Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Backlash for RTE for Gilligan invite.

1246

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »
    My licence fee funds RTE.

    Mine does too. I have the option to watch or not watch, same way you do. Free choice is a great thing. Switch to RTE2 or RTE News while he's on, your tax dollars pay for those too, be a shame not to get use of them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Noddyholder


    infogiver wrote: »
    If you want to sit in front of the TV and cheer for a woman beating murdering scumbag who tortured anyone who got in his way and imported class A drugs that put children in the graveyard while he lived it up in his holiday home in Spain, then go right ahead.
    That says far more about your character then anything else you've ever posted.

    What class A drug & what children in the graveyards ? At least try and know the background in what your writing about.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,699 ✭✭✭thecretinhop


    Utter scumbag typical rte. This sociopathic reptile would more than likely get a fee which we would pay turgity would make it a soft interview he would lie through his teeth more than likely upset guerins family and hey it all ok the jokeshop latelate gets ratings. After valentines day just call it what is becoming the jermy kyle show.
    Instead of hard work researching guests etc its much easier to go down the lazy sensational route.. ffs well worth our license fee


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    What class A drug & what children in the graveyards ? At least try and know the background in what your writing about.

    Ok noddy. Either you don't believe that he was convicted of drugs offences or you don't believe that any young people have died as a result of taking drugs.
    Either of these is easily proven, incidentally.
    Which is your issue or is it both?
    You clearly think this man should be given a platform to put forth his case on the national broadcaster, despite him spending years putting forward his case in a public court of law, and having been found by that court to be a liar, so why do you think he should be given another chance to plead his innocence?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »
    If you want to sit in front of the TV and cheer for a woman beating murdering scumbag

    Show one instance in this thread where anyone said they would cheer him. Go on, I'll wait.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Mine does too. I have the option to watch or not watch, same way you do. Free choice is a great thing. Switch to RTE2 or RTE News while he's on, your tax dollars pay for those too, be a shame not to get use of them.

    I'm sure if RTE advertised that the LLS was going to include a live bestiality show that a lot of people would tune in too, but does that make it alright? I suppose you'd still be telling me to change the channel if I don't like it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    infogiver wrote: »
    If you want to sit in front of the TV and cheer for a woman beating murdering scumbag who tortured anyone who got in his way and imported class A drugs that put children in the graveyard while he lived it up in his holiday home in Spain, then go right ahead.
    That says far more about your character then anything else you've ever posted.

    Who said anything about cheering?? I must have missed his murder, and Class A drug trafficking convictions, got a link??


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »
    Ok noddy. Either you don't believe that he was convicted of drugs offences or you don't believe that any young people have died as a result of taking drugs.
    Either of these is easily proven, incidentally.
    Which is your issue or is it both?
    You clearly think this man should be given a platform to put forth his case on the national broadcaster, despite him spending years putting forward his case in a public court of law, and having been found by that court to be a liar, so why do you think he should be given another chance to plead his innocence?

    I don't know if you deal in facts or not but he was convicted of importing hash. Don't think that puts the children of Ireland on graveyards. Actually, it's a popular train of thought to legalise it. You continue on in your outraged hyperbole though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    infogiver wrote: »
    Ok noddy. Either you don't believe that he was convicted of drugs offences or you don't believe that any young people have died as a result of taking drugs.
    Either of these is easily proven, incidentally.
    Which is your issue or is it both?
    You clearly think this man should be given a platform to put forth his case on the national broadcaster, despite him spending years putting forward his case in a public court of law, and having been found by that court to be a liar, so why do you think he should be given another chance to plead his innocence?

    No one has ever died from taking cannabis!! I'd love you to "easily prove" that they have.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »
    I'm sure if RTE advertised that the LLS was going to include a live bestiality show that a lot of people would tune in too, but does that make it alright? I suppose you'd still be telling me to change the channel if I don't like it?

    Cracking whataboutery and some leap. Like it or not, Gilligan is the most infamous figure of the last 25 years probably. There's an interest there for sure. Didn't think I'd hear the word bestaility before dinner today, where's your decency?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Noddyholder


    infogiver wrote: »
    Ok noddy. Either you don't believe that he was convicted of drugs offences or you don't believe that any young people have died as a result of taking drugs.
    Either of these is easily proven, incidentally.
    Which is your issue or is it both?
    You clearly think this man should be given a platform to put forth his case on the national broadcaster, despite him spending years putting forward his case in a public court of law, and having been found by that court to be a liar, so why do you think he should be given another chance to plead his innocence?

