Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Terrorist Attack in Manchester (Read MOD WARNING in OP Updated 24/05/2017))

14344464849112

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,201 ✭✭✭languagenerd


    pilly wrote: »
    The point some people are trying to make, or at least it's the one that I think about the most is why do we care more about people based on where they live?

    There are children being killed daily in the middle east, do we not a fcuk about them?

    This always comes up in these threads. Caring about one group of victims doesn't mean you don't care about another.

    But for most Irish people, something that happened in the UK will always resonate more strongly than an incident in a far-off place we know little about. Manchester is a city with a culture like our own, many of us have been there or know people living there, it was a concert nearly identical to one that took place here two days ago and many of us have travelled to the UK for gigs. It's very familiar to us and very real in our heads. It's very easy for us to picture the scene, to imagine ourselves or our families in a similar situation.

    On a micro level, if you heard someone died in a tragic accident, you might think "that's awful" and feel a bit sad, but you continue on with your day. If you find out that the person was from your village or went to your school or was friends with your cousin or worked in the bar you go to etc, it plays on your mind more throughout the day, you might even go to the funeral. And obviously if you knew the person, that's obviously going to affect you significantly. Does that mean you don't care about the stranger? Or just that the people closer to you (geographically/culturally/socially) affect you more?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,689 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    neverever1 wrote: »
    So you think Britain dropping bombs in the Middle East had nothing to do with this attack?

    I dont know cause im not sure where Bomber is from or his motive.

    And were Sweden bombing middle east?

    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    22 innocent people, many of them children, lose their lives in a sickening suicide attack and you use this to promote your agenda.

    you really need to do some serious growing up.

    There's thousands of children being killed by British bombs, I'm horrified by any child losing their life, you seem to be only horrified if it's a British child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,680 ✭✭✭elefant


    Help!!!! wrote: »
    Well said, most people are not anti immigration they just want it done right but are called racists/bigots etc.

    There are a lot of posters here that are very much anti-immigration, and are going far beyond being against just immigration.

    I would wager that every single poster on this thread agrees there is a serious issue with Islamic Extremism. It's very scary, and very sad.


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,458 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    neverever1 wrote: »
    So you think Britain dropping bombs in the Middle East had nothing to do with this attack?
    These guys are not particularly choosy - they will attack whoever they can to cause terror and gain publicity. No-where can claim to be particularly safe and anywhere there can be large gatherings of "Westerners" has the potential to be a target of an atrocity like this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,965 ✭✭✭Help!!!!


    neverever1 wrote: »
    So you think Britain dropping bombs in the Middle East had nothing to do with this attack?

    Look on youtube at videos of Ayaan Hirsi Ali or other ex Muslims & you will hear the reason


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    There needs to be better protocol for these events.

    This event was similar to the failed Paris Stadium attack. The Paris attack wanted to get into the stadium, explode a bomb and a second assailant would take out the crowds running from the attack.

    This happens so often in Iraq. An ISIS attacker explodes a bomb and a second bomb takes out the people running away.

    There needs to be better education for this. I am seeing videos on the news of people in the Arena rushing for the exits, some may have been crushed.

    If there is terror attack in a stadium or arena, stay in the arena. It is the safest place, they want you to exit.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    this is a result of a geopolitical conflict, exactly as the troubles were. trying to paint it as religious in cause is flawed.

    that's not to say islam isn't a conduit to control these young men, it clearly is, but painting islam as the problem is naive imo.

    its also naive to state that these guys are blowing themselves up for the seventy two virgins etc. think what you may of them but the religious symbolism is again just a symbolic embellishment signifying the nobility of the cause, which again is geopolitical. these guys are dying for a political cause, not for afterlife tokens.

    radical islam hasn't arisen from nowhere- totalitarian religious extremism doesn't do that, really. it has increased in popularity over the past several decades as a reaction to the instability and misery brought about in the gulf/ME.

    make an existence miserable enough or convince a people (of any grouping) well enough that they have been the target of gross injustice that has left their ancestral/traditional/original/whatever home a wreck and caused them to become a despised minority in one of the countries responsible and you are really creating quite an ideal situation for the generation of disaffected hateful youths and increasing the likelihood of these terrorist attacks.

    there are two solutions if you want to be ludicrously simplistic

    1- own the full requirements of geopolitical intervention in foreign conflict

    basically, acknowledge what you're up to abroad, don't even pretend to give a fcuk, kill em all over there and don't think twice about allowing refugees to escape. why give yourself the hassle? you had also better retroactively safeguard against the other dodge lads that are in europe, no point half-ar$ing it, deport them all back, families, the lot.

    anyone doesn't like it, shoot em. including liberals.


