Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2022 Seanad by-election

  • 16-02-2022 3:54pm
    #1
    Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭


    Normally I wouldn't care much about this, but this one is a bit more interesting due to the presence of Hazel Chu on the ballot. Poll closes end of March.

    It'll be pretty much exactly a year since her charade of running as an independent, she's back now running for the GP. Do we think she's the favourite for this?

    What makes it interesting is what does she do if she loses. That'd be 2 Seanad defeats, and being overlooked for the Eoghan Murphy by-election last year. Does she have a future in the GP?

    Personally I hope pretty much anyone else wins, I was really put off by her show of careerism last year.



«1345

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Careerism - is that not endemic within the political classes?

    She could actually believe in her politics and wishes to proclaim them in to a larger world. She ran the last time as an independent as her party did not agree to her running as a Green candidate because they had an agreement with the other Gov parties. That surely does not affect her political beliefs.

    Perhaps our Minister for Health might answer why he moved from independent to PD to FF if that was not driven by careerism.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I thought her attempts were pretty egregious, happy to embarrass and hurt her own party publicly when they didn't select her. If everyone in a party just went on a solo run every time they didn't what they wanted the place would be a mess.

    What made it worse was she had no chance of winning, she was happy to make her party look weak for her own personal vanity project.

    I also find her politics to be completely empty, it's all about identity with her.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    If she's expecting to tap into green votes then so are at least three other candidates.

    The Green Party executive chose not to select a candidate for the byelection caused by former Labour Party Senator Ivana Bacik’s election to the Dáil last year.

    ex Green MPE Patricia McKenna is also running and former Green Party councillor Sadhbh O’Neill will run as an independent candidate.

    and Paula Roseingrave, who received over 2,000 first-preference votes as a Green Party candidate in the 2020 general election, is standing as an independent candidate.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think there are far to many candidates - nearly as many as will vote.

    Whatever about scrapping the Seanad, I think the whole voting scheme needs to be re-thought out from scratch. If councillors and TDs get a vote, it should be weighted by the number of first preferences they got in the election that got them elected - and substituted councillors therefore would not get any vote. University seats should be scrapped - and either be replaced by some other more representative electorate or just voted by the sitting TDs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    I had a bit of time for Chu in the past. I could see the disgusting abuse she was getting on twitter and she did break a few barriers by becoming Lord Mayor. That Seanad run changed everything for me though. She burned all of her political capital within her party and for what? A no-hoper run for the Seanad! If nothing else it showed that she had terrible political judgement. I think she got the highest vote in the country in the local elections in 2019 and must have thought that the rules of political gravity no longer applied to her. In the end she got 4.9% of the vote, more than 50% behind the FF candidate who was always going to be win anyway because of the vote pact.

    I'm glad that someone mentioned Stephen Donnelly because it was quite similar to his jump to FF - the moment where they truly revealed themselves. It was actually worse in a way because it was all downside and no upside for Chu. She burned her bridges within the party and failed spectacularly in an election that was barely covered in the media. At least Donnelly managed to sell his soul for a ministerial appointment.

    The amusing thing is that, had she not gone on that solo run, she probably would have been the Green Party candidate in the by-election last year (an election that actually mattered and that wasn't rigged from the off). She probably wouldn't have won, since she represents a government party, but it would have raised her profile in the way that she so obviously craves.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I think "she must have thought that the rules of political gravity no longer applied to her" is fairly accurate. I think she has a high opinion of herself, but I would struggle to suggest she is a politician of any real substance. I don't see her ever making it to TD.

    If she loses this election I don't know where she goes. She'll surely leave the Greens, SocDems probably the likely destination. She has no hope as an Indy. She will hardly hang around as a councillor for long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The full list of candidates:

    • Tom Clonan, former soldier, declared on 10 July 2021
    • Hugo MacNeill, former rugby player, declared on 21 July 2021
    • Gisèle Scanlon, Trinity College Dublin Graduate Students' Union President, declared on 21 July 2021
    • Ryan Alberto Ó Giobúin, sociology PhD researcher, declared on 21 September 2021
    • Ursula Quill, Bacik's former assistant and a Labour Party member
    • Ray Bassett, former diplomat, declared on 1 November 2021
    • Sadhbh O'Neill, academic at Dublin City University declared in November 2021
    • Eoin Barry, Labour Party member, declared in December 2021
    • Ade Oluborode, barrister, declared in January 2022.
    • Hazel ChuGreen Party councillor and former Lord Mayor of Dublin, declared in February 2022
    • Aubrey McCarthy, founder of the homelessness and rehabilitation charity Tiglin, declared on 10 February 2022
    • Patricia McKenna, former Member of the European Parliament for Dublin and Cathaoirleach of the People's Movement, declared on 12 February 2022
    • Maureen Gaffney
    • Michael McDermott
    • Abbas Ali O'Shea
    • Paula Roseingrave
    • Catherine Stocker

    source

    I could see Chu getting the most first preferences with a low plurality of the vote (<25%) due to the large number of candidates and lack of any other stand out names in the field. I don't think she will win though due to not being that transfer-friendly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,661 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    The only thing better that Chu failing here would be MacNeill doing worse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I see Ray Bassett in there. Kooky former Irish Ambassador who wrote a paper for a Tory think-tank in the UK advocating Ireland leave the EU. Bojos Tory think-tank of choice with a very opaque funding model.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Between him and Chu, they have almost all of the public profile. Sadly, I think it's hard to see anyone but Chu winning here - given the constituency and the fact that she is by far the most recognisable candidate.

    The real fight here is for the wooden spoon between zero profile candidates and candidates that couldn't be more unsuited, like Bassett, to this constituency.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Yes. And judging by the number of times he is quoted in the Daily Express he is clearly conservative Britain's favourite Irish intellectual, assuming conservative Britain could be convinced that any such specimen as an Irish intellectual actually exists!

    In June last year he had an opinion column posted in the Daily Telegraph bearing the ridiculous oxymoronic headline "The case for an Irish Brexit is growing stronger" in which he assured readers that the Irish nation, nostalgic for the days of mass emigration, starvation and exclusion from decision making on sectarian grounds were only clamouring to come back into the bosom of the United Kingdom as dutiful and loyal subjects of the Anglosphere. (To be fair to Bassett, he used the term Irexit in his text. It was clearly some dopey subeditor/headline writer who thought that "Irish Brexit" made any sense.)

    It will be interesting to see how well Mr Bassett, one of the very few "fat-cat bureaucrats on over generous public-service pensions" that Brexiteers purport in general to despise, fares in a constituency representing the purest possible distillation of "traditional West Brit privilege".

    I look forward to ignoring him completely on my ballot paper!.


    Here's the article to which I referred. It's behind a pay wall but you can read an article a month for free if you wish.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,037 ✭✭✭Shelga


    I would have had no idea there was a Seanad by-election happening, were it not for all of the junk mail I'm receiving from candidates in the last few days. I still don't know how if works so will have to do my research, I'll definitely vote though.

    I haven't heard of any of them other than Chu, who I will not be voting for. She strikes me as highly self-serving and will jump on any "activism" bandwagon going- see her disgraceful comments about An Garda Siochana upon the unfortunate death of George Nkencho. This does not mean I think she deserves abuse of any kind, racist or otherwise.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    MacNeill did ok in the last Seanad election (4th in a 3 seater), and let's just say, has very big FG links..

    I wouldn't be surprised if he won.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Wow. I've just realised that it's 40 years since Hugo McNeill starred on the Irish rugby team that won the Triple Crown (when that was important) for the first time in 33 years. And there are Trinity graduates now who claim never to have heard of him??

    What DO they teach them in that place? 🙄



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    If I recall correctly, that's the lass who ran for the Greens in a Dublin Corporation election many years ago while still a student then headed away for a Summer job abroad before voting day, only, to her complete surprise, to find herself elected!

    If Chew or McNeill manage to win the seat then, like the O'Broin/Boylan partnership, the couple will be pulling in both a Senator's and a TD's salary - plus expenses by two. Not bad!

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    Older than you might imagine. Quite a lot of the younger TCD (and NUI) grads don't bother to register to vote in Seanad elections.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 93,581 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    t

    It was a rhetorical question :)

    I'd imagine Patricia McKenna might have higher visibility for an older group but time will tell.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    She might indeed.

