Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

What if there is no cure?

Options
1235789

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    I've heard that vaccines may attack the T cell lymph nodes directly, and the negative immunogoblin can directly lower the number of AB cell receptors. As they attach to the adenovirus cells directly (not using beta-postive cells), then a vaccine will induce an immunoresponse of plus or negative 2.14, which indirectly leads to cytokine enhanced androgenous amoeba response.

    For that reason this will never work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,734 ✭✭✭✭Inquitus


    SNIP

    In your worst case it would simply keep re-infecting people over and over again and then at some point you'd catch it when you are older, or under the weather, or whatever and it would kill you. Because it would live on through asymptomatic infections over and over again, as no resistance would be built up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,948 ✭✭✭yosemitesam1


    We will realise that this isn't deadly enough to warrant lockdown and get on with our old lives. With or without vaccines or treatments.
    Other than it's new, there's not much different about covid 19 compared to other endemic coronavirus strains.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    hmmm wrote: »
    I've heard that vaccines may attack the T cell lymph nodes directly, and the negative immunogoblin can directly lower the number of AB cell receptors. As they attach to the adenovirus cells directly (not using beta-postive cells), then a vaccine will induce an immunoresponse of plus or negative 2.14, which indirectly leads to cytokine enhanced androgenous amoeba response.

    For that reason this will never work.

    Apologies, any chance of an ELI5 for those who haven't studied biological chemistry? I know what some of this means but not nearly enough to understand what you're saying :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    The potential for a misanthropes wet dream is certainly there. No more old people, no more sickly - or if there are they'll be even more sorted away in the proverbial attic/basement than is the case.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,183 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    The potential for a misanthropes wet dream is certainly there. No more old people, no more sickly - or if there are they'll be even more sorted away in the proverbial attic/basement than is the case.

    People like Dominic Cummings are probably ecstatic about this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,269 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    It is highly likely that at least a weak form of immunity follows infection, so therefore if there is no vaccine, coronavirus will become endemic. Constantly circulating at a low level.

    The big issue for humans immune systems is that this virus is novel. It won't stay novel forever.
    While it is novel is can burn through a population taking out the weak and susceptible. That can't go on infinitely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,576 ✭✭✭Dr. Bre


    Worst case scenario is we let it spread . We try to live along side it . Only the strong survive . That’s why people should try eat healthier now and in general be fit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,828 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    First of all I believe they will find a vaccine or at least an effective treatment.


    If they don't then a few things will happen.


    As permanent quarantine cannot be maintained forever normal activities will resume probably with precautions i.e. screens, masks handwashing etc. the virus will spread throughout the population and many will die.

    Those that are left (most people) will now be somewhat immune or not susceptible to it.

    It may die off naturally or become less virulent perhaps coming back every so often.

    Life expectancy will fall.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 510 ✭✭✭trapp


    The virus isn't deadly enough to cause long term damage to the way we live. Short term yes.

    The current measures and lockdowns are to prevent hospitals becoming overwhelmed etc.

    Over time more capacity will be built up in hospitals, testing and tracing will become quicker and more effective and in time the virus will become endemic, it won't just burn through the population all the time at the same rate as it won't be a new virus anymore.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,469 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    hmmm wrote: »
    I've heard that vaccines may attack the T cell lymph nodes directly, and the negative immunogoblin can directly lower the number of AB cell receptors. As they attach to the adenovirus cells directly (not using beta-postive cells), then a vaccine will induce an immunoresponse of plus or negative 2.14, which indirectly leads to cytokine enhanced androgenous amoeba response.

    For that reason this will never work.

    Who did you "hear" this from ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,867 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Who did you "hear" this from ?

    Waterford whispers medical pages... If you can't baffle 'em with science, baffle 'em with bull****...


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    hmmm wrote: »
    I've heard that vaccines may attack the T cell lymph nodes directly, and the negative immunogoblin can directly lower the number of AB cell receptors. As they attach to the adenovirus cells directly (not using beta-postive cells), then a vaccine will induce an immunoresponse of plus or negative 2.14, which indirectly leads to cytokine enhanced androgenous amoeba response.

    For that reason this will never work.

    That sounds like something right out of a movie script. Sort of like Start Trek technobabble, but for a sort of apocalyptic zombie type series.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,316 ✭✭✭nthclare


    saabsaab wrote: »
    First of all I believe they will find a vaccine or at least an effective treatment.


