Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1782783785787788

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,431 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Florida does have sales tax, what it doesn't have is income tax. Instead as you mention they have property tax, it's still lower than most states.

    Based on a bill of $16k that would be a $2 million dollar property (assuming you're talking about property tax)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,879 ✭✭✭yagan


    It was well below that value but there were annual development charges separate to taxes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭arctictree


    UCD has a whole veterinary class full of foreign, mostly US students. They are paying full fees, which are still much cheaper than the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,630 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    Trump claimed he came up with a new word today. "Equalize"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,109 ✭✭✭✭kneemos


    Apparently he's complaining that his free jumbo is too big.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭eire4


    Your absolutely correct there about median income. Almost 60% of Americans cannot even afford an emergency expense of $1,000.

    Most Americans can't afford a $1,000 emergency expense, report finds - CBS News



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,968 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    His appetite bigger than his eye. Something tells me the Qataris will not take it back, they're rid of something that cost them money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,968 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    On the headline stealers, Musk has said that the big beautiful bill will hurt the economy, a million workers will lose their jobs and the deficit will grow. He's apparently going to spend more time on his motor industry job and less on DOGE, and spend less money on politics. What Trump will respond with is anyone's guess. He cant fire Musk as he's only a volunteer adviser to the Admin and South Africans are flavour of the month.

    Edit: It seems a reporter with mojo asked Trump what he thinks about being labelled TACO by Wall St analysts and that he always chickens out on the tariffs. His response was to talk about how the other countries he was tariffing [incl China] asked him to reduce the tariffs. He ended up criticizing the reporter for his question "But don't ever say what you said. That's a nasty question! To me that's the nastiest question."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 752 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    I can accept that as an excuse for Trump's win in 2016 but not for 2024 after everything he has done. In 2024, the American public knew exactly who and what he is and they still chose to vote for a sexual assaulting insurrectionist felon as their president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,075 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The problem is that all the negative actions of Trump were so heavily reported that the American public became generally numb to it, plus MAGA just reacted with their trademark mixture of equivocation and combativeness.

    Looking back, the re-election of Trump seemed inevitable.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,276 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/05/28/trump-erupts-taco-trade-nickname-tariffs/83903123007/

    "President Donald Trump is no fan of an emerging nickname on Wall Street mocking his on-again, off-again approach to tariffs.

    Trump lashed out at a reporter on May 28 who asked for his response to financial analysts embracing a new term called "TACO trade." The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out" ‒ a jab at the president's propensity to impose or threaten steep tariffs on imports, only to later back off."

    TACO trading... brilliant 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,082 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Because the voters didn't care. It goes back to the point that Trump isn't some strange anomaly, he really represents the majority in the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,052 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Love how his detailed response, covers him backtracking on the negotiations, making the whole point.

    And again, calling it a nasty question, it is no wonder America is the laughing stock of the world right now.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,933 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    They vary from place to place. The State and County is going to get its pound of flesh somehow, but the method varies, and the practical effect varies even more which means that discussions on the “national median” (or even national average) are pretty useless. You may as well try to generalize Europe by taking figures from Greece and Liechtenstein and assuming the results are representative. Ten miles up the road from me in the next county (same State) property taxes are 40% cheaper than where I live now.

    Case study.

    I own two houses, both purchased for about the same price. One in California, one in Texas. (Texas one is near thrice the size, though). The California house is taxed at about 1.2% and cannot increase by more than 1.3% a year courtesy of Prop 13 which has its good points and bad. The Texas house is taxed at about 2.3% of value, which can go up by up to 10% a year (though I’m happy to say it hasn’t). Obviously that means that I pay substantially more property taxes in Texas than I do in California.

    However, Texas doesn’t have income tax. California has pretty high income tax. When we moved to Texas, I was the single earner, and after doing some napkin maths, the property plus income tax in California was just shy combined of the property tax alone in Texas. However, after my wife started working again (kid got older), the same calculation resulted in the overall household tax bill in Texas being far less than that we would have faced in California, since California would have added the income tax from the wife to my own income tax and the property tax. It’s also worth observing that a Texan who rents pays neither state income tax nor property tax.

    There are a slew of other variables as well. I pay in Texas about 10% of the cost of my vehicle registration in California. ($50 vs $500). Sales tax in my part of Texas is about 8%, in my part of California, about 10%. Petrol is 50% cheaper in Texas. Etc., but these additional things made a massive difference in practice.

    The way it all worked out, our disposable income in Texas on just my one income actually worked out as better than had we stayed in California on two incomes (and my income didn’t change with the move). The decision (wife was heavily pregnant) basically came down to the fact that in order to allow us to stay in California, she needed to go to work as soon as maternity leave was over, and then we’d have to hand over most of her pay check to someone else to raise our kid. By moving to Texas, my one income was sufficient to float the family for a couple of years while the wife stayed home.

    Even just comparing disposable income between states only goes so far, as the cost of things equally varies. You get more for your disposable dollar in Missouri than you do in Hawaii.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,570 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    1000033013.jpg

    Absolute ****ing LOL

    Happy constitutional crisis America. Y'all deserve it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,101 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    About damn time. Let's get it over with before he's put too many of his lackeys in positions of power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,109 ✭✭✭✭kneemos




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,130 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    And that reporter is...

    CNBC DC correspondent Megan Cassella.

    Like SV Dáte, a proper journalist, who also stood up to trump, asking him if he was tired of lying to the American public.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,952 ✭✭✭spacecoyote


    In essence, yeah, the MAGAs were always going to MAGA.

    The rest pretty much voted with their pockets...I had more money when Trump was last president than I do when Biden is president.

    They'll forgive an awful lot if they think it means more cash in the bank.

    It's the Homer Simpson Garbage Man episode playing out in reality



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,807 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Oh.. the talking heads will be apoplectic today.

    Lots lot of talk of "Activist" judges and ranting about impeachment etc. and claiming that the Judges are trying to block his policies

    Once again fundamentally misunderstanding what the Judges are saying.

    They aren't saying "you can't do that" they are mostly and clearly saying "You can do it in that way"

    He can apply all the tariffs he likes, but under the Constitution he needs to get Congressional approval.

    But Trump doesn't want to do that because, he knows he won't get it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭Field east


    it’s naive to comment on , for example, income and comparing it between presidencies. It reminds me that when FG got into power it ‘ spent’ most of it ‘cleaning up’ the economy and bringing back into health. The voters did not like it - as their income probably dropped- and put FF back into power. IMO, this happened on a number of occasions. Probably would not happen now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,573 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The MAGA fulminations have started already.

    And, as might be expected, they're fundamentally dishonest. A White House spokesman has said that . .

    It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency

    But the court makes this exact point itself:

    The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the president’s use of tariffs as leverage. That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because [federal law] does not allow it.

    In other words, the courts don't decide how the government should properly deal with what it sees as a national emergency, but they do decide what the government can legally do. That is literally their core job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,051 ✭✭✭golfball37


    If the media in America did its job we wouldn’t have Trump 2. Telling us there was nothing wrong with Joe Bidens mind for years before they had to fess up after the debate gave Trump the extra votes needed.
    Those votes would have gone to a respectable Democrat candidate who was selected at least 12 months previously



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,034 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Oh, I'm not defending them at all. If they thought that voting for a career parasite who's bled every business he's ever had and every person he's ever known dry would fix things for them, they deserve what they get.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,766 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    This still requires the US public to be absolutely fine with electing a convicted felon and rapist. I agree that Biden dropped out too late. Harris and even Biden frankly remain light years ahead of the option that was Donald Trump. In terms of the chaos he's creating to date, Harris called it during the election.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,034 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Or if they weren't relentlessly promoting Trump for decades, making him out to be kind of bombastic figure of fun instead of the evil man he is.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,573 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Not really — people who were concerned about voting for a candidate whose mental faculties were in obvious decline wouldn't vote for Trump anyway, would they?

    It may have been late in the day, but the Democrats did eventually persuade Biden to stand down and make way for another candidate. The Republicans, by constrast, bulled ahead and nominated Trump. And the fact that Trump won tells you that mental capacity was not a dealbreaker for a majority of the voters.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,018 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    So you break down the US into states but are happy to compare to Europe as one big lump knowing full well the disparity between countries in Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,051 ✭✭✭golfball37


    It’s more that they were lying because they were afraid of enabling Trump- which ironically they did.
    The ultimate selling point of Trump was to make ordinary people believe establishment lies to you and considers you stupid. Telling us there was nothing wrong with Joe for a long time prior to the debate was a mistake. A big one



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,560 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Surely it's pot/kettle, there's no way trump gets through the term without some questions/scandal about his mental state/health, but yes a younger candidate sooner was what was needed



Advertisement