FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

Iso_123

Dliodoir2021 wrote: »

RE WILLIAMS TULLAMORE

I can't figure out whether the judge granted §212 (ex 205) or not? He seems to have said it was oppression but didn't.....arghhh idk! Any ideas? Would it be bad to just exclude it from my notes?

The points i have for this case are that one act is sufficient for a finding of oppression and also this is the main case on 212(1)(b) ie acting in disregard to a members interest. I have down that it was found that they had acted in disregard to the interests of the minority shareholders (open to correction on this?) I haven't read the judgment just have this from my notes/manual

Dliodoir2021

Iso_123 wrote: »

The points i have for this case are that one act is sufficient for a finding of oppression and also this is the main case on 212(1)(b) ie acting in disregard to a members interest. I have down that it was found that they had acted in disregard to the interests of the minority shareholders (open to correction on this?) I haven't read the judgment just have this from my notes/manual

Thanks for the reply. I'd actually cut it but will re-add now!

I also had this which caused confusion:

- “Why would Barrington J not simply have decided the case on the second limb of §205 (now §212), as Courtney suggests he could have done?”

- “Although the learned judge grounded his jurisdiction to make an order bc the affairs of the co were being conducted in disregard of the interests of the ordinary shareholders, Courtney feels it is remarkable that Barrington J tagged onto his view the observation that to implement the resolutions would be oppressive: sufficient jurisdiction existed for the court to make an Order under §212 on the finding that the affairs of the co were being conducted in disregard of the ordinary shareholders interests.” [Courtney 3rd edn at 11.031]"

Iso_123

Dliodoir2021 wrote: »

Thanks for the reply. I'd actually cut it but will re-add now!

I also had this which caused confusion:

- “Why would Barrington J not simply have decided the case on the second limb of §205 (now §212), as Courtney suggests he could have done?”

- “Although the learned judge grounded his jurisdiction to make an order bc the affairs of the co were being conducted in disregard of the interests of the ordinary shareholders, Courtney feels it is remarkable that Barrington J tagged onto his view the observation that to implement the resolutions would be oppressive: sufficient jurisdiction existed for the court to make an Order under §212 on the finding that the affairs of the co were being conducted in disregard of the ordinary shareholders interests.” [Courtney 3rd edn at 11.031]"

I find the manuals can be confusing sometimes!

My manual says on this case "it was held that the resolution was passed in disregard to the interests of the ordinary shareholders as the preference shareholders benefited to the detriment of the ordinary shareholders. Barrington J went on to say the resolution was 'oppressive to the interests of the ordinary shareholders"

I think the above is where the confusion comes from because Barrington used the language from 212(1)a in conjunction with the language from 212(1)b essentially blurring the two limbs together..

FE1new

Hi All

Would anyone have Criminal notes they are willing to swap? I have EU notes and sample answers and Equity and Property sample answers. I haven't studied Criminal since 1st year and have zero notes prepared With the exams in 2 weeks I'm panicking

Nikcan18

FE1new wrote: »

Hi All

Would anyone have Criminal notes they are willing to swap? I have EU notes and sample answers and Equity and Property sample answers. I haven't studied Criminal since 1st year and have zero notes prepared With the exams in 2 weeks I'm panicking

I can email you condensed notes.

Aoibhin511

Does anyone have a grid on the cases that came up in the case note Q in Cons?
I can swap for one for EU case notes/EU Qs/Tort/property/contract

Lallers96

Is anyone else ****ting it over this sudden mock exam and the fact that we know absolutely nothing about what time it's at, what we will be tested on, how long it will be etc?

I don't think I can get the day off work so I'll have to hope that this can be done on my lunch break or something. It's in less than 5 days like and no information given.

Aoibhin511

Lallers96 wrote: »

Is anyone else ****ting it over this sudden mock exam and the fact that we know absolutely nothing about what time it's at, what we will be tested on, how long it will be etc?

I don't think I can get the day off work so I'll have to hope that this can be done on my lunch break or something. It's in less than 5 days like and no information given.

