Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Abolish car tax

Options
1456810

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    As fuel prices are falling and about to fall further this is a good time to increase duty and reduce direct car tax.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,204 ✭✭✭Miscreant


    saabsaab wrote: »
    As fuel prices are falling and about to fall further this is a good time to increase duty and reduce direct car tax.

    Or, and I think this is more likely, increase the duty and leave motor tax alone. The country is going to need money after all this pandemic calms down. Motor tax is going nowhere.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Miscreant wrote: »
    Or, and I think this is more likely, increase the duty and leave motor tax alone. The country is going to need money after all this pandemic calms down. Motor tax is going nowhere.


    Motor tax needs reform, too unwieldy, not properly related to use, two systems in place. The EU will have to release funds to cover the costs of the pandemic no single nation will be able to cover it through taxes alone.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,243 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    I'd love to know the percentage of CC based cars on the road and the percentage of overall motor tax they pay. I would guess about 20% or less of the cars on the road and they contribute over 50% of the total motor tax take.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,629 ✭✭✭Wildly Boaring


    I'd love to know the percentage of CC based cars on the road and the percentage of overall motor tax they pay. I would guess about 20% or less of the cars on the road and they contribute over 50% of the total motor tax take.

    The newest cc based is 13 years old!!
    The old 1400cc and down were reasonable.

    I'd say 10% of cars and 10% of tax


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 51,138 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    saabsaab wrote: »
    As fuel prices are falling and about to fall further this is a good time to increase duty and reduce direct car tax.

    Recession and mass unemployment looming after this virus is done and you have the notion that motor tax is going to be reduced. You are either too bored of being locked up or your smoking something.

    Your canvassing and posts here are entertaining though. Keep them going.


  • Registered Users Posts: 35,696 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Are people taxing their cars now? If you had to choose food, lights, heat, or piece of paper for windscreen what would you choose, and would they expect people to tax a car in those circumstances. Just a question, not a situation .


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,832 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Are people taxing their cars now? If you had to choose food, lights, heat, or piece of paper for windscreen what would you choose, and would they expect people to tax a car in those circumstances. Just a question, not a situation .

    if you want to drive a car on a public road you have to tax it


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,138 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    The end of the world doesn't trump not taxing your car..... :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,761 ✭✭✭✭galwaytt


    Are people taxing their cars now? If you had to choose food, lights, heat, or piece of paper for windscreen what would you choose, and would they expect people to tax a car in those circumstances. Just a question, not a situation .

    ..depends on whether you like walking or not.













    After the court case, like :D

    Ode To The Motorist

    “And my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, generates funds to the exchequer. You don't want to acknowledge that as truth because, deep down in places you don't talk about at the Green Party, you want me on that road, you need me on that road. We use words like freedom, enjoyment, sport and community. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent instilling those values in our families and loved ones. You use them as a punch line. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the tax revenue and the very freedom to spend it that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise I suggest you pick up a bus pass and get the ********* ********* off the road” 



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Don't tax you car and it will be taken off you.



    I'm not saying that the money will be lost to Government but transferred to the fossil fuels with a small reg fee payable each year. Simpler, impossible to avoid and fairer.


    Now is a good time as fuel prices fall.


  • Registered Users Posts: 35,696 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    galwaytt wrote: »
    ..depends on whether you like walking or not.













    After the court case, like :D


    So your saying if there was a person out there who had to choose between food and that magic piece of paper, they should die of hunger but with a taxed car. I think in current situation those people will choose to live rather than tax car


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Your car wouldn't be taken from you if the system had it built in the fuel costs. Makes complete sense.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,832 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    So your saying if there was a person out there who had to choose between food and that magic piece of paper, they should die of hunger but with a taxed car. I think in current situation those people will choose to live rather than tax car

    nope. nobody said that. you are putting words into peoples mouths or whatever the internet equivalent is.

    if you can't afford something, then you have to consider keeping it. you can't just think the law doesn't apply to you.

    do you think these people should not have to pay their insurance also?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    LIGHTNING wrote: »
    :rolleyes: It already does. Lets not go down this again


    It doesn't cover it in the way it could be. No good reason to have complicated multiple systems.


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,138 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    Yawn.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 454 ✭✭snoopboggybog


    saabsaab wrote: »
    In the context of an upcoming GE if a party was to include this on a manifesto would there be support?


    Abolish car tax replace it with a flat registration yearly fee say 50 p.a. then transfer the shortfall onto fossil fuels at the pump. Much fairer the more you burn the more you pay. Overall there would be no loss to the exchequer. Could also apply to electricity. Much greener policy too..


    Poll attached

    This would be extremely unfair on the people who have to commute four hours a day to work in Dublin and loads of other people who have to commute around the country for their job.

    The tax is not that bad in this Country anyway at this stage in time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Seve OB wrote: »
    you can't just think the law doesn't apply to you.
    Ever break any yourself?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,832 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    Bruthal wrote: »
    Ever break any yourself?

    Possibly but never intentionally.
    I can honestly say I’ve never driven without tax or insurance.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    This would be extremely unfair on the people who have to commute four hours a day to work in Dublin and loads of other people who have to commute around the country for their job.

    The tax is not that bad in this Country anyway at this stage in time.


    What is unreasonable is living so far from your work. Perhaps with online less people will need to commute. Non fossil fuel transport is here and coming too so nobody is locked into it anyway


    The present system(s) is daft as it is, even if not too bad for many. Just so easy to put it totally on the fuel!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,476 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Car tax should be increased, additional revenue is needed after this recession.


  • Registered Users Posts: 51,138 ✭✭✭✭bazz26


    saabsaab wrote: »
    What is unreasonable is living so far from your work. Perhaps with online less people will need to commute. Non fossil fuel transport is here and coming too so nobody is locked into it anyway


    The present system(s) is daft as it is, even if not too bad for many. Just so easy to put it totally on the fuel!

    You are a bit detached from reality. People have to commute long distances because they cannot afford to own property or rent in large urban areas near where they work. But I'm going to guess that you probably don't have much use for a car so think everyone should be in the same boat. You make it sound like it's a lifestyle choice for many, it's not.

    Also as has been explained to you a good few times in this thead with links yet you seem to conveniently ignore or refuse to acknowledge, various forms of tax are already included in the cost of fuel i.e. VAT, excise duty, etc. +60% of every litre of fuel you buy is tax alone. So the those who drive further spend more on fuel and thus pay more tax on it. Also motor tax is an ownership tax and has been for many years so they tax you for owning a vehicle as well as using it. They won't simply switch one over to the other as you see to think.

    Of course I expect this will probably be ignored completely again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    bazz26 wrote: »
    You are a bit detached from reality. People have to commute long distances because they cannot afford to own property or rent in large urban areas near where they work. But I'm going to guess that you probably don't have much use for a car so think everyone should be in the same boat. You make it sound like it's a lifestyle choice for many, it's not.

    Also as has been explained to you a good few times in this thead with links yet you seem to conveniently ignore or refuse to acknowledge, various forms of tax are already included in the cost of fuel i.e. VAT, excise duty, etc. +60% of every litre of fuel you buy is tax alone. So the those who drive further spend more on fuel and thus pay more tax on it. Also motor tax is an ownership tax and has been for many years so they tax you for owning a vehicle as well as using it. They won't simply switch one over to the other as you see to think.

    Of course I expect this will probably be ignored completely again.


    Many travel by other means to work already. Those that can't can also use non fossil fuels. I don't see the point in having an ownership tax separate from the fuel tax what use is it? I believe that they will switch over to a new system sooner that you may think. Those that use fossil fuels and the roads more pay more much fairer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Now that we’re confined to the house and a 2 km. radius, any chance of a refund on motor tax while my car is sitting in our driveway? At the very least, we should get credit for these weeks (months?) when we renew our tax discs.

    Mind you, to judge by the number of cars that passed while I was taking my daily exercise today, loads of people have essential work requiring use of their car. And I did take the car for the weekly shop on Saturday (but nothing since). Still, my point remains: give credit to law-abiding motorists.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    Caquas wrote: »
    Now that we’re confined to the house and a 2 km. radius, any chance of a refund on motor tax while my car is sitting in our driveway? At the very least, we should get credit for these weeks (months?) when we renew our tax discs.

    Mind you, to judge by the number of cars that passed while I was taking my daily exercise today, loads of people have essential work requiring use of their car. And I did take the car for the weekly shop on Saturday (but nothing since). Still, my point remains: give credit to law-abiding motorists.


    Very hard to determine who would be due a refund, many need it for shopping etc. betterto just abolish it and put it on the reduced fuel costs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 454 ✭✭snoopboggybog


    saabsaab wrote: »
    Many travel by other means to work already. Those that can't can also use non fossil fuels. I don't see the point in having an ownership tax separate from the fuel tax what use is it? I believe that they will switch over to a new system sooner that you may think. Those that use fossil fuels and the roads more pay more much fairer.

    So basically you want people who have to commute long distances to work to pay your car tax for you?

    You should get tax breaks on fuel not bloody been charged more.

    Most workers in Ireland have no choice but to drive to work as public transport is so crap.

    Everyone doesn't work in Dublin where there is good public transport. It's basically non existant in most of Ireland.

    Tax on cars over 08 isn't even bad.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,221 ✭✭✭pablo128


    If northern Ireland doesn't also adopt the system, it won't work. Who in their right mind who lives anywhere near the border wouldn't go and fill their tanks there. And do a weeks shopping too so the journey isn't wasted, taking even more revenue from the state.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,487 ✭✭✭Seweryn


    pablo128 wrote: »
    If northern Ireland doesn't also adopt the system, it won't work. Who in their right mind who lives anywhere near the border wouldn't go and fill their tanks there. And do a weeks shopping too so the journey isn't wasted, taking even more revenue from the state.
    Why would that be a problem? Surely, all Europe and the rest of the World has country borders with different fuel prices between countries.


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,624 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    It's pretty obvious that those wishing to pay less are driving this thread.

    So the low milers, urban drivers, and those who have older bigger engined cars will all want a change to a fuel based tax.

    To them I say tough luck.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,760 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    So basically you want people who have to commute long distances to work to pay your car tax for you?

    You should get tax breaks on fuel not bloody been charged more.

    Most workers in Ireland have no choice but to drive to work as public transport is so crap.

    Everyone doesn't work in Dublin where there is good public transport. It's basically non existant in most of Ireland.

    Tax on cars over 08 isn't even bad.


    No. Even they won't be paying a tax that no longer exists! the polluter pays principle. As I said they can convert to another greener or non fossil fuel nobody has the same car forever!

    In fact you could turn your argument on its head and say that those who do less mileage are paying extra for those who travel more.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement