Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Schools closed until March/April? (part 4) **Mod warning in OP 22/01**

1190191193195196331

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    Apparently according to the TUI phased re-opening of post primary schools guidance doc pdf...states that schools have now reached the level of of case numbers that were the same level as prior to schools closing before the Christmas break....*9th of February cases of 556*

    Today the case numbers are 54 deaths and 1006 new cases....still risky..

    But they are not reopened today! This is a plan for after mid-term- do you expect them to look at the case numbers at 8 o'clock that morning and declare it safe then?

    ps there was 543 cases yesterday- was it safe to open then?

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,485 ✭✭✭History Queen


    Apparently according to the TUI phased re-opening of post primary schools guidance doc pdf...states that schools have now reached the level of of case numbers that were the same level as prior to schools closing before the Christmas break....*9th of February cases of 556*

    Today the case numbers are 54 deaths and 1006 new cases....still risky..

    Was there not 950+ cases around the last days before schools closed for Christmas? I can't remember the exact figure but remember thinking it'll break 1000 by Christmas day.

    Also there is still time for numbers to decline.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 524 ✭✭✭penny piper


    But they are not reopened today! This is a plan for after mid-term- do you expect them to look at the case numbers at 8 o'clock that morning and declare it safe then?

    ps there was 543 cases yesterday- was it safe to open then?

    I actually didn't say they were re-opening today....if you read the document it uses 9th february as an example....to be perfectly honest I don't see how you can base a re-opening based on case numbers that are fluctuating so much...
    Ofcourse..there is the possibility that numbers will remain consistantly low by 22nd February....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,532 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    People still don't understand the difference between 500 cases before Christmas and 500 now, the variants have changed everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 506 ✭✭✭PoolDude


    TUI may know public health advice will be to stay off longer so now can say they were prepared to go back - bargaining chip for something else or am I too cynical? It’s just that all indicators were they wouldn’t advise schools reopening that soon and in the LC instance you have the age group with the highest transmission rates (LC) going in to meet the age group with the highest infection rate (people in the 35 - 45 age group - last Saturday’s stats was 59% from that age group).

    I’d be happy if they do go back if it’s safe to do so.

    Edit - I see ASTI saying plans are inadequate beyond special classes and they will first monitor that in the “weeks ahead” but will negotiate with the department


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭billy_beckham


    People still don't understand the difference between 500 cases before Christmas and 500 now, the variants have changed everything.

    Change the record...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,532 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    Change the record...

    What record would that be billy.......science


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 784 ✭✭✭daydorunrun


    People still don't understand the difference between 500 cases before Christmas and 500 now, the variants have changed everything.

    So no schools until zero Covid is reached?

    “You tried your best and you failed miserably. The lesson is, never try.” Homer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,532 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    So no schools until zero Covid is reached?

    At no point did I say that, but any return needs to acknowledge the difference between pre Christmas and post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭CruelSummer


    khalessi wrote: »
    Not hiding just listening to the health advice other occupations who are wfh are listening to.

    Hyperbole much

    But teachers shouldn’t be “working from home” unless the situation is beyond control. You have to balance the educational needs of our future generations and the consequences of what every week added onto now 6 weeks will do.
    True or false, you were against schools being open from September to Christmas and joined ‘Facebook groups’ to try and gain information on outbreaks in schools?
    The Dept and public health officials are no angels either in their management of this but I don’t believe the vast majority of teachers want schools closures to continue, particularly primary.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,675 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    frank8211 wrote: »
    They are dangerous activiities to be opening so fast... we have thousands of pepple with the vrus since ;last september

    The real danger is the alarming regression of these kids.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 968 ✭✭✭Str8outtaWuhan



    Tui have no choice , they are not covered under industrial relations provisions if they refuse to go back to the classroom, the asti are covered as they voted for a directive before xmas that schools could not impose changes to terms and conditions or some such .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,860 ✭✭✭Mrsmum


    It almost seems like suddenly the unions want to go back ie 22nd Feb before the Government even want them to ! I thought Gov were mentioning phased return from March ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭Locotastic


    People still don't understand the difference between 500 cases before Christmas and 500 now, the variants have changed everything.

    There was and always will be variants that are different to the initial one, once the virus is still in circulation it will continue to mutate as viruses do.

    Conclusions at this stage are mixed on whether any of the 'new' ones are significantly more easily spread or more lethal. It's a consideration but we can't stay hiding under the bed in case of 'variants'. They have not changed everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,441 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Locotastic wrote: »
    There was and always will be variants that are different to the initial one, once the virus is still in circulation it will continue to mutate as viruses do.

    Conclusions at this stage are mixed on whether any of the 'new' ones are significantly more easily spread or more lethal. It's a consideration but we can't stay hiding under the bed in case of 'variants'. They have not changed everything.

    Better tell all the scientists then that the newer variants "have not changed everything". They seem to think that perhaps they have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,439 ✭✭✭✭km79


    Prolonged period of lockdown ahead, Taoiseach tells party meeting
    via The Irish Times
    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/prolonged-period-of-lockdown-ahead-taoiseach-tells-party-meeting-1.4481548


    A confusing night


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 146 ✭✭Neagra


    i have said here before we have done nothing with our teachers on seesaw because of time constraints. but about 2 weeks ago i decided to bite the bullet and interact with the seesaw app. thats the only way they have for teaching.
    and i am glad i did because what my 2 children have been given in activities for their ages is what i consider below standard.
    its made me question the quality of the teachers and the school. said school is meant to be top class.
    its an eye opener and its not good enough.
    . all he gets on seesaw is drawing and colouring, with a very very low standard of maths and English.

    so what we agreed was we got their school books and my wife and i are working through them snappish and also getting stuff from twinkle which i deem to be of the correct standard.
    i think schools will open in September so i am now doing reduced my work hours to help with educating my children.
    time to get on with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,441 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Neagra wrote: »
    i have said here before we have done nothing with our teachers on seesaw because of time constraints. but about 2 weeks ago i decided to bite the bullet and interact with the seesaw app. thats the only way they have for teaching.
    and i am glad i did because what my 2 children have been given in activities for their ages is what i consider below standard.
    its made me question the quality of the teachers and the school. said school is meant to be top class.
    its an eye opener and its not good enough.
    . all he gets on seesaw is drawing and colouring, with a very very low standard of maths and English.

    so what we agreed was we got their school books and my wife and i are working through them snappish and also getting stuff from twinkle which i deem to be of the correct standard.
    i think schools will open in September so i am now doing reduced my work hours to help with educating my children.
    time to get on with it.

    What class?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 12,546 Mod ✭✭✭✭byhookorbycrook


    rob316 wrote: »
    The real danger is the alarming regression of these kids.

    Can you elaborate, please and quote research ?


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 12,546 Mod ✭✭✭✭byhookorbycrook


    Neagra wrote: »
    i have said here before we have done nothing with our teachers on seesaw because of time constraints. but about 2 weeks ago i decided to bite the bullet and interact with the seesaw app. thats the only way they have for teaching.
    and i am glad i did because what my 2 children have been given in activities for their ages is what i consider below standard.
    its made me question the quality of the teachers and the school. said school is meant to be top class.
    its an eye opener and its not good enough.
    . all he gets on seesaw is drawing and colouring, with a very very low standard of maths and English.

    so what we agreed was we got their school books and my wife and i are working through them snappish and also getting stuff from twinkle which i deem to be of the correct standard.
    i think schools will open in September so i am now doing reduced my work hours to help with educating my children.
    time to get on with it.
    Interesting. Parents are the primary educators of their children under the constitution. What ages are your children?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,347 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    Neagra wrote: »
    i
    . all he gets on seesaw is drawing and colouring, with a very very low standard of maths and English.

    Has he gotten round to capitalisation and punctuation yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,339 ✭✭✭The One Doctor


    Never thought I'd say it, but I'm actually relieved that myself, my wife and my six year old daughter have already had Coronavirus (just finished isolation). Makes me less worried about having her in school or crèche, or my wife in work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,067 ✭✭✭Dickie10


    think we really should leave any return to schools til numbers are down to 200-300. around paddys day, maybe attempt every one back after easter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭Locotastic


    Never thought I'd say it, but I'm actually relieved that myself, my wife and my six year old daughter have already had Coronavirus (just finished isolation). Makes me less worried about having her in school or crèche, or my wife in work.

    I can understand that, there are some people who would gladly take their chances so as to have a certain level of immunity and put it behind them and I can understand that too.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 149 ✭✭BiggJim


    Dickie10 wrote: »
    think we really should leave any return to schools til numbers are down to 200-300. around paddys day, maybe attempt every one back after easter

    I personally don't think schools should open at all until this virus is under controlled (when the majority of the population has been vaccinated). I think the home schooling is working quite well, no reason not to continue it as is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,710 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    But teachers shouldn’t be “working from home” unless the situation is beyond control. You have to balance the educational needs of our future generations and the consequences of what every week added onto now 6 weeks will do.
    True or false, you were against schools being open from September to Christmas and joined ‘Facebook groups’ to try and gain information on outbreaks in schools?
    The Dept and public health officials are no angels either in their management of this but I don’t believe the vast majority of teachers want schools closures to continue, particularly primary.

    I'm in secondary and would love to go back after mid term.
    The case numbers are getting back to October/November levels.

    But something really spooked me today.

    Thr UK variant really must be an unknown variable that has the government running scared. I was talking to someone in the union today and the drift i was getting from them was that there is not a big push coming from the department to get us back in the classroom soon. Its going to be rolled out in phases most likely.
    Its a far cry from 5 weeks ago when Norma was like a broken record continually parroting "Schools are Safe"TM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭Locotastic


    Better tell all the scientists then that the newer variants "have not changed everything". They seem to think that perhaps they have.

    It hasn't changed everything, not much has changed due to 'variants'. Are scientists saying that the new variants have changed everything?

    There's very mixed messages about how much of a consideration should be given to 'variants'. Media has a lot of responsibility in feeding scare stories on foreign variants.

    It is a virus there are going to be many different variants.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,234 ✭✭✭giveitholly


    BiggJim wrote: »
    I personally don't think schools should open at all until this virus is under controlled (when the majority of the population has been vaccinated). I think the home schooling is working quite well, no reason not to continue it as is.

    Majority of parents I am talking to and some of them are teachers themselves are sick of homeschooling and says it is not working,stress levels and anxiety are rising as well from what I can gather


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 149 ✭✭BiggJim


    Locotastic wrote: »
    It hasn't changed everything, not much has changed due to 'variants'. Are scientists saying that the new variants have changed everything?

    There's very mixed messages about how much of a consideration should be given to 'variants'. Media has a lot of responsibility in feeding scare stories in foreign variants.

    It is a virus there are going to be many different variants.

    Hopefully the other vaccines will stand up to it as unfortunately it seems Astrazenaca is no use against the SA variant (possibly other variants too?)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,558 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    Neagra wrote: »
    i have said here before we have done nothing with our teachers on seesaw because of time constraints. but about 2 weeks ago i decided to bite the bullet and interact with the seesaw app. thats the only way they have for teaching.
    and i am glad i did because what my 2 children have been given in activities for their ages is what i consider below standard.
    its made me question the quality of the teachers and the school. said school is meant to be top class.
    its an eye opener and its not good enough.
    . all he gets on seesaw is drawing and colouring, with a very very low standard of maths and English.

    so what we agreed was we got their school books and my wife and i are working through them snappish and also getting stuff from twinkle which i deem to be of the correct standard.
    i think schools will open in September so i am now doing reduced my work hours to help with educating my children.
    time to get on with it.

    I really think you should contact school management and inform them of this and maybe even consider changing schools if the level of online education they’re receiving is substandard. If you just let it slide and plough into it yourself instead, nothing will change.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement