Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Couple Ordered to Demolish House - any update?

Options
1262728293032»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,315 ✭✭✭Shoog


    All development was prohibited on the site. There was never ever any possibility they would be offered planning permission on the site. They would have known this at the outset.

    They were taking the piss and sticking their two fingers up to everyone who followed the correct procedure.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,411 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Planning decisions and reasons are in the public domain.

    If the family end up homeless after demolishing the house, I'd guess that normal homeless provisions would kick in.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,411 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It's not about 'commuting patterns'. It's about car-bound lifestyles so that every trip is a car trip. Every school run, every shopping trip, every 'we've run out of milk' scenario, every playdate, every GAA training, every parent teacher meeting - every trip is a car trip. That's not sustainable.

    Here's an update on the planet.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Music Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 8,008 CMod ✭✭✭✭Gaspode


    All of this is dragging the thread off topic, please stick to discussion of this house.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,049 ✭✭✭SharkMX


    Lots of people out where im from building log cabins for their children to live in. Most of then give this house an an example ans say even if they can get 10 or 15 years before they are told to knock down their log cabin they are winning.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 33,237 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Meath CoCo can't CPO the site or just take and convert the house into flats. There are prescribed punishments for unauthorised development which Meath CoCo have to abide by, and that includes forcing the owners to demolish the property. Not only that but the cost for Meath to buy the house and convert it wouldn't be worth it, nor would the added costs if the owners objected to the CPO (which they surely would). The owners could say if the property is okay for Meath CoCo to purchase and use for housing, then the Council are ignoring their own grounds for not granting retention permission to the owners.

    They should be forced to demolish the property. That's the only reasonable outcome at this stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,549 ✭✭✭dubrov


    It doesn't appear that Meath CoCo are abiding by those punishments.



  • Registered Users Posts: 876 ✭✭✭Anaki r2d2


    I’d say if you come back to this thread in 2028 there will still be no update.

    Meath Co Co are just hoping that house sinks into the bog!



Advertisement