Unpopular Opinions - OP Updated with Threadban List 4/5/21

85603

Brian? wrote: »

You can uses them any time you want, there isn't a fine for it. You're just being ignorant and impolite.

Least its not hypocritical.

No to discrimination, booo, boo discrimination, boo.

No dont park there. That space is reserved for one particular demographic. Not you.

Brian?

85603 wrote: »

Least its not hypocritical.

No to discrimination, booo, boo discrimination, boo.

No dont park there. That space is reserved for one particular demographic. Not you.

You really don't understand what discrimination is.

The space is designed for certain customers. You're being politely asked not to use it. If you do there are zero repercussions. But you are being frightfully impolite.

85603

Antares35 wrote: »

What does this mean? Do you think all parents stay at home all day? The 1950s called, they've been wondering where you are.

Those staying home have 11 out of 12 hours. (08:00 - 20:00).

If we're giving out discriminatory preferential treatment then the working person, who keeps this shtshow moving, deserves some compassionate preferential treatment too.

He/she may have been on their feet for the last 8 hours.
Yet the one who was on the sofa for that same time gets the closest spot because they got laid.

85603

Brian? wrote: »

You really don't understand what discrimination is.

The space is designed for certain customers. You're being politely asked not to use it. If you do there are zero repercussions. But you are being frightfully impolite.

Whole lot less impolite than certain other (maternal) practices I could mention.

The Raging Bile Duct

85603 wrote: »

Whole lot less impolite than certain other (maternal) practices I could mention.

I'm intrigued. Tell me more.

Antares35

85603 wrote: »

Those staying home have 11 out of 12 hours. (08:00 - 20:00).

If we're giving out discriminatory preferential treatment then the working person, who keeps this shtshow moving, deserves some compassionate preferential treatment too.

He/she may have been on their feet for the last 8 hours.
Yet the one who was on the sofa for that same time gets the closest spot because they got laid.

But you're assuming that parents are the ones staying at home. What do you base this on?

Antares35

The Raging Bile Duct wrote: »

I'm intrigued. Tell me more.

Oh gawd, not the breastfeeding rant again..Don't feed the troll! (or the baby apparently)

Brian?

85603 wrote: »

Whole lot less impolite than certain other (maternal) practices I could mention.

Still sore about the exposed diddies?

Get over it.

The Raging Bile Duct

Antares35 wrote: »

Oh gawd, not the breastfeeding rant again..Don't feed the troll! (or the baby apparently)

Jesus, I had amnesia for a bit. Apologies, I forgot he was the breastfeeding troll.

Jump_In_Jack

85603 wrote: »

Those staying home have 11 out of 12 hours. (08:00 - 20:00).

If we're giving out discriminatory preferential treatment then the working person, who keeps this shtshow moving, deserves some compassionate preferential treatment too.

He/she may have been on their feet for the last 8 hours.
Yet the one who was on the sofa for that same time gets the closest spot because they got laid.

You should put that in writing, send it to all your local supermarkets and whichever one responds favourably to your opinion, is the one you should do your shopping in.

You should also consider boycotting any shops that give discounts on nappies or baby food, as you can't avail of those discounts and you probably would say that is also discrimination.

Best of all, I'd be unlikely to ever have to be in the same shop as you, which would be a side bonus.

85603

Jump_In_Jack wrote: »

You should put that in writing, send it to all your local supermarkets and whichever one responds favourably to your opinion, is the one you should do your shopping in.

You should also consider boycotting any shops that give discounts on nappies or baby food, as you can't avail of those discounts and you probably would say that is also discrimination.

Best of all, I'd be unlikely to ever have to be in the same shop as you, which would be a side bonus.

Why would I do that, when I can just avail of the discriminatory reserved parking with no regard as to what the chosen ones might think?
I dont buy nappies or baby food, so dont care if they sell for 99% discount or not.

You share the shop space with me regularly.

But I can sympathize, as there are people who I definitely dont want to see around the shop.

Which brings me to my next opinion.

Burqas/face veils. Ban them. Horrid culture, only worn by extremist sects. Dont need them here.

Moderates welcome. Veil wearers not. And thats for all nationalities and colors before someone? tries.

Jump_In_Jack

85603 wrote: »

Why would I do that, when I can just avail of the discriminatory reserved parking with no regard as to what the chosen ones might think?
I dont buy nappies or baby food, so dont care if they sell for 99% discount or not.

You share the shop space with me regularly.

But I can sympathize, as there are people who I definitely dont want to see around the shop.

Which brings me to my next opinion.

Burqas/face veils. Ban them. Horrid culture, only worn by extremist sects. Dont need them here.

Moderates welcome. Veil wearers not. And thats for all nationalities and colors before someone? tries.

The reason those spaces are there is because the shops choose to put them there to attract customers with children.
It makes sense because family shopping bills are usually bigger.
Your gripe should therefore be directed at the shops themselves.
But of course, you must be trolling with this nonsense, or you would qualify as a deviant.

Antares35

85603 wrote: »

Why would I do that, when I can just avail of the discriminatory reserved parking with no regard as to what the chosen ones might think?
I dont buy nappies or baby food, so dont care if they sell for 99% discount or not.