    Sorry lad I just correcting the misinformation your putting out here & once again I see you twisting posts.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,631 ✭✭✭Dirty Dingus McGee


    Utter scumbag typical rte. This sociopathic reptile would more than likely get a fee which we would pay turgity would make it a soft interview he would lie through his teeth more than likely upset guerins family and hey it all ok the jokeshop latelate gets ratings. After valentines day just call it what is becoming the jermy kyle show.
    Instead of hard work researching guests etc its much easier to go down the lazy sensational route.. ffs well worth our license fee


    How is this typical of RTE.They tend to be quite a safe station by todays standards not at all typical them doing something controversial like this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,631 ✭✭✭Dirty Dingus McGee


    infogiver wrote: »
    I'm sure if RTE advertised that the LLS was going to include a live bestiality show that a lot of people would tune in too, but does that make it alright? I suppose you'd still be telling me to change the channel if I don't like it?

    To be honest I doubt many people would tune in for that just like I doubt many people would tune in for a live execution as was proposed earlier in this thread.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,467 ✭✭✭garrettod


    RTE needs to be radically overhauled...

    We do need to retain a public broadcaster, but we don't need it to have two TV channels and a eight radio stations or whatever the current count is. There is endless competition available for both radio and tv, both free and subscription services.

    We currently pay a licence fee to subsidise channels that don't benefit us - particularly when you look at the percentage of TV content that is available elsewhere (Eastenders, several TV shows etc.). I'm more than happy to pay for a TV licence that supports broadcasts that benefit the nation, I'm good with subsidising TG4 because of the Irish langauge content for example and also want a certain amount of local news and current affairs covered, but nothing more and certainly not to watch more bought in material that can easily be viewed on BBC etc.

    Just look at the price raised when UTV sold out it's NI regional broadcasting licence. Likewise, look at the prices raised in the past when various radio stations have been sold - RTE could sell off some of it's stations to raise much needed funds. Sell off one of the two tv stations and a few of the radio stations and you suddenly have €200m - €250m. I can certianly think of a lot of other things the nation would benefit from if those funds were released - be it public housing, improvements to the hospitals etc. etc.

    Rather than pay between €250k-€450k per year to the likes of Ryan Tubridy, Mirriam O'Callaghan, why not start spending our money more wisely or better yet, cut out the Friday night / Saturday night / Sunday night regurgitated talk show crap - we don't need to have three nights with the same crap and the same group of RTE cronies on time and time again, then to finally think we've escaped from them only to find that more of our licence fees are being squandered paying them to pretend to be great dancers on a poor rip off of Dancing with the Stars !

    RTE currently have financial problems (again !) and while it's correct to look at selling part of the property at Donnybrook (they should actually sell it all and relocate to a cheaper property in a less central Dublin location), but rather than cut unnecessary expenditure and sell off non-core stations, the solution is to sell some of it's property so it can keep paying high salaries to their mates. Completely unsatisfactory and long past time it was put a stop to !

    Hopefully people will start emailing Denis Naughton (minister.naughten@dccae.gov.ie) and tell him we want change, we want better value for our licence fee and we want RTE to be overhauled, to bring an end to the bad value it's providing. I've already contacted him but suspect he's not hearing from enough people to really give a sh1t.

    Thanks,

    G.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,631 ✭✭✭Dirty Dingus McGee


    I remember Gilligans lawyer being interviewed on the LLS I'd say about 10 years ago and despite him being very slick and answering all the questions well he came off incredibly badly in my opinion and frankly I'd have him at close to the same level as Gilligan himself for his ability to defend such scum.

