Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Interesting articles

1…717273747577»

Comments

  • #2282
    Larbre34
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,363 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Yes. No reason our outgoing commitment to UNIFIL, 500 troops or so, couldn't go to Ukraine on a multilateral basis, to work in de-mining and force protection.



  • #2283
    sparky42
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭sparky42


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123779538#Comment_123779538

    rear sector demining, sure, be great for the engineers, force protection however? Given we needed an UOR for equipment for the EUBG force, do we have enough equipment? Are the MOWAGs up to the protection levels needed with their upgrades or not? Air defence capabilities? Anti drone systems etc etc…

    I mean we have no idea what ROE would be agreed if any are, or what level of threat might still be there, so it’s a bit soon to make assumptions I would think.



  • #2284
    Larbre34
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,363 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Oh absolutely, in the rear with the gear!



Advertisement