    But I suspect that many voters' memories of her wouldn't be particularly positive - I couldn't stand her! (Although the fact that she isn't Chu would be a massive plus!)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭troyzer


    Will probably end up voting for Clonan. His articles on security are pretty thought provoking and it's a perspective that's mostly absent within Irish politics with the exception of Gerard Craughwell and Cathal Berry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,533 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Fun fact - MacNeill's wife https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Carroll_MacNeill is 22 years younger than him!

    I like the cut of this guy's jib 😁

    Michael has dreamed of representing Trinity in the Seanad ever since this bye-election was called and he realised that getting 10 signatures on the nomination form was actually quite doable. Also, with 16 other candidates, it seemed everybody else was doing it and he didn’t want to feel left out.

    He is running on a loosely-assembled platform of abolishing the Seanad from within and being a voice for current students and the recently graduated who can’t seem to find any accommodation in Dublin because there’s too many hotels in the way. This group is mostly ineligible to vote in this election so it’s clearly something he believes in rather than a shrewd electoral strategy.

    Feckin' size of the ballot paper. They folded it into four, but it has to be folded into five to fit into the envelope... 🙄

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,533 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    University seats should be scrapped - and either be replaced by some other more representative electorate or just voted by the sitting TDs.

    University senators (Ronan Mullen the glaring exception) have usually been the best senators.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, yes - you might be right.

    However, the Senate needs reform of a fundamental nature. It is just a talking shop with no real place in our society or political firmament.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    It's interesting that Citizen's Assemblies are used for all sorts of things (Many of which should just be legislated directly for by the Dail) however a really appropriate use for it would be a reimagining of the upper house. They could get political scientists in from all over the world to talk about the benefits of different ways of electing them them, what powers they should have and also if they are even needed. The Referendum to remove the Seanad was defeated for the most part not because people were happy to continue with the status quo but because they didn't think all of the other possibilities for the upper house had been explored. An assembly would be an ideal forum for that exploration.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    That would be an excellent use of the Citizen's Assembly. They could also look at reimagining the Local Authorities while they are at it - judging by the RTE Investigates programme last night - political corruption at its finest exposed - and politicians doing nothing about it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,533 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    @Brussels Sprout Yes it would but having an emasculated senate, or no senate, suits the government and indeed the main opposition parties so it's not going to happen, turkeys don't usually vote for Christmas.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    That is the whole reason for using a Citizen's Assembly - it provides cover for politicians, and usually has come out with a recommendation acceptable to the general population. Currently the Senate is a home for wannabe politicians, failed politicians and retired politicians. It needs to be a place for normal people not driven by self aggrandisement and petty party political point scoring, but the public good - as perhaps the late Fergal Quinn was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Playing Devil's Advocate here but do we actually want a strong Senate? The reason I ask is because the USA has a strong Senate and it's a factor in the constant partisan gridlock that they have over there where the stars need to align before they can pass any meaningful legislation.

    Are there any example of countries that have two strong houses of parliament where it doesn't end up in legislative gridlock?

    What should an Upper House be tasked with that cannot currently be done by the lower house?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 28,138 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't necessarily need/want the Seanad to be strong, but I do think it needs to be useful.

    I like the concept of an upper house elected differently with the panels - the logic being perhaps it brings more/different expertise and ensures that all (or at least more) views are considered in legislation. I'm not sure how well it is fulfilling that role mind you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The Panels idea only works if the electorate is also from those sectors - as the nominating bodies will nominate anyone at the behest of the parties who then control the bulk of the electorate.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The weakness of the current system is that each elected councillor gets a vote - but councillors from rural areas are more numerous and get elected by fewer votes than say a Dublin councillor, so the Senate is biased towards rural voters. The whole thing is a talking shop supporting failed politicians, and wannabe politicians.

    It needs deep reform.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    This really hasn't been the case since the rural town councils were dissolved. DCC has a lot of councillors which extensively corrects for that and many rural councils have less than the 40 that non-DCC councils can have.

    Quota in DCC ranged from 1178 to 2813 - primarily down to turnout differences.

