Aoibheann Ni Shuilleabhain Harassment Story

MrStuffins · 08-09-2020 1:14pm

Yurt! wrote: »

No. You said she did it for publicity

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

I never used those words, are you ok love ?

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Very pretentious person imo, and now making it public has obviously been done to promote her name even more.

Pretty clear here.....

LiquidZeb · 08-09-2020 1:16pm

MrStuffins wrote: »

Pretty clear here.....

Threads like these really bring out the incels. I bet he'd piss himself if a girl so much as made eye contact with him.

Yurt2 · 08-09-2020 1:16pm

MrStuffins wrote: »

Pretty clear here.....

He must have been on the hooch and forgot he posted it.

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:17pm

MrStuffins wrote: »

Pretty clear here.....

Thanks hun and the other accusations ?

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:18pm

Yurt! wrote: »

He must have been on the hooch and forgot he posted it.

And the other accusations love ?

walshb · 08-09-2020 1:18pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Again not words I used

Whatever words you used, it read to me, and others that you were getting a dig at her for exposing this. Implying she was using it to keep her name in the public domain..

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:19pm

LiquidZeb wrote: »

Threads like these really bring out the incels. I bet he'd piss himself if a girl so much as made eye contact with him.

Now that’s weird

walshb · 08-09-2020 1:20pm

Deleted User wrote: »

To be fair, I did not think the accused was "that type of person" either, even though I somewhat knew the guy personally.

So I don't think you can outright claim that she is "not that type of person" when you don't know her personally at all.

Well, she is not that type person...in the context I am espousing..that being:

“Using this horrendous ordeal that she went through simply to promote herself/career.”

Yurt2 · 08-09-2020 1:20pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Thanks hun and the other accusations ?

As much as this may surprise you, this thread isn't about your name and how you feel it's been besmirched by people mocking you for attacking a woman who has been subject to stalking. Do us all a favour and toddle off.

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:20pm

walshb wrote: »

Whatever words you used, it read to me, and others that you were getting a dig at her for exposing this. Implying she was using it to keep her name in the public domain..

Wow so you make up what people say with no evidence? Punch drunk perhaps

MrStuffins · 08-09-2020 1:21pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Thanks hun and the other accusations ?

When you make a statement like the one above, and then not only try to back-track on it but out and out lie claiming you'd never said it, it rings alarm bells.

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:21pm

Yurt! wrote: »

As much as this may surprise you, this thread isn't about your name and how you feel it's been besmirched by people mocking you for attacking a woman who has been subject to stalking. Do us all a favour and toddle off.

Who’s attacking who yurt ?? It’s you love any mod will see that

MrStuffins · 08-09-2020 1:22pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Wow so you make up what people say with no evidence? Punch drunk perhaps

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Very pretentious person imo, and now making it public has obviously been done to promote her name even more.

Again, you present the evidence yourself. It's quoted right there.

LiquidZeb · 08-09-2020 1:22pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Now that’s weird

While accusing a woman of using her sexual harassment ordeal to get publicity is the height of normal.

08-09-2020 1:23pm

walshb wrote: »

Well, she is not that type person...in the context I am espousing..that being:

“Using this horrendous ordeal that she went through simply to promote herself/career.”

Yes, that is what I assumed you meant. I don't believe that she is that type of person of course, but that is just my opinion as an outsider and not a factual statement I can make because I do not know her personally.

Yurt2 · 08-09-2020 1:24pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Who’s attacking who yurt ?? It’s you love any mod will see that

I'll take a card for for this but I don't care. Stop being a sook and posting weird tripe about someone who has been subject to serious harassment. The thread will be all the better for it.

Mod

Forum and thread ban

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:24pm

LiquidZeb wrote: »

While accusing a woman of using her sexual harassment ordeal to get publicity is the height of normal.

You really have a one track small mind, but ok Zed if you say so

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:25pm

Yurt! wrote: »

I'll take a card for for this but I don't care. Stop being a sook and posting weird tripe about someone who has been subject to serious harassment. The thread will be all the better for it.

What’s a sook ?

Kaybaykwah · 08-09-2020 1:25pm

IAMAMORON wrote: »

Does anyone think she elected to involve the media for fear of any backlash from within UCD? I get the feeling she went so public about the matter to highlight the issue but to also ensure she has a positive future within UCD?

Could she have had other motivations for involving the press?

Before you jump down my throat here, I think it is fair to point out. There are a lot of women who have gone through hell and back with their harassment stories and not involved the media. So I think it is a relevant point? Why did she chose to go actively public with the matter? Is it a journalist "scoop" or was she hoping to reinforce herself against any negativity within UCD down the line?

Well, it could be a scoop, a belated one at that, but what does it matter how it came out in the press?

This matter, in the wake of "me too" and anything related to harassment of any kind needs airing out. Any individual who "doesn't get" that the sollicited party isn't interested needs to be stopped early on. His obsession doesn't need to become someone else's cross to bear. It doesn't matter if it is a woman or a man by the way, there are plenty of people who have problems understanding proper boundaries in human relations.

LiquidZeb · 08-09-2020 1:25pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

You really have a one track small mind, but ok Zed if you say so

It's zeb lad. Are you going to try and back track any more?

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:27pm

LiquidZeb wrote: »

It's zeb lad. Are you going to try and back track any more?

I’m not backtracking zeb you make no sense lad

MrStuffins · 08-09-2020 1:31pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

I’m not backtracking zeb you make no sense lad

Yurt! wrote: »

You said she did it for publicity

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

I never used those words, are you ok love ?

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Very pretentious person imo, and now making it public has obviously been done to promote her name even more.

Embarrassing!

IAMAMORON · 08-09-2020 1:33pm

I think once you involve the countries main broadsheet ( with respect to the Indo and the Examiner etc etc )you are automatically exposing yourself to potential for negative feedback.

Lets be honest, this is not some column inches in the legal/courts section of a Wednesday afternoon. This is a full exposé on a contentious sexual harassment case, pictures, quotes the whole shebang.

Given that to be the case it does warrant discussion as to the motivations of the article and the compliance of Ní Shuilleabhain, not in her harassment btw, but in her willingness to give the media her side of a very big story. She has worked in broadcasting since 2006.

I would just be interested in knowing what were her motivations for going public? It may well be as innocuous as giving her some public reinforcement in her battle with UCD, I get that. But it would be nice to hear her come out and say it.

Morgans · 08-09-2020 1:38pm

IAMAMORON wrote: »

I think once you involve the countries main broadsheet ( with respect to the Indo and the Examiner etc etc )you are automatically exposing yourself to potential for negative feedback.

Lets be honest, this is not some column inches in the legal/courts section of a Wednesday afternoon. This is a full exposé on a contentious sexual harassment case, pictures, quotes the whole shebang.

Given that to be the case it does warrant discussion as to the motivations of the article and the compliance of Ní Shuilleabhain, not in her harassment btw, but in her willingness to give the media her side of a very big story. She has worked in broadcasting since 2006.

I would just be interested in knowing what were her motivations for going public? It may well be as innocuous as giving her some public reinforcement in her battle with UCD, I get that. But it would be nice to hear her come out and say it.

What's contentious about this case?

IAMAMORON · 08-09-2020 1:45pm

Morgans wrote: »

What's contentious about this case?

For me the fact that it has happened in one of our largest universities, a place where we are sending out youth for further education, for starters.

But there is a litany of subject matter.

How many women working for a big 4 Accounting firm or a large solicitor firm are dealing with the same torment? Not as easy to challenge harassment in the private sector?

Would you like any more bones of contention, I have all afternoon?

walshb · 08-09-2020 1:46pm

IAMAMORON wrote: »

I think once you involve the countries main broadsheet ( with respect to the Indo and the Examiner etc etc )you are automatically exposing yourself to potential for negative feedback.

Lets be honest, this is not some column inches in the legal/courts section of a Wednesday afternoon. This is a full exposé on a contentious sexual harassment case, pictures, quotes the whole shebang.

Given that to be the case it does warrant discussion as to the motivations of the article and the compliance of Ní Shuilleabhain, not in her harassment btw, but in her willingness to give the media her side of a very big story. She has worked in broadcasting since 2006.

I would just be interested in knowing what were her motivations for going public? It may well be as innocuous as giving her some public reinforcement in her battle with UCD, I get that. But it would be nice to hear her come out and say it.

Maybe she feels that she was so let down and hurt by UCDs response to all this, that she simply wants to make it known how poorly they behaved here? And, I wouldn't slate her for it; albeit there being two sides to a story...

ThewhiteJesus · 08-09-2020 1:48pm

MrStuffins wrote: »

Embarrassing!

Actually if you look at the words it’s embarrassing for you, but way to go hun

StackSteevens · 08-09-2020 1:48pm

IAMAMORON wrote: »

For me the fact that it has happened in one of our largest universities, a place where we are sending out youth for further education, for starters.

But there is a litany of subject matter.

How many women working for a big 4 Accounting firm or a large solicitor firm are dealing with the same torment? Not as easy to challenge harassment in the private sector?

Would you like any more bones of contention, I have all afternoon?

None of the above whataboutery can in any way justify your use of the word 'contentious".

Please try harder.

IAMAMORON · 08-09-2020 1:49pm

walshb wrote: »

Maybe she feels that she was so let down and hurt by UCDs response to all this, that she simply wants to make it known how poorly they behaved here? And, I wouldn't slate her for it; albeit there being two sides to a story...

Fair enough, this would explain a lot.

No one is " slating " anyone here either.

MrStuffins · 08-09-2020 1:50pm

ThewhiteJesus wrote: »

Actually if you look at the words it’s embarrassing for you, but way to go hun

It's pretty clear you've made a fool of yourself here sweetheart

Aoibheann Ni Shuilleabhain Harassment Story

Comments