    2: mea culpa "we are all responsible for past horrors" white guilt approach

    full open borders. allow fundamental ideology to be preached and flourish in your country. subsidise the lifestyle of insularity and cultural concentration required to incubate terrorism and individual lunatics. refrain from fully investigating links with known terrorist groups, sites, literature, figures.

    even if such links, behaviours and traits become obvious, do absolutely nothing because 'human rights'. because even those who dedicate themselves to the grievous harm of the society that supports them must have the full gamut of trust, resourcing, encouragement and cuddles- to the extent of not presuming ill of them on a message board after they blow up schoolgirls attending a concert because well you know, that seems a little right wing doesn't it ~shudder~

    it'll all settle down in time if we're nice to them, and hey europe had it coming. and sharia law might be ok if we all just stopped fightin against it maaaaan


    theres yer two options, really.

    now, here's the kicker-

    thanks to the nature of global corporate independence and the short termism inherent in most western democratic systems, we're doing *both*, simultaneously

    i wonder how that's going to work out


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭Will I Am Not


    Has anybody mentioned the IRA yet? Because I think that we're not allowed to say much because of the IRA and stuff.

    The crusades...there's another one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,965 ✭✭✭Help!!!!


    elefant wrote: »
    There are a lot of posters here that are very much anti-immigration, and are going far beyond being against just immigration.

    I would wager that every single poster on this thread agrees there is a serious issue with Islamic Extremism. It's very scary, and very sad.

    Well I'm not against immigration, my wife is an immigrant & I was an immigrant before moving back to Ireland but people on here like to throw accusations at me just because I want better border control & easier ways to kick people out who are involved in terrorism


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,028 ✭✭✭H3llR4iser


    Problem is, this is "terror" in a form we've never seen before; We're past the historical motives nor the political ones, it's basically "because we can"; as we see time and time again, more often than not the attacks are carried out by native locals, not the "immigrants" that we so easily want to blame about everything.

    It's mostly about people being incensed through the Internet; Tell someone he is "oppressed" over and over again and at some point he'll believe it - put 100 of these people in a room, and you have a problem. Some will go to Syria or the likes to "fight", some will blow themselves up at a concert.

    Extremist Islam simply offers a "cookie cutter" ideal to which preach and make new accolites; If it didn't exist, it'd be something else. Mark my words, this will change shape soon - it'll start to be about people who had zero connections to ISIS, or even Islam nor other form of extremisms. They'll start pulling in anybody who can be made to feel "left out" - from the unemployed to the geeky kid who can't get laid.

    It's an immensely complex issue that will require immensely complex and novel approaches; Unless we want to have "weapons and explosives checkpoints" everywhere in every city, there's no silver bullet here. We need to rethink many things - is it really a great idea, for example, that any idiot can today access an huge, planet-wide audience and say whatever unchecked rubbish is in his/her head? The writing is on the wall (vaccinations fiasco, anybody?).

    Funny I'd write this on an Internet forum, but still...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,531 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    And what of the terror attacks in 20-30 years time? Are we going to say "but these are homegrown. They are from Syrian parents and grew up in the Europe".

    You have absolutely zero long term view. We will be sending our children into battlefields because their parents didn't want to appear "right wing". Their parents did NOTHING.

    and what do you want them to do richard? you and others are quick to rant but have no actual solutions, bar ones that discriminate against innocent people because of the actions of a few, all because they aren't the same as you. yet you would be the first to complain if you faced the same treatment.
    europe and each individual country within it has anti-terror legislation. It is for the most part effective. However the unfortunate reality is that dispite it, there will be lone wolf attacks. There isn't much that can be done to stop them and that's no comfort to the 22 families who have lost loved ones, along with the many others who have lost loved ones in various attacks. however we have to be realistic.
    Help!!!! wrote: »
    Why are people who want stop these attacks happening in Ireland right wing? How will you feel if it does happen over here & someone close to you gets injured or killed?

    we aren't talking about people who want to stop attacks, because we all want to stop attacks.
    we are talking about people who wish to discriminate against people on the basis of them being muslim, and people who want to implement solutions that not only don't work, but make innocent people suffer, just because.
    Unfortunately your argument just proves your naivety and ignorance to this issue, the Quran is not the bible, to its adherents it is literally the word of God, it cannot be amended to suit an agenda, cannot be revised to, in your words, make the sacrifice greater... before you condemn my suggestion perhaps you should further educate yourself on the beliefs of these extremists.

    your suggestion is childish. that is why it has little to no support on here. and when have you read the Quran?

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    I dont know cause im not sure where Bomber is from or his motive.

    And were Sweden bombing middle east?

    If you're not sure about the bombers motives then why are you asking about Sweden?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    Beasty wrote: »
    These guys are not particularly choosy - they will attack whoever they can to cause terror and gain publicity. No-where can claim to be particularly safe and anywhere there can be large gatherings of "Westerners" has the potential to be a target of an atrocity like this.

    Attacks could happen here but you have to look at the route cause. Bombing Middle Eastern countries for decades has led us here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,489 ✭✭✭SnakePlissken


    circadian wrote: »
    Jesus wept, anyone who cries foul at how the remains of a terrorist are treated, one who has just snuffed the lives of so many innocent children, really need to question their own morality, because at best it is naive, at worst it is downright dangerous.


    of a murderer are treated, one who so callously

    So how exactly would your method deter potential terrorists?