I've been giving this more thought, they definitely just called it a dumb name, it can't be a mock exam because what would they examine? Which of the 8 subjects do they examine? If they asked a q on a subject I hadn't covered and I was a non-law grad i would be just sat there staring at the screen unable to even attempt it, or worst case scenario it would completely freak me out and i would go into panick mode.
I think it must just a dry run of the set up, can everyone log in ok, can the platform handle x amount of people etc

Lallers96

Aoibhin511 wrote: »

I've been giving this more thought, they definitely just called it a dumb name, it can't be a mock exam because what would they examine? Which of the 8 subjects do they examine? If they asked a q on a subject I hadn't covered and I was a non-law grad i would be just sat there staring at the screen unable to even attempt it, or worst case scenario it would completely freak me out and i would go into panick mode.
I think it must just a dry run of the set up, can everyone log in ok, can the platform handle x amount of people etc

I think so, but we should know a time frame for it and how long it will take because I doubt I could swing the day off on such short notice. I'd rather not cause a fuss if its only going to be a 20 minute thing

IgoPAP

It's not an exam; there's no paper, at least what I've heard. Just makes sure that you're correctly set up and you've got everything working.

Do people think someone else could do the ‘mock exam’ for you?

I work an hour commute away but my partner works from home, if it’s just testing computer programme do we think they could do that for me rather than me having to take a day AL?

ellachapman96

Hi does anyone have an up to date criminal law grid they could give me please? I’m working off one only up to 2017 thanks

lilyc223

Would anyone be so kind as to send me just the Competition Law chapter of an EU manual?

FE.ONE

lilyc223 wrote: »

Would anyone be so kind as to send me just the Competition Law chapter of an EU manual?

DM me your email and ill send it on!

Lelila

Hi. Would anyone have sample answers for the March 2020 Constitutional paper please?

Lelila

FE1new wrote: »

Hi All

Would anyone have Criminal notes they are willing to swap? I have EU notes and sample answers and Equity and Property sample answers. I haven't studied Criminal since 1st year and have zero notes prepared With the exams in 2 weeks I'm panicking

I have them. Send me a DM

Aoibhin511

Lawwww2020 wrote: »

Thank you! Have they got back to you on it? I received the email from last week so not sure what’s wrong!

BTW they got back to me this morning about not receiving the last email. No explanation as to why, just confirmation that I am properly register and my email is correct.

CiaraND16

What topics are people doing for company? Are people leaving out receivership because it came up in March? Predictions welcome!

Lelila

kayleee123 wrote: »

Does anyone have the spring 2020 constitutional paper by any chance?

I have it. DM me your email address & I'll send it to you.

fe12020oct

CiaraND16 wrote: »

What topics are people doing for company? Are people leaving out receivership because it came up in March? Predictions welcome!

Hey I’m looking at share transfer, SLP, protection for minorities, directors duties etc and conflict of interests, corporate borrowing, realisation of corporate assets and winding up! Hoping to get 5 out of them!

KCSLAW

If any kind soul has examiner reports for Criminal for March and October 2019 and would like to send them on I would really appreciate it!!

Lelila

ellachapman96 wrote: »

Hi does anyone have an up to date criminal law grid they could give me please? I’m working off one only up to 2017 thanks

I have one up to & including Spring 2019 if that's any good? DM me with your email address if you want me to send it to you.

KCSLAW

also if anyone has an up to date exam grid for criminal that would be great

KCSLAW

& does anyone have the spring 2020 criminal law paper by any chance?

Debarramike137

does anyone please have an Equity or Contract manuscript? Ive lots to swap. PM me,thanks so much

LawStudent96

Would anyone have sample answers for Constitutional please? Can swap plenty stuff, incl. March 2020 papers. Thanks

Aoibhin511

LawStudent96 wrote: »

Would anyone have sample answers for Constitutional please? Can swap plenty stuff, incl. March 2020 papers. Thanks

Don't have sample answers but have a very detailed guide on how to answer specific Qs, willing to swap for papers.

CiaraND16

Is anyone selling their contract and company legislation? I have constitutional and property to swap/sell?

Mod
Sorry, pls don't trade materiel thru' this forum. We do not have to resources to deal with disputes

Aoibhin511

Can anyone help me out with Byrne v Ireland (cons.)
How did the SC use Art 45 to justify JR?

Lelila

LawStudent96 wrote: »

Would anyone have sample answers for Constitutional please? Can swap plenty stuff, incl. March 2020 papers. Thanks

I have sample answers up to & including March 2019. If you want them, DM me with your email address.