You share the shop space with me regularly.

But I can sympathize, as there are people who I definitely dont want to see around the shop.

Which brings me to my next opinion.

Burqas/face veils. Ban them. Horrid culture, only worn by extremist sects. Dont need them here.

Moderates welcome. Veil wearers not. And thats for all nationalities and colors before someone? tries.

Offended by breastfeeding because there's too much on show.

Offended by burkas because there isn't enough on show.

Some people are never happy

cms88

Brian? wrote: »

You can uses them any time you want, there isn't a fine for it. You're just being ignorant and impolite.

So a lot like many parents outside of schools etc then...

Brian?

cms88 wrote: »

So a lot like many parents outside of schools etc then...

Yes. Absolutely

Brian?

Antares35 wrote: »

Offended by breastfeeding because there's too much on show.

Offended by burkas because there isn't enough on show.

Some people are never happy

Full time being offended. Must be exhausting

Jump_In_Jack

85603 wrote: »

We should join the list of countries banning the burqa/face veil.

85603 wrote: »

...

Which brings me to my next opinion.

Burqas/face veils. Ban them. Horrid culture, only worn by extremist sects. Dont need them here.

Moderates welcome. Veil wearers not. And thats for all nationalities and colors before someone? tries.

Repeating this why?

The Raging Bile Duct

Jump_In_Jack wrote: »

Repeating this why?

Because he didn't get anyone to argue with him the last time and he craved some human interaction again.

85603

Jump_In_Jack wrote: »

Repeating this why?

Must have slipped my mind.

Ive contributed several so called 'unpopular opinions' on this thread, and am busy in between.

JimmyVik

Dublin city center at night is just not safe anymore.

Greyfox

JimmyVik wrote: »

Dublin city center at night is just not safe anymore.

Ive walked around it loads of times at night and never got into danger, you just have to avoid engageing with strangers.

It's misleading when news reports say 600 jobs created, where 300 of those are temporary construction jobs, where no 1 trade is likely to be fully on-site for the duration of the construction project and if anything the work is likely to be carried out by those already considered employed in the industry. And yet these numbers could count towards 'the government created x number of job's' reports.? I'd consider this biased reporting by the media on behalf of the government and possibly a false equivalence.

[Deleted User]

[Deleted User] wrote: »

It's misleading when news reports say 600 jobs created, where 300 of those are temporary construction jobs, where no 1 trade is likely to be fully on-site for the duration of the construction project and if anything the work is likely to be carried out by those already considered employed in the industry. And yet these numbers could count towards 'the government created x number of job's' reports.? I'd consider this biased reporting by the media on behalf of the government and possibly a false equivalence.

Just to add to this they're not reporting '300 jobs have been lost' every time a project finishes.

astrofool

Deleted User wrote: »

Just to add to this they're not reporting '300 jobs have been lost' every time a project finishes.

Most reports say "600 jobs will be created during construction with 50 full time jobs once operational" or along those lines.

That's the nature of construction jobs, none are permanent.

JimmyVik

Greyfox wrote: »

Ive walked around it loads of times at night and never got into danger, you just have to avoid engageing with strangers.

So have I. Used to live on Talbot street in fact.
But it doesnt change the fact that there is a stabbing, glassing or bad beating several times a night in Dublin city center now.
A few years ago when I lived there I was out every night in the city. Yes there were fights etc, a lot actually, but its a whole new level now.
You can actually see how bad it has gotten compared to then.

yourdeadwright

JimmyVik wrote: »

So have I. Used to live on Talbot street in fact.
But it doesnt change the fact that there is a stabbing, glassing or bad beating several times a night in Dublin city center now.
A few years ago when I lived there I was out every night in the city. Yes there were fights etc, a lot actually, but its a whole new level now.
You can actually see how bad it has gotten compared to then.

The whole country has been locked up in isolation for nearly 18 months not sure how anyone is surprised that when it opens back up That people are drinking in large crowds aren't going to go a bit nuts with a few beers (& whatever else) on them ,

JimmyVik

yourdeadwright wrote: »

The whole country has been locked up in isolation for nearly 18 months not sure how anyone is surprised that when it opens back up That people are drinking in large crowds aren't going to go a bit nuts with a few beers (& whatever else) on them ,

Makes for some great tourism videos for sure

McGinniesta

Taking the knee was a stupid idea to start with.

It is now wholly meaningless.

85603

Pride parades. Should conduct themselves in a more dignified manner. Just dress as normal, no need to dance around in your pants.
Whats the point? Want to celebrate your identity? Want to say youre not ashamed?
This can all be done, loudly and colorfully, without leather chaps.
Maybe society would get on board more.

yourdeadwright

85603 wrote: »

Pride parades. Should conduct themselves in a more dignified manner. Just dress as normal, no need to dance around in your pants.
Whats the point? Want to celebrate your identity? Want to say youre not ashamed?
This can all be done, loudly and colorfully, without leather chaps.
Maybe society would get on board more.

Ye but then everyone would treat them * (the dressing in nothing type) like everyone else and in reality that is actually the last thing they want,