Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hail To The Chief (Read Mod Warning In OP)

13233353738193

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,084 ✭✭✭FA Hayek


    darced wrote: »
    This post has been deleted.

    The reaction is both extremely hilarious on one hand and pathetic/sad on the other. Its like all people have left is just inane name calling like some robot shill stuck on a loop.

    They have become a parody of themselves. South Park has enough material here for a decade!

    Exhibit A



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,833 ✭✭✭✭Grayson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,088 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    FA Hayek wrote: »
    The reaction is both extremely hilarious on one hand and pathetic/sad on the other. Its like all people have left is just inane name calling like some robot shill stuck on a loop.

    They have become a parody of themselves. South Park has enough material here for a decade!

    Exhibit A

    But that is more to do with the type of people who conflate social media with having a life. I mean, if she was so stressed out it how about calling a friend to talk about it? No, much better to record a video to show everyone just how emotional you really are.

    These people are actually no different that Trump himself, except he uses Twitter rather than FB or youtube.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,681 ✭✭✭Fleawuss


    FA Hayek wrote: »
    The reaction is both extremely hilarious on one hand and pathetic/sad on the other. Its like all people have left is just inane name calling like some robot shill stuck on a loop.

    They have become a parody of themselves. South Park has enough material here for a decade!

    Exhibit A


    Stage 1. Trumpski has triggered much more than emotional meltdown.
    The alt right icon on the video just gives the game away as trolling shyte.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,833 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    FA Hayek wrote: »
    The reaction is both extremely hilarious on one hand and pathetic/sad on the other. Its like all people have left is just inane name calling like some robot shill stuck on a loop.

    They have become a parody of themselves. South Park has enough material here for a decade!

    Exhibit A


    Except I was the one he was referring to, not whoever is in that video. I stated why I thought Trump is a petty vindictive man and strangely rather than replying to what I said people started talking about Hillary.

    So, lets look at he man. He spent years saying that Obama wasn't american. He told his supporters to look at a sex tape of a woman and she wasn't even in it. He constantly lashes out at anyone who offends him, he has no restraint whatsoever. He said that Cruz's father helped kill JFK. He's continuously commented negatively on the looks of women. He's known to wander through the dressing rooms of undressed teenage girls at pageants. He pretty much admitted sexually assaulting women. He's been known to rip off clients and contractors. 4% of his statements are rated as true by politifact. His vocabulary is the same as a 9 year old.

    He's a petty, vindictive liar. And if we don't like/respect him then we're snowflakes having a meltdown?

    I think I know why. It's because Trump isn't defensible. So the only thing that his supporters can do is make attacks calling his detractors snowflakes and other insults.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    Celticfire wrote: »
    Oh yeah the one where the password was "password".. Wikileaks have stated that the leak did not come from Russia that any 12yo could have hacked that account.

    How easy it was is irrelevant. And the fact you think there was a single account with a single password shows just how little you've looked into it beyond the nonsense spouted by Trumps supporters.
    Celticfire wrote: »
    Nothing new with his statements being taken out of context... par for the course. If that's the sole evidence that the Russians hacked the server it's pretty thin.

    It's not the only evidence the Russians did it, it's evidence that Trump wanted them to. There's nothing out of context there.
    Celticfire wrote: »
    It's the system that's in place since the foundation of the country... perhaps not perfect but it's the system. Just because you or someone else says it's undemocratic doesn't make it so. It's not the first nor the last time that someone won but didn't get the popular vote.

    Now you are just arguing for the sake of it. So to reiterate the point for you. Not believing in the legitimacy of the electoral system does not mean you do not believe in the democratic process.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Now he's doing this. Full speed towards totalitarian dictatorship
    https://twitter.com/nycjim/status/820623995808653314


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    Dan Rather. The last quote especially accurate.
    I want to avoid getting too caught up in the tweets of Donald Trump, but there are some comments that are so far beyond the pale that one risks normalizing them by ignoring them. And the message that Mr. Trump said today about Representative John Lewis, a true American hero, is such an instance.

    To be sure, Mr. Lewis levelled some very sharp criticism at the incoming president yesterday - calling his election illegitimate on account of Russian interference. We all know this story seems to grow darker and more worrisome by the hour. I have never seen an administration begin under such a serious cloud.

    One can easily understand why Mr. Lewis' comment would anger Mr. Trump because it is a real threat. The famed and respected Civil Rights leader is putting into words what few of his political peers have dared say out loud. And we must note that there are still many more questions about this issue than there are answers. The fact that the Senate will now conduct hearings - mark you hearings that may very well cast doubt on the legitimacy of a president who has yet to be officially inaugurated - will hopefully lead to a more complete account of what took place.

    But whatever the truth is about these swirling allegations on Russia, and whether one feels such conclusions of illegitimacy are premature, Mr. Trump would have been well served to have let Mr. Lewis' comments pass. Of course he couldn't. In a pair of tweets the President-elect wrote:

    "Congressman John Lewis should spend more time on fixing and helping his district, which is in horrible shape and falling apart (not to......mention crime infested) rather than falsely complaining about the election results. All talk, talk, talk - no action or results. Sad!"

    I have known Mr. Lewis for decades. I covered him in those early and dangerous days of the Civil Rights Movement when almost all the institutions of government and society, especially in the South, seemed to be arrayed against the young activists. One thing you cannot say about John Lewis is that he is "all talk, talk, talk - no action or results." This man came within a hair's breath of dying after being beaten by Alabama State Troopers on a march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma. His expert organizing skills and moral clarity made the United States a far more just and equitable nation. And for all this to happen at the beginning of Martin Luther King weekend, of all times.

    Perhaps the conservative political commentator Bill Kristol said it best in one of his tweets:

    "It's telling, I'm afraid, that Donald Trump treats Vladimir Putin with more respect than he does John Lewis."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,445 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    How the last four presidents rank in terms of popularity just as they were about to take office https://qz.com/885286/presidential-inauguration-donald-trump-has-the-lowest-approval-ratings-of-any-president-elect-in-recent-history/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    david75 wrote: »
    Now he's doing this. Full speed towards totalitarian dictatorship
    https://twitter.com/nycjim/status/820623995808653314

    The fact that some people cannot see how dangerous this makes me wonder if it's worth being worried about Trump when the world is full of so many fools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    rossie1977 wrote: »
    How the last four presidents rank in terms of popularity just as they were about to take office https://qz.com/885286/presidential-inauguration-donald-trump-has-the-lowest-approval-ratings-of-any-president-elect-in-recent-history/

    He seems completely uninterested in bringing the country together. He appears to actually want more divisiveness.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭HellSquirrel


    Regarding Representative Lewis, in truth, I don't entirely approve of what he said. I thought it was...rather undignified. On the other hand, there is a dignity to refusing to let your silence be taken as approval for what is looking more and more like a monumental heap of bull**** that will be Friday. So I'm a bit torn on it.

    Trump's response was, as always, thoroughly undignified, irrelevant and moronic, but that is...not a thing that surprises me anymore when it comes to that guy and Twitter.

    Edit: Eeh. Given this is a guy that took a beating for what he believed before, I don't really get to say that his words for civil liberty and the right to a sane country were undignified. I might have to concede that point to my fiance when he gets back after our debate on it this morning :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    Fleawuss wrote: »
    Stage 1. Trumpski has triggered much more than emotional meltdown.
    The alt right icon on the video just gives the game away as trolling shyte.

    lol it's called a rare pepe, not an 'alt right icon'.

    I'll admit those videos are funny, as are most of the memery on places like t_D and /pol/. The problem is Trump supporters can't separate meme from fact, since most people on /pol/ don't actually care about politics at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭HellSquirrel


    lol it's called a rare pepe, not an 'alt right icon'.

    I'll admit those videos are funny, as are most of the memery on places like t_D and /pol/. The problem is Trump supporters can't separate meme from fact, since most people on /pol/ don't actually care about politics at all.

    Some alt-right lot started using Pepe as an icon for themselves (to the mild horror of the guy that created him), hence the term. I think they have about run pepe into the ground now, so it'll probably be forgotten about fairly soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 199 ✭✭Il Fascista


    Pepe won't be forgotten, if anything he's gained more power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    Some alt-right lot started using Pepe as an icon for themselves (to the mild horror of the guy that created him), hence the term. I think they have about run pepe into the ground now, so it'll probably be forgotten about fairly soon.

    One thing to note about "4chan humour" is that once normies start using their memes, they immediately stop using them and find new stuff. So all we need now is a bunch of SJW Hillary voters to start using them and bye bye rare pepe's.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭HellSquirrel


    One thing to note about "4chan humour" is that once normies start using their memes, they immediately stop using them and find new stuff. So all we need now is a bunch of SJW Hillary voters to start using them and bye bye rare pepe's.

    Tbh, if they want to represent themselves by a hijacked cartoon frog, let 'em at it, I reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭Jimoslimos


    Regarding Representative Lewis, in truth, I don't entirely approve of what he said. I thought it was...rather undignified. On the other hand, there is a dignity to refusing to let your silence be taken as approval for what is looking more and more like a monumental heap of bull**** that will be Friday. So I'm a bit torn on it.

    Trump's response was, as always, thoroughly undignified, irrelevant and moronic, but that is...not a thing that surprises me anymore when it comes to that guy and Twitter.
    Yeah I wasn't sure whether boycotting the inauguration was the best thing either but as always Trump manages to find a way to make himself look worse.

    He could have simply said;

    "I'm disappointed that an iconic figure in the Civil Rights Movement and American politics will not be attending. I think it is important to respect the democratic will of the people and the office of President."

    Makes the same point without the needless aggression.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    The fact that some people cannot see how dangerous this makes me wonder if it's worth being worried about Trump when the world is full of so many fools.


    Who's worse. The fool or the fools that voted for him? ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,896 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    david75 wrote: »
    Who's worse. The fool or the fools that voted for him? ;)
    the greater fools who put up an unelectable candidate for him to stand against and hope that the electorate would simply vote for who "they were programmed to vote for" because the alternative was so unpalatable.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭david75


    the greater fools who put up an unelectable candidate for him to stand against and hope that the electorate would simply vote for who "they were programmed to vote for" because the alternative was so unpalatable.



    The one thing all this has done is strip me of the notion that there's men behind the curtain running the whole show.

    At the same time, the military industrial complex wants war. And this is that and trump the perfect stooge to walk us into that.
    He is already.

    It's just so bewildering that we're here. Literally on the edge about to go over and no coming back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,617 ✭✭✭swampgas


    http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/philippe-reines-donald-trump-214630

    Interesting article about Philippe Reines, the guy who was acting as Trump when Hilary was rehearsing for the debates. His comments on Trump's behaviour and mannerisms (which he researched for the role) are interesting. I hadn't noticed that he doesn't make eye contact much, for example.


    * edit * some of the comments are a little frightening though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    the greater fools who put up an unelectable candidate for him to stand against and hope that the electorate would simply vote for who "they were programmed to vote for" because the alternative was so unpalatable.

    The unelectable candidate won the popular vote and lost the electoral college by under 100,000 votes with the FBI and Russia actively working against her after decades of harrassment by at least 1 'major' news network and tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded congressional witchhunts. Very electable.
    Didn't happen.

    The peril is the loss of character in America, the ignorance and anti-intellectualism that's pervasive. It's a society that gets its guidance from Toddlers in Tiaras, Duck Dynasty and Keeping up with the Kardashians.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,681 ✭✭✭Fleawuss


    david75 wrote: »
    Now he's doing this. Full speed towards totalitarian dictatorship
    https://twitter.com/nycjim/status/820623995808653314

    What might happen is that the WH news conference will become a much bigger event where the huge networks will be diluted in a bigger pond and find themselves reporting on questions asked by the high school newspaper. The events will also be far rarer.

    The physical absence from the WH will hurt egos: whether that will affect their ability to report on Trumps policies remain to be seen.