    Taking two random rural counties, in Cavan it ranges from 1345 to 1631 and in Offally 1172 to 1693

    Only a few wealthy wards on DCC have a significantly higher vote per Councillor than the norm.

    Some wards in County Dublin have exceptionally low quotas - 973 in Tallaght South, 831 in Blanchardstown-Mulhuddart.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,533 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That explains some of the headers who get in!

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Yes, I'm all for a different electorate, so long as everyone gets to vote (not currently the case) and the panels are somewhat equal in size.

    Alternatively I wouldn't mind single regional electorates (such as for European elections) with a different method of election - such as quadratic voting. This is something that is difficult to explain but very intuitive once you try it. There's a great sample that you can do yourself here:

    https://www.economist.com/interactive/2021/12/18/quadratic-voting

    Basically it allows the voter to vote for multiple candidates but to give each of them different weights, if they choose (or they can give their entire allotment to a single candidate if they want). The main downside to this (apart from trying to explain it) is that it would almost certainly need a computer to count the votes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,533 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    There's enough misunderstandings going around about how PR works as it is...

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    We need computer counting anyway. The fiasco of the Euro elections where they had huge ballot papers a metre long, and so many rounds of counting that mistakes must have occurred. Computer counting would allow all votes to be transferred down in fractions to actually represent the true level of preference.

    We do not need computer voting - a different matter entirely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    On a technical level I agree with you but by god I'd miss the suspense and excitement of the few days of vote counting.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,151 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I am sure the excitement can be arranged by not releasing the results as a stage by stage - count by count.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,754 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    I think the panel system is a good idea as it can bring expertise to the dail so I'd like to see the panels opened to everyone, with perhaps a panel for each government department. All voters be randomly assigned a single panel where they would get to vote.

    Voting would take place on the day of the general election and you couldn't stand for both houses.

    Anyway I suppose Chu is the favourite here?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I really don't think she is. McNeill or Quill probably have better chances.

    She gets much more media coverage than the other candidates but that isn't as important in this race.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Anyone know when they're counting the votes?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011




  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Counting of this presumably must be relatively fast?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It should be. Normal Seanad panels aren't as there are fractional transfers due to the tiny electorate, but the Uni seats are normal. There's ~13,000 votes here so it should be like a large council ward to count, but with no surplus calculations etc as its one seat.


    edit: fractional transfers only happen on surpluses anyway so couldn't happen here, ignore that....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    They tweeted this out 3 hours ago:



    Still no results from the first count. That's always the longest one though. There mustn't be any tallies since you'd get them from the very first stage of the counting process so would have been out now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Ok just seeing some more tweets about why it's taking so long:


    Why there may not be a tally


    And when we might see some results





  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]



    "Good look to all 17 candidates!" apart from the utter cringiness of such a pointless tweet, it is jaw-dropping to see that TCD - that centuries-old bastion of Anglo-Irish education - can't even spell "luck" correctly.

    O tempora o mores as TCD graduate Senator Lynn Ruane would definitely not say. 🤢



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    William Quill from the tweet above seems to have updated the tally figures in his google doc.

    Based on a small number of votes (1,592) it seems fairly tight:

    1. Clonan 16.2%
    2. MacNeil 14.8%
    3. Gaffney 14.2%
    4. Chu 13.07%
    5. 3 further candidates in the range 6-9% and everyone else is less than 5%


    Since it's a postal vote presumably that sample is presumably more representative of the total vote than, say, a box taken from a certain polling station would be in a Dail election.

    On that basis I think it's a 3 horse race. I'm writing Chu off on the basis that I don't think she's very transfer friendly and the winner will need to be given how far they all are from the 50% finish line.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    1. MacNeil 15.70%
    2. Clonan 15.07%
    3. Gaffney 14%
    4. Chu 13.62%
    5. Quill 8.78%

    That's the top 5 now, spreadsheet was updated as I typed this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Not sure how transfer friendly MacNeil is going to be either since his entire schtick appears to be "Did you know I played rugby for Ireland?". I don't think his subsequent career in Goldman Sachs is going to be much of an asset to him with this electorate.

    Looking at the 2020 TCD race he fared poorly in transfers versus the left wing candidates - which is most of the rest!

    On that basis I think it's going to be Clonan versus Gaffney for the seat.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement