Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Brexit discussion thread XI (Please read OP before posting)

1151152154156157311

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,813 ✭✭✭joe40


    Well I don't think it would matter - it would still be opposed by the DUP and likely most of the ERG, as well as Labour, SNP, and so on. And also probably by Tory remainers.

    Unless there is a time limit on it, and it would still probably be opposed by most.

    You might be right but this might be the best deal going considering the alternative could be another election resulting in a tory majority. An emboldened Boris Johnson would be even harder to work with.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2019/1011/1082495-barnier-barclay-meeting-brussels/

    Rees Mogg amendment that NI could not have different custom arrangements to GB could be an issue according to Tony.

    His sources adamant they are moving back to December 2017 arrangement for NI only (when DUP threw a strop).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,435 ✭✭✭Imreoir2


    Bloody hell! Looks like back to NI only backstop then!

    How can the DUP live with that?

    They won't. They would be bound to vote against a deal on that basis, but perhaps Johnson does not care. His angle on this might be to secure a deal that he knows wont pass.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    It would need to be a minimum 55% for a UI vote. 65% etc is too high and would make a UI almost impossible.

    Strangely enough, it was the EU that set a 55% threshold when Montenegro held its independence referendum, and the final Yes vote - 55.5%!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Montenegrin_independence_referendum


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Boris not exactly providing comfort to the DUP:

    https://twitter.com/anguswalkertalk/status/1182656507260887046


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,106 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    They won't. They would be bound to vote against a deal on that basis, but perhaps Johnson does not care. His angle on this might be to secure a deal that he knows wont pass.

    Honestly if it is this or crash out the rest might be ok with it. He doesn't have a majority including the dup so they are useless to him. He needs support from elsewhere no matter the deal. There is no point in placating them and ignoring them provides the most realistic option.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,419 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    https://www.rte.ie/news/brexit/2019/1011/1082495-barnier-barclay-meeting-brussels/

    Rees Mogg amendment that NI could not have different custom arrangements to GB could be an issue according to Tony.

    His sources adamant they are moving back to December 2017 arrangement for NI only (when DUP threw a strop).

    That amendment could be repealed as part of the act accepting the new deal.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 2,176 ✭✭✭ToBeFrank123


    Imreoir2 wrote: »
    They won't. They would be bound to vote against a deal on that basis, but perhaps Johnson does not care. His angle on this might be to secure a deal that he knows wont pass.

    It would be great if Corbyn and Labour voted for the deal and outwitted him.

    Labour would benefit hugely from it at the General Election, finally helping secure a deal for the UK to leave.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,261 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    murphaph wrote: »
    This makes sense, especially if Johnson gets his majority and can then just let GB crash out hard in 18 months or whatever it is when the transition period is up. There's no "extension" he can be forced to ask for then. He would have to lose a VoNC to be removed but if he's got a healthy majority of ERG types that won't happen.

    He may have simply realised that he can't get no deal now because of parliamentary arithmetic, but if he's prepared to wait a little longer he can get the same thing (minus NI which nobody cares about anyway).

    If Johnson gets a deal, you can be guaranteed that Farage will use the very very valuable platform he has on LBC to mobilise brexit supporters to oppose this deal.
    Farage wants no deal. He will present any Johnson deal as a pig in lipstick and he will try to force Boris to abandon the deal rather than risk losing the subsequent election due to a split vote from the Brexit party

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭MPFGLB


    As an Irish person living in London who voted Remain and who believes in the EU project with all its faults is it wrong of me to want Boris Johnson to succeed with a deal if it shafts the DUP...Is it ? Is it ? :D

    Seriously even if the EU and Johnson agree it will be very hard to get anything through the HoC

    For one thing if BoJO succeeds he will probably win the next election .Corbyn would rather eat his own Granny than let that happen

    Lib Dems, Green, SNP and many Labour are devout Remainers and are not for turning so they will not vote for it ,especially now as the population majority is remain

    Johnson will have to get some of the Labour Brexiters to vote against their whip...there are alot in HoC

    Its funny the BoJo's deal will look alot like the May deal as Ken Clarke said it would before Johnson came to power

    Seems in politics being lucky is more important than being good


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,517 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Boris not exactly providing comfort to the DUP:

    https://twitter.com/anguswalkertalk/status/1182656507260887046
    That's throwing DUP under the bus if anything; "everyone will benefit from Brexit" and he'll then claim NI benefits from having access to both markets etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    ne.

    It would be easy for Europeans in far flung places like Bulgaria, Estonia etc and not so far flung like France or The Netherlands to just cast Ireland aside as collateral damage and plough on with a deal that would have been easier to do.

    But no they didn't, and that is in a large part due to Ireland leadership on this.

    It would but then if they are serious about keeping the EU as a union of separate nation states collaborating on agreed standards of human rights, tariffs, product and technology regulation,state interference in the economy and a single market with pretty much a level playing field of rules......then you have a vested interest in not throwing one of your member states under a bus as soon as the going gets rough.

    What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Supporting Ireland's concerns has been an open goal for the EU. Only the dopey xenophobic "England uber alles" tendency in the UK has difficulty seeing that.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,934 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Mod: United Ireland posts moved to the United Ireland thread.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,111 ✭✭✭SirChenjin


    LooperDan wrote: »
    I don't post so much, but just feel I want to say thanks to the posters on this thread which have made this my first point of call on the real happenings of all things Brexit.

    I have been following the thousands of posts over the last few months, and the contributions of most of the posters has been excellent.

    I also want to thank those who moderate the thread for keeping it real and not allowing it to descend into the lower levels of trolling.

    It's been incredibly thought provocative and I am the wiser for all your contributions, not to mention very proud of the intelligence that exists in Ireland.

    Just wanted to echo this. For me, this is the best thread on boards, hugely informative with a lot of very well articulated contributions. Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Eurasia was always at war with Eastasia:

    https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1182669382859837444


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,270 ✭✭✭✭Rjd2


    https://twitter.com/alexwickham/status/1182670869509890048

    ERG seem on board. Clever by Boris to give some of them juicy jobs to keep them on side.

    I assume May if she was to read would scream " now you choose to be ****ing practical!":D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭circadian



    I lol'd at this. If it's true DUP want it both ways and they haven't realised their throat has been cut by the Tories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,841 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    I would say it might be the DUP being saved from their own lunacy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    How much is the bung to the DUP?


    They are classy unionists.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,980 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    How much is the bung to the DUP?


    They are classy unionists.


    My guess is a reverse plantation over to Wales, they've been getting uppity recently, they just changed their minds on Brexit sure, cant be having that.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 345 ✭✭Tea Shock


    Please help me get my head around this. Northern Ireland fully participating in new UK trade deals WITH a customs border down the Irish Sea AND remaining within UK customs

    How are these things not mutually exclusive?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,757 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Tea Shock wrote: »
    Please help me get my head around this. Northern Ireland fully participating in new UK trade deals WITH a customs border down the Irish Sea AND remaining within UK customs

    How are these things not mutually exclusive?

    well the whole point was that the arrangement for Northern Ireland was to be unique, bespoke and reflective of it's unique constitutional status.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,057 ✭✭✭✭briany


    lawred2 wrote: »
    well the whole point was that the arrangement for Northern Ireland was to be unique, bespoke and reflective of it's unique constitutional status.

    It's like that time on the Simpsons when the Civil War reenactors staged a battle between the South, North and the East that would keep Springfield in, out and next to the Union respectively.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,806 ✭✭✭An Ciarraioch


    Reading between the DUP lines, this sounds very much like a "Yes":

    https://twitter.com/skydavidblevins/status/1182680171893215232


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,039 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    So how does this rumoured customs union proposal square with single market integrity? I get the process for the customs, and the rebate for NI businesses

    But if the UK is in an FTA with the US and importing huge quantities of awful food this is now ok into NI. How is it stopped from entering the food chain in ROI?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 200 ✭✭darem93


    The DUP have probably come under major pressure from many of their core voters. They had no choice really but to accept these proposals, despite being "no divergence, no backstop, no surrender" before this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,261 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    As predictable, the UK are spinning this as 'The EU always like to do their deals at the last minute' when it seems likely that if a deal does emerge, it will be very similar to the deal that the EU had on the table 2 years ago, and the whole of the last 2 years will have been nothing more than the UK tearing itself and their own economy apart only to cave at the last minute and agree what was already on the table)

    And after all this, even with all the parties coming out with nice platitudes about this development, there is absolutely no guarantee that the hardliners won't still renege on this deal at the last moment and force through a No Deal when it's too late to stop it.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Ultimately this looks like chickens coming home to roost.

    Despite the bluster and insanity from the Tories, they've come in recent days to accept the reality they can't weasel out of asking for an extension.

    If they have no deal, there will be an extension, and there will be an election, and the Tories will get savaged.

    That leaves only one option; Deliver a new deal so they can deliver Brexit on the 31st.

    And ultimately there will be an election one way or another. So it's a case of whether you delivered Brexit or had to go to Brussels with your tail between your legs.

    This is why NI is back on the table. This is why the DUP are suddenly supportive of it. They want to be able to say they delivered Brexit when they're back knocking on doors.

    Of course, it also means they have the opposition by the balls. If they can produce a new deal on time, then the opposition have just two choices; approve it, or crash out.

    Johnson is happy with either outcome. The ERG are hoping the opposition are stupid enough to block any deal, but just as it was back in March, any Brexit is better than no Brexit for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,261 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    seamus wrote: »
    Ultimately this looks like chickens coming home to roost.

    Despite the bluster and insanity from the Tories, they've come in recent days to accept the reality they can't weasel out of asking for an extension.

    If they have no deal, there will be an extension, and there will be an election, and the Tories will get savaged.

    That leaves only one option; Deliver a new deal so they can deliver Brexit on the 31st.

    And ultimately there will be an election one way or another. So it's a case of whether you delivered Brexit or had to go to Brussels with your tail between your legs.

    This is why NI is back on the table. This is why the DUP are suddenly supportive of it. They want to be able to say they delivered Brexit when they're back knocking on doors.

    Of course, it also means they have the opposition by the balls. If they can produce a new deal on time, then the opposition have just two choices; approve it, or crash out.

    Johnson is happy with either outcome. The ERG are hoping the opposition are stupid enough to block any deal, but just as it was back in March, any Brexit is better than no Brexit for them.
    There will be an ammendment to approve the deal if it is put to a referendum

    Johnson has burned so many bridges already that this will pass.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement