Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

COVID-19: Vaccine/antidote and testing procedures Megathread [Mod Warning - Post #1]

18586889091325

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭D.Q


    Call me Al wrote: »
    I think it gives hope, and right now its needed.

    But once there is an end in sight people's focus will change, impatience frustration that we are having to wait, and then of course the hysterics of those anti-vaxxers advocating for natural immunity.
    I can see the headlines already.

    I'm just glad that this is coming out now and there is still a sizable portion of the public that hasn't been radicalised by anti vax, 5G, facebook/instagram bull****.

    It's an absolute scourge that seems to be spreading.

    5/10 years down the line and I'd say you'd have a harder job convincing people to take the vaccine en masse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    Call me Al wrote: »
    I think it gives hope, and right now its needed.

    But once there is an end in sight people's focus will change, impatience frustration that we are having to wait, and then of course the hysterics of those anti-vaxxers advocating for natural immunity.
    I can see the headlines already.

    Speaking of headlines https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54371559
    Even an effective coronavirus vaccine will not return life to normal in spring, a group of leading scientists has warned.

    Hope is good but it should be connected to reality. Personally I would be surprised if I was able to get a vaccine before Q4 next year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 167 ✭✭noserider


    What about those who have had COVID and recovered, do they need a vaccine if and when available?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    noserider wrote: »
    What about those who have had COVID and recovered, do they need a vaccine if and when available?

    At this point it seems very likely that reinfection within months of infection is possible. I almost certainly had Covid in March (which I’m not yet fully recovered from) and I’d take the vaccine tomorrow if it was available. Even if future infections would be assymptomatic for me, I don’t want to risk passing it on to someone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭plodder


    Afaik, the people most likely to catch it a second time are those who were asymptomatic the first time around and didn't develop much of an antibody response. The worse you had it, the greater the antibody response from what I heard.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    There's the T-Cell immunity too that may be more widespread than what's thought. I don't know much about it though!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    noserider wrote: »
    What about those who have had COVID and recovered, do they need a vaccine if and when available?

    Most likely yes, the wild type infection doesn't seem to induce a strong enough response in many people that lasts, especially in asymptomatic and very mild cases. So far the vaccine trials that have included recovered people have shown that the vaccine can significantly boost the immune response (>4x).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    funnydoggy wrote: »
    There's the T-Cell immunity too that may be more widespread than what's thought. I don't know much about it though!

    They help, a lot, can save your life even, but mostly would lower the severity and shedding period of any subsequent infections (protective/partial immunity). To completely avoid reinfection a neutralizing antibody response is required (sterilizing immunity).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Diarmuid wrote: »
    Speaking of headlines https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54371559



    Hope is good but it should be connected to reality. Personally I would be surprised if I was able to get a vaccine before Q4 next year

    Good look to NEPHET trying to enforce restrictions for a minute after the ammouncement that a vaccine has been licenced


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,649 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Good look to NEPHET trying to enforce restrictions for a minute after the ammouncement that a vaccine has been licenced
    There won't be 2 billion doses available upon approval though. That's one stumbling block that most people may not have copped onto yet.

    As soon as the most vulnerable have been vaccinated, pressure on hospitals will drop and also ICUs/deaths/severe disease. Then it'll become much easier to open up society while we wait for further vaccination to eradicate the virus.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Derek Lowe's latest article on the J+J Phase I/II studies. I actually think he's the best around, he simplifies a lot of things into layman's terms. Really good read.
    https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2020/10/01/jj-vaccine-data


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,627 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Diarmuid wrote: »
    Speaking of headlines https://www.bbc.com/news/health-54371559



    Hope is good but it should be connected to reality. Personally I would be surprised if I was able to get a vaccine before Q4 next year


    Even if it does take a year ( not long in the grand scheme of things) i'll take it at this stage because at least it's some sort of end in sight and then we can give the fingers to a certain cohort of misery merchants ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,527 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    JTMan wrote: »
    The FT reports on the latest on the Moderna vaccine here (paywall).

    - November 25 at the earliest for the submission to the regulators for emergency use (healthcare workers etc)
    - FDA previously said turnaround for emergency authorisation is about 1 month. So Moderna might get emergency authorisation by Christmas day.
    - Full approval to distribute the drug to all sections of the population not expected until next spring.
    - Pfizer seem to be moving the quickest and still hope to have “an answer” on their vaccine by the end of October.

    Don't really understand why it will take the fda a month to approve. Is it not possible for them to be kept up to date and investigate concurrently with phase 3 and then approve it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,981 ✭✭✭Diarmuid


    Don't really understand why it will take the fda a month to approve. Is it not possible for them to be kept up to date and investigate concurrently with phase 3 and then approve it.

    It takes time to do due diligence. You are giving a medicine to potentially billions of people *who are not sick*. Even rare lethal side effects (say 1 in 100,000) could result in 10 of thousands of deaths, of people who were healthy. All regulatory agencies have a massive job to do here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Looks like the wheels are in motion across the pond

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-54375643


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Looks like the wheels are in motion across the pond

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-54375643

    Will that apply to the EU or just England?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,351 ✭✭✭Le Bruise


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Will that apply to the EU or just England?

    Assume EU is currently working on something similar for its members? Incredible that these types of stories are beginning to come out/be leaked. Really promising.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Looks like the wheels are in motion across the pond

    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-birmingham-54375643

    So Triumph is almost certainly OxfordAZ. Is 'Ambush' Moderna or does PfizerBT also need to be stored at cold temperatures?

    Edit; Google answered that for me!
    "The vaccine reportedly needs to be held in storage at -94° Fahrenheit, and will last for only 24 hours at refrigerated temps between 35.6° and 46.4°"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,130 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    Gael23 wrote: »
    Will that apply to the EU or just England?
    I assume just England given that they have left the EU. But I'd also assume that the EU are working on similar arrangements


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭Smiles35


    As in the title. When are we getting the vaccination for this?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Thursday, around noon.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I normally have lunch at noon. Can someone let them know I'll be a bit late? Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,065 ✭✭✭funnydoggy


    2021 most likely.

    Lovely thread here - https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2058062347


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭Smiles35


    Thursday, around noon.


    That's great thanks. I was wondering.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Study on how colds might help protect you from COVID-19 and how long COVID-19 immunity might last.
    A new study provides evidence that the seasonal colds you've had in the past could protect you from COVID-19. The study also suggests that immunity to COVID-19 is likely to last a long time -- maybe even a lifetime.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200929123510.htm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    iguana wrote: »
    So Triumph is almost certainly OxfordAZ. Is 'Ambush' Moderna or does PfizerBT also need to be stored at cold temperatures?

    Edit; Google answered that for me!
    "The vaccine reportedly needs to be held in storage at -94° Fahrenheit, and will last for only 24 hours at refrigerated temps between 35.6° and 46.4°"
    From the perspective of planning, it doesn't make a difference whether Ambush is Moderna or Pfizer I suppose. Both will have similar storage requirements.

    Pfizer looks like it will win the race though assuming nothing trips them up.

    We're distributing 2 million Flu vaccines in Ireland over the next month and there should be little fuss. Sounds like we are in a good place for this - and we are unlikely to get millions of Covid vaccine doses in one month.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,151 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    The most efficient way would be for the HSE to set up clinics. GPS will be overwhelmed otherwise


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,505 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    iguana wrote: »
    At this point it seems very likely that reinfection within months of infection is possible. I almost certainly had Covid in March (which I’m not yet fully recovered from) and I’d take the vaccine tomorrow if it was available. Even if future infections would be assymptomatic for me, I don’t want to risk passing it on to someone else.
    does a vaccine prevent you passing it on to someone else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,203 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    does a vaccine prevent you passing it on to someone else?
    Based on the limited trial data we have so far, it may be the case that the first generation vaccines will give protection from serious disease but you can still get the virus and infect other people. We'll know more when the Phase 3 trials are over.

    This is one of the reasons why we are told that even with the vaccine, we will be asked to keep up some of the social distancing, mask wearing etc. for some time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    Might be of interest to those who follow testing procedures and correlates of infectiousness:

    https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603

    Testing on the E gene they were not able to culture anything at all above a Ct>35, regardless of time post symptom onset.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement