South Park WW ROLE MADNESS - Game Thread

Tegan WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Ive a mad theory.

What if the wolves dont share a backroom.

8, 9 or 10 wolves, on the same team but all on separate backrooms.

Each wolf unaware if whos on their team.

Too bonkers right?

That crossed my mind but also thought bonkers as wouldnt it be like 10 lone wolves or whatever number

Brendan WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

That crossed my mind but also thought bonkers as wouldnt it be like 10 lone wolves or whatever number

I was thinking they all have a vote backstage who to munch majority rules

Brendan WW

Actually its a nuts theory. Scrap it

Eva WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

I was thinking they all have a vote backstage who to munch majority rules

Two teams, but vote just like we would normally do for a lynch?

Conor WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Or 10 wolves, split into 2 backrooms but on same team.

With each team getting a munch every second night?

Wouldn’t there Be a decent chance they might hit one of each other in a munch?

In terms of 10 lone wolves, who gets to munch? And again, wouldn’t there of statistically been a decent shout that the wolves would of munched one of their own by accident if they don’t know who the other half are?

Tegan WW

So not ifrst night to avoid suspicion?

Brendan WW

Eva WW wrote: »

Two teams, but vote just like we would normally do for a lynch?

I honestly havent thought it through, im just trying to make sense of the bussing.

They could have 2 teams, each day ine team gets a munch and they alternate. I honestly have no clue. Its probably not feasible

Brendan WW

Conor WW wrote: »

With each team getting a munch every second night?

Wouldn’t there Be a decent chance they might hit one of each other in a munch?

In terms of 10 lone wolves, who gets to munch? And again, wouldn’t there of statistically been a decent shout that the wolves would of munched one of their own by accident if they don’t know who the other half are?

Yes and it is a big flaw in the theory

Conor WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Yes and it is a big flaw in the theory

But 8-10 people in one backroom is practically a village on its own. Does seem bits to be fair.

Conor WW

Conor WW wrote: »

But 8-10 people in one backroom is practically a village on its own. Does seem bits to be fair.

Does seem nuts not bits

Brendan WW

Conor WW wrote: »

But 8-10 people in one backroom is practically a village on its own. Does seem bits to be fair.

Maybe but if the are low powered and have fool roles, not soo much

Brendan WW

What if the wolves were told there may be a turncoat in the group.

Maybe if they thought there was a turncoat they would be relucant to trust eachother, similar to Soprannos game

Tegan WW

Reservoir Dogs mexican stand off im thinking lol

Eva WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

What if the wolves were told there may be a turncoat in the group.

Maybe if they thought there was a turncoat they would be relucant to trust eachother, similar to Soprannos game

Thought did cross my mind. Wolves might not fully know their identities of team mates.

Counter point again, though, is the night one lynch. They are all spread out so perfectly.

Tegan WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

What if the wolves were told there may be a turncoat in the group.

Maybe if they thought there was a turncoat they would be relucant to trust eachother, similar to Soprannos game

Though the Senan Emily thing seemed in hindsight rehearsed maybe

Brendan WW

Its all speculation, but if they did have a turncoat situation they may be recluant to trust and relucant to reveal themselves.

I was in a similar position with Eva not knowing her real alignment. Though I risked it and revealed and happy for it

Brendan WW

Eva WW wrote: »

Thought did cross my mind. Wolves might not fully know their identities of team mates.

Counter point again, though, is the night one lynch. They are all spread out so perfectly.

32 names in the game , easy to spread out

Brendan WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

Though the Senan Emily thing seemed in hindsight rehearsed maybe

Also true but we all have no real clue. No matter how much we speculate we can only vote using our gut, lynch votes, FFAs as guides at this point

Tegan WW

So night 2 the clump on me

lets say for a moment there are 2 groups

What if the clump is a mixture of 2 groups neither knowing they were landing on me? Possible?

Tegan WW

Could they have fecked up

Clodagh WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

Honestly trust your gut.

Regardless though I say Abigail or Phil or Clodagh.

If I had to chose, Id pick Clo

Bad choice

Conor WW

Brendan WW wrote: »

What if the wolves were told there may be a turncoat in the group.

Maybe if they thought there was a turncoat they would be relucant to trust eachother, similar to Soprannos game

I was pussy in the sopranos game. It Made it extremely hard to co ordinate anything as a team. Can’t actually remember much else about the dynamics but i liked all my teammates and felt bad. Only thing I remember clearly was I found that role hard to play.

Tegan WW

if so Senan and Emily were in same group hence the bullet scenario
who else would match up them?

Clodagh WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Im on board with those, Clodagh has all weekend to pop in for a chat and change our minds

Actually I don't I'll be working most of the weekend

Big clue as to who I am in RL

Tegan WW

match up then*

Tegan WW

In two team scenario is this relevant

Negotiator the negotiator is playing on behalf of the bad teams. Once per round each bad team may give a message for another bad team to the negotiator. The negotiator is free to give or not give the message, or indeed to give a different message. The negotiator is known to all bad teams and wins if any bad team wins the game

Clodagh WW

Eva WW wrote: »

Good point.

We are at the point now though where everyone has a point beside them where I’m thinking “they can’t be a wolf because X”.

The fact we have evidence of wolf busing is doing my head in though. Like, there’s clear cut evidence.

I don’t like that Doris fits the same criteria as Ewan, Vernon and Emily did. But the points raised that the wolves seemed to be on her a bit at the end are valid.

I’d poison....Clodagh/Isla.

I feel the main reason I’m letting Isla off the hook right now is that she looked good during the Derry peek moments, and that I trust Patrick, based on gameplay. But Clodagh and Isla are the two I’d pick, based off the night one and two votes.

Still a bad choice

Conor WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

So night 2 the clump on me

lets say for a moment there are 2 groups

What if the clump is a mixture of 2 groups neither knowing they were landing on me? Possible?

To be honest anything is possible. It’s working out how two different wolf teams portion out the munches and how they avoid killing a wolf from the other team that I can’t work out. Could be a simple solution to that but it wouid make strategic voting hard.

Tegan WW

See previous post

Tegan WW

We are dealing with 2 teams maybe and a go between negotiator maybe