Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Report claims Defence Forces Admit ”They Cannot Meaningfully Defend Ireland”

Options
1235

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,031 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    There is an interesting online report by tradingeconomics.com called Military Expenditures - Europe - by Country. Updated February 3, 2022.

    Ireland is not at the bottom of military spending, with several nations below. Of course spending is not the silver bullet of defense. Only one variable.

    In comparison, USA dwarfs all others on the planet in military spending. And America has been friendly to Ireland for decades. And although Ireland is technically a neutral nation, it has had a lengthy understanding with USA regarding the refueling of military aircraft at Shannon. Plus millions of Irish have immigrated to USA over more than the last hundred years. If Ireland were attacked, I have no doubts about USA coming strongly to its defense.

    One idea. Switzerland has a civilian army. In Asia South Korea has one too. All males are trained to defend their nation. Such training may have been one of several reasons why Germany did not invade Switzerland during WW2. Perhaps a strategic cost benefit model made it not worth an invasion by Germany? Wonders if this kind of universal citizen training would also discourage a potential invader of Ireland? And if you wanted and could afford it, in addition to military training for all males, you could also include all women.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    There getting worse



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,238 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Universal citizen training ala national service. There are arguments for and against.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahgjEjJkZks



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,031 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Israel has national military training for all citizens, including men and women. Norway and Sweden do too.

    In America. Currently they only have volunteer military. But all males must register for the selective service at 18, just in case of a major war occurred and the draft was implemented. Women are not required to register.

    Anecdotally speaking. I have no military training. I am tall and athletic. But probably couldn’t beat my way out of a paper sack. But no one in their right mind would attack our home. My housemate has trained and was an instructor for years in MA. She would give a home invader a serious lesson I would imagine.

    Post edited by Fathom on


  • Registered Users Posts: 4 BirgerH


    Reservist civilian army only works, if you have the air support and other modern weapons for it. Israel and Switzerland both have the most modern weapons money can buy. Otherwise everyone just dies under modern weapons. First you need to fix your military and then reservist force comes after that. No use to have 100 000 civilians in arms, if they don't have the missiles to defend against ships, jets, helicopters and artillery. Watch "Taistelukenttä 2020" with english subtitles in youtube to know how large modern reservist army responds to similar attack then is the scenario in Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    None of which is necessary true ,

    You don't need missles to defend against aircraft or helicopters ,

    Just like anyone can claim to be a member of a foreign military or similar

    The finns did it quite well during the war with Russia ........



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    No one doubts our readiness to stop Russian invasion even we have over 1000km land border with them. In fact we are the only country in world to have stopped Soviet Union invasion (Winter War).

    Tell that to the residents of Viipuri. The Winter War was certainly a rude awakening for the Soviet Union, but to all intents and purposes Finland lost.


    Finland borders Russia and is in in an entirely different defence situation from Ireland. It's also not exactly that surprising that it has a better arctic navy than the US considering it is in the Arctic and the US is not. Ireland could have a much stronger defence force, but the question remains as to what we actually want our DF to be able to do. I don't think having battle tanks makes much sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4 BirgerH


    My grandfather lost his home, when Viipuri was lost. That was because before 1939 most politicians in Finland didn't believe that the Soviets would attack to Finland. That is why our defence budget was a way too small before the winter war. The same mistake Ireland is doing right now. In that youtube video Taistelukenttä 2020, there you can see, how Ireland can be taken under complete foreign control in just a couple of days and how you can stop that. Please do not make the same mistakes we did before winter war. I have lived in Cork and you have beautiful country there. Better to keep it so.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    They retained their independence! we need to make it not worth any powers while to invade that's all. We aren't there until we have some interceptors, improved ship capability a radar and missile system. A serious Territorial Army on standby and some tanks suitable for our hills and bogs (like the Swedish S tank?)



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Thank you. Cork could be invaded and then the rest of the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    If they arrive when it rains it would be really easy especially in cork



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,521 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Its already not worth anyone's while to invade Ireland given the absolute global shitstorm it would cause. Ireland having a few interceptors and a couple ships is going to make absolutely zero difference to the equation. If a country is powerful enough to invade Ireland and not have to worry about the international consequences we are going to lose.

    The Winter War equivalent would be the UK invading Ireland. Our overwhelmingly better option for preventing that (vanishingly small) possibility is diplomatic because we would never succeed militarily.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I agree that a few interceptors and a few more capable ships wouldn't be able to stop a serious invasion but it would be a tripwire and a challange to the agressor at the start and show that we mean business. When they are gone our main aim would be to create an ongoing guerilla war with mobile units to make it impossible to stay in the country. Diplomacy alone is limited if there is little to back it up.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    There is still the point of resistance even if the odds are great, the IRA didn't have much chance of forcing British withdrawal anytime soon (apart from the early 70s) yet people from all over Ireland were literally queuing up to join them, the IRA had so much people willing to join that the vast majority of them had to be turned away.

    Prior to 1998 Northern Ireland was disputed territory claimed by both the UK and the Republic, part of our country was occupied up until 1998 when we officially recognised the legitimacy of Northern Ireland.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭jackboy


    If we were ever invaded it would only be by a major power. We could never possibly spend enough money to defend against such an attack. What good would a small amount of top class soldiers do when thousands of civilians are being exterminated. Unless someone nice invades us and only focuses on the military.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    If an invasion happened they don't necessarily have to kill thousands of civilians, that would be counter productive, the best option would be to occupy us with minimal force as that would be the best way to keep resistance to a minimum and make the occupation as easy as possible.



  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Don't knock a small well trained and equipped military , just ask the Russians about Finland , they don't like discussing that ,of the afghans who also fought the Russians despite massacres , indiscriminate bombing of civilian populations and infrastructures and chemical weapons attacks .. Chechnya is another prime example of a relative small number of fighters holding off pretty much the Russians for several years ,

    History is scattered with cautionary tales of mighty armies getting felled by less equipped and trained fighters



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Of course, unless we resisted. Then it is easier to just slaughter civilians until the military surrenders. This is how the modern powers have conducted wars. Of course not productive in the long term but a disaster during the invasion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    That's because they are talking about a conventional army with fighter jets and tanks etc. If an invasion happened we would have to restructure into an underground guerilla army. Fighter jets and other conventional means of defense would be pointless.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭Allinall


    What’s wrong with having your cake and eating it?

    Despite the viscous rumours, it is possible.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    When It comes to Russia they bomb everything back to the Stoneage , targeting primarily civilian infrastructures and population centers and use chemical weapons to subdue who's ever left into not standing up to them



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    True, what I'm saying though is that people are talking about building up a large scale conventional army with fighter jets and other means of conventional warfare, which would be useless if an invasion happened by someone like Russia.

    We would have to restructure into an underground guerilla army, we would have no control over our skies so all this talk about buying fighter jets to defend ourselves against an invasion is nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Nonsense, even if we did start spending extravagant amounts of money on building up our defence forces for the next few decades we would still be one of the easiest nations in the west to invade.

    The only nations who would realistically invade us are extremely powerful and our mediocre defenses would offer no deterrent if they wanted to invade.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,476 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Because of our location, realistically we would only be invaded as part of a wider war to gain access to ports and airfields. If that happened we would be up against a major power in desperate times. Any resistance would be met with vast slaughter of civilians, they would have no time for a protracted conflict. Also, they wouldn’t actually want the bulk of the country so they wouldn’t try to occupy every village or chase the army around the Kerry hills.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Making it not worth it for them in the end would be a deterrent.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭Harryd225


    Any conventional means of defense using fighter jets etc though would be pointless, although we could organise large scale resistance.

    The British ministry of defense claimed in 1972 that re taking IRA controlled territory in Northern Ireland during operation motorman would result in the death/injury of 5000 soldiers. Although the IRA decided not to fight back during the operation and they simply gave up the territory believing the IRA would have been completely defeated if they had tried to defend the territory.

    So using that as an example in terms of a civilian army fighting against a large sophisticated army you can work out your own scenario on what would happen if we tried to hold out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Organized resistance would happen in any case. The point of an airforce/navy would be to show a national defiance of a takeover and as a tripwire in the even of a large scale invasion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,770 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    In that case the opposing power would be on our side and the kerry hills would send out bands to make trouble for them.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,245 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15 thechigger


    Oh great, now EVERYONE knows we're a sitting duck. Great going guys, I'm off to start learning chinese



Advertisement