cause of the disease and why it isn't being addressed. Meanwhile, more beautiful & innocent young kids who are just beginning their lives, will continue to die and be sacrificed on the altar of hypocrisy.

    My deepest sympathies to all who suffered during last night's horror and may those who died RIP.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    Danzy wrote: »
    Ireland has one of the highest rate of fighters per capita travelling of any European State, it is also considered a financial hub for Al Qaeda etc.

    The extremist Muslim Brotherhood runs its European operations from Ireland.

    Traveling to Syria is one thing. Having the ability to plan and carry out an attack is another.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭Barry Badrinath


    Ireland was a member of ISAF and had a few troops deployed in Afghanistan. The Irish army patrol the Golan heights and are in Lebanon.

    None of which matters. Ireland isn't a big target mainly because the Muslim community Issi small here, any radicals would get spotted easily.

    Ireland is the Western edge of Europe, an attractive target for people looking to assert themselves, spread global fear and prove their reach capability.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭Barry Badrinath


    Traveling to Syria is one thing. Having the ability to plan and carry out an attack is another.

    Doesnt take much tbh


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    all it takes is one nutjob to carry out these attacks, remember what happened in Norway a few years with Anders Breivik and he killed twice as many


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,066 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Traveling to Syria is one thing. Having the ability to plan and carry out an attack is another.

    They are not too thick to get in to a car and start it , too thick to pick up a knife and stick it. These are people who had ancestors that came from the cradle of civilization while Europe was an uninhabited wood.

    Travelling to Syria is the hard option.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 56 ✭✭muppetshow


    fryup wrote: »
    all it takes is one nutjob to carry out these attacks, remember what happened in Norway a few years with Anders Breivik and he killed twice as many

    That was one incident years ago,how many have we seen in the last 5 years from islamists?Please come up with another excuse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    So you're saying we should be far more worried by things that are intentional as opposed to unintentional, despite the unintentional things posing far higher problems?

    Splendid.

    At what point will any of you admit the actual threat posed by Radical Islamic Terrorists in the UK has been statistically extremely low?

    Why the disproportionate and irrational attitude towards this one problem? It's the same in America..... if it's an Radical Islamist who bombs somewhere killing 20 people you have this extremely xenophobic, racist reaction but if it's just regular old mass murder committed by non-Muslims there's a "meh" reaction.

    Because understanding intent helps us with our reaction. A consistent, coordinated effort to undermine our societies and the way we live our lives, yet we should give it the same intellectual rigour as something like allergies. That's what you are saying? I think kids getting blown up at a pop concert in manchester is hard to overreact to, or at least it should be ffs


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,072 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Seeing some the videos on the news is awful. Seeing eejits excusing this and refusing to allow any idea of change is so heartless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,072 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    His family are from Libya but he is totally British. Cant possibly send him and his kin back where they belong. He never spoke to neighbours much. Nothing unexpected whatsoever but people still claim hes innocent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,039 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    This is too close to home


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    pjohnson wrote: »
    His family are from Libya but he is totally British. Cant possibly send him and his kin back where they belong.

    True.

    He's dead, and his family have already returned to Libya.

    (Then again, he might already be where he belongs - and I don't mean in paradise with all those virgins, either!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet/status/867106285208162304


    Even Morrissey is saying it. Morrissey ffs. He is more left wing than Ryan Giggs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    muppetshow wrote: »
    That was one incident years ago,how many have we seen in the last 5 years from islamists?Please come up with another excuse.

    its not an excuse,

    i'm just saying that these people don't have to be part of a terror cell to carry out these attacks they can do it on their own if needs be


Advertisement