    An interview would do nothing positive for Gilligan at all (like has being suggested) just show the country what a scumbag he is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,699 ✭✭✭thecretinhop


    I mean pure lazy badly researched easy options joke shop joe the socialist on 600k farcy oops wrong button. Most of rte if not all of it takes easy option operation t dancing with rednecks etc. As i said the rte are just lazy in fact this guest is the easy gutter option to get high ratings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,743 ✭✭✭Wanderer2010


    Paul Williams would be a great interviewer if it ever happened.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,743 ✭✭✭Wanderer2010


    I mean pure lazy badly researched easy options joke shop joe the socialist on 600k farcy oops wrong button. Most of rte if not all of it takes easy option operation t dancing with rednecks etc. As i said the rte are just lazy in fact this guest is the easy gutter option to get high ratings.

    Don't forget that RTE hate working class people despite most people in the country being of that class.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 479 ✭✭mikeoneilly


    Paul Williams would be a great interviewer if it ever happened.

    He would on this single issue for sure

    Other than that I wouldn't care to see him as he sold out to AGS a long time ago


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    Who said anything about cheering?? I must have missed his murder, and Class A drug trafficking convictions, got a link??

    Of course. Gilligan didn't murder or beat up V Guerin. Some other guy did that. Or maybe she's not dead at all. No Gilligan is a proper gent, the salt of the earth.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    Omackeral wrote: »
    I don't know if you deal in facts or not but he was convicted of importing hash. Don't think that puts the children of Ireland on graveyards. Actually, it's a popular train of thought to legalise it. You continue on in your outraged hyperbole though.

    That's right. A terrible injustice has been done to Gilligan and he deserves his 1/2 hour on the LLS to set the record straight.
    Crooked Gards framing an innocent hash dealer....who just happened to have enough money to build an equestrian centre....from his wages as a docker in Dublin Port you know...didn't all the dockers build equestrian centres...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    No one has ever died from taking cannabis!! I'd love you to "easily prove" that they have.


    10 seconds of googling


    https://www.google.ie/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/38994637?client=safari


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »


    The first sentence of that article said the poor guy killed himself. Read your own articles or don't bother at all.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »
    That's right. A terrible injustice has been done to Gilligan and he deserves his 1/2 hour on the LLS to set the record straight.
    Crooked Gards framing an innocent hash dealer....who just happened to have enough money to build an equestrian centre....from his wages as a docker in Dublin Port you know...didn't all the dockers build equestrian centres...

    Yeah because that's what was said. I think you see what you want to see to be honest. Brutal posting from you all thread tbh, making a bit of a show of yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    If he admitted his crimes and claimed to be a Reformed character, I would have no problem with him being given a non-profit opportunity to show his remorse but he hasn't and he likely won't ever.


    I haven't gone through the thread so it was probably already mentioned but Gilligan now has a Facebook likes page. The messages of support for him are sickening.

    https://www.facebook.com/OFFICIALJOHNGILLIGAN/


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    Omackeral wrote: »
    The first sentence of that article said the poor guy killed himself. Read your own articles or don't bother at all.

    He killed himself as a direct result of his addiction to cannabis.
    Read before you reply please.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,505 ✭✭✭infogiver


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Yeah because that's what was said. I think you see what you want to see to be honest. Brutal posting from you all thread tbh, making a bit of a show of yourself.

    I'm not the poster who is trying to make a case for a murdering scumbag.
    That's you.
    Your just embarrassing yourself with your excuses and now a personal attack.
    You should unfollow the thread before you dig yourself an even bigger hole.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 696 ✭✭✭Noddyholder


    infogiver wrote: »
    He killed himself as a direct result of his addiction to cannabis.
    Read before you reply please.
    infogiver wrote: »
    I'm not the poster who is trying to make a case for a murdering scumbag.
    That's you.
    Your just embarrassing yourself with your excuses and now a personal attack.
    You should unfollow the thread before you dig yourself an even bigger hole.

    Do you even read your own links ?? read it again. and your the first person here calling & generalising people as towrags.

    You haven't a clue what your posting about lad.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    infogiver wrote: »
    He killed himself as a direct result of his addiction to cannabis.
    Read before you reply please.

    According to his father, who isn't a doctor and was most likely grieving, angry and looking for sense in his son's death and/or something to blame. He suffered from psychosis. You should read your own bloody articles. Embarrasing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    infogiver wrote: »
    He killed himself as a direct result of his addiction to cannabis.
    Read before you reply please.

    Cannabis isn't addictive.


Advertisement