Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

Options
1109610971099110111021125

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Lord Palmerston


    The two things are not related.

    We can point to lot's of summer series and November internationals where we've picked experimental sides, and similarly can point to plenty of times SA and NZ sent packed sides out in games.

    Jesus christ you're using EOS era stuff here as an example, the game you're referencing here happened 18 years ago.

    There will be plenty of developmental minutes between now and the next RWC, and there likely will be some guys called up to tour this summer for their first experiences in an Irish squad, but the notion that we aren't going to go to SA to try and win is utter nonsense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    If we had also played a developmental team in that game 18 years ago (I presume you’re talking about the 2006 game), do you think it would have made any difference to our performance in the 2007 WC?

    Interestingly enough we sent a developmental team to Argentina in June 2007 and lost both tests and didn’t even make it to a QF.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,836 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I do think most supporters recognise now though that in the grand scheme of things, winning series means very little

    I am happy to enjoy it for what it is.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,283 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    South Africa didn't beat us in the world cup, did they??

    They will be certainly out to 'right that wrong' and that will be their pure motivation. If you think they are just going to shrug and say "let's send out the baby bokke here" you're completely out of touch with reality. They will want 2-0 or nothing



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,101 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    So playing a developmental side guarantees RWC success?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Im utterly staggered that a series win in RSA is thought of as a 'meh, but what about the WC' by some posters.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    100% agreed. I’ve heard of online Irish fans be referred to as arrogant by some opposing fans. Is it this the attitude that they’re referring to?



  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Lol.

    South Africa won the World Cup. Are we so arrogant that we really think they're sitting stewing over the fact they lost a group game to us, with a wrong to right?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,836 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think they are stewing over it, but I think they'll have definitely moved onto it as their motivation du jour.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    We won the tournament we competed in this year but lost to England in the process. Do you think the Irish players will want to avenge that defeat at the next available opportunity?



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I don't really get why you're staggered.

    A series win is nice, but in the big picture it's totally meaningless. Similarly, a series loss is totally meaningless. The result of this summer series literally could not be less consequential.

    As far as rugby goes, it's pure entertainment, with nothing whatsoever on the line.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I imagine they might use it as motivation, or at least Rassie might, because there is little else for them to use as motivation for a relatively inconsequential series.

    If it wasn't this, I am sure they would invent something else to try and generate interest.

    But I can't imagine they really care too much, certainly not in a genuine way.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Well that's a fairly awful comparison, since that loss to England cost us something (a grand slam) and South Africa's loss to us cost them nothing whatsoever.



  • Subscribers Posts: 41,283 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    stewing?? not at all

    i distinctly said it will be a reason they wont put out the green horns like some other suggest we should do with this tour.

    do you think they see us as not credible opposition?

    ps: your post might come back haunt you when the media being building up these games



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,836 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    As far as rugby goes, it's pure entertainment, with nothing whatsoever on the line.

    This is true of all sport man.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,101 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Must be a horrible way to live - not sure how I could even watch the sport if that is how I looked at things.

    The whole enjoyment of international rugby lives and dies on your team winning a tournament that takes place every 4 years.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    ‘Awful’ comparison? Think you’re being a bit hyperbolic there.

    Regardless I have no doubt that SA will ‘want to fúck us up’ to use Rassie Erasmus’ words seeing as they haven’t beaten us since 2016 regardless of their great success since.



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,075 ✭✭✭✭phog


    A series win will be terrific, a series win with some of the settled team at home would even be better

    A series loss with our usual 23 will be soul destroying.

    Using our usual 23 v a SA development team will be a waste of time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,101 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    SA lost to us in a pool game and then won each of their three knockout games by a single point each.

    They were incredibly lucky, and it would be madness to try to link any single act in their preparation to be the cause of their success and even madder to try to copy them and expect similar results.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Lord Palmerston


    It's not going to be a SA Development team.

    They will obviously have some new caps, which is driven by retirements and the general age profile of their squad at the RWC, but there is no way they'd risk losing a series to us so easily as to send out a Development squad against us.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Now this is getting really silly.

    Things that really, really matter in international rugby:

    1. The World Cup once, every 4 years
    2. The six nations, every single year

    Things that are primarily entertainment, enjoyable, but are ultimately absolutely inconsequential and pretty meaningless:

    1. Test series
    2. Lions Tours

    I don't know what the aversion is to accepting this, or why we need to talk up test series into something they are not. It makes us look incredibly small time, like the Ireland of old when we used to talk up triple crowns.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    • 1 Steven Kitshoff
    • 2 Malcolm Marx
    • 3 Frans Malherbe
    • 4 Eben Etzebeth
    • 5 Lood de Jager
    • 6 Siya Kolisi (Captain)
    • 7 Pieter-Steph du Toit
    • 8 Jasper Wiese

    Backs

    • 9 Jaden Hendrikse
    • 10 Damian Willemse
    • 11 Makazole Mapimpi
    • 12 Damian de Allende
    • 13 Jesse Kriel
    • 14 Kurt-Lee Arendse
    • 15 Cheslin Kolbe

    Replacements

    • 16 Bongi Mbonambi
    • 17 Ox Nche
    • 18 Vincent Koch
    • 19 Franco Mostert
    • 20 Deon Fourie
    • 21 Kwagga Smith
    • 22 Faf de Klerk
    • 23 Willie le Roux

    The team that SA sent over to Dublin in 2022 which lost by 3 points. Was that defeat soul destroying for them?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,700 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Our world ranking is good right now, we want it to stay that way until the draw for the next world cup, so that means we want to win as much as possible up to the end of the November internationals in 2025. Beating the top team nearly 4 points ahead of us, away, would give us a huge points boost.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,836 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Only partially. The World Cup is 3 years away and I couldn't give a flip about it. We are b2b 6N champions so what else is there to aim for?



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,077 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'm still annoyed we lost the last tour down there, very eager to see us claim that scalp.



  • Administrators Posts: 53,556 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I couldn't give a crap about the RWC 3 years away either. Don't get me wrong, we should try win this series. I am not suggesting we send a rotated side, that won't happen. It'll be a strong touring team with maybe a few new faces thrown in.

    But ultimately, winning or losing this series is inconsequential, it's nothing more than a feel good moment for the fans. Is it an achievement to crow about? No. Is it something the team will be remembered for? No. Would winning this series take the edge off the WC disappointment? Not even close.

    Similarly if we lose, we'll feel bad for a day or two but it means nothing. A series loss here tells us nothing whatsoever. The players will have forgotten about it before they land on the beaches for their summer breaks. I am sure SA will want to win it, and if they do I am sure they'll enjoy it, and within a few days of it being over they'll have totally forgotten about it too.

    These test series are nothing more than money making machines for the unions. We go visit them so that they'll come visit us in future. We can enjoy them and simultaneously accept them for what they are. Enjoyment isn't predicated on us pretending like they are a huge deal. That is my point.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,101 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Nothing in my posts disagrees with what you note here.

    However, rather than looking to enjoy the upcoming test series, certain posters are moaning about a RWC a year ago and stressing out about the impact of decisions now on a RWC 3 years from now.

    In my opinion that is a sad mindset to be in.

    What is worse is there is zero evidence directly linking that a developmental team would in anyway improve our chances in the RWC, while the real negative impact to seedings is far more likely to hurt in the RWC.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,917 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Couldn't give less of a toss about the outcome of these two "test matches". Much rather we used it to bring new guys into the fold (we won't because we never learn). SA will absolutely not be fielding their strongest 23. We'll probably take a full strength squad and win a test or two and then crown ourselves de facto World Champions because we beat the World Cup wimmers. But honestly after so many years of being the laughing stock of World rugby, all any Irish rugby fan should care about is winning a quarter final.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,962 ✭✭✭OldRio


    'Nice'

    I'll stop at that. If you think a series win in RSA is just nice, you are either very young or naive



Advertisement