    If they don't then a few things will happen.


    As permanent quarantine cannot be maintained forever normal activities will resume probably with precautions i.e. screens, masks handwashing etc. the virus will spread throughout the population and many will die.

    Those that are left (most people) will now be somewhat immune or not susceptible to it.

    It may die off naturally or become less virulent perhaps coming back every so often.

    Life expectancy will fall.

    The strange thing is, the virus needs us to survive and if it is killed off or is being attacked, neutralised whatever the medical terminology is I don't know.

    But it would probably have to become much more harmless if it needs to survive, or something like Prep which people take to stop hiv from attacking the system is used to make people imune to the virus.

    I know sfa about viruses in humans, although I know a bit about plants and how viruses change themselves in order to live.

    Look at those beautiful variegated plant's you'll buy in the garden center, they've actually a viruses, or generic hybrid's...

    If you can manipulate plant's, viruses can be manipulated by nature or more horrifically man-made...

    It's scary sh1t, my exe was a lecturer in biochemistry and she was explaining to me about vectors etc facinating and scary too...


  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭sean555


    The HIV and Malaria viruses would like a word - some viruses evade or hijack the immune system to such an extent that it isn't possible to train it with a vaccine.

    As far as treatments go, some of those unvaccinable viruses require lifelong treatment with very heavy medication that causes all kinds of side effects.

    It's definitely not as clear cut as saying that every virus can be prevented. Obviusly most can and we're all hoping that this is one of them, but it's not a certain thing by any means.

    Malaria is caused by a parasite and treatment is generally quite simple if not affordable for the people in developing countries who are it's main victims.


  • Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭Sir Guy who smiles


    The HIV and Malaria viruses would like a word - some viruses evade or hijack the immune system to such an extent that it isn't possible to train it with a vaccine.

    Malaria isn't caused by a virus.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,994 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Oh, there will be vaccine no doubt. There is way too much money thrown at development so some will be made available. What is problematic is that this virus mutates quite fast and there is over 30 different strains of it right now.
    That means vaccination will be a lottery and with bigger odds than like currently with flu vaccines. You may take one against one or few starins and then get sick anyway with different strain.
    I would rather focus more on possible treatment. For example there is study from trinity that higher levels of vitamin D make your chances of survival much higher as severity of symptoms is greatly reduced. Some more other things in the pipeline but it all comes down to really just try to live healthier with more excercise and better diet. Generally the healthier you are the better off you will be but that is valid for nearly every disease anyway.
    Perhaps we just need to reevaluate our lifestyles.


  • Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭Sir Guy who smiles


    hmmm wrote: »
    I've heard that vaccines may attack the T cell lymph nodes directly, and the negative immunogoblin can directly lower the number of AB cell receptors. As they attach to the adenovirus cells directly (not using beta-postive cells), then a vaccine will induce an immunoresponse of plus or negative 2.14, which indirectly leads to cytokine enhanced androgenous amoeba response.

    For that reason this will never work.

    You are either way more knowledgeable than me, or a bull****ter. Since you threw in "adenovirus cells " and " negative immunoglobilin" I'm going to guess bull****ter.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,469 ✭✭✭bennyineire


    patnor1011 wrote: »
    Oh, there will be vaccine no doubt. There is way too much money thrown at development so some will be made available. What is problematic is that this virus mutates quite fast and there is over 30 different strains of it right now.
    That means vaccination will be a lottery and with bigger odds than like currently with flu vaccines. You may take one against one or few starins and then get sick anyway with different strain.
    I would rather focus more on possible treatment. For example there is study from trinity that higher levels of vitamin D make your chances of survival much higher as severity of symptoms is greatly reduced. Some more other things in the pipeline but it all comes down to really just try to live healthier with more excercise and better diet. Generally the healthier you are the better off you will be but that is valid for nearly every disease anyway.
    Perhaps we just need to reevaluate our lifestyles.

    Why do people keep saying it mutates fast when in fact it is slow, drives me around the bend. Where are your facts ?

    Here's a little link for you

    https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-mutation-rate.html


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    This guy seems to believe we may have to just co exist as we do with many other viruses.


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/dont-bet-on-vaccine-to-protect-us-from-covid-19-says-world-health-expert


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,069 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    What's the end-game if no vaccine is possible and immunity doesn't follow infection?

    i guess in that case we're all,,,,,,,,,,,
    fuked!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    patnor1011 wrote: »
    Oh, there will be vaccine no doubt. There is way too much money thrown at development so some will be made available. What is problematic is that this virus mutates quite fast and there is over 30 different strains of it right now.
    That means vaccination will be a lottery and with bigger odds than like currently with flu vaccines. You may take one against one or few starins and then get sick anyway with different strain.
    I would rather focus more on possible treatment. For example there is study from trinity that higher levels of vitamin D make your chances of survival much higher as severity of symptoms is greatly reduced. Some more other things in the pipeline but it all comes down to really just try to live healthier with more excercise and better diet. Generally the healthier you are the better off you will be but that is valid for nearly every disease anyway.
    Perhaps we just need to reevaluate our lifestyles.

    All that lovely vit D from the sun didn't help the Italians or Spanish?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,653 ✭✭✭✭Plumbthedepths


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    All that lovely vit D from the sun didn't help the Italians or Spanish?

    The tactile nature of Spainish and Italian people didn't help them either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    hmmm wrote: »
    I've heard that vaccines may attack the T cell lymph nodes directly, and the negative immunogoblin can directly lower the number of AB cell receptors. As they attach to the adenovirus cells directly (not using beta-postive cells), then a vaccine will induce an immunoresponse of plus or negative 2.14, which indirectly leads to cytokine enhanced androgenous amoeba response.

    For that reason this will never work.




    RelievedFearfulBlackfootedferret-size_restricted.gif.2476bbe84714cc630f8f23f40540f3be.gif


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭LiquidZeb


    ShineOn7 wrote: »
    RelievedFearfulBlackfootedferret-size_restricted.gif.2476bbe84714cc630f8f23f40540f3be.gif

    Basically the virus is potentially able to kill the t blood cells that normally fight infection. HIV does something similar but it hijacks the cells and turns them against the body. That's what's gotten some researchers worried.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,474 ✭✭✭Obvious Desperate Breakfasts


    The HIV and Malaria viruses would like a word - some viruses evade or hijack the immune system to such an extent that it isn't possible to train it with a vaccine.

    As far as treatments go, some of those unvaccinable viruses require lifelong treatment with very heavy medication that causes all kinds of side effects.

    It's definitely not as clear cut as saying that every virus can be prevented. Obviusly most can and we're all hoping that this is one of them, but it's not a certain thing by any means.

    Malaria isn’t caused by a virus. It’s caused by a parasite and that’s part of why it’s been so intractable. As for HIV, there might not be a vaccine, but most people with it will live a normal lifespan now. Some HIV-positive women can even breastfed because their viral load is so low.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,702 ✭✭✭donaghs


    fryup wrote: »
    What's the end-game if no vaccine is possible and immunity doesn't follow infection?

    i guess in that case we're all,,,,,,,,,,,
    fuked!

    There’s never been a disease that killed everyone, obviously!

    BUT, ASSUMING THE OP IDEA THAT THERES NO VACCINE AND REINFECTION IS POSSIBLE

    People have to eat so you can’t live in a lockdown forever unless you can do subsistence farming, and have a gun to protect your crops/equipment from the urban hordes who can’t do this.

    Everyone else would just have to practice distancing and stoically Accept the 0.5% death rate, and try and survive and rebuild some kind of functioning society. 😀


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 75,719 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Threads merged


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    If the study of antibody rates from New York is replicated elsewhere it may become the case that living alongside the virus is the chosen method of operation.

    It seems one of the main issues here isn't the deadliness of the virus, it's the fact that it's ridiculously transmissible and if let unchecked would infect 1/3rd of the population within a month. A controlled spread of the virus around the population would reach herd immunity in months.

    The current death rates from places with antibody studies would seem to be well below 1%, provided there isn't an obscene rush on the health service. The antibody tests from Madrid and Lombardy will be quite interesting to help us understand this better. A CFR << 1% is a better outcome than we expected especially considering we are relying on unproven vaccines with unknown side effects, and the lack of treatments.

    The genie is out of the bottle now and there is no way out of this situation pain free.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,550 ✭✭✭ShineOn7


    Danzy wrote: »
    It'll become milder in time so one won't know if it is a cold or Chinese Bat Flu.

    Medical treatments will vastly reduce the fatality rate.

    Hand sanitizer and masks will be everywhere after the lockdown.

    5 minute tests, home tests will be everywhere and used for every sniffle.

    All within 8 to 10 weeks.




    Not doubting you, but any source on the above?


Advertisement