    If there are cool heads in the US media there is a huge opportunity here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭HellSquirrel


    the greater fools who put up an unelectable candidate for him to stand against and hope that the electorate would simply vote for who "they were programmed to vote for" because the alternative was so unpalatable.

    No. That argument merely makes the people that vote for him to be gullible fools who haven't an original thought. There are many reasons why it went how it did and the point you bring up is one of them, albeit I'm going to make an unpopular opinion and point out that there was an awful lot of lies around Clinton as well, so not all of her unelectability was her own fault. And -despite that- and despite the FBI, she won the popular vote by a pretty darn high margin (Trump's electoral college win is by FAR the most anyone's lost the popular vote and won the electoral college - 2.86m in the difference. The next is Bush/Gore with a difference of 544k. Obviously, going back further you have differences in population size, percentage that could vote, percentage that -would- vote, etc., so I'm not saying that it's beyond any reason, but it's still a bloody impressive number more people voted for Clinton than Trump).

    But the point is that the people that voted for him, the people that interfered and the dimwits that just want to watch the world burn take one damn hell of a lot more responsibility for his win than "oh no, but CLINTON"*. It's bull****, and it's cowardly bull**** at that. Complain that liberals are smug, condescending and irritating, grand, but Trump? He's a hell of a lot more on the republicans, and the extreme wing thereof at that.

    *Not that they will.

    Edit: Igotadose put it a lot more succinctly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,088 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Fleawuss wrote: »
    What might happen is that the WH news conference will become a much bigger event where the huge networks will be diluted in a bigger pond and find themselves reporting on questions asked by the high school newspaper. The events will also be far rarer.

    The physical absence from the WH will hurt egos: whether that will affect their ability to report on Trumps policies remain to be seen.

    If there are cool heads in the US media there is a huge opportunity here.

    You make it sound like Trump is doing this to try to help the media. This is no more than a way to move the press off the site and away from the WH, less chance of them 'bumping' into a story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Regarding Representative Lewis, in truth, I don't entirely approve of what he said. I thought it was...rather undignified. On the other hand, there is a dignity to refusing to let your silence be taken as approval for what is looking more and more like a monumental heap of bull**** that will be Friday. So I'm a bit torn on it.

    Trump's response was, as always, thoroughly undignified, irrelevant and moronic, but that is...not a thing that surprises me anymore when it comes to that guy and Twitter..

    The residents of Lewis' district have responded on Twitter to just how horrible it is. It includes Buckhead, one of the richest areas in Atlanta. Hartsfield Int'l airport. Lower crime rate than, say, DC or Missouri or other places. Lots of beautiful scenery. Hartsfield's a great airport in my experience. Much better than any in NYC, which gave us Trump. Said residents are lucky to have such a congressman.

    But, Trump the racist figured, long-term black congressman, must come from a minority-dominated poor district.

    Consider this: Lewis suffered a fractured skull protesting on behalf of blacks in the South early in his career. Has Trump *ever* suffered an injury for his beliefs? We know about the heel spurs keeping him out of Vietnam. What a great patriot the President'll be.

    I am thinking that going forward, I'm just going to follow US politics by watching Saturday Night live. I especially liked the line about Steve Harvey - if Trump's such a great real estate developer and mogul, couldn't he find someone with experience to help with housing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio


    Igotadose wrote: »
    The unelectable candidate won the popular vote and lost the electoral college by under 100,000 votes with the FBI and Russia actively working against her after decades of harrassment by at least 1 'major' news network and tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer-funded congressional witchhunts. Very electable.
    Didn't happen.

    The peril is the loss of character in America, the ignorance and anti-intellectualism that's pervasive. It's a society that gets its guidance from Toddlers in Tiaras, Duck Dynasty and Keeping up with the Kardashians.

    On the very last day of the election, Trump tweeted a couple of hours before for a extra stop in Michigan and 40,000 people showed up at 1am for his final rally. I think the high energy was the main reason he won.

    You can blame the FBI and what not, but none of that would have happened if his opponent wasn't doing shady things. Only have themselves to blame.

    123.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 778 ✭✭✭BabyCheeses


    Oh memes, that's me convinced. What else does 4chan have for us?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement