Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Immigration to Ireland - policies, challenges, and solutions *Read OP before posting*

Options
  • 01-06-2023 10:14am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 28,666 ✭✭✭✭


    Following a discussion with @Ten of Swords in the "Zero Refugee policy" thread, I am creating this one as a more general discussion on immigration to Ireland including refugees, asylum seekers, economic migrants and essentially anyone else who arrives at our shores.

    Given the challenges of discussing this topic without including all of these types, the reasons behind them, the challenges and potential opportunities it presents, and the possible solutions that could be implemented to address the issues, it was agreed to setup this more general topic.

    Obviously no one wants this to become a battleground and ideally we can discuss the issues and solutions like adults, but I'll let ToS and the other Mods handle the rules side of it. It's an important topic though and one which affects everyone in this country - now or in the near future - and it's one worthy of debate.


    To kick us off then...

    I am fully sympathetic to genuine refugees and their plight, but I recognise that we can only do so much as a small island with limited resources and a lot of serious domestic problems already that we are abjectly failing to tackle in any meaningful way. I believe that we can only do so much to help and that there is no shame or "wrongness" in recognising and admitting that.

    On top of that, I recognise that our Government's current approach is encouraging more and more people to arrive at our doors - many of whom are not refugees but economic migrants in search of a better life. Again there is nothing wrong with that either in principle - so long as they follow the established rules for entry and working here, are upfront about it, and have skills we need.

    However, we must recognise that we are already struggling to provide supports to those who are already here (both natives, EU citizens, and other more recent arrivals) and that this is having a serious and negative effect on key services and infrastructure. This only hurts us all and we need to accept (per recent polls) that we need to revisit the strategy here.

    As I've said.. charity begins at home, and we can't solve all the ills of the world, nor can we resettle everyone who arrives at our door. We need to impose stronger vetting criteria and processes, improve the turnaround time of deciding on applicants claims, enforce a stronger deportation/rejection process where needed, and put limits on the numbers we accept and process at any given time to allow this all to happen.

    We need to stop virtue signalling and grandstanding for the world about how generous and open we are, and recognise that there is nothing wrong with protecting the integrity and stability of our own State as well - economically, socially, and for the future for all who live here.


    Open to the floor...

    Mod warnings:

    26/11/23 - No discussion of the stabbings or alleged perpetrator permitted. No discussion of the resultant riots on Thursday permitted.

    23/02/24 - Drop the anecdotes, they are getting out of hand in this thread. Unverifiable and agenda driven stories, typically designed to rile people up or get a reaction. They will result in threadbans if they continue. Previous threads were closed because they got so bad.

    26/04/24 - No further discussion of last night's incidents in Newtownmountkennedy permitted as charges have been laid


    Threadbans:

    treemaster

    JP Liz V1 lifted 02/04/24

    TomTomTim

    Packrat

    Hamachi

    rgossip30

    hymenelectra

    xyz13

    ballsdeep69

    TokTik

    Boghouse51

    RobbieV

    Augme

    freebritney

    toucheswood

    Hungry Burger

    Potatoeman

    jmayo

    UsBus

    mykrodot

    tikka16751

    applehunter

    musicrules

    Cluedo monopoly

    tom23 lifted 13/02/24

    tastyt

    redunited

    buried

    Furze99

    mauries wigs

    Oohlalala

    Tom23

    Malinheader

    Mr. teddywinkles

    Honesty policy

    LongfordMB

    Gym_imposter

    Post edited by Beasty on


«134567558

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ultimately there is a finite number of GP places, school places, housing and so forth, and you cannot plan for this if you effectively have uncontrolled migration into the country.

    It cannot keep up, let alone keep pace.

    And so you're spot on. The strategy needs to be revisited because if we cannot look after the people already in the country, how can we possibly commit to looking after even more on top of that?

    That doesn't make someone "anti-immigration", it simply means we need to manage the country better.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    We should predominantly (*but not exclusively*) operate on the basis of give and take.

    The error our neighbor the UK made was that of largely operating on the sentimental basis of 'used to be a bit of our empire'. (among other motives).

    Fellow EU countries give us the right to live there, while they can live here, shared market for labor, services and goods. Its largely a fair deal.

    UK had some good reason for being concerned by the immigration numbers back in 2016.

    What they did next was to ignore the part where they were getting something resembling a fair deal with the EU. And then repeated this wilfull blindness to the one sided deal they were (and still are) getting from the southern hemisphere. 1 million Brits still live in the EU, while maybe 6 Brits have ever intentionally moved to India or Pakistan. Its an entirely 1 sided deal, and as the brexit referendum aproached many people of southern hemisphere extraction could be found cheering on UKs disasterous exit from the rest of Europe.

    Today UK is the home to the largest Pakistani diaspora, and a non-member of the EU, emigration has increased from the southern hemisphere, while EU immigration has decreased. Europeans have to a degree lost access to the UK, and Brits have lost rights in Europe. Brits still arent moving to Pakistan or India, why would they.

    Whatever we do, we know not to do a UK.

    Post edited by greencap on


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,835 ✭✭✭TomTomTim


    This is the problem with the recent issues, everyone is pretending that it's simply a matter of resources and nothing else, and if we had the resources all would be well. Social cohesion was one of the main concerns on old immigration threads and rightly so, as it's far more important than resources. All the resources in the world won't fix many of the problems that come with mass immigration, and people need to stop pretending otherwise.

    “The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone else. You know it is sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know that nobody has insulted him, but that he has invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught at a word and made a mountain out of a molehill--he knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense, and will revel in his resentment till he feels great pleasure in it.”- ― Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I agree, social cohesion and a sense of community are not worth sacrificing for the sake of GDP rising by a point or two.

    Some things cannot be measured in terms of GDP, but which impact quality of life.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,665 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    This only hurts us all and we need to accept (per recent polls) that we need to revisit the strategy here.


    This is the key point right here.

    There is no ‘us’, and there is no ‘all’.


    There are people who agree with you and do nothing (per recent polls), and there are people who don’t agree with you and are doing everything (who aren’t bothered with polls).

    Both groups are working off different strategies with different aims to achieve different outcomes. Both sides are taking casualties, and neither side sees any reason to compromise their positions.

    Politicians are delighted to see both parties taking lumps out of each other, as they know it’ll set them up for life. They just need to pick a side.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I think one of the most important issues would be that posters are aware of the different types of migrants and what their status means. There seems to be a lot of people that just don't understand the difference.

    Refugee - a person who has been granted international protection.

    A person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster


    Asylum seeker - someone who is looking for international protection.

    A person who has left their country and is seeking protection from persecution and serious human rights violations in another country, but who hasn't yet been legally recognized as a refugee and is waiting to receive a decision on their asylum claim.


    Economic Migrant - a person who travels from one country or area to another in order to improve their standard of living.

    Basically everyone that moves to another country.


    Illegal immigrant - a person who comes to live or work in a country that is not their own when they do not have the legal right to do this.


    Might help the discussion somewhat.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Bottom two can also be claiming asylum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,701 ✭✭✭Ahwell


    Just a few statistics..

    Immigration, Emigration and Net Migration in Ireland, 2011- 2021

    It should by noted that the Immigrants column also includes returning Irish nationals. For example, "Of the 65,200 people who migrated to Ireland in the year to April 2021, some 30,200 (46.3%) were estimated to be Irish nationals,". Net migration had been in decline prior to the first Covid lockdown, which was in March 2020. Then of course there's the war in Ukraine, which caused the country to experience the highest population increase recorded since 2008. If that hadn't happened I doubt this thread would exist.

    There were 645,500 non-Irish nationals resident in Ireland in April 2021 and there are an estimated one million Irish-born people living abroad today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Well then they are asylum seekers, when investigated it should be established whether they are genuine or not.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    There were 4.3 million people who usually lived in Ireland who indicated that they had either Irish only or dual Irish citizenship. This made up 84% of the population of usual residents. The number of non-Irish citizens increased in 2022, accounting for 12% of the population.

    • The biggest non-Irish groups were Polish and UK citizens followed by Indian, Romanian and Lithuanian.
    • Brazilian, Italian, Latvian and Spanish citizens were also among the larger non-Irish groups.

    Source: CSO Ireland



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,876 ✭✭✭bokale


    I must say I do enjoy the restaurants immigration has brought, some really cool places in Dublin these days!



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭Nuts102


    What is the definition in ireland for an illegal immigrant?