    I'll be ****ed if I'm elaborating any further than I already have, how this course of action will deter future jihadists is clearly and concisely written on my earlier posts in this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,929 ✭✭✭kopite386


    The children hospital received 12 children under 16 - they received the most amount of patients other hospitals received mostly adults


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 864 ✭✭✭neverever1


    Has anybody mentioned the IRA yet? Because I think that we're not allowed to say much because of the IRA and stuff.

    The crusades...there's another one.

    Everyone celebrated the IRA and their forefathers last year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,209 ✭✭✭ebbsy


    Help!!!! wrote: »
    Well I'm not against immigration, my wife is an immigrant & I was an immigrant before moving back to Ireland but people on here like to throw accusations at me just because I want better border control & easier ways to kick people out who are involved in terrorism

    And I would say it was not easy bringing her into Ireland properly either. I have done it myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,689 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    neverever1 wrote: »
    If you're not sure about the bombers motives then why are you asking about Sweden?

    Because you said had UK not being bombing Middle East then it would not have happened.

    I did not realise Sweden were such animals in your eyes too.

    You seem to know that it was over Middle East not me.( you could be right)

    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,136 ✭✭✭✭Rayne Wooney


    The stats have already been posted about the amount of Sympathisers. It is a massive amount of people.



    But a tiny fraction of 1.8 billon people.

    It's like saying all blacks are gang members, or all Mexicans are drug smugglers. It's idiotic.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'll be ****ed if I'm elaborating any further than I already have, how this course of action will deter future jihadists is clearly and concisely written on my earlier posts in this thread.

    No, the problem is that you're conflating people disagreeing with the deterrent effect of your suggestion with them caring for how the remains of a terrorist are treated as if their concern is related to humanity for the terrorist. There is a genuine concern about inciting further violence - a concern you haven't remotely addressed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,965 ✭✭✭Help!!!!


    But a tiny fraction of 1.8 billon people.

    It's like saying all blacks are gang members, or all Mexicans are drug smugglers. It's idiotic.

    Well 1% is still 10 million let that sink in for a second


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    neverever1 wrote: »
    Everyone celebrated the IRA and their forefathers last year.

    To be fair to the RA; at least they had a somewhat definable end goal - A United Ireland.

    Those dopes just want to kill everyone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,387 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    Calling people out for wanting to deport the families of people 'suspected' of involvement with radical Islam, calling G people out for wanting a full muslin ban on people entering Europe, calling people out for supporting internment, force feeding people pork, burying people in pigs blood isn't the same as calling someone racist for wanting a sensible immigration policy.

    Some of the suggestions in this thread have been barbaric. Sensible people have not been called racist or bigoted. I'd like a sensible immigration policy myself. I think these attacks on people going about their ordinary life are horrific. I can though see further than to blame the evil Muslims and that white Christians or Jews never bomb anyone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    neverever1 wrote: »
    There's thousands of children being killed by British bombs

    no, there isn't. There are thousands of children being affected by the rather nasty war in Syria, mainly at the hands of Assad and ISIS. The RAF is part of a coalition attacking ISIS.

    This wasn't a Syrian child that did this though, the chances are it is someone who is a British born, radicalised supporter of ISIS. They don't give a **** about children being killed in Syria. If they did, they wouldn't be doing it, or using them as soldiers and sex slaves.
    neverever1 wrote: »
    I'm horrified by any child losing their life, you seem to be only horrified if it's a British child.

    stop talking rubbish. Any child losing their life is a tragedy. You seem to be the only one using this to further your agenda.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,775 ✭✭✭✭kfallon


    8 year old girl confirmed dead, that's heartbreaking, never did any harm to anyone. Last night was probably gonna be one of the highlights of her all too brief life.

    I have to say (and this is in general terms) we really are the most despicable species on this planet, the harm we do to each other.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,786 ✭✭✭wakka12


    neverever1 wrote: »
    Would this attack have happened if Britain wasn't bombing Middle Eastern countries? I doubt it.

    you probably would think that but then look at stockholm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,139 ✭✭✭✭Mars Bar


    This girls tweet when she got her tickets to the concert last year. She is one of the victims. :(

    https://twitter.com/emiliesatwell/status/759849942957436929


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,929 ✭✭✭kopite386


    An 8 year old girl has just been confirmed dead - Saffie Roussos she was one of the people still missing with appeals on Facebook and Twitter


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,387 ✭✭✭✭Jayop


    kfallon wrote: »
    8 year old girl confirmed dead, that's heartbreaking, never did any harm to anyone. Last night was probably gonna be one of the highlights of her all too brief life.

    I have to say (and this is in general terms) we really are the most despicable species on this planet, the harm we do to each other.

    Sickening.


Advertisement