Hail To The Chief (Read Mod Warning In OP)

red ears

el diablo wrote: »

Possible coup and/or assassination attempt around inauguration time.
The Donald will need to be on his toes next week. :cool:

I'd say the secret service will be very active on Friday night.

el diablo

B_Wayne wrote: »

Yes, Trump has shown no indication that he is a rational player. That's inherent piece of logic in nuclear policy. I, frankly do not think that he is any way to the presidency. He lacks any sort of diplomatic intelligence and is going to piss off a multitude of nations via his simply childish behaviour. So yep, I don't think the risk with Hillary was remotely comparable. It's a rational conclusion.

Bill's wife was certain to start conflict with Russia had she been elected. Some of her main policies included implementing a no-fly zone over Syria and regime change/ousting Assad. She has also threatened Iran with nuclear weapons in the past and is fully responsible for the migrant crisis in Europe after her interference in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan etc. She is dangerously untrustworthy and unstable.

humanji

A Little Pony wrote: »

Remember things did get released about Trump. Do people not remember the tape with him and Billy Bush? Probably the most embarrassing scandal for decades

Is there actually anything to compete with it though? Have any tapes/recordings been released in the last few decades? That was something someone desperately struggled to dig up. The Wikileaks was a hatchet job designed to attack one candidate while protecting another.

el diablo wrote: »

Do you people honestly believe that Bill Clinton's psychopathic war criminal of a wife would've been a safer pair of hands with the nuclear codes at her disposal?

Well, Clinton doesn't go to peices when someone tweets something bad about them and has the US intel organisations afraid to share any information with her as they suspect her to be a Russian mole. So yeah, the world would have been in safer hands.

She'd have been a terrible president, but that doesn't mean Trump would have been a better one.

red ears wrote:

Give the poor aul donald a chance. Maybe he will turn out ok.

So many people seem to be saying this. It's mad. He has a history of screwing people over for personal gain. Running for election he's made it clear he's doing it for personal gain. Once he won, he started working for personal gain. At what point do we say "maybe we've given him enough of a chance, he's just not going to change"?

el diablo

humanji wrote: »

Is there actually anything to compete with it though? Have any tapes/recordings been released in the last few decades? That was something someone desperately struggled to dig up. The Wikileaks was a hatchet job designed to attack on candidate while protecting another.



Well, Clinton doesn't go to peices when someone tweets something bad about them and has the US intel organisations afraid to share any information with her as they suspect her to be a Russian mole. So yeah, the world would have been in safer hands.

She'd have been a terrible president, but that doesn't mean Trump would have been a better one.


So many people seem to be saying this. It's mad. He has a history of screwing people over for personal gain. Running for election he's made it clear he's doing it for personal gain. Once he won, he started working for personal gain. At what point do we say "maybe we've given him enough of a chance, he's just not going to change"?

He more than likely will be a terrible president but without a doubt he was the least worst option available.

humanji

I can't accept that at all. Just look at what he's doing now. Kleptocracy really is what America is going to be. I honestly see a civil war coming.

Sweetemotion

humanji wrote: »

I can't accept that at all. Just look at what he's doing now. Kleptocracy really is what America is going to be. I honestly see a civil war coming.

A civil war, between who exactly?

60 million people voted for Trump to be their president.

humanji

Sweetemotion wrote: »

A civil war, between who exactly?

60 million people voted for Trump to be their president.

A larger amount voted against him. And a huge number have buyers remorse. And there's many elements of his and the GOPs actions that don't sit right. He's purposefully trying to divide the people, instead of doing his job. He's done nothing to be trusted, so every action should be treated as suspect until he gains people's trust. And even then, people should be wary.

gandalf

el diablo wrote: »

He more than likely will be a terrible president but without a doubt he was the least worst option available.

That's your opinion and tbh I disagree with you totally. Then again I don't believe Trump will last long as President, he is absolutely totally and utterly out of his depth and his press conference and rants on twitter just confirm this.

What interests me greatly is that Americans seem to have no problems with their future president praising a dictatorial president of Russian in the mould of the Soviet Strongmen like Stalin. Putin seems to have Trump firmly in his pocket.

SkinnyBuddha

Apparently Trumpski is going to perform his own music at his inaugruation due to lack of other artists willing to do it.

Leroy42

The Guardian are reporting that Trump is going ahead with a multi million expansion of his Scotland golf course. Trumps team has said that it doesn't all outside of Trumps promise not to have any foreign business during his presidency that he announced at the press conference.

Yet again, Trump shows that what he says is not what he does. He didn't qualify his statement. OK, it's not too important, but all those people saying we should give him a chance, the guy isn't interested. He is a businessman and is not going to give up his life business for a gig that could last only 4 years.

How his two sons, who have just taken over the business have been able to make the decision so quickly without any input from Donald is strange but.

Grayson

el diablo wrote: »

Do you people honestly believe that Bill Clinton's psychopathic war criminal of a wife would've been a safer pair of hands with the nuclear codes at her disposal?

They're far safer in the hands of a man who feels a need to retaliate against anyone who insults him.

Christy42

Leroy42 wrote: »

The Guardian are reporting that Trump is going ahead with a multi million expansion of his Scotland golf course. Trumps team has said that it doesn't all outside of Trumps promise not to have any foreign business during his presidency that he announced at the press conference.

Yet again, Trump shows that what he says is not what he does. He didn't qualify his statement. OK, it's not too important, but all those people saying we should give him a chance, the guy isn't interested. He is a businessman and is not going to give up his life business for a gig that could last only 4 years.

How his two sons, who have just taken over the business have been able to make the decision so quickly without any input from Donald is strange but.

I am shocked. Shocked you hear me. You are right. Donald had his chance during the campaign and after the election. He has continued to lie and gas light and lash out and everyone and anyone.

Skylinehead

el diablo wrote: »

Do you people honestly believe that Bill Clinton's psychopathic war criminal of a wife would've been a safer pair of hands with the nuclear codes at her disposal?

Read the notes in the first post please.

ChikiChiki

Christy42 wrote: »

I am shocked. Shocked you hear me. You are right. Donald had his chance during the campaign and after the election. He has continued to lie and gas light and lash out and everyone and anyone.

If anything I've noticed he's even more brazen since he won the presidency. There's an air of invincibility about him and he feels he can do or say what he likes.

Diplomacy seems to be completly out the window.

demfad

Here's a link to where Estonians have picked up that it's their secret service who recorded a Trump man and a leading member of the Duma in Orague. The other day Trump declared that his lawyer Cohen was not in Prague as per dossier. If the Estonians provide the U.S. media with a pick this will now wide open

http://news.err.ee/v/news/df22cea3-1c2e-4139-92ea-08f029af9f07/newsweek-estonian-foreign-intelligence-eavesdropped-on-russian-official-meeting-trump-associate

A Little Pony

See the Hollywood elites are at it again, the same group of people who haven't got to worry about when the next pay check is or putting food on the table.

These movie stars need to be very careful because they will start to notice less people going to the cinema to watch their movies, which means less profit and with that meaning less money for them. People who rely on the public as movie stars do should not talk about politics. It is just divisive and you will not win because half the country will not agree and a substantial amount will decide to not pay to watch anything you do.

They are getting embarrassing now.

Leroy42

A Little Pony wrote: »

See the Hollywood elites are at it again, the same group of people who haven't got to worry about when the next pay check is or putting food on the table.

These movie stars need to be very careful because they will start to notice less people going to the cinema to watch their movies, which means less profit and with that meaning less money for them. People who rely on the public as movie stars do should not talk about politics. It is just divisive and you will not win because half the country will not agree and a substantial amount will decide to not pay to watch anything you do.

They are getting embarrassing now.

Back to trying to shut down free speech.

Why are you so worried about people saying anything negative about Trump?

Businessmen should be very careful as even when they win over 50% of the people don't agree with them and they might just start to see less people wanting to use a business associated with them.

FA Hayek

InTheTrees wrote: »

No. It's just part of the culture here. The mentally handicapped are out on the street and everyone knows it was Regan's policies that kicked them out of the hospitals.
Similarly the prison system is essentially used as long term care for the mentally handicapped. Where else would they go? And whos going to pay?

So, that is a no, you do not have any proof or evidence to support your claim, its 'just known'... if its just known how come I do not 'just know' it?

Your just as bad as others who peddle fake news. Tell us something as fact, when asked to back it up, you refuse. You were called out on this in another forum, and you ran away with your tail behind your legs. This is AH so people can make stuff up alas.

FA Hayek

humanji wrote: »

A larger amount voted against him. And a huge number have buyers remorse. And there's many elements of his and the GOPs actions that don't sit right. He's purposefully trying to divide the people, instead of doing his job. He's done nothing to be trusted, so every action should be treated as suspect until he gains people's trust. And even then, people should be wary.

To be honest, people going on about civil war, Trump is an illegitimate president, martial law to stop Trump being president, are stupid idiots. In a Republican democracy the hand over of power is the keystone of such a system working.

These people who hail from the left, who would view themselves as educated progressive, worldly and tolerant beings, are losing their minds and acting like hysterical primal cavemen.

Trump will neither be as good as his supporters will claim to be, nor as bad as people like yourself will claim to be.

The continued reaction of people to his election is nothing short of pathetic. It reminds me that most people are willing to believe in flat earth emotional reasoning, no matter what their hue.

WinnyThePoo

A Little Pony wrote: »

See the Hollywood elites are at it again, the same group of people who haven't got to worry about when the next pay check is or putting food on the table.

These movie stars need to be very careful because they will start to notice less people going to the cinema to watch their movies, which means less profit and with that meaning less money for them. People who rely on the public as movie stars do should not talk about politics. It is just divisive and you will not win because half the country will not agree and a substantial amount will decide to not pay to watch anything you do.

They are getting embarrassing now.

It's pretty embarrassing your so against free speech.

The pure arrogance off ya.

david75

Grayson wrote: »

He can
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_football

That's almost totally wrong.
There's a number of ways administrators and army and navy chiefs can prevent him doing anything.

Sweetemotion

WinnyThePoo wrote: »

It's pretty embarrassing your so against free speech.

The pure arrogance off ya.

The smell of smugness off ya.

david75

el diablo wrote: »

Bill's wife was certain to start conflict with Russia had she been elected. Some of her main policies included implementing a no-fly zone over Syria and regime change/ousting Assad. She has also threatened Iran with nuclear weapons in the past and is fully responsible for the migrant crisis in Europe after her interference in Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan etc. She is dangerously untrustworthy and unstable.

Putin is on record saying if Hillary gets elected it means war.

Wouldn't be one she started. His own insecure limp dick mentality on show is all.

Hank Scorpio

I think what's happened is the people on the right wanted somebody to run who was against this cancerous political correctness plague that's been been devouring western society for the last 6 years, what they got in return from Trump was something far beyond their realistic exceptions. It's driving certain ideologies to the brink of insanity, and I'm quite enjoying it.

Sweetemotion

Hank Scorpio wrote: »

I think what's happened is the people on the right wanted somebody to run who was against this cancerous political correctness plague that's been been devouring western society for the last 6 years, what they got in return from Trump was something far beyond their realistic exceptions. It's driving certain ideologies to the brink of insanity, and I'm quite enjoying it.

Could you imagine the civil war.

Pistols and colouring books at dawn. :pac:

Hank Scorpio

Sweetemotion wrote: »

Could you imagine the civil war.

Pistols and colouring books at dawn. :pac:

Never mind that the police and army are on Trumps side. It would be quite the slaughter.

Sweetemotion

Hank Scorpio wrote: »

Never mind that the police and army are on Trumps side. It would be quite the slaughter.

But they have pronouns.

Hank Scorpio

Sweetemotion wrote: »

But they have pronouns.

Yes, this election has been a thing of beauty. Books will be written about it.

david75

Hank Scorpio wrote: »

Yes, this election has been a thing of beauty. Books will be written about it.

You know nothing about America if you put books and trumps America in the same thought.

Sweetemotion

david75 wrote: »

Putin is on record saying if Hillary gets elected it means war.

Wouldn't be one she started. His own insecure limp dick mentality on show is all.

Hillary wanted to shoot down Russian pilots if she won.

How would it not be a war she started?