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,015 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Very surprised by those figures for migration as thought the numbers has been rising much more.

    Urban legend I suppiose then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85,050 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    We need a task force, policy reform and enforced deportations

    Ireland just cannot handle the numbers coming in

    I believe we have done our part greatly for Ukraine

    I have sympathy for anyone fleeing war

    The applications need to be approved or rejected quicker

    Also if arriving without documents, I would jail or deport to what ever country they came from last and implement control at NI border

    I probably sound harsh and no doubt a far right racist



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭Nuts102


    So basically anyone who would fall under the definition of illegal immigrant has no reason to put themselves in that position.

    All they have to do is turn up without documentation and claim asylum and they are not classed as illegal.

    So basically our current immigration policy allows people who want to come here illegally to do it through a legal way.

    So why would anyone who wants to come here illegally do it through illegal channels.

    So it's a very fair assumption that people who would want to enter here illegally are turning up and claiming asylum and we don't class them as illegals.

    We must be a laughing stock to the rest of the world.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,030 ✭✭✭lmao10


    Most of the posters here believe there is only one kind of migrant - an economic migrant, who is here to take advantage of the system.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    No. Not necessarily.

    People who have been served with deportation orders and haven't left the country are illegally here.

    People coming from safe countries can try claiming asylum, but they are dealt with quickly and rarely granted refugee status.

    Some people might just prefer to enter illegally and work on the black market for cash in hand.

    Some people that are here illegally are trafficked in by criminal gangs and forced to work for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Everybody is an economic Migrant!

    How about all the foreigners working in tech in this country?

    Or the Brazilians, or Filipinos.......etc etc etc



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,015 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I agree with 80%of what you say except for the last part.

    We are obliged to accept them at their word and apply no penalties or deport unless they have exhausted the asylum process.

    This is to protect genuine refugees fleeing persecution and torture.

    The problem is our system is swamped and they are neither being processed fast enough nor deported effectively pnce refused.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭Nuts102


    You cannot board a plane without a passport whether a genuine refugee or not.

    Anyone who arrives here on a plane without a passport has deliberately lost it.

    So this idea that people are fleeing wars without a passport and boarding planes without passports is a lie.

    They are simply economic immigrants who should be deported upon arrival.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭Nuts102


    Who has said all immigrants are economic immigrants?



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    That's simply not true. You can indeed get in a plane without a passport, I did it myself only last Monday. Passport was checked on arrival in Dublin.

    However, I don't believe people deliberately destroy their identification documents should be allowed entry either.

    But there is the problem that some genuine cases do have to leave their homes without documents, so we can't just turn them away without investigation. It shouldn't be very hard to check if their ID was checked before getting on board, if they 'lost ' it on the plane? Then no entry.

    Of course, you can enter by land and sea also.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    The majority are. Economic Migrants are someone that moves in order to improve their standard of living. So basically everyone that goes to a different country,

    except maybe the bag packing around Oz etc, young travellers just exploring.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,704 ✭✭✭Nuts102


    Where did you enter ireland from when you were allowed board a plane without a passport?

    You have to scan your boarding pass and show your passport on every plane I have ever entered.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,894 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    London.

    & The week before I left Dublin airport and walked straight out of the terminal in Heathrow and Noone checked my passport anywhere.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Is Dublin Airport the same?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,248 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    There is nothing wrong with economic migrants from outside the EU or UK coming here in principle... as long as they apply for work visas and are granted them.

    All other economic migrants must be stopped either at point of entry or very shortly afterwards and sent back from whence they came.



  • Registered Users Posts: 85,050 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    I've always shown my passport travelling in and out at airports to other countries



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 691 ✭✭✭atticu


    So you arrived in the UK, and did not have to show your passport. Did you travel from Ireland?

    We all know that there is a common travel zone between Ireland and the UK, and you don’t have to show your passport when you arrive in the UK from Ireland. Did you have to show your passport to get into Ireland before you left for the UK, or where you born here to Irish parents?

    You can get on a plane in most countries in the world without a passport, but you can’t get on a plane without a passport if the plane is leaving a common or free travel area.


    Next you will tell us that you traveled across mainland Europe and went from country to country without showing your passport.

    Well, everyone can do that, it is the Schengen travel zone.

    The question is, did you enter the Schengen area without a passport?



Advertisement