Relaxation of restrictions Part II

rovers_runner

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Infection rate rising again in Germany after relaxations in some states, R moves back to 1, which means the virus is becoming more mobile again.

https://amp.dw.com/en/coronavirus-latest-transmission-rate-rises-in-germany/a-53264933?__twitter_impression=true

As I said in the other thread the WHO has warned countries not to lift restrictions early because they face a 'doom loop' of having to reimpose tougher restrictions.

This is far worse a trap for society and the economy.

We must avoid this fate ourselves.

Kermit.de.frog upon reading said article...........

drunkmonkey

drunkmonkey wrote: »

.........

If Leo the doctor doesn't know how to do it so why do people think the general population does. He's at a testing center.

I was in a takeaway last Fri (first takeaway of the lockdown), you could see into the kitchen, spotless place to be fair, all the chefs in gleaming white chef gear...... Anyway, two taking phone orders and passing out the grub ......... both of them touching face masks routinely and also placing them on their chins for some phone chats.

Folk I see with them in cars have them on the chin (in between calls/deliveries maybe).

Folk in shops with them on seem to ignore the 2m thing because they presumably reckon they are protected.

Facemasks are grand to catch a sneeze or cough but they aren't the be all and end all for the bulk of the population that some reckon they are, IMO.

If they are worn widely I'd fear that the 2m social distancing will lapse by many.

drunkmonkey

RugbyLad11 wrote: »

Do you seriously think he was testing people with the mask down around his neck? He obviously took it down to get his face in the picture.

Sweet Jesus you never take it down, it's either on or off. You've just drove home the point, people including your good self don't know how to use them..

gozunda

polesheep wrote: »

Please don't tell me what I mean. There are a great many experts in the country available.

So ok you're moving that to disregarding certain 'experts' because you dont agree with them? How many experts are we going to get through before you might be finally happy?

trapp

The French prime minister, Édouard Philippe, has begun outlining the schedule for the end of the coronavirus lockdown in France to MPs in the Assemblée Nationale.

Philippe began saying the situation was unique. “Who could have envisaged a France where schools, universities, cafés, restaurants, the majority of businesses, libraries … beaches, stadia … would be closed. We have never known this situation in our country. Not during the war, not during the occupation, not during previous epidemics,” he said.

“The country cannot be locked down for a long time … it is efficient against the virus, to stop its spread and the saturation of our hospitals and protect vulnerable people.”

“An instrument is only useful if in the long term the positive effects are greater than the negative … We have to proceed to a progressive end of lockdown.”

Philippe said he would outline the “national strategy” to end the lockdown. In medical terms “we have to learn to live with the virus …no vaccine will be available in the short term, there is no treatment and we don’t have what they call herd immunity”.


Lukethebandit, the boy from cork, kermin the frog etc etc

Game over lads.

What Username Guidelines

Penfailed wrote: »

What's irresponsible about it? *confused face*

It gives the impression that if we hit the NPHET goal, restrictions are eased back to "Normal". Could have been "new normal" or just something around "Loosening" restrictions.

iamwhoiam

https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/blame-for-expected-extended-lockdown-shifted-onto-the-public-1.4239955



After stoically sucking up more than six weeks of tough restrictions, including four weeks of full lockdown and with plenty to go, the people were put on the naughty step.

The Taoiseach said the public’s behaviour could result in full lockdown being extended by “two or three weeks”, taking us into the third week of May. Funnily enough, that chimes exactly with how long the HSE says it will take for the State to ramp up Covid-19 testing to the level that we have been repeatedly told is necessary for an easing.

So which is really to blame? Flouting of restrictions, or the State’s repeated failure on testing? A cynic might say the Government is allowing the public to be the fall guy to distract from its own mistakes.



This is exactly why people are beginning to be rightly pissed off now .,Its the HSE s failure to act that is delaying the lifting of restrictions

RugbyLad11

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Sweet Jesus you never take it down, it's either on or off. You've just drove home the point, people including your good self don't know how to use them..

How do you know he didn't take it off after photo was taken and put on a new one??

ixoy

gozunda wrote: »

You may need to realise that he virus doesn't 'bargain' with anyone ...

Which is why you have to try and make a reasonable measure to try and balance the well being of everyone against it. And well being includes factors like mental health, economy and health in other areas. Covid-19 doesn't trump them all.

drunkmonkey

RugbyLad11 wrote: »

How do you know he didn't take it off after photo was taken and put on a new one??

Good Lord will your educate yourself on ppe.

RugbyLad11

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Sweet Jesus you never take it down, it's either on or off. You've just drove home the point, people including your good self don't know how to use them..

The main function of the mask is to stop people spreading it so once they keep it on around other it's better than nothing.

ek motor

trapp wrote: »

Game over lads.

You are in for an almighty shock. We will be having rolling lockdowns/restrictions until a vaccine/anti viral drugs are available.

stephenjmcd

EU countries with restriction updates this afternoon

Austria,
Austria has said that citizens would be allowed to leave the house for non-essential trips as it eases coronavirus lockdown measures, but said limits on gatherings and social distancing rules would remain in place.

Currently, residents are permitted to leave the house only for certain trips, including to go to work if they cannot do their jobs from home, or to buy food or seek medical care, according to restrictions rolled out in mid-March.

But from 1 May, people will be permitted to leave their homes with fewer restrictions, as long as they do not meet in groups and respect social distancing rules.

Public gatherings will be limited to ten people, or 30 for funerals, until at least the end of June.


France

Shops and markets can reopen when France's coronavirus lockdown eases on 11 May, though schools will resume classes only gradually and face masks will be compulsory on public transport, Prime Minister Edouard Philippe has said.

Philippe told parliament that home confinement had helped brake the epidemic and prevented tens of thousands of deaths, but the economy now had to be reopened, though "with prudence, progressively".

Philippe has said that a lockdown imposed in response to the Covid-19 pandemic had saved 62,000 lives in a month, but that keeping the restrictions in place would mean risking economic collapse.

Speaking in parliament, he said it was time to explain to the country how the lockdown would gradually be eased. French citizens will have to learn to live with the virus and to protect themselves, he said.

gozunda

ixoy wrote: »

Which is why you have to try and make a reasonable measure to try and balance the well being of everyone against it. And well being includes factors like mental health, economy and health in other areas. Covid-19 doesn't trump them all.

Never said it shouldn't. But at the moment we are at war with a virus and at this point in time that takes precedence. Will things change - yes they will.

What is sure is that the pandemic will cause health problems - both physical and mental for years to come for those who are infected, those in the frontline and those who have loved ones who die. And those sho are affected for many other reasons.

There are no simple answers atm.

pjohnson

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Good Lord will your educate yourself on ppe.

Hes on a one man mission to show WHY masks would be utterly useless to some.

RugbyLad11

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Good Lord will your educate yourself on ppe.

Yeah all these counties recommend masks for the fun of it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face_masks_during_the_2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic

Like I said before we will also be added to the listen but not until the UK do it first

KrustyUCC

iamwhoiam wrote: »

https://www.irishtimes.com/opinion/blame-for-expected-extended-lockdown-shifted-onto-the-public-1.4239955



After stoically sucking up more than six weeks of tough restrictions, including four weeks of full lockdown and with plenty to go, the people were put on the naughty step.

The Taoiseach said the public’s behaviour could result in full lockdown being extended by “two or three weeks”, taking us into the third week of May. Funnily enough, that chimes exactly with how long the HSE says it will take for the State to ramp up Covid-19 testing to the level that we have been repeatedly told is necessary for an easing.

So which is really to blame? Flouting of restrictions, or the State’s repeated failure on testing? A cynic might say the Government is allowing the public to be the fall guy to distract from its own mistakes.



This is exactly why people are beginning to be rightly pissed off now .,Its the HSE s failure to act that is delaying the lifting of restrictions

Yup nursing homes and the failures with testing

Neither of which have anything to do with the general public

CalamariFritti

Kermit.de.frog wrote: »

Infection rate rising again in Germany after relaxations in some states, R moves back to 1, which means the virus is becoming more mobile again.

https://amp.dw.com/en/coronavirus-latest-transmission-rate-rises-in-germany/a-53264933?__twitter_impression=true

As I said in the other thread the WHO has warned countries not to lift restrictions early because they face a 'doom loop' of having to reimpose tougher restrictions.

This is far worse a trap for society and the economy.

We must avoid this fate ourselves.

In Germany the number has been hovering around 1 for over a month. Data quality is also an issue. Such numbers are up to 2 weeks old by he nature of it. Going from 09. to 1 doesn't mean a lot really.

This is Germany's R0.

drunkmonkey

RugbyLad11 wrote: »

The main function of the mask is to stop people spreading it so once they keep it on around other it's better than nothing.

What Leo has done in that picture is an absolute no no when it comes to facemasks.
What Leo has done is exactly why the public can't be trusted with face masks.

https://twitter.com/EddieHoareFG/status/1254891713832857605?s=20

Using a facemask incorrectly is a lot worse than using none ask any professional health care worker.

drunkmonkey

RugbyLad11 wrote: »

Yeah all these counties recommend masks for the fun of it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Face_masks_during_the_2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic

Like I said before we will also be added to the listen but not until the UK do it first

Give it up you've already proven yourself to be clueless when it comes to ppe.

begbysback

Just popped in to see if there was any change in the situation today, from what I can see there is no change, the virus is still here and Kermit is still trying to mislead people with data to suit his own narrative.

Tell me how

drunkmonkey wrote: »

What Leo has done in that picture is an absolute no no when it comes to facemasks.
What Leo has done is exactly why the public can't be trusted with face masks.

https://twitter.com/EddieHoareFG/status/1254891713832857605?s=20

Using a facemask incorrectly is a lot worse than using none ask any professional health care worker.

You mean like Leo?

Thelonious Monk

Is that Leo at a halting site? Not much point testing that lot with the way they've been carrying on.

Raisins

RugbyLad11 wrote: »

How can you seriously argue that wearing a mask doesn't help? If joe blogs wears a mask and has the virus without symptoms he will not be spreading it

Even Germany is making it mandatory to wear masks in public otherwise you'll get fined

You can’t conclude joe bloggs wouldn’t spread it with the mask. Joe Bloggs is thick.

It probably will help but it’s arguable that the benefits are outweighed by the negative impacts.

1. Joe bloggs just doesn’t understand the virus will live on the front of the mask, in a best case scenario.

A. Then joe bloggs re uses the mask constantly - there’s a reason medical staff carefully throw them out without touching the front of the mask after every use

B. Taking it off, leaving it on the table, picking it up again, using it, repeat, repeat. joe bloggs does not understand the front of the mask is a virus Petri dish they’re carrying around.

2. Joe Bloggs with a mask could be less likely to socially distance with the mask on.

You’d need a massive public health campaign if you wanted to hand out millions of masks and end up with a successful outcome for joe bloggs.

road_high

easypazz wrote: »

Just because you want to believe that, does not make it true.

Loads of businesses trading out the back door.

An ever increasing number very day.

Delighted to hear it- survive or die at this stage. Businesses can't take 2 months of 0 revenues. Simon Harris knows zilch about running one, he's a walking picture of poor health and overcautious anxiety himself.

Stark

Raisins wrote: »

You can’t conclude joe bloggs wouldn’t spread it with the mask. Joe Bloggs is thick.

It probably will help but it’s arguable that the benefits are outweighed by the negative impacts.

1. Joe bloggs just doesn’t understand the virus will live on the front of the mask, in a best case scenario.

A. Then joe bloggs re uses the mask constantly - there’s a reason medical staff carefully throw them out without touching the front of the mask after every use

B. Taking it off, leaving it on the table, picking it up again, using it, repeat, repeat. joe bloggs does not understand the front of the mask is a virus Petri dish they’re carrying around.

2. Joe Bloggs with a mask could be less likely to socially distance with the mask on.

You’d need a massive public health campaign if you wanted to hand out millions of masks and end up with a successful outcome for joe bloggs.

You could use all these arguments against condoms also. Plenty of people put them on wrongly, re-use them, engage in more promiscuous behaviour but no-one seriously argues that they're not a good idea on the whole.

Ultimately the benefit of masks is in reducing the spread of droplets from infected persons. Confusion seems to arise because they're not very effective in preventing the wearer from infection in most cases but they do protect other people from the wearer.

ixoy

I don't believe there's been any big information campaign about using masks correctly in Germany. Are they doomed to fail there?

The virus won't live indefinitely on the mask so could they be rotated around if you had a few, since you're not going to get enough for people to use disposables.

RugbyLad11

drunkmonkey wrote: »

Give it up you've already proven yourself to be clueless when it comes to ppe.

Yeah I'm thick and clueless so why don't the government do a campaign to teach people how to use masks instead on buying their heads in the sand

RugbyLad11

ixoy wrote: »

I don't believe there's been any big information campaign about using masks correctly in Germany. Are they doomed to fail there?

The virus won't live indefinitely on the mask so could they be rotated around if you had a few, since you're not going to get enough for people to use disposables.

It's crazy people trying to say masks are useless people because can't use them.

As the poster above said are condoms also useless people some people don't know how use them? so no one should use condoms

ZX7R

CalamariFritti wrote: »

In Germany the number has been hovering around 1 for over a month. Data quality is also an issue. Such numbers are up to 2 weeks old by he nature of it. Going from 09. to 1 doesn't mean a lot really.

This is Germany's R0.

That is also the ro for the country as a whole ,they also have a break down of each state in the country most are below 1 or well below it