Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Working From Home Megathread

1256257258259260262»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,040 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Comparing just two years, one to the next, is f*ck all use really. Also note that any countries where it happened to increase year on year are conveniently left off.

    "RW Blowhard In Misleading Use Of Statistics Shocker"

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Media ramping up the return to office narrative, where is the green agenda when you actually need it?



  • Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    All my office staff work at home and have for a long time. I haven't seen any drop in productivity or anything like that, but I'd be very interested to know what the likes of Amazon have found that's to the contrary. I'm sure they have their reasons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    Getting people back into office is really a way of controlling the poor worker and the poor manager. A bad manager will be a bad manager weather he\she is WFH or in the office. Everyone has a reputation in a office environment. He\she is lazy, he\she is a good worker etc. It's very demoralising for a team if a manager is always working from home, even if they still do nothing in the office they have still have some visibility if they are seen. Company culture is also a contributing factor, bad managers\employees can coast for years without any consequences in certain companies and WFH is adding to this. Companies with agressive review systems will weeds out these workers quickly regardless of WFH policies. The biggest problem for companies is having the same WFH policies for everyone i.e the lazy worker and the strong performer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,767 ✭✭✭Sono


    Getting people back to the office full time is a sure way of trying to accelerate retirements.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Minier81


    Absolutely right on the retirements. Is it a way of getting out of paying redundancies?! Just get a cohort of the staff to quit?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,041 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Amazon move is a cheap redundancy play. They expect attrition as a result.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,767 ✭✭✭Sono


    speaking from my own place, an awful lot of people in their 60’s wfh 4 days a week.

    I am convinced if they were told it was 5 days a week in the office you’d see people retiring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 21,615 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    And this would be improved in the office, would it?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 337 ✭✭Jerry Atrick


    Print media really cranking up the end of WFH narrative. As usual in this country, they'll dance to whoever plays the sweetest tune.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,040 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Anything that generates the fear/outrage clicks

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 653 ✭✭✭Minier81




  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,288 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Their reasoning for it is fairly bullshíty too.

    Centric’s position was that it wanted Mr Jorge back in the office for “sound business reasons”, identifying a need to “increase the quality of communication between colleagues” and to “take account of the changing circumstances of the company”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    WRC dropped the ball on this one. The plaintiff possibly didnt help matters by representing himself. The focus should have been on the company ignoring the change in his contract, not his right to request remote work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,409 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Not really. The decision was based on the change in contract - the article states the WRC deemed it “a reasonable change”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Personally I would have contacted a contract lawyer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,409 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Well the change is nowhere near enough to justify constructive dismissal IMO. So I'm not sure where else the employee could go with it. They're free to leave if they don't like the new terms and conditions, ad employers reserve some say in the work location needed by the business which can change over time.

    I think a lot of employees are finding out that they really are just a fungible number to their employer and they don't hold the power and influence they might think they do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Sure, but the guy says he got another job offer and a condition of him staying was he go fully remote and it was stated as such in his contract.

    Then the company changed his contract.

    "Theyre free to leave if they dont like the new terms and conditions". I would be advising he does just that now. I would be doing the same.

    Also, Centric Medical, I shan't personally be doing any business with them in the future as it seems any contract with them is not worth the paper it is written on, figuratively speaking.



Advertisement